ThugsRUs's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ThugsRUs's Profile › ThugsRUs's Posts
1 (of 1 pages)
lai-lai:But his team still beat a formidable Portland team on the road, why? Because, unlike Dork, D12 can bring more to the table when his shot is not falling. Just because Howards stat sheet wasn't impressive doesn't mean he didn't impact his team in other ways. |
bawomolo:That team is done. They should've kept Harris. Trading him for an aging Kidd was one of the dumbest trades in recent memory. Now it's coming to haunt them. Is it a coincidence that Mavs began to regress every year since the trade? While Dwight Howards team is 17-5, getting better every year, NoWINski's team is regressing ever since the subliminal chokejob in the Finals. |
lai-lai:LeBron does have serviceable options on offense. That is a myth. Its just that LeBron himself can singlehandedly, as he wins games, can lose games as well, esp. if his greatest weapon is taken away from him. The Cavs are a good offensive, but are even a greater defensive bunch. Their offense is not as bad as people are making out to be. Their guys are shooting good percentages. Its just being masked b/c their defense is more of the backbone to the team. |
A-40:[b]Why are you putting words in my mouth? I never claimed they were "offensive juggernauts" as you put it. Show me in my posts where I referred to LeBrons cast as such. Instead, I claimed they were good serviceable role players on offense w/ great defense & rebounding (their bread & butter) which is 100% fact. Why do you like twisting peoples words? In LeBrons Finals postseason, the Cavs had enough offense to will teams over the top. Even if LeBron didn't have a clear second option on offense However, it was LeBron that self-destructed himself as a jumpshooter, causing their downfall. You claimed the Cavs lacked some reliable scorers. Some stats you might want to consider during the 2006-07 playoff season: Daniel Gibson shot a .561 eFG% off jumpshots, accounted for 84% of his shot attempts, in the playoffs. That is excellent. Big Z, who is more of a low post scorer w/ an OK jumpshot (for a big), shot a .604 eFG% inside the paint. Again, very efficient. Drew Gooden, a jumpshooting big, shot a .463 eFG% on 67% of his attempts, which is respectable. Varejao, another guy known for his inside presence, shot .571 eFG% inside the paint on 71% of his attempts. All these guys saw big mintues in the playoffs. LeBron HAD HELP on offense. You had guys shoot respectable to very good %s going more to their STRENGTHS. Now, lets take a look at LeBron: Of all the shot attempts LeBron took in the playoffs, a whopping 67% of it was jumpshots. Why? Because the Spurs turned him into a jumpshooter for the most part w/ their lane-clogging. It turned out that LeBron shot a dismal .336 eFG% from there. He couldn't go more to his strengths, which was inside, where he shot a whopping .662 eFG%, accounted for only off 33% of his shot attempts.[/b] A-40:When an argument doesn't go your way, you resort to personal attacks. Very classy of you. They couldn't manage to score more b/c LeBron was busy chucking the team out of the series w/ his brickest. He also commited 5.8 turnovers a game, most in NBA Finals history. Did you ever think of that? Why aren't you addressing the issue? So how you expect his supporting cast to score more is beyond me. When Gibson, Gooden, Big Z & Varejao were given the ball, they shot good percentages. Other than that, LeBron was busy either, shooting his team out of games, or commiting stupid turnovers (traveling, bad pass, charge etc, ) A-40:So, you actually believe the Spurs were better than the three peat Lakers?!? (ROFFLES). WOW. And you attacking my knowledge of the game. A-40:[b]Those 22 points came off mostly either free throws, fast break points, or inefficient jumpers . When you take a ridiculous amount of shots, you are bound to score 22 points in a game. The real question is: Was it an efficient 22 points? I think we already know that answer to that. And LeBrons teammates not averaging more than 3 assists a game is sheer poppycock. LeBron needs the ball in his hands to be effective, being the primary ball-handler and the defacto point guard. But then, he was busy making stupid decisions w/ the ball and shooting his team out the game. LeBrons mistakes could've in fact turned into assists for his teammates. So, then why do you expect his casts to average more than 3 APG, when LeBron himself is the primary ball-handler? 27% of all of the shots LeBron took throughout the playoffs that year were assisted. Therefore, LeBron isn't a good off-ball player. Not to mention that LeBron had one of the worst assist-to-turnover ratio: a better indication of a good passer, than just assists (a real NBA fan would know that). Yeah, LeBron averaged alot of assists in the Finals, but at what cost? So, there goes your so-called knowledge of the game. LeBron is actually the one that sets the tone on offense and looks to find his cutting man, or an open teammate. Yet another dumb logic by A-40 himself.[/b] A-40:Thats not too bright of you. I'm not arguing D12 is better than LeBron, but what comes w/ a dumb logic follows another personal attack about someones knowledge. Hypocrite much? ![]() A-40:No disrespect, but you are infact delusional if you believe having a good (but not great) starting cast translates to poor depth. A-40:Thats a big IF. He has many more years in the NBA to get to the Finas. Nowitzki didn't get to the Finals until his late 20s. It happens. You can't expect D12 to get to the Finals when he hasn't even sniffed his prime. LeBron couldn't even will his team to the Finals at 22. LeBron did that at 23. D12 just TURNED 23 TWO DAYS AGO. DURRRRRR!! A-40:Yes. D12 must will his team to the championship at age 23, b/c LeBron James did it Nice logic. A-40:Apprently you. Otherwise, you wouldn't have brought his name up, trying to compare both. D12 is a legit defender. Camby isn't. A-40:One erratic game does not make a player, although I wouldn't expect you to know that. . . A-40:Please. Enough excuses about your boy. He doesn't bring anything to the table other than his jumpshot. When his jumpshot is flat he is basically useless. He is an OK rebounder (for his height) and a good passer at times (I must admit), but he doesn't impact games as a D12, KG or Duncan. He doesn't anchor defenses, give his team second chance opportunities, etc. Remember, defense is half the game, and Dirk is non-existent. He isn't a force inside, and doesn't have legit post game other than facing up his opponent. Thanks for the insults. It shows your character in simple debates. |
('_') hahaha Am i the GOAT poster or what ? |
In my British Savings Acount ('_') |
Adonis Reflection, off the Mirror, ma dome is perfection I bag shallow shortys on looks, i BONE with Protection PHURCK being polite, ma looks & persona never collides, Money over BEACHES for life , A buck 50, shorty's tipping to get with me, Damn she gives the Head sweetly, oops thats ur Dime PP . and i still Graze haters with hollow stones, re-arrange ur collar bones, & take-away ur Mama Home ('_*) |
1 (of 1 pages)


