Redslip's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Redslip's Profile › Redslip's Posts
JLINE:Just kiddin, I just wantd a diversion from this argument dats all. |
I blew my Demo acct last week abeg who go help me fund am ![]() |
Pipsbasketing:Respect Boss! Master of currency correlation, keep it up |
![]() |
currentprice:Boss! are u now a Mod ![]() |
Nigeria situation is similar to George orwell Animal Farm Animal Farm begins with a very drunk Mr. Jones (owner of Manor Farm) doing a really crummy job of, you know, his job. Luckily, there's a wise pig on the farm: Old Major. Old Major encourages the neglected animals to rebel and run the farm themselves with one important qualification: everyone should be equal. Then he dies. This seems like a grand idea to everyone except Benjamin, a cynical donkey whose main job in life is to be, well, cynical. So, they rebel. The pigs, being the smartest animals, naturally take the leadership role. So much for that equality business. So much for Old Major's vision of a peaceful coup, too, because there's immediate conflict between two pigs, Napoleon and Snowball. Napoleon wants to sit around and be in charge of everything, while Snowball wants to teach the other animals and build a windmill. Obviously, Snowball's plan is way better, so he wins. Not. Instead, Napoleon uses his private army of nine ferocious and enormous dogs to become the All Powerful Dominant Boss Leader Chief Pig. Okay, he doesn't call it that, but you know it's in the back of his mind somewhere. With Snowball is out of the picture, the other pigs blame everything on him. They exploit the other animals shamelessly, breaking all the rules about equality that they had established after the Rebellion. Life on the farm gets worse and worse, the animals forget old Major's original dream, and the pigs make some poor management decisions when dealing with the neighboring farms. The culminating miserable moment comes when the pigs send Boxer, a hardworking and loyal horse who is ready for retirement, to his death. Ouch. In short, the pigs are starting to look a lot like the horrible human owners that we started with at the beginning of this whole mess, walking on two legs and everything. In fact, everything became even worse. http://www.shmoop.com/animal-farm/summary.html Naija which way |
we need alert o not all this e-fight and showoff stunts make I continue to grow my demo account ![]() |
FxDuke:Boss! This zero sum or non zero sum argument had made me to research alittle about it and come to a conclusion that the phrase is been misconstrued to fit in/ buttress whatever view one may one to hold. According to Wikipedia, ...Many economic situations are not zero-sum, since valuable goods and services can be created, destroyed, or badly allocated in a number of ways, and any of these will create a net gain or loss of utility to numerous stakeholders. Specifically, all trade is by definition positive sum, because when two parties agree to an exchange each party must consider the goods it is receiving to be more valuable than the goods it is delivering. In fact, all economic exchanges must benefit both parties to the point that each party can overcome its transaction costs, or the transaction would simply not take place. There is some semantic confusion in addressing exchanges under coercion. If we assume that "Trade X", in which Adam trades Good A to Brian for Good B, does not benefit Adam sufficiently, Adam will ignore Trade X (and trade his Good A for something else in a different positive-sum transaction, or keep it). However, if Brian uses force to ensure that Adam will exchange Good A for Good B, then this says nothing about the original Trade X. Trade X was not, and still is not, positive-sum (in fact, this non-occurring transaction may be zero-sum, if Brian's net gain of utility coincidentally offsets Adam's net loss of utility). What has in fact happened is that a new trade has been proposed, "Trade Y", where Adam exchanges Good A for two things: Good B and escaping the punishment imposed by Brian for refusing the trade. Trade Y is positive-sum, because if Adam wanted to refuse the trade, he theoretically has that option (although it is likely now a much worse option), but he has determined that his position is better served in at least temporarily putting up with the coercion. Under coercion, the coerced party is still doing the best they can under their unfortunate circumstances, and any exchanges they make are positive-sum. There is additional confusion under asymmetric information. Although many economic theories assume perfect information, economic participants with imperfect or even no information can always avoid making trades that they feel are not in their best interest. Considering transaction costs, then, no zero-sum exchange would ever take place, although asymmetric information can reduce the number of positive-sum exchanges, as occurs in the market for lemon- Wikipedia Capitalist system/market system is all about exploitation so competition is not really a bad thing per se. This global market is structured in way that asymmetric nature will correct itself (whether due to Govt intervention or through other forces in play) to bring the market to equilibrium so the cycle continues Wetin I no sef my humble opinion |
Seun:Things like this will continue to happen be it on nairaland or elsewhere as long money is involved and the likes of ogbo raph is here |
godoluwa:Boss maybe the ink of the screen don finish dats y ![]() Boyz making imaginary profit since time memorial jst to scam |
Feshizzy:Simple, opening new acct wit ur desire moniker |
@OP having read thru I think I need to carryout a BG check on you, I knw u must b .... ![]() |
sweetmaris:Boss! boss!! it hasn't come to dat na, pls don't take it d wrong way we r all newbies |
sweetmaris: |
sweetmaris:You gave us the impression dat u r a newbie buh knowing Odiaero famous quote ehn ![]() |
emmytayor:As the name implies 'home no bet' meaning if home wins ur stake is return on the other hand if away wins I loss since am banking on draw represented by x |
Soccer / International Clubs / UEFA Europa League Playoffs 1 17.03.16 19:00 Valencia CF - Athletic Bilbao (Away no bet) X 2.00 Enjoy at own peril Red |
soccer / International Clubs / UEFA Europa League Playoffs 1 17.03.16 19:00 Bayer Leverkusen - Villarreal CF (Home no bet) X ?-? 1.80 2 17.03.16 19:00 Valencia CF - Athletic Bilbao (Under 1.5 goals in each half) No ?-? 1.55 Enjoy at own peril Green |
Timbuktu14:Boss! I understand that some ppl can be soo annoying but your threat sef they make me sef de shiver ![]() |
Ogboraph:Respect to you Boss, only a few men can do that |
Redslip:in line with the colour |
Soccer / England / Championship 1 06.02.16 04:00PM Fulham FC - Derby County (live) (Under/Over 2.5 goals) Over 2.5 1:1 2 06.02.16 04:00PM Leeds United - Nottingham Forest (live) (Under/Over 0.5 goals) Over 0.5 0:0 3 06.02.16 04:00PM Cardiff City - Milton Keynes Dons (live) (Under/Over 0.5 goals) Over 0.5 0:0 Enjoy at own peril |
Redslip:Confirmed Red |
Rangers FC - Kilmarnock FC Under/Over 0.5 goals Over 0.5 Enjoy at ur own peril |
Merrybet is no good bookie for me, walahi I go leave them after I lost 2day
|
Redslip:Green |
Melbourne Victory - Western Sydney Under/Over 1.5 goals Over 1.5 Enjoy at ur own peril |
Timbuktu14:Hope this Michael owen is not statue coz I noticed Alabi shot wit him now this? ![]() |
drmikeadams:Its like I go soon open my one bookie coz dats d only way person fit profit sef ![]() |
drmikeadams:Boss no be only you o Braga do me strong tin today. were r the thunder crew they should do the needful ![]() |
Panthrakikos - Panionios Under/Over 0.5 goals Over 0.5 stake at your own peril in line with colour. soo sad |
am monitoring this game for value Panthrakikos - Panionios merrybet unblock this game make I go for my over 0.5 now |




