₦airaland Forum

LMFAO! Kraken has been butchered, roasted and served on a platter.

LordReed:
LMFAO! Kraken has been butchered, roasted and served on a platter.

Remember guys, there is still one more kraken with Ono.

LordReed:
LMFAO! Kraken has been butchered, roasted and served on a platter.

Is that the supreme court? The supreme court has the final say.

Mintum:
Is that the supreme court? The supreme court has the final say.

By the time any such appeal heads to the Supreme Court, the Electoral College would have already cast their votes for president and Vice President.

Besides, the United States Supreme Court would never want to essentially invalidate the vote of the Electoral college.

Mintum:
Is that the supreme court? The supreme court has the final say.

Read the screen shot of the Wisconsin Federal court above.
It reads: FEDERAL JUDGES DO APPOINT THE PRESIDENT IN THIS COUNTRY.

It had never happened in US history where the supreme court abrogated itself the power of appointing the president of the United States.

Mintum:
Is that the supreme court? The supreme court has the final say.

The Krakens were not filed in the Supreme Court. If they ever get to be, they'll receive similar roasting. LMFAO!

BREAKING

Jeh Johnson says he won’t serve in Biden’s administration.

This means that the race for AG is now between Sally Yates and Senator Doug Jones

wirinet:
Read the screen shot of the Wisconsin Federal court above.
It reads: FEDERAL JUDGES DO APPOINT THE PRESIDENT IN THIS COUNTRY.

It had never happened in US history where the supreme court abrogated itself the power of appointing the president of the United States.

I just love how all what they are doing is basically setting a precedent

It would surely go against them someday, one day.

PDPGuy:
BREAKING

Jeh Johnson says he won’t serve in Biden’s administration.

This means that the race for AG is now between Sally Yates and Senator Doug Jones

Thought they said Merrick too was among those being considered?

happney65:
Thought they said Merrick too was among those being considered?

Jeh Johnson built the cages to hold illegal immigrants.The media lies it's Trump and idiots here believe the activists posing as journalists.
A photo of Jeh Johnson visiting the ICE.
He cannot pass Mcconnell muster.

The hypocrisy of democrats and media is horrifying.
MICHELLE OBAMA, on Americans: “They watch in horror as children are torn from their families and thrown into cages.

Some if not all these children are brought in by coyotes.They get violated enroute such that their parents have to ensure they are on family planning before their transporters take possession of them.Democrats want these children to be housed in the same room as their fake parents

PDPGuy:
By the time any such appeal heads to the Supreme Court, the Electoral College would have already cast their votes for president and Vice President.

Besides, the United States Supreme Court would never want to essentially invalidate the vote of the Electoral college.

18 states have joined Texas lawsuit against 4 states for violation of the constitution .Arizona among them.

18 is yuge.They give the SC the right to question the effect of the courts and executive actions to alter the rules. Meaning those 4 states have to explain some irregularities. For example all 4 stopped counting votes with at least 93% count and Trump leading, only for Biden to overcome Trump within a few hours

The SC can also order the electors be delayed till they resolve the case. The only date cast in stone is Jan 20 inauguration .Any other can be delayed.

This is huge.Biden might not be sworn in.

feedthenation:
---It is just sad that he, like some others are so confident to post inaccurate and baseless information most times---which unfortunately some people will think are true---

They adopt president maga's tactic so we, or rather, you have learnt to factcheck them.

basilico:
18 states have joined Texas lawsuit against 4 states for violation of the constitution .Arizona among them.

18 is yuge.They give the SC the right to question the effect of the courts and executive actions to alter the rules. Meaning those 4 states have to explain some irregularities. For example all 4 stopped counting votes with at least 93% count and Trump leading, only for Biden to overcome Trump within a few hours

The SC can also order the electors be delayed till they resolve the case. The only date cast in stone is Jan 20 inauguration .Any other can be delayed.

This is huge. Biden might not be sworn in.

For me o, the line in bold remains one of the mysterious, most corrupt, big ticket item of fraud, theft and ignominy in the last general election. No matter how the demon rats spin it, weave it around COVID-19, etc etc, I will not accept. It's bedrock of the theft, taint, voters corruption we are looking for.

Funny thing about this is that the demon-rats and RINOs know this. They also know they can never get away with it. Not in the US of A.

So, Biden will not get an inch close to the White House come 20th January, 2021.

AmazonTopaz:
I hope Biden returns the favour

It is not Biden's duty to investigate trump. As soon as that orange turd loses his presidential immunity, the appropriate investigative offices will do the job they are set up to do.

And by the way, and yes in my wildest dreams, Biden should appoint William Barr to the DOJ. He's the only one going after the turd who would not seem political, and he'll have to do his job right this time if for no other reason but to redeem himself. But like I said, in my ........

PDPGuy:
So, you TRULY think a SC justice would base his/her ruling, in part, as to whether she agrees with the political philosophy of one of the parties in a dispute??

Yes I do

If abortion as a liberal idea which is built on emotive reasoning can be legalized
How much more originalistic voting law which is a rationalize constitutional interpretation

Which federalist fanatics and zealots like Barrett and Religious extremist Alito value with passion

Look at the 4-4 ruling of Pennsylvania law amendment supreme courts ruling


Every state had corona ,no special privilege for any state

Liberal lawyers and attorneys are in SCOTUS jurisdictional interpretation

Which is 5-4 originalistic except john Roberts

Many States and Pres Trump have joined Texas lawsuit

These is an historic federal case

Dapcity007:
Yes I do

If abortion as a liberal idea which is built on emotive reasoning can be legalized
How much more originalistic voting law which is a rationalize constitutional interpretation

Which federalist fanatics and zealots like Barrett and Religious extremist Alito value with passion

Look at the 4-4 ruling of Pennsylvania law amendment supreme courts ruling


Every state had corona ,no special privilege for any state

Liberal lawyers and attorneys are in SCOTUS jurisdictional interpretation

Which is 5-4 originalistic except john Roberts

Many States and Pres Trump have joined Texas lawsuit

These is an historic federal case

Another "yuge" point made.

Biden will have his "Office of the President Elect" team in his garage for life.

PrideofLincoln1:
Once Trump pardons himself, there's nothing President Biden can do but Trump will meet his nemesis from Ms Letitia James the Attorney General of New York. That's the one Trump and his family are really scared of.

Trump pardoning himself is actually damage enough to be honest, since he would at the same time be showing he is guilty as hell. The reputational damage would be immense and worldwide that his legal business will suffer. Besides, a pardon is not for crimes committed in the future and we all know trump can't resist pussy grabbing.

Ibime:
Trump has almost finished America.

People keep saying this but did 80m+ not just inform 73m+ magas that they are not America?

Lesson, as taught by Chinua Achebe's tortoise:

One is not 'all of us'!

PDPGuy:
I’ve come to a realization: the reason why most Republican members of Congress are supporting Trump’s stubbornness is that Trump currently has a 89% favorability rating amongst Republicans.

They’re deeply scared of being abandoned by Trump voters or being primaried by a Trumpian candidate in 2022.

Once this dust settles, most of these Republicans would turn to chameleons to later claim that their support of these frivolous lawsuits was done in the name of “ensuring that the voting systems in the country are fool-proof”. They will make this pivot in order to deceive gullible independents to think that they (Trumpian Republicans) are rational people.

Thankfully, there will be a tweet to show their true colour, for as the great Prophet Bob once sang,

Whosoever diggeth a pit shall fall in!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsXbl1IMOGw

budaatum:
People keep saying this but did 80m+ not just inform 73m+ magas that they are not America?

Lesson, as taught by Chinua Achebe's tortoise:

One is not 'all of us'!

80m fraudulent, tainted, compromised votes.

ono:
80m fraudulent, tainted, compromised votes.

I know. All the supposed not fraudulent non tainted uncompromised votes were for an orange turd.

Evidence of fraud is so overwhelming that it causes judges to make irrational judgements and bias judgements

I don't know why these leftist are so dumb to think they would manipulate voting laws to allow felons to vote,and fraudulent mail in votes

And disguise it as a public health covid 19 concern to encourage their supporters , some even justify their dumbness as voting right

These liberal judges think America is full of ignorant stupid people

Even some democrats regret voting biden seeing his son corruption

But they can't afford universal health care

Timiofak:
But they can't afford universal health care

misplaced priorities, but I guess weariness of China can cause this but still, this is an overreaction

Dapcity007:
Yes I do

If abortion as a liberal idea which is built on emotive reasoning can be legalized
How much more originalistic voting law which is a rationalize constitutional interpretation

Which federalist fanatics and zealots like Barrett and Religious extremist Alito value with passion

Look at the 4-4 ruling of Pennsylvania law amendment supreme courts ruling


Every state had corona ,no special privilege for any state

Liberal lawyers and attorneys are in SCOTUS jurisdictional interpretation

Which is 5-4 originalistic except john Roberts

Many States and Pres Trump have joined Texas lawsuit

These is an historic federal case

You're a comedian. NC amended its election law by court order...why isn't Texas AG suing them?? I know - orange Reagan won there. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article246660368.html

Gov Abbott used executive order to extend early voting and also limit the number of drop off ballot boxes. Why didn't Texas AG remember to sue MI, PA and WI then??

You Trumpers are clowns. States rights be damned when it favors orange man. This next L you guys are about to receive will be delicious!!

Dapcity007:
Evidence of fraud is so overwhelming that it causes judges to make irrational judgements and bias judgements

I don't know why these leftist are so dumb to think they would manipulate voting laws to allow felons to vote,and fraudulent mail in votes

And disguise it as a public health covid 19 concern to encourage their supporters , some even justify their dumbness as voting right

These liberal judges think America is full of ignorant stupid people

Even some democrats regret voting biden seeing his son corruption

Republican legislature agreed to these changes genius! Texas Governor extended early voting by 6 days. But because it didn't favor orange fake Reagan - we start hearing all these opaks..
Kraken ko, Krackers ni

edi287:
Republican legislature agreed to these changes genius! Texas Governor extended early voting by 6 days. But because it didn't favor orange fake Reagan - we start hearing all these opaks..
Kraken ko, Krackers ni

The arguement originalist need to make is to prove whether changes made are constitutionally binding and with the evidence of voters fraud, alleged fraudulent signatures which laws were created to prevent its audit

Texas law never modified the Constitution to prevent audit of ballots

If not Democratic party and liberal lawyers will have a strong case

edi287:
You're a comedian. NC amended its election law by court order...why isn't Texas AG suing them?? I know - orange Reagan won there. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article246660368.html

Gov Abbott used executive order to extend early voting and also limit the number of drop off ballot boxes. Why didn't Texas AG remember to sue MI, PA and WI then??

You Trumpers are clowns. States rights be damned when it favors orange man. This next L you guys are about to receive will be delicious!!

The Democrat party has a case pending with regards to north Carolina

Still active case

basilico:
18 states have joined Texas lawsuit against 4 states for violation of the constitution .Arizona among them.

18 is yuge.They give the SC the right to question the effect of the courts and executive actions to alter the rules. Meaning those 4 states have to explain some irregularities. For example all 4 stopped counting votes with at least 93% count and Trump leading, only for Biden to overcome Trump within a few hours

The SC can also order the electors be delayed till they resolve the case. The only date cast in stone is Jan 20 inauguration .Any other can be delayed.

This is huge.Biden might not be sworn in.

Per the bolded, I seriously doubt whether the Supreme Court would want to alter the calendar of the Electoral College vote.

Remember that the same court in Bush v. Gore decided the case early, in part, due to the upcoming “safe harbor” and Electoral College vote deadlines then. And this same court quickly dismissed Rep Kelly’s suit due to the same approaching “safe harbor deadline”.

Moreover, if Texas is claiming the right to sue some states due to a perceived violation of the US constitution and state constitution with regard to voting rules, nothing stops California, NY, Colorado, Nevada etc from bringing a suit before the USSC against TX or some other red state that have been suppressing voting rights of ethnic minorities.

After all, the actions of Texas elections authorities also impacted the presidential election vote, which impacts the votes in California

PDPGuy:
Per the bolded, I seriously doubt whether the Supreme Court would want to alter the calendar of the Electoral College vote.

Remember that the same court in Bush v. Gore decided the case early, in part, due to the upcoming “safe harbor” and Electoral College vote deadlines then. And this same court quickly dismissed Rep Kelly’s suit due to the same approaching “safe harbor deadline”.

Moreover, if Texas is claiming the right to sue some states due to a perceived violation of the US constitution and state constitution with regard to voting rules, nothing stops California, NY, Colorado, Nevada etc from bringing a suit before the USSC against TX or some other red state that have been suppressing voting rights of ethnic minorities.

Then they should bring their case with cogently strong evidence


SCOTUS intervened with respect to Pennsylvania law amendment 4-4 , Ginsburg died

Originalist dominates SCOTUS

And these is a federal Lawsuit States against States

edi287:
Republican legislature agreed to these changes genius! Texas Governor extended early voting by 6 days. But because it didn't favor orange fake Reagan - we start hearing all these opaks..
Kraken ko, Krackers ni

Not that they agreed only, in PA for example the pushed for it and voted for it unanimously. Now thing go south they want to go back on he rule they sponsored and passed.

I am not dragging anything with any of them. After Monday, we would discuss better.

ono:
For me o, the line in bold remains one of the mysterious, most corrupt, big ticket item of fraud, theft and ignominy in the last general election. No matter how the demon rats spin it, weave it around COVID-19, etc etc, I will not accept. It's bedrock of the theft, taint, voters corruption we are looking for.

Funny thing about this is that the demon-rats and RINOs know this. They also know they can never get away with it. Not in the US of A.

So, Biden will not get an inch close to the White House come 20th January, 2021.

They all stopped counting simultaneously with Trump leading states he had won in 2016.
The SC can summon those who called off the counting, Most likely they were instructed by a shadowy figure.Hers they can squeeze a deal and rat out who was directing the counting behind the scenes .The trail IMHO goes high up