Intels2020:


You are a hoodlum

Why are you calling people hoodlum? What's this? If you don't agree with their statement pls state yours.

bukhety:

Why are you calling people hoodlum? What's this? If you don't agree with their statement pls state your.

Lol....don’t overthink it. I understand his sarcasm

Intels2020:


You are a hoodlum

We don't use such word here!

bukhety:

Why are you calling people hoodlum? What's this? If you don't agree with their statement pls state your.

Lol Aunty it is only a banter ooooo.
Check out what the person wrote and my reply, you will know that it is mere bantering.
Peace to all

Sanprecious:



Lol....don’t overthink it. I understand his sarcasm

Thanks bro for your understanding

ezenwaez:

Your English gave you away, "cut mark"

Are you saying that people with credible infos don't make typos?

Seeing the figures you guys are quoting as gt salary in the sister agency (ppra, dpr, pef), then it is safe to say all the staffs at the managerial level in those agencies are billionaires.
Ehn. This life no just balance

papiforreal:
Seeing the figures you guys are quoting as gt salary in the sister agency (ppra, dpr, pef), then it is safe to say all the staffs at the managerial level in that agencies are billionairesm

Billionaire ke!!!

I just hope the continuous test, if true, will lead to the engagement of atleast 300-500 employees, otherwise; the rigmarole is just not making sense

I really never see I swear

slydog:
I just hope the continuous test, if true, will lead to the engagement of atleast 300-500 employees, otherwise; the rigmarole is just not making sense

ennyj01:



Billionaire ke!!!

Abi. Imagine getting 30-40 million per annum for 10 years excluding office wuru wuru.
How much would you be able to save in 10 years?
Na few people de just pack all the money for this country.

Funny thread.

Well, NNPC recruitment thread still has the upper hand. There was way more seers, source givers, motivational speakers, people of hope...

Just know one thing gentlemen -
"- Knowing the very second appointment letter will drop doesn't guarantee you a place at the towers neither does worrying.

- It's normal to be a little tensed - so am I, but don't give yourself high blood pressure for what you can't really influence (even if you can, still slow down)

- Avoid building castles in the air already; truth is not everybody will get this APL. (I did build castles in the air when I went for NNPC interview...and when the castle crumbled it was a big fall)

- It is ideal to pray to God (Miracles surely happen; God's grace does influence things) and do not worry much about the information you see here; for what shall it profit a man to consume all the information from the various ministers of information and still not gain NCDMB APL ?"

Ministers of information I've off my mic, over to you all.

Testmi website is down.. Guess there job is done. Odizi na aka chukwu ( Everything now is in the hands of God)

papiforreal:


Abi. Imagine getting 30-40 million per annum for 10 years excluding office wuru wuru.
How much would you be able to save in 10 years?
Na few people de just pack all the money for this country.

Can someone earn such money in NCDMB at the SS level?

Maybe managerial level sha.

Sanprecious:


I got that. But you also mentioned that the test will be job specific.....so I asked, do you mean discipline based like I should expect to answer petroleum engineering questions coz that’s what I studied for a example? I understand clarity might be a struggle at this stage, but will appreciate if you’d explain what you already know from the info, please.

Well said

ennyj01:



Can someone earn such money in NCDMB at the SS level?

Maybe managerial level sha.

Yes. Managerial level I mean.

Just incase the interview invites rolls in, is it going to be at the towers for everybody?

Well, speaking about the decision of moving straight to interview maybe as a result of some info I got from a worker at testmi...
People that scored above 70+ in the first test were above 5,000 I think. .he didn't give the exact number tho...
But for the 2nd test, not more than 1200 people scored that high...
About 1500 people scored 60-70, and more than 2000 scored 50-60...

That's the little I know...
So going with 40% cut off "might" be real owing to the fact that close to 5000 people scored above 50( from estimation ooo) that's already a good amount for an interview phase tho

I'm not saying the interview info by Oracle is true..because person source fit no totally dey correct .even my source sef own fit get lapses...
But Nothing wey God no fit do, I'm sure they're still deliberating on the cut off Sha....until we see mails before we know the real deal...
Peace bro/sis

Jehovah has the final say!

If an axe head can float on water!

Anything is possible!

So let's allow God to do his quick word.

We are watching the space. Very soon we will know where we stand.

In view of this cut off issue, some people who scored high score in the first test had a poor score in the second test 7,000+ now going to 1500+ and some who had a poor score in the first test were able to score high in the second test, testmi can just work with their data base and make an average of the two score. with this it will be able to juxtapose a fair score and make a fair cut off mark even if is still 40%.

2kings 6 vs 6

Easy499:
Jehovah has the final say!

If an axe head can float on water!

Anything is possible!

So let's allow God to do his quick word.

This would have been great tho, but I think they only sent scores for this second test...although the first test score is already with ncdmb before the second test ...
So it will be ncdmb's decision to use this method which is almost not possible...but let's wait and see Sha...
Na source from the tower we dey wait for...

Ayodele09:
In view of this cut off issue, some people who scored high score in the first test had a poor score in the second test 7,000+ now going to 1500+ and some who had a poor score in the first test were able to score high in the second test, testmi can just work with their data base and make an average of the two score. with this it will be able to juxtapose a fair score and make a fair cut off mark even if is still 40%.

Won’t it make more sense that the cut off mark would be 70%. For the fact that they are only employing 100 people and if 1,500 people scored 70% then that’s enough amount to pick 100 from.
Instead of going back and forth, giving people unexpected hope and wasting time.

They should send the interview mail and get it over with cos It’s getting exhausting. Just viewing comments here shows how a lot of people are experiencing anxiety issues due to this recruitment.

The annoying aspect is, out of this 100 they are recruiting, they already have slots fixed. So how many would be left for merit based ? 20 or 10? Who knows!

So why waste time when they already know what they are doing. Anyways I wish everyone the best of luck!

The issue of employing 100, cut of mark 40,50,70 etc...all are speculations... The next mail will surely be the real deal

yusufnussy:
Won’t it make more sense that the cut off mark would be 70%. For the fact that they are only employing 100 people and if 1,500 people scored 70% then that’s enough amount to pick 100 from.
Instead of going back and forth, giving people unexpected hope and wasting time.

They should send the interview mail and get it over with cos It’s getting exhausting. Just viewing comments here shows how a lot of people are experiencing anxiety issues due to this recruitment.

The annoying aspect is, out of this 100 they are recruiting, they already have slots fixed. So how many would be left for merit based ? 20 or 10? Who knows!

So why waste time when they already know what they are doing. Anyways I wish everyone the best of luck!

Lunex:
The issue of employing 100, cut of mark 40,50,70 etc...all are speculations... The next mail will surely be the real deal

Alright then! We would wait for the mail.

Lunex:
Well, speaking about the decision of moving straight to interview maybe as a result of some info I got from a worker at testmi...
People that scored above 70+ in the first test were above 5,000 I think. .he didn't give the exact number tho...
But for the 2nd test, not more than 1200 people scored that high...
About 1500 people scored 60-70, and more than 2000 scored 50-60...

That's the little I know...
So going with 40% cut off "might" be real owing to the fact that close to 5000 people scored above 50( from estimation ooo) that's already a good amount for an interview phase tho

I'm not saying the interview info by Oracle is true..because person source fit no totally dey correct .even my source sef own fit get lapses...
But Nothing wey God no fit do, I'm sure they're still deliberating on the cut off Sha....until we see mails before we know the real deal...
Peace bro/sis

Testmi: 5000 people scored well in the test, let's redo it...

After the second test,
Testmi: 5000 people scored well in this second test, lets take it like that...

If this is true, then the whole thing nor make sense

Lunex:
The issue of employing 100, cut of mark 40,50,70 etc...all are speculations... The next mail will surely be the real deal

And who tell you guys they're recruiting 100 people?

Lol..
But remember the number of people that scored 70+ in the first test alone are 5000+
For the second test, that number is for people with 50 above...but it's way easier for NCDMB to work with the 2nd test...don't you think so?

jasonex4:



Testmi: 5000 people scored well in the test, let's redo it...

After the second test,
Testmi: 5000 people scored well in this second test, lets take it like that...

If this is true, then the whole thing nor make sense