₦airaland Forum

Timiofak:
Not that they agreed only, in PA for example the pushed for it and voted for it unanimously. Now thing go south they want to go back on he rule they sponsored and passed.



Who created the law the state supreme court judiciary or legislatures

Voting counting after election is a taboo to originalistic jurisprudence scholars

We go soon see
I am not dragging anything with any of them. After Monday, we would discuss better.

Timiofak:
Not that they agreed only, in PA for example the pushed for it and voted for it unanimously. Now thing go south they want to go back on he rule they sponsored and passed.

I am not dragging anything with any of them. After Monday, we would discuss better.

Timiofak:
Not that they agreed only, in PA for example the pushed for it and voted for it unanimously. Now thing go south they want to go back on he rule they sponsored and passed.

I am not dragging anything with any of them. After Monday, we would discuss better.

edi287:
Yep. Trump is one disgusting bastard. The fool is willing to plunge the country in chaos because he lost.
Same conspiracy theories he has been spouting since 2012. I really loath and despise that bastard.

Dapcity007:
Who created the law the state supreme court judiciary or legislatures

Voting counting after election is a taboo to originalistic jurisprudence scholars

Timiofak:
Shut up, vote counting is what?

Year's ago, at times votes were counted for as long as 30 days, as far as it came in on or before Election Day, or it was postmarked by Election Day.

All of the mail ballots came in we'll before November 3, some a month and the half. Gop legislatures, in pa, wi, mi, refused to start counting before Election Day, in order to set up confusion like this

But as I told you early, no matter what I tell you, you won't agree. So yeah enjoy


4 days from now when EC votes, if you want to jump into pit then, you are free

Timiofak:
You do know courts don't determine who wins an election right?

Dapcity007:
Emotional reaction will not save Leftists

The truth must prevail

Fraud is fraud

No civilized society will tolerate fraudulent election

SCOTUS decides

Dapcity007:
There is logic in your arguments

But with the cogently strong evidence of voters fraud via signed affidavits, non audited mail signatures, fraudulent voters , strong forensic analysis of dominion machine

The doubt is cast

SCOTUS will analyse all factors from voting rights to evidence of fraud, voting laws

It all must be binding by the Constitution

Dapcity007:
Who created the law the state supreme court judiciary or legislatures

Voting counting after election is a taboo to originalistic jurisprudence scholars

edi287:
You're a comedian. All you Trumpers have been throwing is wild conspiracy theories.
You haven't shown us how Dominion flipped Trump votes for Biden
You haven't shown us proof of the "kraken"
You haven't shown us the list of millions of dead voters that voted for Biden.
50 cases thrown out from both Republican and Democrat judges.
Orange Reagan will be dragged out of the white house come Jan 20th.

Dapcity007:
There is logic in your arguments

But with the cogently strong evidence of voters fraud via signed affidavits, non audited mail signatures, fraudulent voters , strong forensic analysis of dominion machine

The doubt is cast

SCOTUS will analyse all factors from voting rights to evidence of fraud, voting laws

It all must be binding by the Constitution

PDPGuy:
My friend, votes have been counted DAYS after Election Day in many states for decades. For eg, it typically takes California 3-4 weeks to finish counting votes cast in a general election. Bear in mind that CA has around 21 million registered voters.

There is no way a court will ask any state to limit counting of votes to only the Election Day. In fact, other large states like Texas, Florida, North Carolina and Ohio count votes BEYOND Election Day.

You just have to accept it as the reality of life.

Dapcity007:
Another emotional leftist response


Even if SCOTUS fails

We have electoral legislative options from the Constitution

Until Jan 20th before Biden can b certified winner

edi287:
Looool excuses after excuses. Biden won. Trump lost. Get over it or better yet - cry some more

basilico:
There is a video showing the Dominion voting machines can count blank ballots and have the operator change the scanned into the choice he/she/they want

Dapcity007:
Wait till den

Timiofak:
But they can't afford universal health care

edi287:
Prove it counted blank ballots in favor of Biden. Is it so difficult for you to understand?

Dapcity007:
Evidence are dismissed as moot by biased and fearful judges

edi287:
Prove it counted blank ballots in favor of Biden. Is it so difficult for you to understand?

ono:
Yeah. There's no free lunch - even in Freetown. Health care for drug addicts, abortionists, people who want to change their sex, trans-sexual, all crazy idiots. And you want hardworking, honest and peaceful people to pay for all that crap? No way!

If you do the shit, you foot the bill. Don't ever think hardworking taxpayers will foot the bill for your stupid, drug addicted ass.

basilico:
I'm not the fly on the wall when the votes were being counted.
Jury relies on expert witness to determine guilt or innocence in cases like murder.
Trump has forensic experts saying Joe Biden had a one in a quadrillion chance of beating Trump. Expert witness whom activist courts don't want them testifying,instead throwing out cases on technicalities.

SC will take up the case.
Oh and I forgot Wisconsin has allowed full evidentially hearing into the elections.

Stop denying there was no fraud, let those who say there was fraud give evidence under oath, and those who say there was none to debunk it under oath.That too much to ask.

LordAdam16:
When I pointed out that the horse had bolted out of the stables after the insane conspiracy to get Trump out by whatever means possible, the Ostriches here were saying I'm fatalist. That Americans will hold hands and sing Kumbaya after the last 4 years of rabid anti-Trump venom. You think you're dealing with sissies you can intimidate with Tweets!

Now, you guys are holding out hope it'd die down after Biden is inaugurated. After you thought it'd die down after the media called it for Biden.

Get your head out of your a$$. Half of the Texas suit is about getting Trump his second term by whatever means possible, the other half is setting the precedent that both sides are willing to cross any lines to get what they want.

As I said, we'd all live long enough to witness the mess this will devolve into.

-Lord

basilico:
I'm not the fly on the wall when the votes were being counted.
Jury relies on expert witness to determine guilt or innocence in cases like murder.
Trump has forensic experts saying Joe Biden had a one in a quadrillion chance of beating Trump. Expert witness whom activist courts don't want them testifying,instead throwing out cases on technicalities.

SC will take up the case.
Oh and I forgot Wisconsin has allowed full evidentially hearing into the elections.

Stop denying there was no fraud, let those who say there was fraud give evidence under oath, and those who say there was none to debunk it under oath.That too much to ask.

LordAdam16:
When I pointed out that the horse had bolted out of the stables after the insane conspiracy to get Trump out by whatever means possible, the Ostriches here were saying I'm fatalist. That Americans will hold hands and sing Kumbaya after the last 4 years of rabid anti-Trump venom. You think you're dealing with sissies you can intimidate with Tweets!

Now, you guys are holding out hope it'd die down after Biden is inaugurated. After you thought it'd die down after the media called it for Biden.

Get your head out of your a$$. Half of the Texas suit is about getting Trump his second term by whatever means possible, the other half is setting the precedent that both sides are willing to cross any lines to get what they want.

As I said, we'd all live long enough to witness the mess this will devolve into.

-Lord

Dapcity007:
62 electoral college votes hangs in the balance

SCOTUS decides our next fate

basilico:
Texas filed a suit against 4 states.They will produce evidence in court. The rest are just friends of the court ie Amicus Curiae.

New development. Missouri, Arkansas, Utah, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Louisiana have now filed to be party to the suit.Meaning they can adduce evidlence too.



While Giuliani was the front face looks like Trump was working the states.
I doubt any reasonable judge can use technicalities to dismiss the case.

This media elect president with media computed 306 EC votes might as someone said here before the longest president elect serving from his basement.