Radicalwarrior's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Radicalwarrior's Profile › Radicalwarrior's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 21 pages)
Speaking during a recent gathering, Adeboye emphasized the importance of unity, fairness, and national cohesion, urging Nigerians to look beyond ethnic divisions. He reportedly appealed to the Yoruba people to back an Igbo candidate, arguing that such a move would promote equity and strengthen the bonds among Nigeria’s major ethnic groups. According to sources present at the event, the respected cleric highlighted the need for inclusiveness in leadership, noting that the Southeast region has yet to produce a president in Nigeria’s current democratic dispensation. He stressed that supporting an Igbo presidency would be a step toward justice and national reconciliation. “The time has come for Nigerians to act with a sense of fairness and brotherhood,” Adeboye was quoted as saying. “We must build a nation where every region feels seen, heard, and represented.” The remarks have since sparked mixed reactions across political and social circles. Some leaders have praised the call as a bold step toward national unity, while others argue that presidential elections should remain strictly based on competence rather than regional considerations. Political analysts suggest that such a statement, coming from a highly influential religious figure, could significantly shape public opinion ahead of the 2027 elections. The conversation around zoning and power rotation is expected to intensify in the coming months. As Nigeria continues to navigate complex political dynamics, Adeboye’s comments have once again brought the issue of equity, representation, and national unity to the forefront of public discourse. |
If tinubu can not step down for an igbo man from south east region of Nigeria to be the next president of Nigeria in 2027, then the igbos will stop tinubu from winning the 2027 presidential election in Nigeria. Tinubu have taken the Nigeria presidency mandate from igbos in 2023 and must return it back or Bola tinubu and yorubas will not have the presidency in 2027 instead let the Igbos have the presidency in 2027. |
Tinubu have failed Nigerians and APC members. Tinubu is a national disgrace to Nigerians and Africans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1IjXi_13So&pp=ygUddGludWJ1IHRydXN0ZWQgYWxseSBsZWF2ZSBhcGM |
Jossyman0007:Why are you behaving immature? Talking to Op in a disrespectful way, is a sign of immaturity behavior from you. Be a man! |
Tinubu have failed Nigerians And APC members. Jail awaits tinubu after he loss the 2027 presidential election to southeast presidential candidate for the 2027 presidential election. |
AskProf:Stop asking OP meaningless question when the fact is there for all to see. Watch one fact below and stop asking unnecessary question. Members Of APC Have Started Attacking Tinubu (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1IjXi_13So&pp=ygUddGludWJ1IHRydXN0ZWQgYWxseSBsZWF2ZSBhcGM%3D |
Ibas3454:Continue deceiving yourself as tinubu is publicly disgrace. Members Of APC Have Started Attacking Tinubu (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1IjXi_13So&pp=ygUddGludWJ1IHRydXN0ZWQgYWxseSBsZWF2ZSBhcGM%3D |
Members Of APC Have Started Attacking Tinubu (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1IjXi_13So&pp=ygUddGludWJ1IHRydXN0ZWQgYWxseSBsZWF2ZSBhcGM%3D |
Obiedun:Upper Iweka news is better than Yoruba media houses that spread fake news. The news by OP is real and authentic. |
Hightablevoice2:Members Of APC Have Started Attacking Tinubu (video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1IjXi_13So&pp=ygUddGludWJ1IHRydXN0ZWQgYWxseSBsZWF2ZSBhcGM%3D |
Kanwulia:SATAN can cast out SATAN! Impeaching tinubu is possible. Hehe. So 'Satan can't cast out Satan' but 'we need the mandate-thief out'? Bro, you're basically saying 'I want the house to be clean but I don't want to sweep'. Impeachment is the sweep. You either want the job done or you just want to complain. So 'we don't need impeachment' but 'we need him out'? Make up your mind. If you want him out, then impeachment is literally the constitutional way to do it. Or are you suggesting we use 'Nigerian factor' to remove him? Because that's called a coup, not democracy. |
Jakarta:Lol ![]() So because no one has been impeached, we should just assume it’s impossible? That’s like saying ‘no one has died from smoking’ until they do. I’m not running away from reality. I’m refusing to be held hostage by your ‘it’s never happened’ nonsense. If Tinubu breaks the law, he’ll be the first. That’s how history is made. Obj didn’t actualize 3rd term because the Senate said no. Same Senate you say is ‘at Tinubu’s beck and call’. So even when legislators were loyal to OBJ, they still stopped him. That means the Senate can say no. So your argument collapses: if they could stop OBJ, they can stop Tinubu too. You want me to name a Nigerian civilian president that was impeached? I’ll name one when it happens. But let’s not pretend ‘it hasn’t happened’ means ‘it’s impossible’. You’re confusing ‘hasn’t’ with ‘won’t’. The constitution doesn’t care about your ‘reality’. It cares about 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, the Senate will act — or Nigeria will act on the Senate. |
BrickandLace:I get the anger. But saying they all lack conscience is how we excuse ourselves from acting. Not every HOR or Senate member is corrupt. Some are trying. The problem is we don’t protect the good ones when they stand up. If we want a new Nigeria, we have to start by voting out the treacherous ones, not by writing everyone off. That’s how people felt about Buhari in 2011. ‘All politicians are the same’. Then 2015 happened. If we keep saying ‘they’re useless’, we’re giving them permission to keep being useless. The new Nigeria starts when we treat elections like war, not like prayer. |
Jakarta:Bro, I’m awake. You’re the one sleeping on history. ‘Singing on your mandate’ was the same song for Buhari in 2015. By 2018, those same legislators were trying to impeach him. The Nigerian factor is loyalty to interest, not loyalty to one man. When interest changes, the song changes. The ‘Nigerian factor’ is what made Saraki’s Senate threaten Buhari with impeachment in 2018. Same factor made Lawan’s Senate block Buhari’s loan request. So which ‘Nigerian factor’ are you talking about? The one that works for Tinubu today, or the one that worked against Buhari yesterday? So the ‘Nigerian factor’ means the Senate can’t impeach Tinubu, but it could threaten Buhari? Or is the Nigerian factor only when it’s your man? The constitution doesn’t say ‘Nigerian factor’. It says 2/3. If Tinubu breaks the law, that same Senate will act. Watch. |
IGBOSON1:Hehe. Akpabio is ‘firmly in Tinubu’s pocket’ today. But Saraki was ‘firmly in Buhari’s pocket’ until 2018. Lawan was ‘firmly in Buhari’s pocket’ until APC primaries. The pocket changes when interest changes. That’s politics. So because Akpabio is loyal now, Tinubu can’t be impeached? That’s like saying ‘my referee is my friend, so I can’t get a red card’. Impeachment is in the constitution, not in Akpabio’s loyalty. If Tinubu breaks the law, even his pocket will be emptied. You idealists? Lol. In 2018, the same APC senators that were ‘firmly in Buhari’s pocket’ were threatening impeachment and defecting. So which one is it? Is it only idealistic when it’s not your man? |
Antoeni:You said ‘Tinubu vs Atiku vs Obi vs Kwankwaso will produce same result’. But in 2023 you were saying ‘Obi can’t win’. So now Obi is a threat enough to guarantee Tinubu wins? Make up your mind. If he’s not a factor, why mention him? You can’t say ‘same result’ when the conditions are different. In 2023, Tinubu had the incumbent advantage, PDP was split, and Obi was new. In 2027, Tinubu will be incumbent with economic hardship. People don’t vote the same way when their stomachs are empty. So no, it won’t be the same. |
OneCandleAway:Saraki and Akpabio are worlds apart — I agree. But both were Senate Presidents who didn’t always bow to their president. Saraki clashed with Buhari. Akpabio is clashing with no one now. The point isn’t who they are, it’s that Senate loyalty isn’t permanent. It shifts when interests shift. If they’re worlds apart, then your argument falls apart. You can’t say ‘Saraki did it’ to prove it’s possible, then say ‘but Akpabio is different’ to prove it’s impossible. Either the Senate can act independently or it can’t. Which is it? |
FSBoperator:Lol BAT is doing his second term? 2027 hasn’t happened yet. Calling it ‘AI assisted bullcrap’ doesn’t change the fact that the South East is asking for equity. If you think that’s pathetic, then democracy itself is pathetic to you. You can laugh, but laughing doesn’t cancel the constitution. ‘AI assisted bullcrap’ is what people said about Obi in 2023 too. Look how that ended. You can’t insult your way out of a zoning debate. Tinubu is a one term president because Nigerians have rejected him. |
OneCandleAway:So because the Senate is singing now, Tinubu can’t be impeached? That’s like saying a referee who claps for a player can’t give him a red card. The rules don’t care about the song. They care about the offense. True, this Senate is pro-Tinubu now. But impeachment isn’t about singing. It’s about the law. If Tinubu violates the constitution, or if the economy collapses, that same Senate will change tune. Remember: The same Senate that sang ‘Buhari till 2023’ was the one that voted against his loan requests and blocked some of his nominees. When interest changes, the song changes. ‘Singing on your mandate’ is not in the constitution — 2/3 votes is. Tinubu could be in the same spot. If he delivers, no one will talk impeachment. If he doesn’t, even his singers will leave the choir. Buhari had US support in 2015, but that didn’t win him the election — Nigerians did. If Buhari could lose 3 times before winning, then nothing is ‘evident’ until votes are counted. Tinubu’s US backing doesn’t stop a Nigerian from beating him if people are tired. |
Jakarta:Nobody said it’s happening tomorrow. But ‘impossible’ is what they said about Buhari defeating PDP in 2015. Politics changes fast. Senate today, different tomorrow. Senate presidents commend presidents all the time — that’s their job. But remember: Saraki and Lawan both clashed with their presidents. Senate loyalty isn’t forever. It sounds ‘un-Nigerian’ because we’ve never done it. But the constitution says it’s possible. If Nigerians are angry enough, even the ‘impossible’ becomes real. You’re right — today it looks impossible. The Senate President is backing Tinubu, and borrowing is the current plan. But the constitution doesn’t require ‘Nigerian’ to impeach. It requires 2/3 of Senate and House. If Tinubu breaks the law, ignores the National Assembly, or triggers mass protests, the math changes. |
Lagos, Nigeria — In a powerful and unprecedented political declaration, influential Yoruba and Northern leaders within the All Progressives Congress (APC) have jointly called for the 2027 Nigerian presidency to be handed over to an Igbo man from the South-East geopolitical zone — but with a critical stipulation: the candidate must be a bona fide member of the APC. This stirring demand signals a pivotal moment in Nigeria’s political evolution, reflecting a growing consensus among major ethnic blocs in the ruling party to foster true inclusivity, national cohesion, and respect for the country’s unwritten power rotation norms. The Yorubas and Northerners’ endorsement of an Igbo presidency within the APC is grounded not only in historical justice but also political pragmatism. For decades, the Igbo people — despite their significant economic contributions and population — have been largely excluded from the highest office, deepening feelings of marginalization and disenfranchisement. By emphasizing that the Igbo presidency candidate must be a member of the APC, these leaders are underscoring the need for internal party democracy and loyalty. This insistence also serves as a subtle but firm message to the broader political class that the Igbo ambition for the presidency should be pursued within the mainstream ruling party, which currently controls the machinery of government and has the strongest chances of winning the election. Political analysts view this united call as a potential game-changer for the 2027 general elections. It bridges long-standing regional divides, signaling that the APC’s core ethnic constituencies are ready to set aside historical suspicions and work toward a shared future. Dr. Ibrahim Musa, a leading political commentator, noted, “This is an extraordinary alignment. For Yorubas and Northerners to publicly support an Igbo APC candidate suggests a shift from ethno-centric politics to a more pragmatic and inclusive approach. It could redefine how power is negotiated in Nigeria.” While the call is historic, it comes with formidable challenges. The South-East political landscape is currently fragmented, with multiple aspirants eyeing the presidency, many not formally aligned with the APC. Convincing these actors to rally behind the party’s candidate will require strategic diplomacy and robust consensus-building. Moreover, this demand adds pressure on the APC leadership to fast-track credible zoning arrangements and internal reforms that guarantee the Igbo candidate not only emerges but also garners widespread support. This united front by Yorubas and Northerners is more than a political gesture; it is a clarion call for national integration, equitable power distribution, and party loyalty. If handled with wisdom and sincerity, it could mark the dawn of a new chapter in Nigeria’s democracy — one where ethnic identities enrich the political landscape without breeding division. As Nigeria approaches the crucial 2027 elections, all eyes will be on how the APC navigates this complex terrain and whether it can transform this bold vision into reality. |
The current state of Nigeria under President Bola Tinubu's leadership has raised concerns among citizens, prompting calls for his impeachment. With the country grappling with hunger, bad governance, and economic instability, it's imperative for lawmakers to reassess the president's performance and consider taking drastic measures. The 1999 Nigerian Constitution provides clear guidelines for impeachment proceedings. Section 143(1) states that the president can be removed from office for "gross misconduct". Given the widespread discontent with Tinubu's administration, lawmakers must evaluate whether his actions constitute gross misconduct. President Tinubu's inability to effectively address hunger and economic instability has exacerbated the suffering of Nigerians. The recent nationwide protests against hunger and bad governance underscore the need for urgent action. Lawmakers must consider whether Tinubu's leadership has violated the constitution and compromised the well-being of citizens. To initiate impeachment proceedings, a simple majority vote is required in the House of Representatives, followed by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. Lawmakers must prioritize the nation's interests over party affiliations and take decisive action. Nigerian lawmakers have a constitutional duty to ho6ld the president accountable. We urge them to: 1. Assess President Tinubu's performance: Evaluate his leadership and determine whether it constitutes gross misconduct. 2. Initiate impeachment proceedings: Follow constitutional guidelines to remove the president from office. 3. Prioritize national interests: Put the needs of Nigerians above party loyalty. The time for action is now. Lawmakers must demonstrate their commitment to the nation's well-being and take bold steps to address the current leadership crisis. |
In a surprising turn of events, many Nigerians are urging Vice President Kashim Shettima to decline the role of Acting President if President Bola Tinubu is impeached. The reason behind this request is to ensure that the presidency remains in the South-South region, as stipulated by the APC constitution. The APC constitution requires that the presidency should alternate between regions to maintain balance and fairness. With President Tinubu potentially facing impeachment, Nigerians are keen to see this stipulation upheld. If Vice President Shettima steps down, Senate President Godswill Akpabio would be next in line to assume the role of Acting President. Many Nigerians see Akpabio as a more suitable candidate to lead the country than Vice President Kashim Shettima, given his experience and leadership style. The call for Vice President Shettima to step down is gaining momentum, with many Nigerians taking to social media to express their views. While some argue that Shettima's association with President Tinubu could compromise his ability to lead effectively, others believe that Akpabio's leadership would bring much-needed stability to the country. The Nigerian Constitution outlines the order of succession, with the Vice President assuming the presidency in the event of a vacancy. The call is rooted in the desire to see Senate President Godswill Akpabio take the reins as the next Acting President of Nigeria. Many Nigerians are dissatisfied with the current administration's handling of economic and security issues. The impeachment process is ongoing, with many Nigerians eagerly awaiting the outcome. If President Tinubu is impeached, the country will be watching closely to see who will take the reins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoUkjmaz9Lk Video Of Nigeria's people calling for the impeachment of president Bola Ahmed Tinubu. They wants tinubu forcefully remove as president of Nigeria. |
Sangoamadioha1:Lincoln didn’t lose because Nigerians rejected him. He lost because he was in the minority party. Atiku lost because Nigerians voted against him 6 times. If your time never reached after 6 tries, maybe it’s not your time. Lincoln had one failed Senate run and one failed VP run. Atiku has six failed presidential runs. That’s not ‘your time never reach’ — that’s Nigerians saying no. Lincoln didn’t have corruption cases, EFCC files, and 30 years in government. Atiku does. Different time, different country, different man. Nigeria isn’t America. And Lincoln didn’t have 30 years of baggage. |
Sangoamadioha1:Lincoln didn’t lose because Nigerians rejected him. He lost because he was in the minority party. Atiku lost because Nigerians voted against him 6 times. If your time never reached after 6 tries, maybe it’s not your time. Lincoln had one failed Senate run and one failed VP run. Atiku has six failed presidential runs. That’s not ‘your time never reach’ — that’s Nigerians saying no. Lincoln didn’t have corruption cases, EFCC files, and 30 years in government. Atiku does. Different time, different country, different man. Nigeria isn’t America. And Lincoln didn’t have 30 years of baggage. |
Atiku and his supporters have no regard for Southern Nigeria. He contested against Obasanjo, Jonathan, and Osinbajo. Now he wants Southerners to vote him in 2027? No. Obi or nothing. When it’s 2031, let the North have its turn. But 2027 is for the South East. That’s equity. Atiku and his camp say ‘unity’, but they’ve never supported Southern leadership. They’ve contested against every Southern candidate. Now they want Southern votes? Obi or nothing. 2027 is for the South East. 2031 can be Northern turn. That’s fairness. |
Onme:Calling this ‘Igbo’ or ‘Obi supporters’ won’t change the facts. Nigerians from every tribe are tired of recycling. Atiku Abubakar has run 6 times and lost. He’s 80 in 2027. That’s not about tribe — that’s about competence. And no, it’s not about money. It’s about justice. After North and South West, it’s the South East’s turn. That’s equity, not tribalism. |
