₦airaland Forum

Troop101: lmimp Bru Patches that guy sy poes man

Otu nne gi dia,ur fada sy poes man

Conspiracy theories Emanated from CIA,so that they keep u busy (u busy solving false equations) while they do the real deal

Conspiracy theories was Emanated from CIA,so that they keep u busy (solving false equations) while they do the real deal

cooljude: They should better stop all this war rhetorics because both USA and RUSSIA can never be called saints. US sponsored ISIS in Syria as the opposition( but we know better who they are). Russia supports Eastern Ukrain but would deny any region in its territory to rebel. What i am saying is all this Mega Nations are after their own interest. The question is what would be our own interest. 1 European union is sanctioning Russian energy sector meaning that demand for our oils might increase, how do we gain from this? 2 Russia is banning food import and beef from those country, how do we put our goods to fill in the gap in Russia. 3 make sure that no Chemical, Boilogical or Atomic weapon is used if a war was to insue between those nation. Africa has to start drawing up its international policies that would be highly advantagous to Africans.

I love this ur comment

all4naija: Oh, please! I have seen that source more than 20 times during the Ukraine-Russia problem over Crimea. You are possibly blinding yourself to the truth here. That is regarding the international space station(ISS). Since USA decommissioned its space shuttle NASA has been using the Russian old Soyuz to launch astronauts to ISS. That doesn't mean they have better space tech or have achieved more successive space explorations than USA. Please, international space station is directly not going to impact NASA because it has plan for future exploration of Mars and other exo-planets of which ISS is not directly needed. Of what big usefulness is international station to USA if Russian decided to bar Americans from using their Soyuz. It will only give room for more aggressive space advancement for NASA which at presently USA is still the leader in all ramification.

American crew in ISS is scheduled to be replaced by 2015 lemme see how they re going to fly from ISS,it seems they re going to use parachute?

all4naija: Oh, please! I have seen that source more than 20 times during the Ukraine-Russia problem over Crimea. You are possibly blinding yourself to the truth here. That is regarding the international space station(ISS). Since USA decommissioned its space shuttle NASA has been using the Russian old Soyuz to launch astronauts to ISS. That doesn't mean they have better space tech or have achieved more successive space explorations than USA. Please, international space station is directly not going to impact NASA because it has plan for future exploration of Mars and other exo-planets of which ISS is not directly needed. Of what big usefulness is international station to USA if Russian decided to bar Americans from using their Soyuz. It will only give room for more aggressive space advancement for NASA which at presently USA is still the leader in all ramification.

American crew is schedule to replace by 2015 lemme how they going to fly from ISS

Kalvan500: The anti US sentiment on this thread is ridiculous. The US is a beacon democracy and freedom. I don't see that in Russia, I don't see that in Nigeria. Too many Lunatics running around this forum.

u re brain washed by what u c n da media,my advise is u should research and see that america masked themselves in democracy
1.a country that milk its citizens to destroy another country
2.A country that will do anything to achieve thier goals
3. a country that 'll take what that doesn't belong to them and spit at the owner's face for him to do his worse thereby creating the global trend called terrorism
4.America created conspiracy so that they 'll keep all the world intelligence agency busy so that they ll b doing the deal

Back in 2004, President Bush
announced that NASA's aging
space shuttle program would be
retired in 2010 and — eventually
— replaced by a plan to return to
the moon. At the time, NASA
realized there would be a four-
year gap between the space-
shuttle retirement and when the
new manned space transport
system would be in place.
But at that point, it didn't seem
like a big problem for NASA to
ask Russia to transport US
astronauts to and from the space
station in the interim. Relations
between the two countries were
friendly — Bush was telling
reporters that he'd looked into
Putin's eyes and "got a sense of
his soul." What's more, NASA had
relied on Russian transport for 29
months after the Columbia
disaster in 2003, when the
shuttle program was put on hold. Development of NASA's
replacement vessels, however,
has taken much longer than
anticipated — the agency won't
have a replacement for the
shuttle until 2017. There are a
few reasons for that. Bush's
moon program was cancelled by
Obama in 2010 and replaced with
a plan for private companies to
shuttle astronauts. Meanwhile,
NASA's budget requests to pay for
the new program were repeatedly
underfunded by Congress.
"It's put us in a vulnerable
position," says John Logsdon,
former director of the Space
Policy Institute.
This isn't the only way that the
US spaceflight program is
dependent on Russia. The Atlas V
rocket — built by Lockheed
Martin and used to launch
American military satellites and
civilian payloads — runs on a
Russian-built engine.
When the Atlas V was being
designed in the 1990s, Lockheed
Martin got a waiver from the
usual Defense Department
requirement that critical
components be manufactured in
the US, partly because the
Russian engines were better and
less expensive than American
options, and partly because of
political motivations.
"There was a fear that if we
didn't find some way of keeping
Russian rocket scientists
employed, they would go off and
work for Iran or North Korea,"
says James Lewis, a national
security and space analyst. When construction of the
International Space Station was
begun in 1998, it was seen as an
embodiment of the new age of
cooperative space exploration — a
permanent scientific alliance
between a number of countries,
but especially longtime rivals US
and Russia. The two countries
launched separate segments of
the station that were assembled
in orbit.
Obviously, the tenor of Russian-
American relations has changed,
but in space, the two countries
are still codependent. NASA
astronauts travel to and from the
station — used mostly for
scientific experiments on long-
term human spaceflight — on
Russian Soyuz rockets, launched
from the Baikonur Cosmodrome,
in Kazakhstan, the cradle of Soviet
space exploration since the 1957
launch of Sputnik.
THE WHOLE THING IS DESIGNED
TO OPERATE WITH BOTH
AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN
INVOLVEMENT
The next launch is scheduled for
May 28, when a rocket carrying
American, Russian, and German
astronauts
will take off to replace the
current crew. The astronauts will
live together in extremely close
quarters for about six months,
and if anything goes wrong,
they'll depend on a Russian
spacecraft docked at the station
to serve as an emergency
lifeboat.
But the Russian astronauts are
also heavily dependent on NASA.
The US segment makes up the
majority of the space station, by
area. Its solar panels provide
most of the electricity, and its
gyroscopes are crucial in
controlling the station in orbit.
On a broader level, the space
station represents one of the few
prestigious international projects
that Russia is currently involved
with, something that probably
appeals to Russian leaders
.
As a whole, the space station
takes instructions from command
centers in Houston and Korolyvov.
The whole thing is designed to
operate with both American and
Russian involvement, and it's hard
to imagine it surviving otherwise. A few recent events have raised
the possibility that political strife
between US and Russia may spill
over into the space relationship.
Last month, as part of the
sanctions process, NASA
announced that it would be
suspending all non-essential
contact
with Russia. That order had lots of
exceptions — including anything
space station-related — but it's
still not conducive to a good
working relationship in space.
A RUSSIAN MINISTER TWEETED
VEILED THREATS TO EXCLUDE
NASA ASTRONAUTS FROM FUTURE
TRIPS
In response to the sanctions,
Russian Deputy Prime Minister
Dimitry Rogozin tweeted "I
suggest to the USA to bring their
astronauts to the International
Space Station using a trampoline,"
earlier this week.
Russia hasn't moved forward with
any plans to withhold space
equipment or delay the May 28
launch, but Rogozin's comment is
an obvious concern. "That's the
first high-level negative comment
from either side regarding space,"
Logsdon says. "It's certainly not a
good sign."
These events — and the Ukraine
crisis as a whole — seem to have
made the need to develop
American manned space transport
more urgent. The current plan is
for NASA to award a grant to one
of three private companies
(Boeing, Sierra Nevada, or
SpaceX), so they can upgrade
their cargo-carrying rockets for
human use.
The day after Rogozin's tweet, a
House subcommittee fully
approved a $785 million NASA
funding request
for the private space flight plan
— an increase from recent years
— and added money to the
Defense Department's 2015
budget
specifically to develop an
American replacement for the
Russian-made Lockheed Martin
rocket engines.

all4naija: Using the word pontificate in your comment is an overly exaggerating of your biased approach to provide evidence to what I pointed out to you in my previous post. I don't think there is anybody writing trash here other than you.

For your information, Russian space technology is not advanced than the Americans. NASA has carried out more successive space explorations more than Russia's space agency. You are holding on to a very primitive man's approach of throwing jabs. Bwahaha...When has durability be about advancement? Hehehe... There is no way Russian fighters are more advanced than the Americans. The Raptor is still way better than Russian Sukhoi Su-47 in advanced system and other equipment.

Yes, they did as the Russians. I am saying that Russians haven't made significant advancement in technology lately. You seem to make statements out of line with what I said in my previous post.

After Russia's invasion of Crimea
, the US government imposed
economic sanctions on Russia.
Russia subsequently left the G-8
(an informal group of the world's
biggest economies), further
straining diplomatic ties.
All this has led to fears that the
relationship might disintegrate
entirely, especially when it comes
to space. Last week, the Russian
Deputy Prime Minister angrily
tweeted veiled threats to exclude
NASA astronauts from future trips
to the International Space Station.
But the US and Russia have to
keep talking in space. That's
because there are currently two
US astronauts and three Russian
cosmonauts aboard the
International Space Station
, orbiting about 260 miles above
Earth's surface.
Russia, for its part, depends on
the US segment of the space
station for the electricity provided
by its solar panels. And NASA, for
its part, has no way of getting its
American astronauts to and from
the space station — or anywhere
else in space, for that matter. So
it pays $70.7 million for each
one-way ticket on Russian rockets.
The earliest that could possibly
change? 2017.

MOSCOW (AFP) – Russia said
Saturday that it had chased away
a US submarine that had
approached its territorial waters
in the Barents Sea.
A representative of the naval
headquarters told Russian news
agencies that what was believed
to be a Virginia class fast attack
submarine was discovered close
to Russian territorial waters on
Friday.
Thanks to “active measures by the
Northern Fleet’s anti-submarine
forces, the submarine was
‘pushed away’” from the area near
Russia’s territorial waters in the
Arctic, the naval official was
quoted as saying by Interfax news
agency.
An anti-submarine aircraft was
also involved in the operation, in
which no force was used.
The official said contact with the
sub lasted 27 minutes, and was
far from the only incident with
foreign subs in that part of the
Russian Arctic recently.
The deputy head of the Russian
parliament’s foreign affairs
committee, Leonid Kalashnikov,
said on Echo of Moscow radio that
such incidents are quite common.
“Occasionally other countries test
how the submarine location
service is working,” the lawmaker
said, suggesting that the rather
unusual announcement was a
public relations move by the navy
to call attention to their work.
The incident comes amid
heightened tensions between the
West and Russia over Moscow’s
role in the Ukraine crisis

MikeZA: Mike..ZA out!!!!!

Leaving the thread like(pic)......................Bye Bye!!! #SANavy

Snorkeling pipe called submarine

FighterPilot: You need psychologist desperately. Just imagine a missile woth mach 0.5. You are sick.

lol umkhonto missiles is as fast as a heavy duty truck

FighterPilot: Nigerian military have never experienced live missile firing on their entire lives. They have only a handful of missiles which they can never waste at all. Worst, they are not even sure if their misiles are functional or not.

Fact remains u ve never fired ur mach 0.05 umkhonto missiles to an Enemy

hungryboy: Hey idiat,i'm signing out now, have a nice evening, and dont forget to bathe with salt oh

u need 2 b isolated and quarantined

hungryboy: 2pac is dead u idiat,

no forget to bathe with salt this evening if u don't want to join him

FG Is after ur kind for dispersing quack prescription id10t

hungryboy: Idiat how are u?,
i hope say u been bathe with salt in the morning?

F00l don't play dirty with me,cos when I bring it,I'll bring u drama xo 4uck u and ur motherphu.cking mama

MikeZA: The air force uses live bombs in exercises and demonstrations.

is it ur mach 0.5 umkhonto bombs?

MikeZA: The air force uses live bombs in exercises and demonstrations.

is it ur mach 0.5 umkhonto bombs

hungryboy: All these idiats shouting go Russia, incase of war between this two countries who do u think will support Russia, the americans will have europe by its side, i bet u even the chinese won't support the russians

if u reach houz u greet ur papa "idiat good evening sir"

MikeZA: The Gripen have been deployed multiple times.

"We train as we fight",and SA spends more on training individual soldiers than Nigeria.

Continue training,but fact remains u have'nt drop any bomb from Gripen!!!

MikeZA: We have more than free fall iron bombs in SA.

u have it, but u ve never use it

upko: [size=30] Most Nigerians are Educated idiots don't be surprised...[/size]

Including u,plssssss Moderator do ur work.

upko: We all hate the Yanks but we would Kill to get a visa to Yankee.....Who are we deceiving??.......

it is u that is on Que to get yank.y visa

upko: [size=80pt] Pained Nigerians be like "Russia has the best this, Russia has the best that"......When the war starts Putin would even flee and seek asylum in Syria or Iran. [/size]

don't underestimate ur enemy/Friend !!!

but in all things Remember: What are some signs? It's in the
Bible, Matt 24:3, NKJV. "As Jesus
was sitting on the Mount of
Olives, the disciples came to him
privately. "Tell us," they said,
"when will this happen, and what
will be the sign of your coming
and of the end of the age?"
Men posing as Jesus will try to
deceive people in the last days.
It's in the Bible, Matthew
24:23-24, NIV. "At that time if
anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is
the Christ!' or ‘There He is!' do
not believe it. For false Christ's
and false prophets will appear and
perform great signs and miracles
to deceive even the elect—if that
were possible."
There will be wars, though they
may seem overwhelming, it is not
the end. It's in the Bible,
Matthew 24:6, NKJV. "You will
hear of wars and rumors of wars,
but see to it that you are not
alarmed. Such things must
happen, but the end is still to
come."
Earthquakes and famines, and all
the signs are only the
contractions of what's coming. It's
in the Bible, Matthew 24:7-8,
NKJV. "There will be famines and
earthquakes in various places. All
these are the beginning of birth
pains."
Non-Christians will find it hard to
believe we are living in the last
days of earth's history. It's in the
Bible, II Peter 3:3-4, TLB. "First,
I want to remind you that in the
last days there will come scoffers
who will do every wrong they can
think of, and laugh at the truth.
This will be their line of
argument: ‘So Jesus promised to
come back, did He? Then where is
He? He'll never come! Why, as
far back as anyone can remember
everything has remained exactly
as it was since the first day of
creation.'"

tobtap: they believe every propaganda on cnn and bbc....s400/s500 is scary

Remember that hamaz are just firing rocket that is mach 2 and u saw the casualties imagine a mach 20 missiles hitting u?

upko: [size=80pt] With a combined USA and NATO power Russia would burn to the ground in Two Weeks, Air supremacy would be achieved in Just 2days. Russia stands no chance......But foolish Nigerians especially Muslims who hate the USA would Keep living in denial. [/size]

Am nt Muslim but I h8 d yan.ks and thier silly bully imagne what they doing to Nigeria tru there media?

tobtap: dont mind does ingorant peeps that believes usa is invincible....usa have not won any war against a standard amry since world war 2..... and russia have the best nuclear submarines in the world...and the best air defence system in the world as well

That haven't heard of S400/S500 mach 20 missiles

illitrate: tell Russia not to provoke the b2 nuclear bombers.

Tell US NOT PROVOKE TU-95 (BEAR)

xp17: bros, if you know how many humans and animals died during the world war 1 and world war 2 respectively, you would have gone in your quit to pray that God should not allow this happen in your generation.



America is very civilized, we believe in diplomacy, not like Russia. we've been at the centre to resolve the crisis in the middle east as a guardian of freedom to the people and the American way of life.


Russia is a small country and too small to be ended by the US in 24hrs. the numbers of the US army+marine+air force+ navy is more than the size of the Russian population.

America is the only country in the world that has fought 2 war simultaneously and still conquered.
note: the US army creed never accepts defeat and never quit.

God is good, that was why he made Obama for this time. if it were Bush's administration, the US would had since invaded Russia , take over her oil and leave Putin on the run to take asylum from one of the G6 countries. thank God Obama believes in peace talk to war.


as dumb a'ss as putin, he gave a sanction that his people would suffer most, more than the sanctioned . seriously putin would be better off in the rehab .

war is ugly, so as Russia
peace is beautiful , just like America

have heard about iskander missiles,Russian ICBM capable of destroying 2 size of New york city in 24 hrs, Russia has 15,000 vs US 6500. tanks,Russian fleet of about 30 nuclear submarines,Russia is only country in that its submarines has Nuclear ICBM capabilities,Have u heard of Russian blinder radar (AESA VHF RADAR) ,if it is fitted onboard fighter jet and flown over a war ship/Aircraft carriers it blinds all systems automatically making the ship to sink

patches689: We have fought 4

Nigeria is the one whom has never fought in a real war

Fact Remains that u ve never shot a fly from ur gripen 4ool.

MikeZA: Remains a fact your air force has no aerial combat experience.

Fact remains u ve never fought a real war dude, ur Airforcewood ve never shoot out a common iron bomb from ur GRIPEN