Stillwaiting's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Stillwaiting's Profile › Stillwaiting's Posts
1 2 (of 2 pages)
antiaqueen:yes of course, a lot of people have reapplied using priority service after they were refused. Wishing you the best of luck |
tayeby78:Long time my people in the home You had better gone for reapplication/fresh application and reapplied as well. You could also wait if the ECM will overturn their initial decision and issue visa (may be 5-6 months), if positive, if not you have to wait for long time, minimum of 18 months before all issues are resolved- almost 2 years |
Fynebouy:Yes, exactly as Lexusgs said. I told him exactly what I do in Nigeria and he said you could continue with that here, which I answered in positive. Just be factual. |
EvaMD:Questions such as: when did you see your wife last? Who was your sponsor? What is the immigration status of your sponsor? What work are you doing in your country? When was the first time your wife came to this country? He then advised that I should go and collect my BRP immediately! very few minutes, not up to 10 minutes. The TB test I did and included in my application because the original was with my wife. This is the best forum I have ever come across, people here are always gratuitously ready to help people with immigration and visa problem on gratis that some of the so-called immigration lawyers will charge thousand of pounds as fees. We only need to be truthful with our case. My first application, the lawyer collected N500.000 and I was refused, and he said he would charge me separately for the appeal, and with God, then through guidance and encouragement here, I did 2nd application and I was successful and he was not happy when I informed him. In the process, another lawyer took another N100.000=N200.000 from me on the tourist visa to Ireland which he knew I would be refused and he refused blatantly to listen to my suggestions. I DOVE MY HAT FOR ALL YOU GOOD PEOPLE HERE. I GIVE YOU GUYS KUDOS AND PAT ON THE BACK. God will continue to help you. Too numerous to mention, justwise, Lexusgs, and others continue your good work for the sake of humanity |
Many thanks to Almighty God. I arrived the UK safely at the weekend in the waiting hands of my family. I collected my BRP at the designated post office. very few questions were asked by the immigration officer at the airport, no question was asked abouit the TB test. Thanks a lot my people in the house. |
[quote author=midmenconsult post=53946471][/quote]ENCOURAGES SOMEONE OR DISCOURAGES IN FACT, IT POURS COLD WATER ON SOMEONE'S PLAN AND EVEN PUTS A SPANNER OR MONKEY WRENCH IN IT!!!Supreme court justices have unanimously backed Theresa May’s “particularly harsh” £18,600 minimum income rule for British citizens to bring non-European spouses into Britain that campaigners say has led to tens of thousands of families being separated. But the supreme court ruling does acknowledge that the rule has caused hardship for thousands, and criticises the lack of focus on the treatment of children and the ability of Home Office staff to consider alternative assets when they assess the earning ability of the British spouse. Lord Carnwath said he and his fellow judges had held “that the minimum income threshold is accepted in principle” but he added that the Home Office’s rules and instructions failed to take full account of their legal duties in respect to the children involved or to allow alternative sources of funding to be considered. The justices ruled that current Home Office rules and guidance are defective and unlawful until they are amended to give more weight to the interests of the children involved. This could give limited hope to some of the separated families with children but the four families who brought the appeal will not find out whether they can live together in Britain until their cases are reconsidered. The £18,600 minimum income threshold for British citizens to bring non-European Economic Area spouses to live with them in the UK was introduced by May when she was home secretary in 2012 as part of her drive to reduce net migration below 100,000 and the ruling will come as a major relief to the Home Office. It was estimated in 2015 that the £18,600 threshold excludes 41% of the British working population, including 55% of women, from bringing a foreign spouse to live in Britain. The threshold rises to £22,400 if there is one or more non-European-born child in the family. The income of the non-European partner does not count towards the threshold. The ruling testing the legality of the family visa rules covered several linked cases. Two of them, Abdul Majid and Shabana Javed, involve British nationals married to Pakistanis; a third, known as MM, is a Lebanese refugee. A nephew of MM, known as AF, is also an appellant, as well as SS, a refugee from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The ruling is a blow to campaigners who say the rule has meant British families have faced a choice of separation or living in exile. They have highlighted the plight of up to 15,000 British children who have grown up as “Skype kids” to keep in contact with one of their parents since the rule was introduced. The supreme court justices acknowledge in their judgment that the £18,600 rule “causes hardship to many thousands of couples, including some who are in no way to blame for the situation in which they find themselves” but add that “does not mean that it is incompatible” with article 8 of the European convention on human rights on the right to family life. The supreme court also agreed that the income rule has “a particularly harsh effect” on British citizens who have lived and worked abroad, have married or formed stable relationships there and now cannot return home to Britain. It is also particularly harsh for couples who got together before 2012. “Of particular concern is the impact upon the children of these couples, many or even most of whom will be British citizens themselves,” they add. The justices also acknowledge that the rule “does present a serious obstacle to their enjoying family life together” and may provide a permanent obstacle to many couples because those earning less than £18,600 are unlikely to amass sufficient savings to make good the shortfall. Women and especially those from minority ethnic groups will be particularly hit because of the gender pay gap. But they have ruled that the £18,600 threshold is a legitimate part “of an overall strategy aimed at reducing net migration. Its particular aims are no doubt entirely legitimate to ensure, as far as practicable, that the couple do not have recourse to welfare benefits and have sufficient resources to be able to play a full part of British life.” They say that, given that is a legitimate aim, it was not possible to say that “a less intrusive measure” should have been adopted. Immigration welfare campaigners took comfort in the supreme court’s findings that the rule was causing hardship to thousands of families and that the interests of children needed to be reconsidered. Saira Grant, the chief executive of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, said: “This judgment is a real victory for families, especially those with children. For five years JCWI has been working with affected families and has been trying to persuade the government to abandon the family migration rules it introduced in 2012 because they are tearing families apart and significantly harming children. “The supreme court has now declared this to be the case. These rules are unlawful as they do not safeguard the best interests of children. The strict requirement that only the sponsor’s personal finances can allow the £18,600 threshold to be met has also been discredited.” She added: “The supreme court has said that alternative funding sources should be taken into account when a person’s right to family life could be breached. These are significant victories for families up and down the country. This judgment confirms that the government’s position is now untenable and they must now take immediate steps to protect the welfare of children in accordance with their legal duty.” A Home Office spokesperson said the court had endorsed its approach in setting an income threshold for family migration that prevents a burden on the taxpayer and ensures migrant families can integrate into our communities. “This is central to building an immigration system that works in the national interest,” they said. “The current rules remain in force but we are carefully considering what the court has said in relation to exceptional cases where the income threshold has not been met, particularly where the case involves a child,” they added. SOURCE: The Guardian |
Alexlady: Thank you very much for your response. We are appealing. I have read through the immigration ruled. Yes we acknowledge that overstaying is an immigration breach but overstaying in itself is not a reason to refuse. There also has to be aggravating circumstances. Unfortunately the ECO has failed to state what those aggravating circumstances are. All 4 points are about overstaying although we dispute the last point of redocumentation process. Yes we acknowledge he did not leave but eventually did voluntarily and not on public expense. I have had to do a lot of research myself since I don't have any help at the moment. The ECO was harsh to refuse on 320 11 with no evidence of balancing exercise nor consideration of his wife. If you are appealing, think SERIOUSLY about the over- psychological trauma of endless and long-term appeals. Once beaten, twice shy! Here is the recent estimate timeline for appeals 18 months from the day of submission of appeals, before appeals could be heard 2 weeks for the Judge to post the decision to the appellant 4 weeks for visa section to receive decision 8 weeks for visa section to process decision 18+14=32 months (2years and 8 months). all things being equal @ Alexlady, preparing for hearing appeals is likened to preparing a fresh application, except for the various fees. You put in excess evidence, they will sort it out and ensure that you label it properly. Put everything there; if no information after appeals has been won, one can email:Team@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk |
EvaMD:please what's the best strategy to take in making sure we cover all angles because I don taya for this long distance marriage ( this thing is not easy ooooo.. emotionally and all other ally you can think of. As Lexusgs has said just be sincere and honest, explain your circumstances. Tell them how the distance relationship is causing you harrowing tale of psychological trauma. Convince them of evidence of the subsisting relationship. Your husband coming home should be evidenced with proof of contacts as many as possible. Social media; what's app, Facebook, skype, call logs, emails, pictures, evidence of gifts and cards etc. Explain with proof and remorsefulness the Kenya fake visa saga. Wishing you the best of luck. |
Alexlady:I have taken my time to peruse your refusal notice and I found the history regarding your case a bit curious. I make the following submission in case sensitive. 1. Visa expired 30 Nov,2011 and you made an initial application for a Tier 4 General Visa the same month 21, Nov,11--THIS WAS TOO CLOSE, YOU OUGHT TO HAVE APPLIED AT LEAST A MONTH TO VISA EXPIRY 2. which was refused on 24 April 2012 because again he did not satisfy the requirements and 'was asked to leave the Country. He did not leave and overstayed for 4 years and returned to Nigeria on 25 December 2016 and we got married on 28/12/16'....I THINK HE OUGHT TO HAVE LEFT THE COUNTRY AND DO THE NEEDFUL. ONE OF THE SERIOUS IMMIGRATION BREACHES IS OVERSTAYYING. ONCE THEY HAVE ONE'S PASSPORT, THE FIRST THING THEY LOOK OUT FOR IS IF THE APPLICANT HAS OVERSTAYED 3. Although on the application form we listed the two refusals, we didn’t provide any further details or an explanation for overstaying. We assumed this would be established through an interview.. IT IS LIKE YOU TOOK THE ECO FOR GRANTED, YOU OUGHT TO HAVE GIVEN DETAILED EXPLANATION AS REGARDS YOUR CASE, ECO ARE HUMAN BEINGS LIKE US, THEY APPRECIATE PEOPLE EXPLAINING AND JUSTIFYING THEIR CASE. OF RECENT, THEY HARDLY INTERVIEW SPOUSE APPLICANT. 4. On 10 February we decided to write to the ECO to explain his immigration history, his overstaying and apologising for this. We did not realise that this letter was too late as the ECO had already made their decision on 8/02/17...THEY MAY CONSIDER THIS AS AFTER THOUGHT AND 'AFFRONT' AND AGAIN Be TAKING THEM FOR GRANTED. THEY MAY THINK YOU WANT TO OUTSMART THEM My advice is reapplying and appeal and fill the gaps, explain the explainable, justify the justifiable as Lexusgus will say, immigration lawyer could help you to quote law in the appeal. OR READ PAST SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENTS ON SIMILAR CASE BY LOGGING ON TO THEIR WEBSITE. SINCERELY, BE HONEST WITH THEM. I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK. |
Davdar:Here is the timeline for appeals 18 months from the day of submission of appeals, before appeals could be heard 2 weeks for the Judge to post the decision to the appellant 4 weeks for visa section to receive decision 8 weeks for visa section to process decision 18+14=32 months (2years and 8 months). all things being equal @ Davdar, preparing for hearing appeals is likened to preparing a fresh application, except for the various fees. You put in excess evidence, they will sort it out and ensure that you label it properly. Put everything there; if no information after appeals has been won, one can email:Team@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk |
Abbylove:Thanks a lot, Lexusgs430, Abbylove and Darcy16. Very grateful. |
Davdar:Davdar, at this stage, I don't think anything can be overturned, hence it is being listed for hearing. My chats history spanned for one year May2015, while some Nov, 2015-to the time I reapplied in 30 December,2016. Bombard them with lots of contacts. I keep my fingers crossed. Wishing you the best of luck |
Lexusgs430:Lexusgs430 and others: How can I get cheapest flight or ticket? Do I still need to bring along my original TB certificate to show the immigration officer at Heathrow because the original is with the documents they returned to my wife and the cost of DHL of one document, although I have the photocopy in lieu of the original. Is it acceptable? On a lighter mood, our first application was refused on the ONLY ground that my wife did not respond to their calls/unable to contact the sponsor but to our great surprise none of us was either interviewed or contacted, although we managed to 'bombard' them with lots of contacts: skype (80pages),what's app(70pages), facebook (100pages), emails, Greeting cards (almost 15), pictures(almost 30), call logs, emails to tribunals, etc. Thanks a lot |
Funmijj3:Please send it along with it. |
Funmijj3:Thanks a lot and God will relieve you. They will definitely reply you. You must DHL everything to Sheffield. They will only scan passport, application and TB Test certificate. Applicant is required to DHL all documents and self-addressed envelope to Sheffield and as at yesterday all our documents have been returned to my wife |
justwise:Justwise. I cannot forget you. I am too grateful. |
Lexusgs430:Thanks a lot. I am humbled. I will. could you send me your account details? |
pls see my timeline below country applying from Nigeria visa processing office location: Sheffield Type of visa applied for Settlement-Husband (non-priority) 20th December, 2016: On-line Application Submitted 30th December, 2016: Biometrics Taken 3rd January 2017: Email from TLS contact-Application Received by UK visas & Immigration 5th January 2017: Application Being Prepared for consideration by ECO 6th January 2017: Sponsor's & Applicant's documents received (no e-mail, it was tracked) 13th February 2017: Decision made email from TLS contact @ 10:42 am 13th February 2017: Collection Email received from TLS contact @ 2:22pm 14th February 2017: Passport and VISA collected 8th February 2017: Date visa was issued (5/6weeks) |
MANY THANKS ARE DUE TO ALMIGHTY GOD. Today is one of the happiest days in my family. My 2nd application was successful today, after many years of separation with my family. I want to sincerely thank the following people for their encouragement for me to submit a fresh application without waiting for the hydra-headed appeal;@justwise, @Abbylove,@Lexusgs430 @ @portsmouth86, @newbie715, @light me @Uchman365, @dday101: I want to sincerely thank justwise for encouraging me to scan the refusal letter so that other people on this forum will advise me which I found very invaluable in preparing documents for this my successful 2nd application. I quoted the definition of subsisting marriage as suggested by @light me. In fact, people in this forum are very helpful it is far better than paying a huge amount of money for ignoramus lawyers. Almighty God will bless you all for your selfless service. Those of us that got help here, we should not abandon this forum because we have been relieved. We should recommend it to others. I was not aware of this forum when my lawyer prepared my first application that was refused and even when the appeals was prepaRED and they refused to overturn it. Thanks, thanks.I pray for those that are waiting that God will put smiles on their faces. my timeline follows |
Funmijj3:Funmijj3, Did you actually send with your initial application self-addressed envelope for them to return your document as they require from the spouse applicant? Alternatively, send an email to Sheffield (VisaShefield@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk)telling them your predicament that you wanted to reapply and this document is holding you back or reapply with the photocopies you have and writing a note that the original documents are with them. I do empathise with you and understand the emotional and the psychological trauma you are passing through. You will be relieved soon JUST A SUGGESTION. I HOPE THIS HELPS. |
N101:Thanks a lot for the clarification, Portsmouth86. I actually meant Nigeria International Driving Licence |
N101:Thanks a lot for the clarification, Portsmouth. I made a mistake I meant Nigeria International Driving Licence Thanks. |
Portsmouth86:Driving Licence ( international licence can be used for 12 months from entering UK) PLS, Portsmouth86, Does UK allow Nigeria International Passport as the valid driving licence in the UK for 12 months? Thanks |
Funmijj3: Hello everyone. I'm new here and I need some advice please. My son age 8 applied for an eea family members visa recently,And he was refused. He went to Ikeja to submit ,and I sent all original documents (pay slips,DNA test,employment letter, tenancy agreement, letter from landlord etc) to Sheffield the same day. To my surprise, I received an email exactly a week, that a decision has been made. The refusal letter states the reason he was refused is because we didn't include evidence of employment in the UK. So they are not sure if I am exercising treaty rights in the uk. But everything is with them in Sheffield. They didn't even bother to check because the decision was made just 5 day after. He hwas given a right to appeal. Please does anyone know how long it takes to appeal or should I put in a fresh application? Learn from my predicament. Experience is the best teacher. Appeal and reapply simultaneously. Read my ordeals here: ' After Thirteen months of appeal, since November 2015 I got NOTICE OF HEARING beginning of this month which was fixed for towards the end of May (17 months)'. For appeals, if not overturned, then one should be looking forward to two years. Pls, A burnt child dreads the fire. You do not need to put the copy of refusal notice there, there is a column in the application form where you will state reasons why you were refused the first application. |
Funmijj3:Learn from my predicament. Experience is the best teacher. Appeal and reapply simultaneously. Read my ordeals here: ' After Thirteen months of appeal, since November 2015 I got NOTICE OF HEARING beginning of this month which was fixed for towards the end of May (17 months)'. For appeals, if not overturned, then one should be looking forward to two years. Pls, A burnt child dreads the fire. |
Abbylove:. It is Almighty God that has been the source of our strength. It is an experience one will never pray even for his enemy I was a novice then, I haven't got this forum and my lawyer was interested in money, they could not advise otherwise. I keep my fingers crossed. Anyway, thanks a lot for your sympathy and empathy. Nothing that has a beginning, it must have an end, no matter how dark the night it will break into a day, and every cloud has a silver lining, I am assured that there will be light at the end of the tunnel. Thanks @ Abbylove |
Lexusgs430:Thanks a lot sirs |
I am very grateful to you all for your moral support. |
Happy weekend to you all. @justwise, @Abbylove,@Lexusgs430 @ @portsmouth86, @newbie715, @light me @Uchman365: and others Long time my people in the house. God bless you all for your selfless effort. After Thirteen months of appeal, since November 2015 I got NOTICE OF HEARING beginning of this month which was fixed for towards the end of May (17 months). Here are the relevant questions I want the people in the house to kindly assist me. The letter reads among others: ' You must send the following documents to the tribunal at the above address and to the other party (to arrive) no later than 5 days before the date of Full Hearing. 1. witness statements of the evidence to be called at the hearing. 2. A bundle of all documents to be relied on at the hearing-these must be clearly page numbered, indexed and include a schedule identifying the essential passages. (The essential passages are any sections you consider highly significant in your appeal). I will be very appreciative if I could be educated more about these two requirements and how we can go about it. Thanks in advance |
anyichi16: I sent both originals and photocopies of all my supporting documents. C/O: Demoore and anyichi(16): After the Dec 5th announcement that all documents will be scanned to UKVI at Teleperformance. Does applicant still require to send original copies of documents to Sheffield by courier service ![]() |
anyichi16:C/O: Demoore and anyichi(16): After the Dec 5th announcement that all documents will be scanned to UKVI at Teleperformance Does applicant still require to send original copies of documents to Sheffield by courier service ![]() '....From 5 December 2016 customers applying for a UK visa using our standard or Priority Visa services in Lagos Victoria Island and Ikeja Nigeria will benefit from digital improvements to the UK visa application process. TLScontact will scan your supporting documents whilst you’re at the visa application centre, and then give back your documents to you immediately. They will then send these digital documents to UKVI, with your passport, and visa officers will consider your application in the usual way'' |
1 2 (of 2 pages)
IN FACT, IT POURS COLD WATER ON SOMEONE'S PLAN AND EVEN PUTS A SPANNER OR MONKEY WRENCH IN IT!!!
