Stonecoldsteve's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Stonecoldsteve's Profile › Stonecoldsteve's Posts
1 2 (of 2 pages)
The key to unlocking graduate admissions after satisfying all entry requirements in Canada is the acceptance from a supervisor. No consent from a supervisor, no party. Forget those things you see on their website. Your application will remain pending even after satisfying eligibility requirements until a supervisor picks you. Canadian schools have a very low lecturer/student ratio and so postgraduate schools usually wait till a student is paired with a supervisor before issuing offers. My advice to you will be to call or email the secretary to the PG school and find out the status of your application. If none of the supervisors you chose have accepted you, you will need to mail them to find out if they are currently accepting students. If the aren't, you will need to either find another supervisor, switch to a course based MSc. or seek admission in another Canadian institution. waynee2baba: |
He can try www.kijiji.ca to look for rooms within Fanshawe's vicinty Nellykuch: |
In the area of publication record, you will not be committed financially as all costs will be borne by your lecturer/professor or the postgraduate student you're working with. Your job will be to help with taking readings for experiments or presenting data.[ For Networking, you can go through the professor's publications on Google scholar or Researchgate and politely request for a copy of their publication you're interested in. Ask questions on their methodology, conclusion or any part of the paper you may/may not have issues with. They will be happy to respond though they are very busy people. You do not need to write any exam to apply for funding. When you are ready to apply, let the professor know your intention and send him/her your CV and transcript/degree certificates in a mail. If the professor is impressed, he/she invites you for a skype interview where all the skills outlined on your CV are assessed. You can send me a private message if you have any more queries Teophilus96: |
Hi, It's great you are already thinking of your future at this stage. It's also nice you have a firm consciousness of how much your final class of degree will affect your future academic endeavours. As much as good grades are nice to have, most recruiters are more interested in how much transferable skills you have been able to gather. There are five things you will need to consider: 1. Your background: Your background should tally with your intended postgraduate degree if you want to have a strong application for funding. For Bioresources Engineering, you should be able to show a background in Agric. Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Biology or anything related. 2. Publication record: This will set you apart from other students competing with you for limited funds. Approach your professors, masters or PhD students and volunteer to assist with their research in exchange for co-authorship. It will be tedious for you but rewarding in the end. This early collaboration will also help you with easy references when you begin your application. You can also try and publishing in the student category of conferences related to Bioresources Engineering or your background. 3. Your grades: You are already conscious of this so keep your foot on the gas pedal. 4. Programming and Statistical skills: Learn how to use MATLAB and also learn basic programming like c++. Have some idea of ANOVA and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Adding these skills in your CV will set you apart. 5. Networking:Start researching Professors in McGill who you hope to work with and focus on their research interests. Professors will only supervise you and offer you funding if your research interest aligns with theirs. Start a relationship by emailing them and asking questions about their research or other questions around their area of specialization. This will help you you when you are finally ready to apply to McGill Teophilus96: |
I quite agree with you. A visa isn't a right, yes we know it's at the discretion of the VO or the issuing country whether or not all requirements have been satisfied. However, besides fulfilling entry requirements, the applicant has to pay a processing fee which now makes it a transaction. Also, each visa category has got processing timelines usually stated on their website. What that means is that with each visa application, we pay a processing fee for the consulate office to sort through our documents to check for eligibility within the specified timeline. The applicant fulfils their part of the transaction by paying the visa processing fee as well as submitting requested paperwork for the application. On the other hand, the consulate office fulfils their part of the transaction by giving a decision on the visa application within the specified time frame. Anything outside of this is a breach of transaction. The only exception to this is when the consulate office releases a disclaimer stating that processing times may vary and is at the discretion of the consulate office or VO. Even at that, there should be periodic correspondence between the consulate office and the applicant during this period. In essence, I think I support your proposition. A moderately toned letter can be sent citing the psychological and emotional distress encountered by the applicant during this exhausting wait period. Our problem in this part of the world is that we are scared to speak up for our rights for fear of rebuke or admonishment. Behaviours we term as arrogant are viewed as confidence in developed countries. Bracha: |
Even though your supervisor has agreed supervision in principle, the final decision to admit or not rests with the graduate recruitment committee. If your supervisor is a very influential personality in the school then he/she might most likely have an input in the decision making process. From my experience, secretaries of graduate schools can influence the decision making process as they are part of these graduate recruitment committees. Secretaries to graduate schools can give you and idea whether or not you've been accepted before a decision for admission is displayed on your portal. Since you have a strong 2.1 (this makes you eligible but is not the only scoring criteria as I have seen first class graduates denied admission) and you have a supervisor in principle, then I will advice you work on other criteria like work experience, publications, personal statement and you'll be fine. geofortress: |
Try and have some patience interpreting context. I was referring to the IRCC honouring the NDDC scholarship since you implied they wouldn't honour LGA sponsorship quote author=Austacus post=76374038] I am talking about IRCC not school they are two different things entirely.[/quote] |
I know someone with the NDDC scholarship who is currently trying to use it in a university in Canada. Are you trying to imply that it won't be honoured? Austacus: |
I applied for the PhD category and was shortlisted. I did not submit either of my transcripts as there was no transcript option during the file upload. Besides the advert stated that transcripts would be required at a later stage. Slik07: |
PTDF looking indecisive as regards the split site programme and the LSS induction! |
1 2 (of 2 pages)