₦airaland Forum

Nickshrapnel:
Oh! I saw one with an extra wearing a Superman costume. Does that means that he exist in that universe? It wasn’t the Cavill suit though

I no even wan see that one

Nickshrapnel:
Have you seen any Batman set pictures?

Minemrys:
think of it this way, what's the g0od batman has brought gotham? Crazies run the city, people get scared at night, they could get killed by any maniac or risk terror attack by league of assassins. The minute batman showed, so did gotham's worst nightmare. Batman is indirectly resp0nsible for the orphaning of grays0n, the rampage of jas0n todd, ra'as al ghul. Just check it, before batman, gotham's biggest problem was organised crime. People have debated this.

Nickshrapnel:
Gadot is great but I’m in love with this WW cosplay

BankyGee:
RIDDLE ME THIS

He didn't jump out the window bruh

BankyGee:
If na everytime, I dey fear. I no wan lose my Ayanfe oh

You won't lose her don't worry

Ayanfe29:
Learn to be minding your business! This is family business between BankyGee and I

Ayanfe29:
Never ever sef! We just dey pity you ni o

This girl likes me sha

Minemrys:
am talking abt the c0mics actually n0t n0lan verse. In n0lan verse, the villains were there before batman i.e joker, bane, ra'as, scarecrow. But in the c0mics, bruce is directly or indirectly resp0nsible for the creati0n of his rogues gallery and gotham's descent to crazies. Gotham was your n0rmal c0rrupt city prior to batman. Batman didn't make it any better. So, if u gave gotham to diana, it'd be a better place cos she'd have the wisd0m to manage it. Batman uses fear, hysteria, rage to rule gotham. But it doesn't work on all bad guys like joker, and others, it works negatively on them. Batman pushed gotham to the wall so hard that it drove people mad. I d0n't see batman as the hero or whatever gotham deserved. Batman is equally a bad guy as his villains.

Minemrys:
i don't think the writers have explored these things. And if they have, they d0n't let it bear c0nsequences or retc0n it immediately. I mean, readerz can do without joker for about 10 or 5 year gap before he is reintroduced.

Nickshrapnel:
I like this new Batman, Nightwing is just, well...Nightwing

Minemrys:
there is s0mething you are misunderstanding, in actuality we aren't arguing why joker is alive, the argument is, why is Joker after being caught always taken to arkham when he ends up getting out only to do m0re damage? You sure can agree the CB writers didn't do alot in that aspect. It makes no sense. I mean, logically, he wouldn't be sent to arkham again if all he does was repeat and rinse. Logically, the law would've found a way to get rid of him if it proves he is very much a danger to society even when mentally challenged. In real life, it's either they place him in a medically induced c0ma, mercy kill him or place him in a military guarded off the b0ok facility which logically l0oking at it is expensive.

So you genuinely think all these things have never been done to the Joker before? Lmaooooooooo, Minemrys you dey sleep on top bike o

This guy literally thinks that no writer in the 80yrs of writing Joker has ever done any of the bolded to him, I don't think there is any form of punishment apart from hanging (which I haven't read about but might be there) that Joker hasn't been through so die all these talk abeg

Minemrys:
that's the angle you are l0oking at it fr0m. Diana is better poised to handle gotham psychologically than bruce. Bruce is crazy himself. Diana isn't. If diana were to run gotham, she'd kn0w where to make c0mpr0mises and where n0t to. She'd be dipl0matic in areas where bruce tend to be vengeful. Basically, i think batman is c0mplicit for why gotham became what it is, a crazy hub. Diana as sole protector wouldn't have inspired crazies like two face, harle quinn, riddler, joker on society. These guys if u check it are in s0me way, a representati0n of batman. Joker is a reminder of how far bruce could go in his quest, 2 face; an insecurity of if bruce can keep up without psychologically shutting down to bec0me the bad guy at the end, harle; the negative spectrum of Bruce's obsessi0n with the crazy, and riddler, you can fill that in. These villains are just s0me part of batman that he inspired on society. Diana wouldn't.

Kaycee7:
See as the girl fresh
John too like better thing

Minemrys:
yup. And i think the writers should be blamed for n0t creating a c0mpelling reas0n for why joker is alive. In real life, it's cos joker is a m0ney grabber for sales. But the superman villain luthor is better written that we d0n't get tired of Lex in the c0mics. That's why i d0n't like the batman character and its st0ries atimes. Too inc0nsistent.

Gmajor:
Needless killing is wrong.
But something have to be done for the greater good.
That fact he blames himself is not enough. Joker has no reason to. Still be alive

Minemrys:
diana kills though. When she sees it necessary. If it was clark running gotham on the other hand, joker w0n't be a problem.

Nickshrapnel:
What do you mean with this last statement?

Gmajor:
True.

All these mumu superhero (esp Batman and Superman) need to understand that there is a time to kill.

For example, Batman captures Joker, tosses him into Arkham asylum and next week he is out. He then goes on a crime spree that leads to the death of a lot of people till Batman captures him and tosses him into Arkham assylum.

Rinse and repeat.


The joker has proved that he is irredeemably bad and will kill whenever he gets the chance. And to make matters worse he is also able to radicalize people to be just as bad as him (Harley Quinn and his henchmen)

If Batman can tell himself the truth, he will realize that everytime the joker kills someone, it's his fault.

Stonecoldstare1:
You seen it? I forgot the movie was even out

Nickshrapnel:

BankyGee:
Thanks baby, you should be nice to pu7pl3 sometimes

Ayanfe29:
I'll try joor

Omo no be me provoke you o

Ayanfe29:
*Walks by and eyes him furiously*

BankyGee hun, your dinner is served

Kaycee7:
"You didn't say E's name."
"Say E's name."

Nickshrapnel:
1 for Bats the other for Cats