Thepsyhiccensor's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Thepsyhiccensor's Profile › Thepsyhiccensor's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 32 pages)
Gay is the New World Order because it was the old world order https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP4Ap2BxzLU |
Wake up out your slumber |
lanrefront1:Most do as they believe anyone who thinks outside the box is insane. Do you really think Nigeria isnt hindered by religion? I can quote a famous Nigerian pastor who thinks so. Any nation that has shrines for human sacrifice and can be found like local corner stores is in serious trouble with God. |
Destroy the lies |
The Coronavirus is pedophilia Baal worship |
lanrefront1:Of course it hinders Nigeria |
Destroy the lies. And if you are apathetic then nothing can save you.
|
Secret enemies |
God hate sodomy |
God hate sodomy |
egopersonified:America blocks alot of social media accounts the censorship is crazy. |
The Coronavirus is pedophilia Baal worship |
The Coronavirus is pedophilia Baal worship a detractor public scare scripted by the Simpson cartoon as well as other forms of medium |
TakingItBack:No government will feed the people so feed yourself. www.feedyourselfandyourfamily..com |
Pink is for pedophile |
Black Rome the cruxifiers of the Black Christ and killers of God's prophets |
Name them devils or suffer the wrath of change |
Secret enemies unmasked |
Skip to content WAS SOCRATES BLACK SOCRATES DESCRIBED HIS OWN APPEARANCE AS BLACK Death from a kangaroo court brought on by drinking from a cup of poison hemlock as punishment for his teachings, the words of Socrates provide pillars of Christian belief and Western thought. These have earned him the title of Father of Western Philosophy. Those ideas include: The doctrine of Nous, i.e. Mind or Intelligent Cause in order to account for God and Creation. The immortality of the soul. The doctrine of Supreme Good. However, was Socrates African? A. BLACK ATHENA: In Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization, Martin Bernal ignited a controversy expounding on a hypothesis that ancient Greece, and hence Western civilization, derived much of its cultural roots from Afroasiatic (Egyptian and Phoenician) cultures. He also holds that Socrates was African. His chief critic, Mary Lefkowitz of Wellesley College, believes that Bernal is mistaken and hence the groundwork for their debate. Yet, neither has mentioned that Socrates described himself as African – hence, there’s no argument (see below). B. DEFINITION OF AFRICAN: An African is an individual inclined to have wooly hair, a full mouth, and full nose [11, 12, 13,14, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Wooly hair has a long history. It is recorded for the Son of Man in the bible in Daniel 7:9 where he’s described as having a “head like pure wool.” Hence, while Socrates does not describe his hair, as he has other African features, wooly hair would accompany them [11, 13, 15, 16, 19] though the sculptures don’t show wooly hair: Wavy [1 through 6, 8, 9, 10] but not wooly [11, 13, 15, 16, 19]. The sculptors, in their use of creative license, I’d say, were amiss. C. SOCRATES DESCRIBES SELF AS AFRICAN: In the Socratic Dialogue, Symposia, chapter V (perhaps first mentioned in the 1980s by Dr. Clyde Winters), Socrates gives a self-definition based on African features. In one of his last dialogues before his death, Socrates and Critobulus compete to win the Prize of Beauty; he, Socrates or Critobulus, a new colonist. And, who better to describe himself than himself? Socrates uses the following words to describe himself: He says his nose bridge isn’t high and nose not straight [e.g. 6, 9, 10] as Critobulus’ but “spread out wide and flat,” [5, 13, 14]. And both Critobulus and Socrates also speak of his “snub nose.” [see: 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 11 – 19]. Socrates specifically states that unlike Critobulus, he has “thick lips.” [see especially: 5, 11, 13, 14]. Equally convincing is that he describes himself as looking like the most handsome god “Selinus,” [11 – 16] and all will recognize them not as Mongol or white, but African as Socrates unabashedly and proudly describes himself – gloriously Sambo. This is amusing as white supremists, voicing the claim by the German philosopher George Hegel, state that Africans contributed nothing to civilization. Socrates gave philosophy departments and Hegel a job. D. SOURCES SPEAKING TO SOCRATES’ AFRICAN PHYSIQUE: Ancient authority (Plat. Symp. 215a ff.; Xen. Symp. 5.7) speaks of Socrates’ stocky body [Attic actors, 500 BC # 17; and from Athen’s Temple of Hercules, 550 BC, #18]. The preceding were Pygmies as Plato describes Socrates’ psysiognomy. E. WHY SCHOLARS AND THE WORLD THINK SOCRATES WAS WHITE [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]: In the weeks or months following his death, Socrates’ followers had pictures painted of him referred to in ancient texts. These along with his own self-description (the literature states) provided sculptors with material to make sculptures of him based on psysiognomy and called in the literature, Type A (see 1 – 5 above). Lycippus, the famous sculptor who gave us images in stone of Alexander (he was the court sculptor) also made a sculpture of Socrates. Socrates was a favorite subject of reproduction and many Grecian islands had schools that produced his bust giving us stylized 3rd century images of a white Socrates which gained credibility due to their hoary age. And historians least liked and least showed the most African-looking images of Socrates [1 – 5]; and, most promoted the white-looking Socrates [6, 7, 8]. But, facts show the white Socrates (Type B, 6 – 10), is divorced from reality. Socrates called himself African. Socrates: hero (he 3 times participated in the Peloponnesian War against Assyria), Statesman, African, and Father of Western Philosophy. Nearly 400 pages of worldwide African (black) history before Columbus, before the West, and before Christ from: http://www.beforebc.org/AfricanaResources/AfricanaResources/index.of.pages.html WRITTEN BY MARC WASHINGTON You see Socrates is Black because classical Greeks and Romans are Blacks and the Whites were their servants now called Jews or Tribe of Dan the Black Nobility, etc |
Plato Was Not White Posted by Nathan P. Gilmour Nathan P. Gilmour , 5 August 2014. Another teaching semester is about to ramp up, and as is often the case, I have some Platonic dialogues lined up to teach. I’ve taught at least one dialogue in almost every semester since about 2005, and on the campus of Emmanuel College, where I’ve taught since 2009, people who know about me at all know about me as “that Plato guy.” My sense is that the relatively few people who know about me on the Internet regard me likewise. Perhaps that professional investment in Plato (personally, I’m more of a postmodern Augustinian with leanings towards MacIntyre’s brand of neo-Thomism) has made me more irritable than I should be when the old Athenian ends up in the crosshairs of well-meaning folks who wish to set right the balance of power and take away the overlordship (I prefer that Anglo-Saxon compound word to the Hellenism “hegemony,” and I grant the irony) from “dead white males.” I think the political questions there are fascinating, but a matter of some historical import gets in the way of the politics, if one isn’t careful: Plato wasn’t White. Whiteness, as sociologists will tell you if you ask, isn’t merely a matter of skin pigmentation: it’s a much more complex and more historical phenomenon. The stories of “light-skinned” Black people in the twentieth-century United States show some of this complexity. Because they’re part of a narrative that involves centuries of institutional slavery, being “light-skinned” does not confer membership in the social group of political power. There might be social benefit relative to White people or even among other Black people, but also possible is a betrayal-anxiety renders such a Black person subject to different sorts of injustice, perhaps even suspicion that they’re masquerading as white by their own choice or betraying “their people” because they “look white.” Likewise, human beings born into the former (or current) European Empires with lighter-than-average pigmentation don’t get treated as “white” so much as exotic specimens of “those people” who “look like us.” Pigmentation figures in but only pigmentation as one variable in a complex, multi-variable system. Where did Plato go in all of this? My brief answer is that the name “Plato” has become a token in a game that the historical man Plato would not have recognized. The fact of the matter is that Athens, though a significant regional power in the fifth and fourth centuries, was not the sort of global empire that the British and French and Germans and Dutch grabbed and maintained a couple thousand years after he wrote his rightly-famous dialogues. In fact, reading around in the actual texts of Plato and his contemporaries reveals a fascination not with “white” empires (there weren’t any yet) but with the Egyptians, Babylonians, Persians, and other, more far-reaching powers who have become, in the age of European empires, the colonies of the new world powers. And that’s the point: “White” names a very recent development in the grand human story, not one that’s perpetual or inevitable. And that means we’re free to imagine other possibilities. That’s what’s insidious about declaring Plato “White” too easily: such a move threatens to obscure the contingency of history, in which the man Plato was not “White” because that term takes its twenty-first-century meaning not from skin-coloring but from a centuries-long (but not THAT many centuries!) narrative of Capitalist-formed human slavery, nationalist-based empire-building, and–I grant this point–attempts to co-opt texts like those of Homer and Euripides and Plato as parts of a “Western Canon,” a movement that claims them as part of a project of “civilization” undeniably tied up in the story of how northern and western Europeans became “White” as opposed to the Asian and African and American tribes over whom they won military supremacy. Or, to put it another way, I fear that when we 21st-century folks point at Plato and shout “White!” we forget the contingency and thus the mutability of the story of “White” and grant “White” a historical longevity that it just doesn’t have. My hunch is that we might actually find more political grain to glean when we grant the historical contingency of the era of European overlordship, and I eagerly note that Washington, D.C. in the twentieth century is something analogous to Baghdad in the ninth or Rome in the first or Babylon centuries before that without being identical to any of the above. But to insist on the “Whiteness” and thus the moral badness of someone who wasn’t around long enough to see that part of the human story strikes me as a reductionist move that ultimately cuts off conversations that are worth having. Is Nathan Gilmour, twenty-first-century English professor and blogger, White? Yes. And there are better ways and worse ways for him to be so. May he always be aware enough of his place in complex historical stories to strive towards better ways of living with his neighbor as the contingent, historical being that Dasein finds itself being. Was Plato White? No. And my hunch is that the best way of reading him is not as a forerunner and pioneer of the British Empire but as someone alien to our own experiences precisely because he was a Greek and thus not a beneficiary of Empire the way that Nathan Gilmour is. 5 August 2014 Of course Plato was Black and so was the King of Greece and Rome also Blacks. Socrates is also Black.
|
“I have the terrible feeling that time goes by and I do nothing, nothing happens, and nothing moves me to the core.”
|
“I have the terrible feeling that time goes by and I do nothing, nothing happens, and nothing moves me to the core.”
|
“I have the terrible feeling that time goes by and I do nothing, nothing happens, and nothing moves me to the core.”
|
ap·a·thet·ic /ˌapəˈTHedik/ adjective showing or feeling no interest, enthusiasm, or concern. |
Truth is powerful and indisputable |
See for yourself |
The Coronavirus is pedophilia Baal worship The Sun in the cardinal direction of South at its zenith expels demons. When the archangel Michael casted demons from heaven they fell into the lowest and darkest parts of the Earth. Demons are expelled by fire and light. This is why you must never pray to God Almighty without a light. There are two types of fire that of Mars which is the fire of hell and the illuminous light of the Sun which gives life.
|
If they wear a mask it means they live a secret life. The man of God Almighty does not wear a mask. Remember Christianity destroyed Black Rome then they put the White Jesus up on the throne of Rome. This blasphemous lie will not survive the 5g Apocalypse. 6 feet apart is the rule of social distancing because 6 is the number of Sango. It is the number of archangel Michael on the Kabbalah Tree of life. This is the illuminous light of the Sun which is called Samash who sees all the people below and knows their inner hearts. The Romans main God is Zeus associated with Jupiter not the Sun despite they use its symbolism to mask their Satanic work. The light of the Sun exposes and expels darkness especially when the Sun is at High Noon in the South. Wake up out your slumber
|
Name them devils or suffer the wrath of change |
Greetings Who knows of the Great Wheel spoken of by the powerful legendary African sage Tehuti? It is the 25,000 year time cycle and its division into 12 Zodica houses which equal 2160 years. We are 3 years into the last age of Pisces and about to enter Aquarius the Ifa Age of Sango. Pisces deals with secret enemies and like Ejiobe gains alot of secret enemies because he is outspoken. So the first Christ was crucified in Africa for being outspoken about Baal worship in Isreal opposed upon them by the treacherous Pharisees and Black Romans. Christ was betrayed and his movement hijacked because during time Deception reigned. Another attribute of the Age of Pisces or Olokun is Deception. Why does Christ or outspoken people have secret enemies and who are they? Around you everyday is someone living a secret life of filth and wickedness. These people practice aggression against society in order to keep their secrets. The people who did this were the Pharisees an organized group Hebrews that had mixed and mingled with the kingdoms around them. The Romans have never been a God fearing kingdom and were outright wicked. So it is the Hebrews who practiced treachery because the foreign practices they engaged were against the Hebrew covenant with God Almighty. The Romans learned this cover from the Hebrews when they adopted Christianity as their outer religion. Inside Romans practice Baal worship which is the worship of Zeus who you are taught is Christ. And Christ was crucified in Africa and if he were reborn through his bloodline do you believe he would be born in Africa? Or in China where they are under super surveillance? What about Europe where a pastor was arrested for preaching in public in London? Or Latin America where they have gangs killing the outspoken? Begin to narrow it down with reasoning and logic and apply it to the answer. Its that simple. If you are outspoken and have secret enemies they are people who put on a mask in public and cause distraction to cover up their iniquities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2T2p8qsXTw 5g is the Apocalypse which means to uncover to reveal
|
See for yourself |
5g is the Apocalypse which means to uncover to reveal |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 32 pages)