₦airaland Forum

.
In Granada the use, and abuse, of wine and hashish along with prostitution and sodomy extended to all levels of society,” the historian of Moorish sexuality Dr Antonio Arjona Castro has written.

It is well documented that the Moors were of Black skin mainly with few exceptions. They were not the original Arabs who are brown skin and Moors are not to be confused with brown skin nobility of Europe who actually desired the invading Moors out of Spain and Portugal. The Moors were and still are the Islamists with a hidden faith which is Egyptian worship. Sexual deviance is quite common among the Moors even the ones who voyaged and set up civilization in the Americas.

The Great Reset.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npa8otJn0oQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmGlN4aJxv8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmGlN4aJxv8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmGlN4aJxv8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmGlN4aJxv8

The myth that same-sex relations were absent in precolonial Africa is one of the most enduring. Digging through history and drawing from African-derived examples, it becomes clear that traditional Africa was tolerant of different sexualities, orientations and gender relations. Thus, it is disservice to history to say that same-sex relations in Africa was introduced by Europeans.

In my review of Nwando Achebe’s Female Monarchs and Merchant Queens in Africa, I highlighted the African phenomenon of “gendered males” and “gendered females” which refers to the way that the interconnected universe allows males to transform themselves into females and females to transform themselves into males. As Achebe argued, “these transformations are encouraged by a milieu that recognizes that . . . sex and gender do not coincide; that gender is a social construct and is flexible and fluid, allowing . . . women to become gendered men, and . . . men, gendered women.”

So, to understand same-sex relations in traditional Africa, one must understand African cosmology. There is a close relationship between spirituality and sexuality in African cosmology as well as with the different types of spiritual power associated with each sex. This worldview not only gave rise to male and female gendered spiritual forces but also allowed for the practice of same-sex relations.

Several instances in oral histories, critical texts, folklore, and ethnographic reports confirm that traditional Africa recognized same-sex relations. Thousands of years ago, evidence from rock paintings show the prevalence of anal sex between San men in present-day Zimbabwe. In Tommy Boys, Lesbian Men, the authors identified several same sex practices in ancient and contemporary Africa while in Egypt, as far back as 2400 BCE, excavated bodies of two men, Niankhkhnum and Khnumhotep, showed them apparently cuddled to each other as lovers. Also, in some traditional African societies, certain magic rituals and rites of passage from boyhood to adulthood often involved same-sex activities.

Homosexuality was only wrong if you were a follower of Abrahamic traditions which go back to King Shem. Homosexuality is rooted in idol worship and seeing that Africa was all about idol worship, why would they have a law against it? There were no laws against Sodomy or rather Anal Sex in Africa only taboo in some places. Taboo is not law it is the shunning of a particular act because it can bring shame or pain. This can be seen in being on the receiving end of anal sex that some Africans shunned this aspect and not the penetrating aspect rightly so. Yet the whole act is condemned by God because anal sex allows entrance for demons into the body. Which this was the main objective of many magical rites to be possessed by conjured spirits.

Africans are decieving the world with a homophobic staged lie. And Black Americans who desire land in Africa because they hate White people so much think it's better for them in Africa. Alot of the difficulties Black Americans are going through are brought by the cursed order of Prince Hall Freemasonry. Every Primce Hall lodge is a temple to Lucifer. Men engaging in anal sex as apart of intiation and women prostituting themselves to gain entrance. Why blame White people for curses brought on by disobeying the laws of God?

PROPHET MUHAMMAD AND THE SKIN COLOR ETHIC

SAPELO SQUARE
6TH APRIL 2021


The reports that say the Prophet was “white” (bayd/abyad) can have the meaning of unblemished or bright, and not be a reference to skin color at all according to this. Moreover, in other contexts, colors are utilized in a strictly symbolic sense.

A few months ago I posted the following on Facebook: “If you think that an Arab man who lived over a thousand years ago in the middle of the desert had white skin, I invite you to reconsider that.”

I somewhat regret writing that post because the Prophet of Islam is not any Arab man, and even though I did not say that he was, no doubt there was a better way to pose the “challenge.” It is so important for us to shed our preconceived notions and drop some of our racial baggage when talking about anyone who lived in an era so different from our own – especially the person of the Prophet. That was, in large part, the point of that post and point for this article.

However, not all that racial baggage is useless, in fact, some of it may provide a useful lens without which we would be lost in the weeds. That’s because racism, or more particularly colorism, is nothing new in the umma. The society in which the Blessed Prophet was born into had its own kind of color caste that was not only restricted to color but also ethnicity, language, and wealth. Like most caste systems it prejudiced people in many ways, both socially and economically.

But none of this was an issue because it was the norm, it was custom, it was not on the lips of people in the public square, or in the gathering of Mecca’s chiefs. Rather, the Prophet recognized colorism and its evil partner classism as the poisons they were and so, radically, he addressed it and redressed the wrongs it had produced. So this is what I mean by saying that our baggage can also be our lens, because it helps us see – though less perfectly – the kinds of wrongs that the Prophet himself saw.

There is no moral value attached to the color of someone’s skin. The Prophet made this clear. There was, however, something to be said for the quality of someone’s complexion – whether it was bright or dull; there was also something to be said of the character of someone’s face – whether it was pleasant or surly. All of these attributes, bright, dull, pleasant, or surly can be applied to any skin color, from pale white to blue-black and all of them could possibly hint at an aspect of a person’s spirit manifesting on their face.

I won’t seek to answer the question: What was the Prophet’s skin color? For one, I don’t know. Second, this question is only interesting to me out of a sense of love for the Prophet and a need to visualize him and contemplate his countenance in order to feel more connected to him. Not for one second should any one of us think we are out of bounds for talking about this. If it didn’t matter, scholar after scholar would not have devoted book after book to detailing every attribute of the Prophet (physical and nonphysical) that they could acquire. They would not have written about it if it was not important, and sure enough when we describe the Prophet to our children, or our students, or neighbors we often lean on the description of his physical self that we’ve learned about to carry the meaning of the message. For most of us, it is a matter of devotion and love that we care to contemplate the face of the Prophet and make him more real in our lives.

SO WHAT WAS THE PROPHET’S SKIN COLOR?
Rather than answering this question, I’d like to lift up the varied reports found in books of hadith that describe the Prophet’s skin color in seemingly contradictory ways. Moreover, I want to talk about the challenges that might arise from describing the Prophet in our modern American context, a context in which his describers were not writing. I also want to highlight that this is not the only complication because the contexts in which these reports were written also suffered from a past that may have been equally troubled by racism and colorism. It’s probably more realistic to say that just as racism still exists in America after the abolishment of our most racist institution – slavery – it likely still existed in these pre-modern contexts as well.

I have often read and heard scholars, teachers, and ordinary believers describe the Prophet’s complexion as white or light-skinned. Today, to refer to the Prophet as white connotes all kinds of images and concepts that the Prophet is unencumbered by and free from. Calling him white does not take into account that whiteness, in an American context at least, takes on a very particular meaning, associated almost exclusively with white people of European ancestry with particular historical markers vis a vis others in American society. People will draw on their experience of whiteness in their own context and as they’ve come to understand it to determine what that may have looked like on the Prophet and how he may have carried himself among others.

Conducting some research I came across a fascinating article on this very topic called “The De-Arabization of Islam and the Transfiguration of Muhammad in Islamic Tradition” by Wesley Muhammad. Although I do not support his definitive conclusion that Prophet Muhammad was a dark-skinned Arab because I do not feel comfortable making such a final designation, Muhammad does provide some evidence for his conclusion. For the purposes of translation, many of the hadith quoted here will be taken from Muhammad’s own translation, which at a cursory glance seem correct, and are in fact found in the collections of hadith that he attributes them to. However, I make no comment as to the strength of the various hadith.

First, we should state the obvious, Prophet Muhammad’s complexion is characterized as “white” or “abyad” in some hadith. The Shamail of Tirmidhi has the following report:

“The Messenger of God had a white complexion, which was slightly reddish, and had a medium-sized body.”

In the Sunan of Tirmidhi he reports a hadith from Anas b. Malik that puts the Prophet’s complexion as a mean:

“The Messenger of Allah (s) was neither tall, such that he would stand out, nor was he short. He was not albino-white (al-abyad al-amhaq), nor was he deep black (adam). His hair was neither very curly nor completely straight. Allah commissioned him towards the end of his fortieth year. He remained in Mecca for ten years and in Medina for ten years. Allah caused him to pass away at the turn of his sixtieth year and there was not found on his head and beard [as much as] twenty white hairs.”





Wesley Muhammad complicates what might be the literal understanding of white-skinned by lifting up an entry by Lisan al-Arab, the well-known Arabic dictionary by Ibn Manzur:

The Arabs don’t say a man is white [or: ‘white man,’ rajul abya∙] due to a white complexion. Rather, whiteness [al-abyad] with them means an external appearance that is free from blemish [al-zahir al-naqi min al-uyub]; when they mean a white complexion they say ‘red’ (ahmar)… when the Arabs say, ‘so-and-so is white (abyad –[al-zahir al-naqi min al-uyub]; when they mean a white complexion they say ‘red’ (ahmar)… when the Arabs say, ‘so-and-so is white (abyad – bayda), they [only] mean a noble character (al-karam fi l-akhlaq), not skin color. It is when they say ‘so-and-so is red’ (ahmar- hamra) that they mean white skin. And the Arabs attribute white skin to the slaves.

Prophet Muhammad was the cousin of Jesus as Arabs are the cousins of Israel sons of Yakov as such our ancestors had brown skin. Shem is brown even according to the Egyptian who kept accurate descriptions ancient races in colored pictures. The Nation of Islam teaches that Muhammad is White and Jesus was White also that Yakub was an evil scientist who made the White Devil. Sounds like the work of evil Moors who are obviously black skin. The Nation of Islam were former followers of Noble Drew Ali Moorish Science Temple of America and they are all Freemasons. The Klu Klux Klan are also Freemasons and we will cover this later and how Freemasons are behind the black and white Dichotomy. Yes Elijah Muhammad founder of the Nation of Islam was a Freemason.

There are multiple reports (hadith) that describe the Prophet’s skin color as brown (asmar) like the following from the Jami of Tirmidhi:

Old paintings depicting Prophet Muhammad as brown skin.


Observe the lineage chart below Prophet Muhammad is related to Jesus both are grand sons of Abraham.

When the Knights Templar arrived in the Americas these Indigenous Peoples were various nations, some were clearly of Indian and Hamite origin and others were Moabite and Hamite origin.

When God created us, he did not intend for us to die; he made us like himself. 24It was the Devil's jealousy that brought death into the world, and those who belong to the Devil are the ones who will die.

Every human being was created to be immortal that is viewing themselves as a reflection of God. Wherever you hate yourself you invite the Devil who will use you to cause death into the world. And if you fall into this envious snare you will lose the reflection of God. This is the death of the soul that intangible essence which is immortal.




The Moors and the Jesuits are both hidden orders of Freemasonry Egyptian worship. Freemasonry is the order of Lucifer and Elijah Muhammad also kept its secrets having been initiated before he founded the Nation of Islam. Many Christian pastors are also Freemasons and are apart of the kingdom of darkness. I spare none, even I have relatives who sided with Satan.

No Arab would consider Noble Drew Ali and Elijah Muhammad as prophets of Allah. And as far as what Elijah Muhammad said about not desiring Muslims here in America becoming corrupt like the East well if they are Freemasons then they are the same corruption. Freemasonry is the Devil's order born in North Africa.


Key note: Elijah Muhammad's son Warith Deen Muhammad did create a pure branch of Islam as did a few ministers of the old Nation of Islam who he guided.

Written by Ann Brown

May 17, 2021

SUBSCRIBE
47
SHARES
The Nation of Islam (NOI) was founded in the 1930s by Wallace Fard Muhammad and many of its roots were influenced by the teachings of Noble Drew Ali.

Ali founded the Moorish Science Temple of America in 1913, based at his Canaanite Temple in Newark, New Jersey. Ali later relocated to Chicago. He had a following of thousands of converts.

When looking at Moorish Science Temple of America and the Nation of Islam (NOI) side by side, one can see the similarities. In fact, the leaders of the NOI often praise and give credit to Ali. Despite this, there have been tensions between the two groups throughout the years.


There are several similarities of the two movements, from the Fez hat worn by both Ali and NOI leader Elijah Muhammad (who took over the group after Wallace Fard Muhammad’s disappearance in 1934) to both groups naming their meeting places “temples.”


Ali had the male members of his Temple wear a Fez or turban as a head covering; the women wore turbans.


Elijah Muhammad spoke about the Fez hat worn by the Moorish Americans and Noble Drew Ali. “The hat was red. They wore black ones and red ones,” said Muhammad, who himself was wearing a red Fez hat. According to Muhammad, the Fez has been worn by the NOI since the days of the organization’s founder Wallace Fard Muhammad.





“The Fez that the Shriners wear is the Fez of the Moors. And the tassel on it was tied down. It [the tassel] didn’t swing 360 degrees,” explained Farrakhan.

The meaning of the tassel “means the same thing it means when you are graduating from school. That means knowledge,” Muhammad pointed out.

The Fez hat worn by Ali and his followers was a solid color and was not designed with the moon and star that the NOI members wore, according to Elijah Muhammad.


During a speech at the People’s Church Los Angeles in 1960, Muhammad said, “Brother Noble Drew Ali, as Master Fard Muhammad said, was a [devotee] of Islam; he didn’t have enough knowledge in Islam to keep going with it because of the name that he named his organization, which at the time we called it Moorish Americans.”

The use of the term “Asiatics” is common in both groups.

Following the Russo-Japanese war, which occurred in 1905, many Black Americans took pride in Japan’s victory because it symbolized more than a military achievement. W.E.B Dubois saw the outcome as a win for all oppressed people around the world. Activist and religious leader Reverend J.M. Boddy viewed Russia’s defeat as an achievement of the Black race. He declared that the Japanese race “must be akin to the Negro race” and because of their “large infusion of Negro blood in their veins.” Black nationalist groups adopted Reverend Boddy’s view of Afro-Asian relations and “merged the Black and Asiatic identities to serve their agenda,” “Navigating the Pacific: 20th Century Afro-Asian Relations“ blog published by Emory University reported.

When Ali founded the Moorish Science Temple of America one of the major tenets of the movement’s theology was that Black Americans were Moorish Americans and descendants of the Moabites.


Moabites are a West-Semitic people who lived in the highlands east of the Dead Sea (now in west-central Jordan). They flourished in the 9th-century BC, according to Britannica.


“The conception of the Asiatic Black man invalidated claims of inherent racial inferiority, distanced African Americans from the stigmatization of their race and proposed an alternative ancestry marked with prominence,” Emory University reported.

It has been reported that Ali traveled to Egypt where he met a high priest of Egyptian magic. The priest, it is said, trained Ali in mysticism and gave him a “lost section” of the Quran. Ali developed this “lost section” into what is now known as the Holy Koran of the Moorish Science Temple of America (not to be confused with the Islamic Quran).

Ali used this material to claim Jesus and his followers were Asiatic. Ali used the term “Asiatic” to describe all dark or olive-colored people.

But like the common use of the Fez, temples, the Nation also teaches that the first humans were the “original” or “Asiatic” race, whom it describes as members of the Tribe of Shabazz.

“Prophet Noble Drew Ali was the first one to enlighten our people,” Baltimore community leader Taharka Bey said during a 2020 interview on DoggieDiamondsTV. “The Moors come for the Northwest and South western shores of Africa and [they] migrated into the Americans before the Europeans even thought about coming out of the cave…we are all of Moorish bloodline.”

Bey, who is not part of the NOI, hosts the YouTube show “Moorish Science Temple of America.” Bey spoke of the off-and-on conflict between the Moorish Americans and the Nation of Islam over whether there was a connection between Ali and the start of the NOI.

Although there had been disputes between the NOI and Black American Moors, Farrakhan said the two groups were once close.

“The first time Elijah Muhammad came to New York after I had accepted Islam, it was Oct. 1955. Elijah Muhammad spoke on two men who were the forerunners to him, Noble Drew Ali was number one and Marcus Garvey was number two,” recalled Minister Farrakhan during an interview on Dec 19, 2016.

He continued, “On that day he lifted Noble Drew Ali and said that we should honor him respect him and study what he did as a forerunner…and we never clashed with our brothers from the Moorish Science Temple.”



Listen to GHOGH with Jamarlin Martin | Episode 74: Jamarlin Martin Jamarlin returns for a new season of the GHOGH podcast to discuss Bitcoin, bubbles, and Biden. He talks about the risk factors for Bitcoin as an investment asset including origin risk, speculative market structure, regulatory, and environment. Are broader financial markets in a massive speculative bubble?

Even today, the Nation of Islam’s current leader Minister Louis Farrakhan often honors Noble Drew Ali and his teachings for his inspiring the NOI.

“[We] respect and honor Noble Drew Ali and Marcus Garvey as the forerunners to what we are doing right now,” said Farrakhan. “Marcus Garvey and Noble Drew Ali blazed a trail and were forerunners to Islam and to all the Moors.”

During a 2014 Nation of Islam Saviour’s Day event Farrakhan praised Ali. “Now let’s look at Noble Drew Ali…He’s the first man to bring Islam to us in the way he tried to bring it,” he said. “I thank him. I thank Allah for him.”

The Nation of Islam evolved out of the Moorish Science Temple. They are both Freemason Illuminati groups which Prophet Muhammad said those taking oaths in secret cults were not of him.

Ali traveled to Egypt where he met a high priest of Egyptian magic. The priest taught Ali. Elijah Muhammad uses similar story that Master Fard Muhammad a god on earth taught him mystical knowledge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgzWbbqcRaE

Why There are No White People in the Bible
Dan Bouchelle

Did you know there are no white people in the Bible? Does that surprise you? It’s true, I assure you. Not Adam, Abraham, Moses, Deborah, David, Elijah, Jezebel, Daniel, Jesus, Peter, Paul, or even Lydia or the church in Rome were white. Most of the people in the Bible were Jews of middle eastern origin. The few people in the Bible from the region we now call Europe may have had light-colored skin and would be considered white today, but they were not white in their day.

How can I say this? Because the concept of whiteness didn’t exist yet. Since the beginning of recorded history, humans have always thought in terms of tribes or nations (as in the Cherokee nation or Navajo nation, not a modern nation-state), but the idea of race is a fairly new concept. The Greek word for nation is “ethnos” (from which we get the word “ethnic”) and referred to any group of people with a common language, culture, story, and territory. Some nations were related to others with common historical roots and cultural overlaps. Some nations were greatly different from each other and far removed in every way.

Nations or tribes were categorized in various ways in the ancient world, as reflected in the Bible, but skin color was not one of them. It’s not that the Bible never notes that some nations had darker skin than others, but that is an exceedingly rare thing for the writers of scripture to mention. It just wasn’t considered a relevant factor for identifying people groups.

Skin color in antiquity was more like hair color is for us today. We see it and occasionally mention it. We can even build a few stereotypes and jokes around it. But no one really considers blonde, red, brown, grey, or black hair to be a marker of value, superiority, personality traits, or humanity. It’s just one of those things that can vary among humans like height, body type, or eye color. Humans come in endless varieties, but we are all humans. As N.T. Wright once quipped on a podcast, “In the Middle Ages, no one in Europe would have called anyone ‘white’ unless they had seen a ghost or were dead.”

However, starting in the 15th century, for the first time in human history, skin color began to take on a new significance. Europeans began placing people of different nations on a continuum of skin color, with baseless generalizations being made about people on either end. This way of thinking grew in prominence until the formulation of legal justifications for race-based chattel slavery in the 17th century.

Creating the language of “black” or “white” people was driven by economics and empire. It was an effort to justify the enslavement of people from Africa or the Americas by Europeans as they expanded their global empires and needed cheap labor. What developed was a diabolical but baseless theory of race that classified all nations on some color scale of “red, yellow, black, and white,” which was combined with a developmental scale that put white people at the top, black people at the bottom, and red and yellow people somewhere in between.

All this was just a form of tribalism or nationalism on steroids. All these ways of thinking are mere extensions of self-interest in communal forms that are profoundly anti-gospel. The gospel tells us that all people are children of God equally loved and valued by their creator, who will unite us all in Christ to form one people who demonstrate the diverse beauty of God’s creativity (see Rev. 21:22-22:5).

While slavery had been around from the beginning of recorded time, it was not previously based on skin color. Slaves were people conquered in war or people who had fallen on hard economic times. Slavery was typically not a lifelong or hereditary status. It was an ugly reality, but not as evil as it became when it got tied to the myth of race. The idea that people of certain skin colors were superior or could legitimately own and control people of other colors was unknown in the days of the Bible.

All this means that “whiteness” is artificial—a false story humans have created. It is important to know there is no genetic or biological reality that supports the idea that people with certain skin tones constitute a distinct group with common characteristics. People of all races are 99% genetically identical. Exactly who has been considered white has changed over time. Early in U.S. history, neither Jewish, Irish, nor Italian people were considered to be white, but now they typically are. There was a time when the KKK opposed viewing Christopher Columbus as a hero because he was Italian, they did not consider Italians to be white, and they wanted to keep them out of the USA. Who gets counted as white has been amazingly arbitrary.

Now, in saying that whiteness is not a biological reality, I am not seeking to diminish the impact race has on our world. Race is a powerful myth that has impacted billions of lives for half a millennium. Most of us with light-colored skin and European ancestry have been deeply indoctrinated in the mythology of whiteness (often under other names), and we carry unconscious convictions of white primacy, which we are skilled at hiding from ourselves. We may not tie it to skin color or genetics, but we typically assume that “white culture” (which we can’t define) is better, more evolved, or more refined. We assume that other cultures can be improved by being more like “white” culture, regardless of skin color. We believe this because we have been taught it directly or indirectly. You don’t have to be part of some fringe “White Supremacy” group to be infected with white superiority assumptions.

Why does this matter?

Because the amount of evil done in the name of race is staggering and beyond calculation. It must end.

Because there is a false idea, still prominent in many parts of the world, that Christianity is a white or western religion.This makes it difficult for many people to embrace Christ because they have been hurt by “white” people who claim to follow Christ.

Too often, Christians from the western world have bought into false racial ideas that have directly or indirectly supported white primacy. This undercuts the faithfulness, justice, credibility, and impact of the gospel. Lurking behind the struggle American missionaries sometimes have with trusting national leaders in other countries is the unspoken and unrecognized factor of race.

The implications of the myth of race are massive and complex, and the challenges of undoing the injustices in our world fostered by these arbitrary categories are immense. Yet, the one thing we should be able to agree about as followers of Jesus is that skin color is no basis upon which to judge or rank people. Jesus wasn’t white. Seventy percent of Christians globally are not white. And all people matter equally to our creator.

While we should not try to be color blind, which doesn’t acknowledge the realities of people whose life experience is different than ours, we should reject color bias. We should be relentlessly committed to the equality of all people. The cross should be the end of all claims to the superiority of any people groups.

Our hope is not in any race, culture, nation, or other human source. Our hope is in the God who made us all from the same original couple and who is drawing all people from all tribes and nations, regardless of color or culture, toward the same home in the New Jerusalem.

Various opinions on the subject of skin color which is I have said it's a wile of Satan.

The Nzima of Ghana had a tradition of adult men marrying each other, usually with an age difference of about 10 years. Similar to the pederasty of ancient Greece, Sudan's Zande tribe had a tradition of warriors marrying boys and paying a bride price, as they would for girl brides, to their parents. When the boy grew up, he too became a warrior and took a boy-wife.

Homosexuals are the richest people in Ghana!

So they are sending agents to Africa to become Youtube reporters with widely viewed channels mostly by their cults. Black Americans cults push LGBT and Africa pushes their traditional LGBT. All paganism is unlawful to God.

https://www.nairaland.com/7609169/brown-skin-anti-christ


Does brown skin really make anyone happy?

Oh, and self hatred of black skin is in America as well just look at him below!

Indians started off brown skin, fair skin and mixing with Ham made lot of them jet black and dark brown, this new bloodline took over India creating the caste system. Also a lot of Canaanites and Hittites which are descendants of Ham fled into Sindhu Valley after the fall of Babylon. Indians have hatred for their own dark skin color its in their blood due the mistreatment Cushites under King Nimrod afflicted on the original Yavadas or Yahounde.

Did God favor Shem?

Coveting brown skin and this includes Whites as well.

Coveting of brown skin even among Whites although tanning causes skin cancer just like bleeching!

Envy is often rooted in low self-esteem – sometimes from very early unmet childhood needs where the person feels inherently not good enough. An envious person may frequently ‘compare and despair’ and find themselves wanting. And so they seek to bring down the object or person who they perceive is making them feel that way. It’s almost as though the other person is responsible for the envious person’s happiness – because their self-image is dependent on things outside of themselves. They feel deficient in themselves and have a constant hunger to fill that deficiency.

By denigrating the thing that makes them feel ‘less than’, the envious person can make the other feel bad, so they can ultimately begin to feel ‘more than’. It’s a shaky way of building self-esteem, but it’s as though the envious person needs to absorb some of the other’s energy in order to feel whole and functioning. Except the ‘feel good’ effect never lasts, and they may need to up the ante to continue to feel better about themselves. Envious people can be competitive. More than that, they can seem to take pleasure in another’s misfortune. We see this kind of envious attack carried out on social media daily, where celebrities’ looks and behaviours are criticised – and the tiniest slip is magnified and vilified.

Envy is often rooted in low self-esteem – sometimes from very early unmet childhood needs where the person feels inherently not good enough. An envious person may frequently ‘compare and despair’ and find themselves wanting. And so they seek to bring down the object or person who they perceive is making them feel that way. It’s almost as though the other person is responsible for the envious person’s happiness – because their self-image is dependent on things outside of themselves. They feel deficient in themselves and have a constant hunger to fill that deficiency.

By denigrating the thing that makes them feel ‘less than’, the envious person can make the other feel bad, so they can ultimately begin to feel ‘more than’. It’s a shaky way of building self-esteem, but it’s as though the envious person needs to absorb some of the other’s energy in order to feel whole and functioning. Except the ‘feel good’ effect never lasts, and they may need to up the ante to continue to feel better about themselves. Envious people can be competitive. More than that, they can seem to take pleasure in another’s misfortune. We see this kind of envious attack carried out on social media daily, where celebrities’ looks and behaviours are criticised – and the tiniest slip is magnified and vilified.

All of this is painful yet every day they envy brown skin. Extremely gorgeous women and men can be affected by low esteem due to having dark or black skin.

Spiritual War!

Passage
Resources
Hebrew/Greek

2 Kings 3
Good News Translation
War between Israel and Moab
3 In the eighteenth year of the reign of King Jehoshaphat of Judah, Joram son of Ahab became king of Israel, and he ruled in Samaria for twelve years. 2 He sinned against the Lord, but he was not as bad as his father or his mother Jezebel; he pulled down the image his father had made for the worship of Baal. 3 Yet, like King Jeroboam son of Nebat before him, he led Israel into sin and would not stop.

4 King Mesha of Moab raised sheep, and every year he gave as tribute to the king of Israel 100,000 lambs and the wool from 100,000 sheep. 5 But when King Ahab of Israel died, Mesha rebelled against Israel. 6 At once King Joram left Samaria and gathered all his troops. 7 He sent word to King Jehoshaphat of Judah: “The king of Moab has rebelled against me; will you join me in war against him?”

“I will,” King Jehoshaphat replied. “I am at your disposal, and so are my men and my horses. 8 What route shall we take for the attack?”

“We will go the long way through the wilderness of Edom,” Joram answered.

9 So King Joram and the kings of Judah and Edom set out. After marching seven days, they ran out of water, and there was none left for the men or the pack animals. 10 “We're done for!” King Joram exclaimed. “The Lord has put the three of us at the mercy of the king of Moab!”

11 King Jehoshaphat asked, “Is there a prophet here through whom we can consult the Lord?”

An officer of King Joram's forces answered, “Elisha son of Shaphat is here. He was Elijah's assistant.”

12 “He is a true prophet,” King Jehoshaphat said. So the three kings went to Elisha.

13 “Why should I help you?” Elisha said to the king of Israel. “Go and consult those prophets that your father and mother consulted.”

“No!” Joram replied. “It is the Lord who has put us three kings at the mercy of the king of Moab.”

14 Elisha answered, “By the living Lord, whom I serve, I swear that I would have nothing to do with you if I didn't respect your ally, King Jehoshaphat of Judah. 15 Now get me a musician.”

As the musician played his harp, the power of the Lord came on Elisha, 16 and he said, “This is what the Lord says: ‘Dig ditches all over this dry stream bed. 17 Even though you will not see any rain or wind, this stream bed will be filled with water, and you, your livestock, and your pack animals will have plenty to drink.’” 18 And Elisha continued, “But this is an easy thing for the Lord to do; he will also give you victory over the Moabites. 19 You will conquer all their beautiful fortified cities; you will cut down all their fruit trees, stop all their springs, and ruin all their fertile fields by covering them with stones.”

20 The next morning, at the time of the regular morning sacrifice, water came flowing from the direction of Edom and covered the ground.

21 When the Moabites heard that the three kings had come to attack them, all the men who could bear arms, from the oldest to the youngest, were called out and stationed at the border. 22 When they got up the following morning, the sun was shining on the water, making it look as red as blood. 23 “It's blood!” they exclaimed. “The three enemy armies must have fought and killed each other! Let's go and loot their camp!”

24 But when they reached the camp, the Israelites attacked them and drove them back. The Israelites kept up the pursuit,[a] slaughtering the Moabites 25 and destroying their cities. As they passed by a fertile field, every Israelite would throw a stone on it until finally all the fields were covered; they also stopped up the springs and cut down the fruit trees. At last only the capital city of Kir Heres[b] was left, and the slingers surrounded it and attacked it.

26 When the king of Moab realized that he was losing the battle, he took seven hundred swordsmen with him and tried to force his way through the enemy lines and escape to the king of Syria,[c] but he failed. 27 So he took his oldest son, who was to succeed him as king, and offered him on the city wall as a sacrifice to the god of Moab. The Israelites were terrified[d] and so they drew back from the city and returned to their own country.

The Moabites have always been enemies of God despite their forced conversion by Arabs they are Semitic and not Hebrews. By mixing with tribes of Ham these Semitic Moabites became dark brown and sometimes jet black. The Moabites are matriochical and make up a good number of Black Americans whom identify with this lineage. They are apart of the North African Illuminati rather syncretized with Islam and pagan Egyptian rites.

All the Back To Africa were put together by the Luciferian Prince Hall Freemasonry and their Divine Nine cults that practice paganism. Not all of Americans are descendants of Africa for some of us ancestors were European so Prince Hall lied to us. Propaganda and deceit are tools of devils!

Even Dr. W.E.B Dubois who traced his slave great grandmother to West Africa was a member of Prince Hall and Divine Nine. These Greek loving Americans live as bisexuals just as Ghanian traditionalists so its a perfect fit for them.

At Cape Coast Castle on the shores of the Ghanaian city, a sordid history belies its beauty. The castle overlooking the Atlantic Ocean, a former slave-trade outpost, is home to the so-called "Door of No Return," through which millions of Africans were forced onto slave ships bound for the United States.

Ghana puts on a big show about how sorry they are for having enslaved Israelites in their empire and selling them away to White Jews. Something in me knew that Ghanians were insincere and I was always inclined to accept Nigerians apology because it came with no show.


Land is precious in any country because its usually has been fought over and contested by many groups and therefore is sacred. To give land away the way Ghana does with no strings attached seems odd. The very reason Ghana sold away their Israelite slaves was because they did not want to share the land with the people whose culture and religion differed from their own. This is evident by the Door of No Return and despite what Ghana says they did not ever want those people back because they were different. Ghana is a pagan society so they have always been Gay, despite their traditional Gay is not the same expression as the West, nevertheless Ghana has its Gay practices embedded in its traditions. I believe in religious freedom but I don't tolerate deceit. Wherever there is witchcraft there is ritual sex to conjure the gods. Those who are unaware of this metaphysical principal that Homosexuality is the Gateway to the spirit world will never see through Ghana. I say to Ghana keep your traditions and your land and may God bless you.

The Brown Skin Anti Christ.


Moors ranged any where between dark brown and jet black. They were generally very tall and ferocious warriors. Moors are of the Brown skin nobility that ruled Europe yet rather tried to invade and conquer it.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiLwMWduDw0

There are pedophile rings throughout the Western world mainly because Sodomy was unlawful under Christian law. Yet in Africa, India, Mayan, Ika, Polynesian and in the Islamic world they all had pedophile traditions!

There are pedophile rings throughout the Western world mainly because Sodomy was unlawful under Christian law. Yet in Africa, India, Mayan, Ika, Polynesian and in the Islamic world they all had pedophile traditions!

There are pedophile rings throughout the Western world mainly because Sodomy was unlawful under Christian law. Yet in Africa, India, Mayan, Ika, Polynesian and in the Islamic world they all had pedophile traditions!