AlhajiImam:


You see, you people say that fulanis are violent and have no understanding. Ordinary discussion we are having, you already started calling a whole Alhaji like me idiot. Can you stand any of my boys in the bush?

Bastard. Bring your boys. Theyll be used for Suya.
Alhaji that cannot use his brain when typing.

Gondonu:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2021/01/cows-shouldnt-be-roaming-about-in-21st-century-adamu-garba-apc-chieftain/amp/

Where have you put your brain since all these days?!
Nice one

LabuleofNigeria:

You must be a psychiatric patient i guess !
Allah owns all the land indeed. Go to The USA and graze openly. Bastard

Leave America and talk of Nigeria

AlhajiImam:
Allah owns every land. If we are to pay, we use the money as alms to help our people and the almajirai.

People should stop claiming ownership of lands. It's a natural Allah given resource to be used by all.

SORRY TO SAY, BUT E PONU SIR. it is not a new thing that ALLAH owns everything , he however has given its control to certain persons while they live and will give account of how they manage it after death. Unless you want us to apply the same law to your cows, cos definitely ALLAH owns all animals hence nobody should lay claim to them.

AlhajiImam:


Before the land use act of the 70's, have we not been grazing and making use of the land in southwest?

before the Fulani jihadist invaded sokoto have we not been brewing and selling burukutu?

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

You said a lot but ended up saying nothing. No point was made, just English up and down.

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

I wholeheartedly and strongly disagree with you. If the culture or way of life of Igbos, Yorubas or any other tribe down south was resulting in miscreants and criminal elements within these groups to constitute a constant danger to life, welfare and property of other tribes, I put it to you that they would have been roundly and conclusively dealt with. No case would have been made for the fact that it is only a deviant few causing mayhem. They will be no Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists drafted in to come up with fanciful ideas. The entire group would have been branded criminals and subhuman. Host communities, especially those up North would have slaughtered them, including pregnant women, children and babies. Armed forces would have launched "operation jumping kangaroo" or some other ridiculous title ages ago and it would have been a foregone conclusion. Appeasing an aggressor has never worked in history, because it only emboldens them. Look at what happened at the start of WWII when countries like UK tried to appease Hitler? A period in history of shame when remembered. Why should the entire country country tread "sensitively" with their hearts in their hands, effectively being held to ransome by a small group who continue to operate with brazen impudence? History will not judge our leaders well if they do not grow some balls and deal with this issue, and similar issues facing us, decisively.

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

My friend. Stop being sentimental. Dont kill your sense of judgement because you want to pitch tent with your father inlaw! Your analogy drills down to one thing; is it right or wrong to practice ranching? You agree it is right but culture....Do what is right and tell truth to your inlaw. Every culture grows! It was once a culture to kill twins in calabar, it was once a culture in yorubaland to sacrifice strangers to the gods, it was infact a culture not to allow any black speak in west in last 100 years. Inability to speak truth in the face justice is being morally bankrupt.[sub][/sub]

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

I tried to make sense of what you wrote but it seemed you said a lot of things without saying anything.

dumahi:
OK. Sensible. This is my first time of seeing one of them saying the obvious truth that should have been said since. I'm afraid he's trying to manipulate us into thinking he cares. Otherwise, why now? In any case, better late than never.

He has come to manipulate some gullible short memories elements.

He also has investment in cows business. Now look at how he technically made his demand... Because some corrupt traditional rulers in the East appointed by sultan of sokoto caliphate, who might had given another person's land to fulani politicans from the north forcibly, because of money and political power to oppressing the people of the land with intimating weapons like security agencies police, military and other terrorist groups with guns and ammo that usually brought people to rotal submission of their land to start governors to fulani terrorist political class.


He called on government to quickly speak on land ownership in the country with a view to resolving certain misconceptions about land ownership.


Indigenous people has taking back their land. FG, states and LG should keep off stay clear off our land. Fulani herdsmen jihadist must leave our forest.

Gondonu:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2021/01/cows-shouldnt-be-roaming-about-in-21st-century-adamu-garba-apc-chieftain/amp/

First time of seeing a Northerner speak the truth.

Kudos, he did not waste his education like some Nairaland zombies.

This is probably the first time adamu garba is talking sensibly..... This maybe because southern unity is now imminent and the fulani is unwittingly making themselves a tool for this unity

Odinaka00:
In South Africa, every cow owner has his own ranch but in Nigeria these cows move around.

South Africa is a country while Nigeria is a zoo. Spot the difference.

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

tell them to maintain their culture in their lands and not obstruct ours. Our culture is to farm and reap the proceeds of our farms in due time and not to get killed, raped and maimed on daily basis in out farms.

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

Are you drunk or something

Open grazing is a culture

So destroying people’s livelihoods is a culture you can’t live without, with your small education you still can’t reason straight!!! Smh!

So we have intelligent Fulani?

Really

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

Cultures are meant to evolve and progress. If they want to remain nomadic, it is fine. They can continue doing that in the north.

Don't say in the name of culture, you'll destroy other people's farms and businesses.

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

So which part of your sociological analysis explains the foray of these Fulani bastards into banditry and kidnapping which is the crux of the matter?

Let them continue roaming around with their useless cattle and encroaching on people's farms. We can grudgingly tolerate that (after all, this has been happening for decades already). But why are they misusing their illegal forest occupancy as hostage centres to perpetrate this free for all, industrial scale kidnapping enterprise? Who would accept that? Someone can't travel in peace, even in public transport, from one state to another without fearing that these Fulani animals would emerge from the Bush to shoot and kill and kidnap random persons on different expressways.... What does your complicit, beef-faced Fulani father-in-law have to say about that?

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

You did not make any sense.... You can not come from wherever to my community to state a case for your culture... The moment you step out of ur community, you culture will be sheat until the next time u re home.. If u want to wander around wit cow. Do so in a fulani community whr everyone wander around wit cow.. So u don't wander into an indigenous farmland....

Bro, don't fall for it.

Remember, he is a politician from APC. Trust politicians at your own risk.


They say the right thing in the open and then do the evil in the closet. He is only making political statement for political correctness.

Adamu Garba cannot be sensible like that overnight.

Gondonu:
His senseless fight or suit against twitter CEO seems to have knocked some senses into him or perhaps it is another political gimmick?

AlhajiImam:
Allah owns every land. If we are to pay, we use the money as alms to help our people and the almajirai.

People should stop claiming ownership of lands. It's a natural Allah given resource to be used by all.

Your post is senseless

Gondonu:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2021/01/cows-shouldnt-be-roaming-about-in-21st-century-adamu-garba-apc-chieftain/amp/

The first time Adamu Garba have a wonderful statement in 2021 January

AlhajiImam:


Every society have their culture and their traditions

Okay, it is our culture that no one rear cows openly in forests. Anyone who wants to rear cow should buy the land and build ranches.

That is our own culture and tradition and u must obey it or leave.

We have obeyed ur own culture over there in ur land. When u come to our own lands, obey ours.

AlhajiImam:


Did you feed the grasses? Did you spend time and energy to grow the grasses on the land?

Animals can also take care of themselves if let a alone in the bush. But you hijacked one and began to nurse it and it automatically become yours I will also hijacked a land through any means and fenced it, that land have automatically become mine. So anybody going there without my permission is trespassing, at the same vein anybody who forcefully take animals in your care will be considered a thief, Allah is the owner of everything including animals and land, but they have been allocated to someone. Therefore now you need a permission to have access to any of them. That's why we have countries and their presidents. You will need a permission for you to pass on either side, because it strictly belong to someone. Today even sea belong to a particular country how much more of a land.

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

Hundred years fake and oppressive one Niggeria was ended 7/8 years ago.

Biafra freedom or there will be no Nigeria. Hard truth.

beejaay:


So I can come and build my burukutu biz beside your family house in Kano since the land is free and belongs to Allah and your bloodthirsty tongue will not wanna kill...

,
U gave him a wonderful reply

SchmidtHammer:
I spoke to my father-in-law,a Fulani man himself, a while ago (due to my personal relationship with him, this was the first time I have ever considered the farmers-herders clashes from the perspective of a Fulani man), he explained certain delicate and complex intricacies that makes the proposed ranching system, that used to me a very straightforward one, now seem quite problematic IN THIS PRESENT MOMENT.
The laws in our constitution are not the laws of nature. These laws, as stated in our constitution, are created considering human peculiarities, such that 'general' beliefs even though inclined towards sentiments, as long as they are adopted by a represented reasonable minority and such that IT IS POSSIBLE THERE COULD BE A WAY AROUND THEM with the conditios that it does not threaten the ORDER in the country and the fundamental rights of others (the majority) is not infringed upon.
Having stated the above, it is easy to see that the problem with the proposed Ranching System is that while it is a very logically straightforward solution, it is not the most considerate, therefore not the most appropriate (at least in the short term) and using a method analogous the Occam's Razor for solutions in politics and human relations is unreasonable in my opinion. Open cattle rearing is a culture and proposing a change in this culture must be approached as sensitively as other important cultures of the other tribes. One does not expect that a culture be abandoned overnight, nor that laws guiding a country be entirely insensitive to the peculiarities of the people bound under it.
As in developed worlds, these are the kinds of problems that are confronted by Political scientists, Economic analysts and sociologists, putting forward a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of THE PROBLEM OF HERDERS in the country.

I think you are Muslims?Or are you cow worshippers?
Is it good to inhibit the growth of others with your culture even killing their livelihood and taking their lives when they complain?

Your people kill easily as if those lives they take gruesomely belong to mosquitoes.

That culture is barbaric.Ranching is the modern way of rearing cows and you will live with your neighbours joyously ever after.
Nobody hates a Fulani.Just stop these incessant killings.
We Yorubas are even on you now.
If you don't desist,this is surely your final end.
We are very resolute on this.
Sunday Igboho is just to make you know that you are totally gone if you don't desist.
All Yorubas are united on this.Trust us.

seunmsg:


Allah may own all the lands in North west but you see the lands in Ekiti and other south west states, it belongs to the indigenous people of the states and according to the land use act, the custody is vested in the governors of the states.

Even in your Sokoto and Kano where Allah owns the land, can I move into any available land and start producing and selling alcohol? Can I move into any of your forest and start rearing pigs?

Your hypocritical sharia police goes about breaking bottles of beer after taking tramadol and sniffing latrines and we don’t complain because we know it’s your land. So, why can’t you do your business in our states without the criminal activities and without violating the customs of the local people?

.
Thanks for replying that man who thinks from his anus