VBCampaign's Posts
Nairaland Forum › VBCampaign's Profile › VBCampaign's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 29 pages)
kpankpangolo:Beautiful So very well stated. One reason I think AI cannot replace writers |
Kobojunkie:I see. I'm sure there are there who can refute you. I don't have the time. |
Kobojunkie:And how are you, your own self, not a frusdster? It is always easy to criticize, till you find yourself in that shoes. |
budaatum:Very sad indeed Well, we hope that others can learn from his life |
Another Perspective on Jimmy Swaggart’s Death By: Deji Yesufu Jimmy Swaggart died on the 1st day of July, 2025. He was ninety years old. It is sad that the epitaph that will follow him into the grave will be the headline attached to his death – “Jimmy Swaggart, Disgraced Tele-evangelist, Dies at 90”. Swaggart was a leading television evangelist in the 1980s. However, in 1988, it was discovered that he had a secret sexual liaison with a prostitute and would eventually be exposed, with the American media making a big deal out of it. The image of Swaggart, making a public plea for mercy both to God and his church members, is probably one of the most-watched scenes in television history. Swaggart is seen crying, calling on God to forgive his sins, and saying over and over – “…I have sinned…” Many people did not think Swaggart took his confessions seriously. They regard the “I have sinned” moment as a TV stunt made in a calculated attempt to preserve his place in the ministry and, particularly, donors’ funds. Jimmy Swaggart, a long-time Assemblies of God minister, would eventually be restored to ministry, but he never returned to the height of fame he had before his sins were revealed. Dr. Tony Costa, a reformed Baptist minister in Canada, wrote a short tribute to Swaggart, saying that regardless of his failures, he owes his conversion, under God, to the ministry of Jimmy Swaggart. That statement was a confirmation of a sentiment that was running through my mind: men like Swaggart, who represent the old-line Pentecostal denominations, had quite some orthodoxy to their ministry and I will be very reluctant to bring an anathema on their ministry because of their professed Pentecostalism, like I might do with a committed Prosperity Gospel preacher. And even the fact that he failed in ministry, and still continued to work as a pastor, does not detract from the legitimacy of his profession to the person of Jesus Christ. Different denominations handle failure in ministry in different ways. Some will regard the minister as having been permanently disqualified from ministry, while others take less drastic steps of sanction. My concern is not with what happened to Swaggart’s ministry after his moral failures; my concern is with the manner in which Christians view this matter of sin. When Swaggart died, and the newspapers reminded us of his sin of 1988, the following scripture came to my mind: “Some men’s sins are open beforehand, going before to judgement; and some men they follow after” (1 Timothy 5:24). One can say that Jimmy Swaggart’s sins went beforehand to God’s judgement. I think what that means is that God exposed that pastor in this life, and he suffered the consequences of his indiscretion throughout his life, and he is even still suffering it in death. However, that is God’s mercy to him. The persons who are truly accursed, and who will wish that they were never born, are those whose sins “follow after”. While some of these people condemned Jimmy Swaggart and made a ministry out of labelling him and his likes false teachers, their sins were successfully concealed on earth, only to be revealed in heaven. Some would be found out to have been as sexually deviant as Swaggart was, if not more deviant. Some will preserve their reputation, and they will die as “great men of God”, “profound miracle workers”, “the greatest reformed thinker of our time”, but their sins will follow them to the throne of God. Their sins will not be exposed on earth, but in heaven, where not only will their reputation be destroyed, but also their bodies and their souls in hell. Christians must understand that God does not see sexual scandals in the same manner the world sees them. The world may make it into headlines, news, and epitaphs – that is their business. Sexual scandals are all within the gracious outworking of God’s providence in reforming and sanctifying the Christian Church. The minister in the middle of a sexual scandal is a man whom God deeply loves. If God hates that man, God will help that man conceal his sins until it is way too late for him to repent of them. So, when a pastor “falls”, the Church must begin to see the incident from God’s perspective. We must understand that a destroyed reputation and even disqualification from ministry or a failed marriage that result from all these are all part of God’s way of sanctifying the person involved. It is also a careful reminder to those in ministry that none of us is immune to sin. It is a time to “take heed to oneself” lest we fall. It is a time to destroy every form of pride and self-righteousness within us, and to both thank God and plead with him to help us stand. When it comes to sexual sins, those who are not guilty of it should never take up a Pharisaical mindset, but should thank God daily for preservation. A minister falling into sexual sins should also remind the Church about the gospel of Jesus Christ. We should thank God that Jesus said he had not come to save the righteous, but sinners. We should thank God that we have the account of David, and Solomon, and Samson, and Peter right there in the Bible. We should thank God for Psalm 51, and we should remind ourselves that both those who have sinned sexually and those who have done it in their hearts are in the same category as far as a righteous God is concerned. We should look closely at Matthew 1:21 and celebrate the fact that the Son of God came into this world to save sinners, for which you and I are chief. The fall of a minister should be a time to apply the blessing of the blood on the church. This will not detract from the administrative decision of the local church to either disqualify the minister, demote him, or even forgive him. Whatever the Church does must be in view of God’s gracious work to us all who are sinners ourselves. Jimmy Swaggart lived a very long time. I get the impression that God wanted him to feel the full weight of his misdemeanour, and I think that the disgrace is sufficient punishment for him. Just before his sexual misdemeanour was discovered, Swaggart was at the forefront of revealing the sexual misadventures of his fellow pastors. He was one of the few people who cast the greatest aspersion on Jim Bakker, another televangelist who was discovered to be having an affair with his secretary. Swaggart saw Bakker as a competitor and was too happy to pull him down. The year did not end before his own sins were discovered. These things happen for our own learning. When pastors’ sins are found out, it is not the time to rush to Facebook or help the worldly media propagate the news. It rather should be a time for careful introspection because we very well could be at the receiving end of it all, too. When we write like this, some tell us we are lowering the standards of God’s righteous judgment. The truth is that none of us wants to come face to face with God’s righteous judgement. God’s holiness will condemn all sins equally. What we should celebrate is that God has very graciously given us a way out of sin through the death and resurrection of his Son, Jesus Christ. He has also given us His Holy Spirit to sanctify us through life. If these two things become the pursuit of the churches, we will have very little time left to bother with ministers who have fallen. Jimmy Swaggart knew the Lord Jesus Christ. He has today gone to rest from his labours. He has handed the baton to us. Let us run our race circumspectly: “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted” (Galatians 6:1). Amen. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at naijareformed@gmail.com Source
|
How I Ended a Career in Information TechnologyDeji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at naijareformed@gmail.com Source
|
𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝘆𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗵(𝘀) By: 𝗗𝗲𝗷𝗶 𝗬𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗳𝘂 In September 2024, Alistair Begg, pastor at Parkside Church, Cleveland, USA, announced that he would be retiring from ministry in September 2025. He was giving the church a full year to consider the matter and to find a replacement for him. This month, June 2025, Alistair Begg preached his last sermon at Parkside Church. He had moved his retirement three months forward – perhaps the church had found a replacement for him. Begg will not be retiring from ministry but he will cease from carrying out active pastoral duties. Someone commented on a video on the subject on YouTube and explained that she was convinced that Alistair Begg had never gotten over the reaction that many in the Church had over his comment to a grandmother on the subject of homosexuality. He felt betrayed – especially by many of his friends who he believed were quite uncharitable to him in their comments about the subject. I agree with that lady’s comment. I would even go further to say that there is a militancy among reformed Christians that is not Christlike. In light of the current crisis between Israel and Iran, I think it is even possible to compare some in the leadership of Reformed Churches to something of an Ayatollah. I will explain more. The Ayatollah is the supreme religious leader of Shia Islam in the nation of Iran. In 1979, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini led an Islamic revolution that overturned the government of that country and established an Islamic theocracy over the country. Ruhollah Khomeini died in 1989 and was succeeded by the present Ayatollah – Ali Khamenei. Ruhollah Khomeini was an extremely religious individual and those who know something of his private life testified to his moral purity. He is one of the few Muslim leaders who married only one wife and remained committed to her all his life. The People’s Profile documentary on his is worth the time to watch. So, when Khomeini declared a fatwa on Salman Rushdie in 1988, he was speaking with an authority that is only second to the voice of Allah. Khomeini died in 1989, but the fatwa hung on Rushdie’s head until August 2022, when he was attacked with a knife in New York and lost an eye. The Ayatollah’s authority does not only exhume from the office he occupies; it is also something that exhumes from the false sense of righteousness that his moral uprightness gives him. The Ayatollah is not only the religious leader of Iran; he is also their political head. He is the supreme leader. I will now turn my attention to the subject of the “false sense of righteousness” that fundamentalist leaders could possess that can make them into something of an Ayatollah. A phenomenon we could find even in churches – including reformed churches. If religion will produce anything at all, the minimum we should see in anyone who professes religious beliefs is some moral rectitude. All religions come with their standards of righteousness and holiness; all religions propound laws that a deity enumerate to the people. The religion that gave rise to Christianity was Judaism – the religion of the Jews. The Jews received laws directly from God – the maker of the heavens and the earth, and the overall testimony of the Old Testament was that the Jews were unable to keep God’s holy laws. God enacted a New Covenant in the person of his Son Jesus Christ mainly because the end of every religious pursuit is always a false righteousness. False righteousness is a sense of moral purity that a man may have because of the belief that he has succeeded at gaining moral ground mostly above his peers. Nothing depicts this more than the prayer of the Pharisee in Luke 18, where he approached God in the confidence of what he has succeeded at doing in religion; while the publican is weighed down heavily by his failures. Suffice it to say here that Jesus commended the publican’s prayer instead, and pointed out that that man went away justified. Therefore, the place Christianity triumphs over other religious professions is never in how well God’s people keep religious laws; rather, Christianity triumphs in a solid comprehension of the concept of grace. The whole idea is that God has saved a sinner; God forgives our sins; God gives us the space to triumph over our sins; God commands that we show the same mercy to others that we have received from him; etc. Christianity brought grace, love, forgiveness, freedom, and joy to our world through Jesus Christ. On the other hand, fundamentalism is replete with hate, retribution, bondage, and depression. That, my friends, is a description of fundamentalist Islam. It is what informs the violence that they carry out on Christians and Jews. What we fail to realize, however, is that fundamentalism can also be found among Christians who carry the same spirit of hate, retribution, bondage, and depression. The United States of America can no longer be regarded as a Christian nation. However, the Christian worldview that informed the birthing of that great country has benefitted the whole world. Before the coming of America, the concept of freedom and religious tolerance was almost non-existent in our world. America taught the world freedom – freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, freedom of commerce, freedom of ideas, etc. The downside of religious freedom in the United States of America is that the country is replete with cults of all kinds. Anyone can just rise and preach whatever he likes, gather a following and influence people – the American authorities will not do anything to him. As long as such an individual keeps to the law of the land, America will never infringe on the religious profession of a people. The upside of American freedom is the proliferation of ideas. It is what informs commerce and productivity in that country that has made it super wealthy today. On Saturday, the 21st of June, 2025, American B-2 stealth bombers invaded Iranian airspace and destroyed the nuclear weapon facility that the Iranians had been developing for more than two decades now. That operation was based on the work of one individual in the American military who had discovered in 2009 that Iran was building underground facilities in Fordow and had advised his superiors on developing a unique bomb that could destroy such a facility when the need arose. The American versatility is based largely on the freedom of ideas they give their people, and the resources they use to support the realization of those ideas. Fundamentalist societies will not give liberty to their people; they will not permit freedom of ideas; and they will not encourage economic prosperity among their people. Anything the people must do will revolve around the narrow mindset of the fundamentalist leader. My concern in this essay is the need to discourage every kind of religious fundamentalist in Christian circles. We must remind ourselves of the bedrock of our religion – grace. We must remind ourselves that we are sinners who have been freely forgiven by our Lord. We must enjoy the grace of the gospel, and we must allow this grace to extend to others also. We must not reach that point in our religious profession where we think that the standard of religion stands and falls by what we do. We must thank God daily for the progress we have made in sanctification, but we must never have that sense that we are the only standard of religion for all people. We must accept that Jesus Christ is working in all men who are professing his name. We should maintain our denominational peculiarities but we must never have an exclusive bent to our denominational profession. We must accept that Christ is working in every denomination and that there is something we all can learn from other Christian groups. We must commend our religious beliefs through charity – and never by force. We must understand that the most acceptable religious actions are not those that are dictated by a religious leader, but those that exhume from a heart that has come to accept the grace of God – especially as it is found in Christ Jesus. We must allow God to freely motivate his people towards sanctification. We must wait for God to do a miracle of grace in the hearts of men – just as he has done to us via his profound patience. As we do this, we get a glimpse of how Christ works through diversity in our world to bring to pass his good purposes. It has been eighteen months since the Alistair Begg controversy erupted, and I have no regrets at all in standing with that good man in that debacle. Since that time many religious leaders who criticized Begg have themselves failed woefully in Christian ministry. I had warned that the danger of condemning Begg during that controversy was that we would encourage a religion of Phariseeism. What Pharisees do well is that they cover their sins, while they rejoice over the failures of others. Pharisees also love hierarchy. They enact religious leaders that become the face of their sect – their own Ayatollah. If there is one thing the Protestant Reformation gave Christianity, it is the idea that one man can no longer rule the Christian Church – there are no Popes among believers today. Christ alone is the head of the Church. The Ayatollah is as much a sinner as the least person in the church. Where these ideas are rejected, we find the rise of fundamentalism in the churches and the coming of Christian Ayatollahs – even Reformed Ayatollahs. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at naijareformed@gmail.com 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲: https://textandpublishing.com/reformed-ayatollahs/ Attached photo: Pastor Alistair Begg, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
|
columbus007:What is poi? Folks like you could read the article and more to the subject |
Obafemi Awolowo is not Dead by: Deji Yesufu Obafemi Awolowo had a robust belief in the human being. His comprehension of what constitutes a man is very much in line with the biblical worldview that men have divinity residing in them. The Bible says that man is created a little lower than God but of greater essence than angels. It is this worldview that informed the sage’s position that human beings can be and must be developed to the highest possible form. It is the reason why he had a fanatical commitment to education. The Action Group, the party that Awolowo led in the 1950s, that led the Western Region at that time, promised to ensure that every child living in the Western Region had access to primary education at no cost. By the time the finances of the country were improving after the oil boom of the early 1970s, Obafemi Awolowo argued that Nigeria could now afford to provide free education at all levels to all its citizenry. What education does to the overall populace is that it raises the bar of discussion at all levels in the country. The country becomes a leading exporter of knowledge; technological advancements become the order of the day; the political system will shore up great thinkers, whose political theories can be shared on the world stage; etc. The United States of America is what it is today because many of its citizens are educated. Nigeria still grapples with underdevelopment because, on average, Nigerians are poorly educated. When you consider that the Action Group brought television broadcasting to the Western Region long before many countries in Eastern Europe had one, you then appreciate why Awolowo’s belief in the inherent worth of the human being was way beyond his time. My publishers and I are in the middle of a work on Obafemi Awolowo, and I had the immense privilege of talking with a member of the sage’s family recently. I asked this person what happened to the “DSH”. The DSH is “Dideolu Specialist Hospital” which is located at Ikenne. As the sage drew to his final days, he immersed himself in a project of building a world-class hospital, where people could get treated for all kinds of ailments here in Nigeria. He named it after his wife – the person who had been his biggest supporter all his life. The hospital was planned to look like the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, United States of America, where Awolowo and his wife would usually undergo annual medical checkups. Awolowo was convinced there was no reason why such a vision could not be replicated in Nigeria. In response to my question, this member of the Awolowo family told me that there is no practical possibility of finishing that vision today because even if the building is finished, the mass exodus of Nigerian doctors from the country will still render the place non-functional. Obafemi Awolowo envisioned the DSH because he believed so much that no one need die in their youth from disease; and that every Nigerian should have access to the best and most affordable health care. A week ago, I received a report that the young man who is in charge of disposing of refuse in my estate had suddenly died at 46. Another one, my plumber, died at 27 – all because our country has a nonfunctioning health system. But why did I title this article “Obafemi Awolowo is not Dead”? Well, it is again the offshoot of my discussion with this member of the sage’s family. This person said that since Awolowo died, the family have come to reconcile with the fact that their patriarch is no more. If he was alive, he would have used his influence to actualize many of the visions he still had. But now that he is dead, very few people wish to continue with his visions. The rest of this article will be used to argue against this position. In the final year of Obafemi Awolowo’s life, the sage told those who were close to him that that year would be his last on earth. He explained, however, that he would still be serving Nigeria even in death. What could the man have meant? It is simple. Worthy, beneficial, godly, and influential ideas are not from human beings – they are from God. Our societies today are the product of ideas from influential persons from times past. What you and I do today, are mostly dictated by the counsels of our fathers, many of them who are dead today. Those godly counsels were the product of experiences that emerged from the deep suffering of some of them. Those experiences and the ideas that emerged from them, which they pass to us, are all the providential workings of God in the lives of these men. Therefore, Obafemi Awolowo is still serving Nigeria mostly through his writings and ideas. It was only after reading his autobiography, Awo, that I learnt that it was Awolowo who brought the idea of “federalism” to Nigeria. Awolowo learnt the concept of federalism from the politics of Mahatma Ghandi and the scenario around Indian politics of the 1930s/40s. He saw how the desperate nations of India were wielded together through federalism, and he argued earnestly for it – against the feudalism of northern Nigeria and the unitarianism of Eastern Nigeria. It was the concept of federalism that Awolowo sold to Yakubu Gowon that led that administration to divide the one monolithic North into six different states on 27th May 1967. Although that action was the final straw that brought the country eventually to civil war, it was clearly an idea from God and has served the country well. It can be argued that Nigeria is not practicing true federalism. But the mere fact that this country is practicing some federalism is owing largely to the political sagacity of Obafemi Awolowo. In that regard, the man is still serving Nigeria. Obafemi Awolowo still serves Nigeria by continually challenging South-west Nigeria to remain the pacesetter in the country. The Cocoa House, which stands as a monument to a time in Western Nigeria, when this region of the country was forward-thinking and productive, still challenges people of my day to keep the flag of the sage flying by ensuring that this part of the country continues to be the leading thinkers and producers in the nation. It is true that a lot of things are not working, but it is also true that south-west Nigeria has such potential for greatness, and Obafemi Awolowo is always reminding us about this. Recently the Awolowo Foundation (obafemiawolowofoundation.org) brought the sage alive by publishing all his written works. It has become the favorite pastime of half-baked publishers, unseasoned YouTubers, and unscrupulous bloggers, to continue spewing mistruths about the sage. Obafemi Awolowo envisioned that this was going to happen to his legacy and that is why one of the reasons he left the Gowon administration in July 1971, was so that he could write his memoirs – carefully documenting all that happened to him. It is surprising that some people still mention the Coker Commission as a stain on the legacy of Awolowo when it is a historical fact that the Coker Commission was a politically motivated machinery to destroy the good works of Awolowo and his administration. In fact, that action ultimately led to a civil war in the country. I do not share the idea that Obafemi Awolowo is no more. I believe that like all righteous men, who left worthy causes behind, the man is still serving Nigeria even as he said he would in his final years. As I grew up in northern Nigeria, the only literature of Awolowo that I read were the three booklet volumes my father had in his library: The Voice of Wisdom, Courage and Reason. In one of these books, Awolowo mentioned that as far back as the 1970s, northern Nigeria was behind the southern parts by 150 years by educational standards. He said his foray into politics was to try to bridge the gap. All the problems Nigeria has today with the insurgency in northern Nigeria must be traced to the fact that the leaders of the north have restricted Western education to only children of the elite – while making Quranic education compulsory for all children. Now that we have a generation of northern youths saying that Western education is haram, you can understand what the sage was complaining about then. Awolowo, like many worthy sons of Nigeria, cannot die. Their ideas and ideals will continue to form the basis on which our society will stand. Things may not be where they are supposed to be today. But things will improve in the days to come. The sons and daughters of Obafemi Awolowo will rise up one day; they will bring the sage back to life through his ideas, and they will help actualize a better, functional, and progressive Nigeria. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at naijareformed@gmail.com Source
|
MrPresident1:We make our arguments public because we invite scholarly criticism of our work. Please provide the errors. Thanks. |
Mighty Sparrow, Amen... send me an email, Mighty |
What You Should Know of the Israel/Iran War By: Deji Yesufu Our generation takes a lot of things for granted and one of those things is the subject of war and peace. Any careful study of history will reveal that one common factor among nations is the subject of war. Long before the coming of Western liberal thoughts, that promote freedom and democracy, and the idea that sovereign boundaries of nations should not be exceeded, the one common factor in the relationship of man with man is that there is always one strong man somewhere who is convinced he can overrun the rest of his neighbours, subjugate them, and bring all people under his rule. It is because nations fear the rise of this strong man that we have things like international relations and diplomacy. When these fail, the next thing that we will have in our hands is war – and the conflict that we see between Russia and Ukraine is an example. What has occasioned this article is the recent rise in hostilities between Israel and Iran. What is going on between these two countries is a lot more than hostilities: these two sovereign nations are at war. Israel targeted Iranian nuclear facilities a few days ago and did not only destroy them, they also killed top leading Iranian nuclear scientists. In the last count, Israel has killed seven of their thirteen leading scientists and they have also taken out a couple of their military commanders. In response, Tehran, the capital of Iran, yesterday, sent hundreds of missiles into Israel. Israel has a dome system that it uses to shield itself against missile attacks. However, a few of these missiles leak through this dome defense and reach Israeli settlements – destroying homes and killing people there. Why is Israel attacking Iran? The animosity between the two countries is historic. It dates back to the writing and theology of the Quran – the Muslims’ divine revelation. The Quran regards the Jews as enemies of civilization and that there will be no peace in our world until all Jews are annihilated. When the Quran was written, Jews had been dispersed from their land of origin – which the British named Palestine in the 18th century. After the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, one of God’s judgements on the Jews was that they were going to be dispersed from their land of origin. In AD70, the Romans moved into Judea and while trying to quell an insurrection, they levelled Jerusalem, slaughtered thousands of Jews, and sent them all into exile. So, by the time the Quran was written, the Jews were everywhere in the Middle East and Europe. Now, though they had no land of their own, they possessed a unique culture that was influenced by the Bible, the Old Testament, that made them stand out anywhere they found themselves. This is besides the fact that the Jews are so uniquely gifted by God that they excel in anything they lay their hands to do. Now, even though they had been dispersed from their land, they could read from the Old Testament and see that God often shows mercy to them and restores them to their land. So, in the 19th century, a movement called Zionism began to rise in Europe, where the idea of Jews returning to their fatherland was championed. At this time, Palestine was not occupied by anyone – except for a few Arabs. With time, the Jews began to return to their homeland. But there was a greater exodus to Palestine following the genocide against the Jews by Hitler’s Nazi regime. In 1948, the United Nations recognized Israel as a sovereign nation, and the Jews felt they now had their own country. Except that now they must deal with their Arab neighbors – who are mostly Muslims. While the Jews had overcome one problem, returning home they encountered another. The story of the Jews since 1948 up till date is how they must survive in a Muslim-dominated region, whose scripture teaches that Jews must be annihilated. The conflict we are witnessing between Israel and Iran has also been elicited by October 7. This was when Hamas, a confirmed terrorist group, moved into Israel and killed 1,400 Israelis. Israel discovered that Iran was behind these terrorist attacks, and they have since launched attacks on not only Hamas strongholds in Gaza but also Hezbollah, which is another terrorist group in Lebanon. Israel succeeded in destroying all the men at the helm of affairs in Hezbollah and the group is non-functional today. Now, if Israel has succeeded so far, what are the issues on the ground? At the heart of Israel’s challenge is Islam. Islam has two big problems: there are Muslims who have been exposed to Western civilization and who can see that there is a deep conflict between Islamic ideals and Western values. They understand that they can’t function in the modern world, while at the same time holding to age-old Islamic fundamentalist beliefs. Some of these Muslims include Muslims in nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE countries. What such Muslims do, therefore, is that they try to enjoy the benefits of two worlds. They live within a Western world; enjoy western scientific developments; adopt western values – like education and monogamy; etc. At the same time, they keep some Muslim values. These Muslims are the ones that some of us have come to call “peaceful” Muslims. The second problem is that there are Muslim groups that do not have the patience that these peaceful Muslims have. They have read the Quran; they have followed Muslim histories and have reached that comfortable position that the true Muslim is the one who will establish the kingdom of God on earth with the power of the sword. They will have an Islamic society now or they will die trying to establish one. Some of these groups are Boko Haram, ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah, and a host of others around the world. The world has succeeded in labelling these groups terrorist groups; although even that label is being contested by many groups and faulty ideologies. One such faulty ideology is the rise of the Left in the West. What is very clear is that Western civilization is founded on a Christian worldview. What informs the laws of many nations are the pronouncements of God in the Judeo-Christian scriptures, the Bible. The Ten Commandments and the laws that God gave Moses to establish a civil society for Israel are still many of the laws that are in our constitutions today. This is why when the British established the nation called Nigeria, they simply transposed many of these Judeo-Christian values into our laws. On the other hand, for three hundred years there has been a rise in Western societies of a Leftist worldview that espouses ideas that are against the biblical worldview. This is what has led to the homosexual revolution of the West. These people are enemies of Christians. When you discover that Islam has historically never been a friend of Christianity, you understand why many Muslims are finding comradeship with the left. It is these leftists that are joining Muslims around the world to scream “death to Israel”. Is there a way forward? I will end the way I began this article: all of us have taken the peace that we enjoy in our world for granted. Lasting peace is the result of conquering. Even after nations have conquered others, laws and justice must still form the undergirding principle of a society – or else the society will return to war. Functional societies are led by strong men and proven institutions. Strong men are established via military prowess. Military actions in our days have gone beyond field battles – most of the terrorists Israel took out in their recent campaigns were killed remotely. Modern warfare is waged with a sound mind. It means that the countries with the best and most modern military armaments are the ones that will win a military conflict. I predict that Israel will defeat Tehran and that the murderous regime in that country that has been ruining that land since the 1970s will be replaced. Terrorist Islam will be defeated in our world. But that will not be the end. Every one of us has to realize that the future of our world is education. We must begin to learn and gain understanding of issues. Islam must jettison its antediluvian ideology that believes that might is right. In our world today, it is the people who can champion the best ideas and show that those ideas are workable, that will gain the upper hand. Islam is coming of off age, and those who have refused to learn, are learning their lessons the hard way. Those who love peace should pray for America and Israel that God will grant them the ability to neutralize all forces of evil in our day and time and grant peace to our world. The alternative is militant Islam; or, China’s socialist regime; or, Russia’s fascist dictatorship; or, North Korea’s atheism. The choice is ours to make. As for me and my household – we choose life: we choose the Judeo-Christian worldview that has given our time workable societies and modern technological advancements. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at naijareformed@gmail.com.
|
CreatedtwoRule:Amen |
Typing: ![]() |
Exceed15:Yes |
jchioma: ![]() |
My Thoughts on the Death of Rev. David AzzamanSource
|
okomile:AI Summary: The article on Nigerian Bigmanism explores a cultural phenomenon where individuals, often men, flaunt their wealth and status through extravagant spending, material possessions, and displays of power. This behavior is often driven by societal pressures, a desire for respect, and a need to showcase success. Bigmanism can manifest in various ways, such as: - Excessive spending on luxury items - Boasting about wealth and status - Using material possessions to measure self-worth - Emulating Western or elite lifestyles The article might discuss the implications of Bigmanism on Nigerian society, including its potential effects on social dynamics, economic stability, and individual well-being. |
Nigerian Bigmanism By: Deji Yesufu When a society has fundamental problems, every person living within that sphere becomes an overnight sociologist. We all try to proffer solutions to these problems with the hope that we can solve societal troubles. A cursory look at Nigeria’s history will reveal that this country has never had a short supply of solutions to our problems. Books have been written; academic papers have been published; the radio and TV are filled with social commentators; etc. Everybody appears to know what the problem is with this country but the solution continues to evade us. I might have accidentally found the solution to our problems but before I mention it, I must trace out a little history of this country. In 1949, Obafemi Awolowo called a few friends to a meeting in his house and shared with them the idea of forming a political party. He told them that the party was going to be birth in secret. Having been in politics long enough, the sage had realized that many good ideas have perished in Nigeria because people see what could become of those ideas and because they will not be primary beneficiaries of it, they ensure it is killed in infancy. Between 1950 and 1951, when the political party would be announced to the public, numerous meetings were held; key offices in the party were enacted; ideas were shared; policy papers for the party were formed; etc. Eventually, they came to the question of what to call the party. After a few deliberations, Awolowo suggested that the party should be called “Action Group”. He argued that the main problem with Nigeria is not lack of ideas, it is just that Nigerians love to talk; they love to hear the sound of their own voices, but they hardly have the will to do the things they were talking about. Awolowo told his associates that the Action Group will be known more for what it does, than for what it says. The Action Group government that led South-west Nigeria from 1952 till 1960, remains the most successful political organization in this country’s history. Their success arose essentially from the fact that they pursued to actualize the things they promised the electorate. They allowed their actions to speak for them. By the time they finished government, many of the ministers in Awolowo’s government, including himself, were in debt. They served the people of Southwest Nigeria and much of what they did then is still standing as a witness to their work here in Ibadan. What is the Nigerian problem? The chief problem with Nigerians is that we love the allure of office, while we are not so concerned with using that office to meet given goals. Nigerians will kill to get to positions of influence, but they reach those offices and spend most of their time there flaunting the fact that they are “Mr. this” or “Chief that”. I had always been aware of this fact about the people of my country. I however did not know what to call it. I was on a phone call with a man I now regard as a mentor who told me that that thing I have successfully identified should be better called “Nigerian Bigmanism”. I will explain what the two words mean, and how the phrase they both form is relevant to the question of solving the Nigerian problem. Nigerian Bigmanism is essentially a Nigerian thing. There is no doubt there are many places around the world, even in developed societies, where this ugly human trait shows itself – but one could argue that it is more pronounced in Nigeria. Everyone in this country wants to appear important. Everyone wants to occupy office. We pursue degrees and certificates, not because we want to solve societal problems but because we want to be called “doctor” or “professor”. We are offended when we are called in public without our given titles. Family members spend time wanting to know the ages of other family members so we can remind such persons we are older than them. Nigerian bigmanism is a Nigerian thing. With what I have written above, one can safely deduce what “bigmanism” means. But in case you have not, bigmanism is simply the corrupting of two words: “big” and “man”, and then an attempt to make the two words into a noun. The big man is everything in Nigeria. Many times he might just be big in name, and empty of any substance within. Having identified this problem of bigmanism in Nigeria, the next thing is to attempt a cure for it. To be able to rid ourselves of its corrupting influence, Nigerians must first and foremost accept that we have this problem. To write this article, I have settled within myself that because I am Nigerian, I am also plagued with this problem of bigmanism. Like Alcoholic Anonymous, I must say to myself “I am plagued with bigmanism” and I must submit myself to a program to rid my mentality of this problem. Alcoholic Anonymous takes its principle from the Christian message that calls men to repentance if they will experience any redemption within their lives. When we accept our sins, we are on the path of being forgiven and of being rid of them. Therefore, every person reading this article, if you happen to be a Nigerian, you must accept that you are plagued by this disease. The second thing that every Nigerian must commit themselves to do would be to talk less and do more. Like Obafemi Awolowo encouraged his political associates to do, we can allow our actions to speak for ourselves. I believe when we began to suffer in this country was when Nigerians began to pay little premium to merit, and give more effort to the question of who and who you know. When a problem arises in Nigeria, the first question that is usually asked is: “Who do you know in that place?” You need to know someone in an office for your case file to be treated; you need to know someone in a hospital to see the doctor; you need to know someone in a political organization to get a job within a system; etc. When merit died, nepotism and cronyism took its place. At the close of the day, Nigerian institutions are no longer known for what they produce; but mainly for what they used to be. If this country will not go under eventually, we must rediscover merit, and we must be a people with the ability to translate vision into work. Productivity must heighten in this country, and the people who can deliver on a project must be called to occupy office; not just that they know somebody, or they possess some certification; or, any of these silly sentiments that carry the Nigerian big-man toga. There are many other things Nigerians must do to rid themselves of bigmanism. But I think this one last thing cannot be avoided: Nigerians must understand the true meaning of meekness. The meek man is the person who has power and ensures he does not abuse it. The meek man knows that the position he occupies already gives him a vantage point and strength, and he ensures he does not oppress those under him because of the position he occupies. A meek man makes humility his pursuit. He never announces himself. Even when the work begins to speak for him, he still ensures that he is humble. A meek man enters the office to use the office to meet set goals; not to uplift himself and belittle others. The meek has his strength under control. When we realize that our time in office is fleeting, and one day we must leave our position for someone else, we endeavour to treat other people the same way we wish they would treat us when they are in places of authority. Nigerian bigmanism dies in the face of meekness. When we have knowledge of some history – and realize that many men of power have lived, died, and are mostly forgotten, we want to humble ourselves – because we also will become of one those numbers one day. We should hope that our time in office will leave a mark for many to remember. We should hope that there will be landmarks that are tied to our names in the future. We should hope that a generation will rise and say, like they say of Obafemi Awolowo, “We went to school because of this man’s vision of free education”. Nigerians should pursue to actualize the given vision and stop basking in the allure of office. There are many things wisdom teaches. Bigmanism is never one of them. The Nigerian problem is not rocket science. It is easy to solve. I will not mind if this essay joins the scrap hill where Nigerians throw away good ideas. I will however endeavor to commit the rest of my life to ensuring that bigmanism dies within me. I hope that if and when I occupy the office, I will spend more time being productive than enjoying the perks of the office. I hope I can be an example to people via my actions, and maybe then people will discover this article from the scrap hill of ideas and realize that I have been championing these thoughts long before I came into office. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY Source
|
chiagozien: ![]() |
Boko Haram: Nigeria’s Nemesis By: Deji Yesufu One of the leading weapons that Ukraine has succeeded in using against Russia’s incursion into their land is American drones. The technology behind drones is simply breathtaking. If you have a moment, go to YouTube and watch short videos of how these drones are used on the battlefield. The drone tracks down a detachment of Russian soldiers, and while filming them, it begins to aim bullets and bombs at them. There is usually nowhere for the soldiers to hide. After evading the drone for a little bit, the soldiers end up being killed. One of the ways they succeed against these drone attacks is to distract them with one soldier, who chooses to lay down his life for his colleagues, while others flee to safety. Well, the Nigerian public needs to be aware that Boko Haram is now in possession of these same drones, and they have been using them against Nigerian soldiers. In fact, the recent resurgence of these evil men and the increased successes they have had in Borno State are largely owed to this fact. The issue has become such an urgent matter that the Nigerian military reported that its core leadership have now moved to Maiduguri to find lasting solutions to the Boko Haram problem, which has successfully made itself into Nigeria’s chief nemesis. The beginning of Boko Haram must be traced to a young man called Mohammed Yusuf, who at the beginning of this millennium began to teach an unorthodox Islamic doctrine that the white man’s civilisation was “haram” – not permitted by God. Those who study a bit of sociology say that there is an inevitable clash that will arise between the Western bloc in the world and the Eastern parts of our world. The West was built essentially upon Christian values, while most of the East is Muslim. When the British came to Nigeria to colonise it, their main concern was not to spread their religion. The British needed raw materials to feed their ever-growing industries. They found, however, that they could not separate their mission from the missionaries who had come to bring the light of the gospel to the local people. The British would eventually see the missionaries as allies. The British provided the missionaries with military cover for their work, while the missionaries aided the colonisers to reach the local populace. All of these were happening in the backdrop of a simmering conflict that had just concluded. An Islamic scholar and warlord had only just concluded his missions in Northern Nigeria when the British arrived in the country through the coastal areas in the 1830s. Uthman Dan Fodio was born in 1754 and died in 1817. Dan Fodio was a Fulani who helped to spread Sunni Islam throughout Northern Nigeria. His movement was regarded as a revolution because it took over most of the areas we now regard as North West and North East Nigeria. His hopes were to bring Islam to the coastal areas of Nigeria, but his followers’ crusade in Southwest Nigeria was stopped at Ilorin. This is why the Sokoto Caliphate still lays claim to Ilorin. Another thing that is generally known about Dan Fodio was that he spread his religion with the force of the sword. If Nigeria had a constitutional government at his time, Dan Fodio could easily have been likened to an old-time Boko Haram. Boko Haram and Dan Fodio quite easily could find justification for their actions from the Muslims’ holy book – the Qu’ran. There is nothing within the Qu’ran that commands Muslims today to pay allegiance to the constitution of Nigeria. In fact, there is everything within their sacred texts that tells them to wage war against unbelievers and bring the government of Nigeria under the rule of Islam. This is the justification that Boko Haram has for its actions. As we continue to consider the real dangers that Boko Haram and other terror groups pose for the continuous existence of Nigeria, we must also come to grasp with another real fact: which is that our boys in the army are dying en-masse in a war that naturally should not take the nation any time to bring an end to. I am friends with a few soldiers on Facebook, and you cannot imagine the horrors that our boys must endure in a war that I consider needless, and that this country should have ended a long time ago. Perhaps at the heart of the failure of the army to rein in the Boko Haram insurgency is the endemic corruption in many public institutions in Nigeria. Many people are spending blood money in this country. It appears that what propels a lot of Nigerians into action is never love for country or for their fellow men, but love for themselves, their families, and their communities – in that order. One way or the other, Nigerians missed the lesson that a country is only as strong as the people in it band together. The foremost reason people enter public office is almost never to serve the populace, but to serve themselves, their families, and their communities. Corruption is killing Nigeria, and the army is not immune to this epidemic. Perhaps one day this country will find military men who will occupy office to bring an end to the violence in the North East. As Nigeria battles the evil of corruption in its midst, there is also the challenge of foreign influence on the country. David Hundeyin has been positing a conspiracy theory for a long time, but very few people are paying attention to the young man. He has been saying that the Western world realises the potential Nigeria has not only in the mass of natural resources beneath her soil, but also in the sheer number of its population. Nigeria has simply not gone under because Nigerian women continue to give birth to children in record numbers. When you compare this fact with the Western world, where women are having an average of one of one child to a family, and our women here are having at least three children to a family, you understand why the Western world fear Africa and Asia’s domination of the world scene through sheer population growth. The conspiracy theory is that the West will continue to support insurgency activities in the country that will cause chaos, anarchy, and killings, just so that our numbers can be reduced. When you also realise that the drones that the Boko Haram terrorists use are Western-made, in fact, American-produced, you begin to give some thought to this conspiracy theory. Finally, there have been reports that Boko Haram and other Islamic insurgent groups continue to receive mysterious military supplies and food, delivered to the terrorists in their hideouts in the bush with helicopters, etc. You then begin to realise that these conspiracy theories may have elements of truth in them. America’s chief concern has never been the good of the world. The American fundamental theory is “America first”, and Donald Trump has only come to strengthen that philosophy. If anyone will save Nigeria, we may need to stop looking less to the Western world, and also consider a similar philosophy of “Nigeria first”. The biggest takeaway from my article should be this: how do we solve the Boko Haram problem? The solutions will not be easy, but the Nigerian government must be willing to consider them. The first thing I think the government of the day must come quickly to realise is that there are essentially two types of Islamic ideologies in Nigeria today: the first are agreeable to Western civilisation, and the second are gravely opposed to it. The challenge that I think this country has been having is that many Muslims who are agreeable to Western civilisation also give tacit support to Boko Haram. You find this support not in what they say or do, but in their complete silence about the carnage that this evil group is bringing on Nigeria. If Muslims regard Boko Haram as a terrorist group in truth and verity, organisations like MURIC should be at the forefront of condemning these animals. What you find is that MURIC and other Muslim organisations will complain about everything except the scores of people being killed daily in Borno State. It appears to me that Muslims have come to regard the activities of Boko Haram as normal. I also fear that it is also appears that there is a hope that some Muslims have that they will one day see Boko Haram overrun this country so that Nigeria would no longer be a secular state but a Muslim one. These allegations may sound extreme, but I believe the only way Muslims would convince some of us otherwise is when they begin to condemn Boko Haram with the strongest words possible. Second. This country must pray and hope that God will send saviour military men to our army. Men who have the genuine good of this country at heart, and not men who are just in office to line their pockets. Some of the stories that emerge from the frontlines about the raging corruption in the military are really heartbreaking. Earlier this year, Fisayo Soyombo, an investigative journalist, unveiled corrupt practices in the military, where soldiers were aiding the smuggling of crude oil in Rivers State. That story was covered up, and nothing came out of it. Instead, poor Soyombo is doing everything today to not end up being killed by assassins for the work he does to save Nigeria. If the Nigerian military is giving cover to smugglers of crude, what else are these men doing in the face of insurgency attacks in the country? At some point, Nigerians will have to come to grips with the fact that there is such a thing as patriotism. Also, that God has created us to not only benefit our families and ourselves, but also to benefit humanity. And if charity must begin at home, we must all commit to helping this country solve its problems. All hands must be on deck. The potential of this country is way too much for us all to allow it to waste away. Most of us have ignored this Boko Haram subject because it appears to be hundreds of kilometres away from where we live. But the nature of insurgency is that no one knows what it can become tomorrow. The Boko Haram threatening to take Maiduguri today may begin to head to Abuja. And if those animals take the seat of power, this country is as good as finished. Lastly, I must leave a word for our youths: What are you doing with your education? The nation has heard your cries for jobs, but you must understand that the greatest blessing that God might have given your generation is the absence of jobs in Nigeria. What education equips you with is the ability to solve problems. When you bring solutions to people’s problems, these people will pay you any amount for it. This is how jobs are created in working societies. Recently, a can of beans was being sold for N5,000 in Ibadan. Have you considered agriculture? Here we are talking about the menace of Boko Haram in our society. Have you considered gathering children together and teaching them lessons on patriotism? Instead of these endless skits you young people make, have you considered bringing yourself together and birthing another Nigerian Youth Movement (NYM)? Do you know that the NYM of the 1940s is what produced great nationalists like Obafemi Awolowo and Nnamdi Azikwe? Your education is meant more than to keep you in an office with air conditioning blowing over your face. It is meant for you to recognise societal problems and provide solutions to them. Yesterday, I met a young man who is planning to become a distributor of electric motorcycles in Ibadan. Another young man has started to build “okada Teslas” in the Eastern parts of Nigeria, and this young man will be selling that product in Ibadan soon. These boys saw that fuel is becoming too costly, and that Nigerians might begin to prefer motorcycles that run on batteries alone. How Boko Haram became both a menace and a nemesis to Nigeria is a story that will still be properly told someday. For now, we must rest content with the fact that this country has a problem, and we must be brutally honest with ourselves enough to solve it. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at newdejix@gmail.com Source
|
Thank God for the Prosperity Gospel By: Deji Yesufu Controversies have always been the driving force in theology. A careful reading of the New Testament will reveal that our Lord Jesus Christ himself did not shy away from controversies. Most of what Jesus taught was either diatribes against a popular opinion of his day or a polemic against false teachers. The Jews of Jesus’ day could never have imagined that God would have anything against their doctrine or practice. They were convinced that, unlike the days of their fathers, when they frequently departed from God’s laws and went after idols, Ezra had finally succeeded in importing true religion to Israel. The fact that they had groups like the Pharisees and the Sadducees was only a pointer to the virility of their beliefs, or so they thought. “Doctrine divides…”, I could imagine a few of them boasting. Alas, when Christ the Son of God, nay, God himself, came among them, our Lord condemned the religion of the Jews. They couldn’t believe it and, in their exasperation, they took the Lord of glory and crucified him. Christ’s death was the response of the Jews to Christ’s polemic against their religion. We could sit pretty in the 21st century and think that we ourselves would never do such a thing. But such thinking totally underestimates the wickedness in every one of our hearts. Thankfully, the coming of Jesus had promised salvation from sin (Matthew 1:21). The sin this scripture promises Christ will redeem men from shall not be the sin of the world but the sin of his people. Long before Christ was condemned at the cross, God had set out a plan to save his people from their sins. The true biblical thinking, therefore, is not the man who thinks he has finally gained mastery of his sin; rather, it is the man who identifies the wickedness of his own heart to be on par with those of the Pharisees and Sadducees. If God saves the Jews who condemned his Son, God will save any sinner. This is the gospel. These thoughts emerge in my thinking in light of a simmering controversy on social media. The details of that controversy are not necessary to be mentioned here. What I felt I must respond to was a diatribe against me during this controversy. When an individual made a statement that I am convinced has my person included. This person said, and I paraphrase: a lot of people you see on social media are not Reformed. These people are only reacting against the Prosperity Gospel. You then ask: how do you know this person was talking about you? And I answer: I was not born yesterday. My chairman at the Reformed Theological Seminary Foundation (RTSF) tells me that the greatest strength of the British is hearing what people did not say within a whole lot of statements they uttered. Besides, how many Reformed persons in this country have written against the Prosperity Gospel like me? My book, HUMANITY, was a polemic against the Prosperity Gospel. Now, to be fair to this individual, he might not have had me in mind when he made that statement. For the sake of this article, however, I choose to wear the cap. My angst against the Prosperity Gospel can be traced to my mother’s words to me sometimes in 1984. Here we are staring at the television, and Benson Idahosa appears, preaching in a flowing white agenda. My mother said: Beware of men like this. They are in the ministry only for money. Many years later, I saw the story of Jeroboam, the first king of breakaway Israel. Scripture records that Jeroboam made two calves and proclaimed that those calves were the ones that delivered Israel from Egypt. Now, a 21st-century thinking person will say: no one should believe that narrative. Israel should know their history. Alas, they believed it. Not alone, generations after generations prostituted themselves with those calves. Scripture tells us that every king after Jeroboam followed this doctrine and every one of them sinned. This continued until God rid the land of Israel. I read that part of the scriptures in 1999, and I became convinced that Benson Idahosa could very easily be substituted for Jeroboam. Modern Prosperity teachers in Nigeria are the sons and daughters of the sin of Jeroboam – nay, Idahosa. What, then, is the relevance of this thesis to the recent controversy? I will explain. Genuine Reformed thinking has never been a doctrine that emerges by itself. Every Reformed work the Holy Spirit has embarked on since Elijah has been a reaction to false doctrine. Reformed Theology, in other words, is REACTIONARY THEOLOGY. We are in business because false teachers are in business. The day we cease to react to false doctrine, we cease to be Reformed. The word “Reformed Theology” was birthed by Ulrich Zwingli. Zwingli died early in the Reformed struggle, and it was left to Calvin to push the doctrine forward. And since then, the Reformed message has always entered a land to purify that land of prevailing false doctrine in a land. So, when modern Reformed thinkers tell us that our Reformed message should not react to the Prosperity Gospel, they are speaking from a very limited understanding, to say the least. If you live in Nigeria and your Reformed theology has so evolved as to no longer be bothered about the Prosperity Gospel, one should question your commitment to the gospel demands of our time. Now this piece is titled “Thank God for the Prosperity Gospel”, and I must hurry to explain the reason for my joy and rejoicing. God told the Jews that he had left some of the inhabitants of the promised land there so that the land would not be overrun with wild animals, and so as to teach Israel to wage war. If not for the Prosperity Gospel, I would probably have never known that Christ died for my sins ALONE. I employ the word “alone” because Martin Luther used it in his translations of the Greek New Testament into German, particularly in that mighty scripture in Romans 1:16-17. Rather than leave Romans 1:17 as “…the just shall live by faith…”, Luther added “…the just shall live by faith alone…” When he was accused of adding to the word of God, Luther explained that the German language needed that emphasis. But you and I understand that today that the distinction between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism is that word “alone”. In a similar way, the difference between reformed theology and Word of Faith is the word “alone”. Biblical theology, and by extension reformed theology, teaches that Christ died for our sin alone; while Word of Faith teaches that Christ died for our sin, and to make us healthy and wealthy. There is a lot of difference between these theologies, and making this distinction a lifelong pursuit is a worthy ministry. As we pursue the distinction between reformed theology and the prosperity gospel, which is Word of Faithism, it is also important to remind ourselves of some reformed distinctives. No matter how much anyone accuses some of us of not being reformed, the fact still remains that reformed theology, which is true biblical theology, has never been in lip service alone. While we rejoice in our confessions and we uphold worthy doxologies, true reformed theology is what people do. This is what I mean: biblical Christianity is a life that is transformed by the power of the Holy Spirit via the regeneration of a sinner’s heart. God sovereignly overrules the intentions of men’s hearts, causes repentance following the hearing of the gospel, and then imparts faith in the heart of the listeners. Salvation is by faith alone, which implies that we lay hold on Christ with the hands of faith. However, it is also the reformers who taught us that true saving faith is not alone. It yields fruits in keeping with genuine repentance. Therefore, it is not he who merely confesses the confessions that is confessional. It is not he who claims to be reformed, that is genuinely reformed. It is not belonging to a local assembly, where everyone vaunts reformed theology that makes a person reformed. The one who is genuinely reformed is the person who lives out the biblical tenets in all of their ramifications. It means that a Roman Catholic who believes in Jesus and lives out the commandments of Christ is reformed, while a reformed person who lives like a devil is not reformed – it does not matter what confessions he makes. One day in a nation very far away from ours, at a time quite distant from us, two missionaries met on the mission field to discuss the implications of their mission works so far, and how much more the Lord would demand that they do for him. There was, however, a small disagreement: one of the younger missionaries had left the group and returned home at the very point in time he was most needed. As they plotted the next mission, one of the missionaries insisted that this young missionary would not go with them. The other missionary said it was not an issue; the young missionary can be forgiven. What began as a small matter degenerated into a “sharp” disagreement. The once joyful missionary group became divided (Acts 15:36-41). In the eyes of men, this disagreement was looked upon as something bad, sinful, and controversial. In the eyes of the Lord, two missionary boards had been created to reach the nations with the gospel. The gracious sovereignty of God is the way and manner he uses even our sins to bring his good purposes to pass. This is why I am so thankful to God for the Prosperity Gospel. Because if there had been no prosperity gospel, I probably would never have encountered the doctrine of grace. Amen. Deji Yesufu is the Pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church, Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. He can be reached at newdejix@gmail.com. Source
|
Kobojunkie:Coming from a "junkie" ![]() |
Daisyle:Yes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX6qKQmoNqg?si=9ntttzP7G3nAFokm |
How Kemi Olunloyo brought a curse on herself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bX6qKQmoNqg?si=xKRXsEFLTZvNoGVw |
Concluded On a flight home from London on one occasion, Olunloyo ran into Prof. Wole Soyinka on the plane as he was putting his carrier bag in the overhead compartment. ‘Hello, editor of Mustard Seed.’ Wole Soyinka instantly turned and smiled. Soyinka was editor of Grier House magazine, Mustard Seed, in their school days at GCI and was two years Olunloyo’s senior. Both Soyinka and Olunloyo were in Grier House, both now academics, both sideline activists and politicians, both Ibadan ruminants who knew its nook and crannies for all its notable culinary joints. So there was plenty to share and to heartily reminisce about before they took their seats on the plane. Watching quizzically as they engaged were too students from the Middle East. Nervously, they went to Olunloyo. ‘Sir, is that Wole Soyinka, the Nobel laureate that you were talking to?’ Olunloyo answered in the affirmative, and both students nodded to themselves as if I told you so. Soyinka, with his mane, is unmistakable. The students summoned courage and approached Soyinka to pay their respects and admiration. They were mathematics students, so they asked Soyinka if Nigeria also had mathematicians of his stature. All Soyinka did was look back from his seat and point them to Olunloyo, who led them to him. The students returned to Olunloyo and laid bare their mathematics problem. They wanted a simultaneous equation problem involving three unknowns solved. Olunloyo asked for a sheet of paper and solved the problem with three approaches—substitution, matrices and moulds—to arrive at the same answer. It left the students with their mouths hanging open. Suddenly, they exclaimed: ‘Nigeria is full of geniuses.’ Perhaps so; who knows? When Lekan Are, his friend and classmate was going to be 80, I teased him that Lekan’s GCI school number was 514 ahead of his at 546, making Lekan a quasi-senior boy. His mind went in a different direction. He said to me, ‘Lekan’s number at 514 is very interesting. That is, two to power nine (512) plus two to power one (2), making 514, which in binary language is 1,000,000,010 for the computer’. Anyone who thinks like that must be crazy. Olunloyo was crazy about mathematics. I once had a week-long programme in Oxford. Somehow I finished by Friday and now had the weekend to myself. To occupy the weekend, I needed a handy book to engage me and so I went to Blackwell’s bookshop for one. I found none until I ran into a mathematics book. So captivated was I that I read the book to the bookshop’s till, through the bus ride to my hotel, and by the next day, I had finished reading the book. Excitedly, I called my wife with elan about my read, and she asked, as women are wont to do, whether I was under the influence. She declined to share the book with me and instead suggested that I give the book to Olunloyo. As soon as I returned to Nigeria, I went to Olunloyo with my new find. Unsurprisingly, he sat me down and gave me a fuller lecture on Srinivasa Ramanujan, the Indian mathematician who took a mathematics chair at Cambridge without a university degree. Olunloyo just simply knew mathematics. When integers stood alone or together, he saw ascension or descension; he could make their evenness or oddities; when placed on top of one another and fractionated, he could make sense of them all; when a full stop was thrown around numbers, the decimals were his companions; seeing figures, he could make an apparent or inherent meaning to them; he could see figures when sequenced or looped; even when numbers were chaotic, he could make sense out of chaos. Given any figure, he saw a deeper meaning, and with several figures, he could interpret where, under the same circumstances, the rest of us drew a blank. So, for him, there was maths and beauty everywhere around us, in literature, in music, and horticulture. Three years ago, he introduced me to the maths in graphic arts through the works of the genius E.C. Escher. Olunloyo was just simply phenomenal, a wondrous make, a mathematical head, pure and simple. But he was humble enough to acknowledge the vastness of knowledge, and he made a daily assignment to learn continuously. And so he spent endless hours in his study and paid weekly visits to the bookshop. Even when he suffered a stroke, he put his head to the test, and when the faculty was still fully operational, he said the legs could go as long as the head was intact. He rode around in a wheelchair in his study and made regular visits to the bookshop. On his penultimate visit, he sent me a note…He wrote that the bill be given to ‘Kolade whatever his surname’, and this was coming from ‘Olunloyo the man with constitutional authority’. Sometimes at public functions, he was bewitched in his thoughts. He would bend over to a sheet of paper to solve some mathematical problems. In this mood, I knew better not to disturb his train of thought. When admirers, friends, relations, etc, stopped by to say hello, they found him vacant. He was in a different realm. Surprisingly though, and magically so, he followed the proceedings of the function. You knew this because, at the end of the event, he could engage by giving a blow-by-blow account of what had transpired. For his work life, he took up an academic position as a lecturer at the University of Ibadan, then the University of Ife; he was later Rector Polytechnic Ibadan and briefly Polytechnic, Kwara; he held variegated positions with Government and Academic institutions—fifty-five in total spanning forty five years of service. He served as Commissioner for Economic Planning and Community Development, and Commissioner for Education in Western State. At some point, he held two portfolios at the same time as Commissioner of Education and Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs. In a number of these institutions, never mind his title, he served as a troubleshooter, an ombudsman, a cracker to solve any and every problem, and an interventionist minister. It was against this background that he set his sight on politics and was sucked into serving fleetingly as the Governor of Oyo State. I did not think much of his politics and never hid that from him. He was a mass of contradictions. Once, he told me that the politics of Oyo State operated on a tripod: Lamidi Adedibu provided the brawn, Aseez Arisekola/Yekini Adeejo the money, and Olunloyo, the brain—to formulate the ideology and strategy to propel the politics. I was never impressed. I thought he leagued with men after power with all means possible. But he countered that political parties are made up of angels and devils, less of one than the other. I have seen plenty of truism in that statement. Often, when he talked about politics, I listened intently but with dissimulation. I thought he had started his mathematical journey brilliantly, but it stood still when he veered into politics. I wish he stayed true and exclusively focused on mathematics and engineering. His wealth and profound faculty of intellect would have been globally felt far more than his political achievement. But he strayed into politics and remained mercurial in it because he tried to solve it with equations and theorems. It was a struggle that consumed him till the very end. For all his brilliance, he lacked financial intelligence. This dogged him in his twilight because of the huge expense over many years for his medical care. His family’s medical care was also, for many more years, quite exorbitant. People like him ought to have been kept in the financial court of the government or academic institution. They were not to be disturbed by mundane matters such as finances. Their focus had to be entirely scholarship—morning, day and night. He was on scholarship throughout his academic career. He could have been a national scholar for life. I am sure Olunloyo would not mind me mentioning his debt to his family and to the late Abiola Ajimobi, late Lekan Are, late Alafin Oba Lamidi Adeyemi, Enoch Adeboye, Rasheed Ladoja, Seyi Makinde, Bode George, Wale Babalakin, William Kumuyi, Olusegun Obasanjo, Gabriel Ogunmola, Kola Daisi, Lekan Ademosu, and Ibrahim Babaginda. Friends do not often reveal what friends do. He repeatedly sang their praises because they extended to him. Given the portrait that I have offered in this essay, the question should be posed whether his talent lay more in scholarship, particularly in mathematics and engineering or in politics. I will cast my lot with scholarship. He knew I talked little and wrote little, but when I had to, I did freely of my mind, which was the brace of the relationship. I was one of his sounding boards. He was a great friend, senior and mentor. I will miss his endless stream of conversation from Beethoven to Newton, Einstein to Awolowo and Akintola and, of course, Euler, Ramanujan, Hawkins and Archimedes—his fellow mathematicians. He was a polyglot, a polymath, an iconic, itinerant teacher, a maverick, and a restless politician. Such was the ease with which he could move from Pythagoras through Aristotle and Dante to Nietzsche and Shakespeare with relative ease. He was truly well-cultured. I remember a tale he once told me. Chief Obafemi Awolowo had written a letter to him in which he stated categorically that ‘…when I become 80…’. Olunloyo took the letter back to him the next day after having read it. He added two words to that categorical statement, to now read ‘…if and when I become 80…’ Awolowo accepted the correction. The Good Lord took Awolowo away at 79. Man’s limitation and language is to make provision that whatever will be will be, only if God is willing, deo volente (dv), an ablative absolute expression. On Saturday, April 5, 2025, Dr Olunloyo called me not once, but four times. On the fourth call, he asked that I undertake an assignment for him. I sent a note to the mutual friend he sent me to and added, ‘by the way, Dr Victor Olunloyo will be 90 on April 14, 2025’. Suddenly, I remembered his tale and quickly corrected myself and now wrote ‘…Dr Victor Olunloyo will be 90 on April 14, 2025, God willing’. The Good Lord, in his providence, called him home the next day, April 6, 2025. When death finally came, even though previous rumours and hospitalizations had prepared me, I shed a tear. …Last scene of all That ends this strange eventful history Is second childishness and mere oblivion Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything. William Shakespeare, As You Like It, Act II, Scene VII. Dr Kolade Mosuro is a Publisher, Bookseller, and Trustee of Government College Ibadan Old Boys Association. Source Photo: Author of the article - Kolade Mosuro of Booksellers, Dugbe, Ibadan
|
Dr Victor Omololu Olunloyo: Uncommon Brilliance By: Dr Kolade Mosuro On at least two different occasions, the rumour was rife on social media that he was dead. To be falsely deceased, I teased that he, like Alfred Nobel, had had the chance to read his own obituary. In a particular instance, a family rebuttal revealed that he was in intensive care at the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan. I made for the Intensive Care Unit, UCH, the next day, a Saturday morning. I was not going to disturb their care or protocol. I just had to be there in case he needed me. Expectedly, and rightfully so, the nurses barred visitors from seeing him. I wrote my name on a sheet of paper and gave it to a nurse to hand over to him, just for him to know I was outside in case he needed anything. The nurse came rushing back and said that he wanted to see me immediately. As I got to his bedside, he held my hand tightly and, to the amazement of the medical staff around, quoted the melancholy words of Jacques in Shakespeare’s As You Like It: “All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances, And one man in his time plays many parts…” Right there, I stopped him in his tracks that he should quote no further. Instead, to his smile, we both said in unison that the exit was not now. He lived another three years after, but poorly. Finally, with every man inevitably to his exit, death, not wholly unexpected, came calling on April 6, 2025, after he had played many parts following an innings of eighty-nine. The preparation for these many parts began from Government College, Ibadan (GCI) in 1948, although he was scion to an illustrious family, the first educated elite and early Christians in Ibadan. When David and Anna Hinderer, the first CMS missionaries, came to Ibadan in 1853, they were placed in the care of Balogun Olunloyo, a warlord and high chief of Ibadan. Balogun Olunloyo’s children, Akinyele, male, and Yejide, female, found play and school with the Hinderers. Akinyele became the first male literate of Ibadan, while Yejide became the first female literate. Yejide Girls Grammar School, Ibadan, is named after her. The Olunloyos prominently took up early church, civil, and administrative roles in Ibadan. The Akinyele line produced Horatio Vincent Olunloyo, who was Victor Omololu’s father. The brilliant signs of Horatio’s first son, Victor Omololu Olunloyo, were there even precociously from primary school. He took the common entrance examination, which was a global examination for all leaving primary school students, and he was first in 1946 and 1947 in the whole of the Ibadan District Church Council schools from Ibadan to Gbongan, Ikirun, and Osogbo. It was while at St. Peter’s Aremo Primary School that he was introduced to mathematics by an impressionable teacher, J.A.F Sokoya, in a remarkable and inspiring way. He saw early and clearly the relations of integers and that there was a concrete connection between mathematics and real life. Here, foundational mathematics was planted to flourish in him for the rest of his life. In 1948, he entered Government College, Ibadan (GCI) from Standard Five, as the youngest in his class, when most of his classmates came in from Standard Six. It took him some time to rally. Once he found his stride in the second year, he never let go of the first position in Mathematics. To be first meant not just to score high but to get everything. Two illustrations will suffice. A mathematics examination was going to be served by the teacher, Mr W.H. Browne. The teacher aimed to write the questions on the board, exit to have tea in the staff room, and come back to collect the students’ scripts. As he wrote the first question, he asked the students to commence. There were five questions, and they were to answer all of them. As he finished writing the fifth question and just as he was gathering his papers to go for tea, Olunloyo raised his hand. ‘What is it Olunloyo?’ the teacher queried. ‘I have finished, sir,’ Olunloyo replied. The teacher first thought it was a prank, remonstrated Olunloyo and then collected his papers for marking to see that, indeed, he had finished and got everything. There was an ‘unsolvable’ problem in the Mathematics textbook by C.V. Durrell. It was common in those days to tackle all the problems in a text to gain proficiency in the subject. There was a generational problem because nobody in the annals of GCI that used Durell’s textbook had solved it. It was a problem built around a billiard table. It was such a knotty problem because it fell outside the imagination of the boys. They had never seen a billiard table before. And then Mr. A. Long, the principal, was going to be visiting a friend at the University College, Ibadan, and he took some boys along. One of them was Olunloyo. Following the visit, they called at the Senior Staff Dining Hall and Recreation Centre, and before their very eyes, for the first time ever, was a billiard table, and a game was on. Olunloyo took a careful look and was in a conjectural mood. He could hardly wait to return to school to tackle the intractable Durrell problem—the one that had baffled his class and the seniors before him. He settled to the problem and finally solved it. In that eureka moment, he threw off his uniform; some said he went nude, running wildly around his house, Grier, shouting: “I have solved it! I have solved it!! I have solved it!!!” It was a momentous occasion for schoolboy mathematics. His brilliance and escapades at GCI became a lore. He went on to record a Grade 1 in his final year at GCI and A1 in Mathematics. Following GCI, he dazzled with some academic performances. He spent some seven months preparing for his HSC Examinations, a programme that would ordinarily take two years, and passed by scoring AAAC. He spent three months at the University College, Ibadan (UCI) and passed the Intermediate BSc, a programme that would ordinarily take two years. His stay at UCI was brief, but the records he set were renowned. At tests and examinations, when given mathematical questions to solve, for the student to attempt three out of five, Olunloyo would do four within the allotted time, and write on the script for the lecturer to mark any three he chose. He got them all. He was fittingly nicknamed by his fellow classmates, ‘Mark Any Three.’ Of his brilliance, everybody took notice; some took a special interest. Adegoke Adelabu and Emmanuel Alayande saw in him a very special Ibadan poster boy, a pride. M.S. Sowole, Ambassador and Agent-General for Western Nigeria in the UK, his father’s contemporary and bosom friend, and Lady Kofo Ademola and others saw in him a national academic prodigy. They leaned to an overseas university training. For overseas universities, Olunloyo’s heart was really in Manchester University. Why? Manchester then was one of the leading universities in the UK offering Technology. Ademola Banjo was there making waves. He had just recorded a first class in Mechanical Engineering. But Kofo Ademola was pushing differently. She wanted Olunloyo to go to Cambridge to be a part of that reputational institution that had graduated some of the best minds in Mathematics—Isaac Newton, Alan Turing, Carl Gauss,etc, and to go to Cambridge just as did her husband, Sir Adetokunbo Ademola. But Cambridge offered a one-year deferred admission because the session was already on. Olunloyo was not in any mood to wait idly for one year. Kofo Ademola was challenged to find another great university which offered immediate admission, which was what led him to St. Andrews College. The University of St Andrews is no pushover. It is the topmost and oldest university in Scotland. It is a university much favoured by the British royalty. It was established in 1413, and it is as renowned as the University of Oxford, founded in 1096, and the University of Cambridge, founded in 1209. Coming with only three months from the University College, Ibadan, Olunloyo was placed in the first year to study Mechanical Engineering. He kicked against his placement. He wanted to be placed in the second year, and he was adamant about this. By precedent, this was not done, but Olunloyo was obstinately insistent. He took his case to his Head of Department, Prof. Caldericks. Finally, Caldericks took the matter to the Senate, whereupon they reluctantly agreed to put him in the second year on the condition that he took a test in Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry. Olunloyo pleaded for a week of preparation before the tests were served. When the tests were served, three hours per subject, and marked, he scored 98, 88 and 84 percent in Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry, respectively. St. Andrews immediately placed him in the second year. In that second-year class, he led in all the subjects he took. He became a unique academic specimen, and this time, it was the Senate pressing to meet him. Prof Caldericks took his student to the Senate to the amazement of all the dons. Olunloyo got their bow. One of the amazing things he did in an examination of 150 questions in which they were expected to do 100 was to do all and he scored 132%. The next student to him scored 89%, while the third scored 66%. At graduation in 1957, six academic medals were available in his department; Olunloyo won five, and the sixth was won by Ifedayo Oladapo, both Nigerians, both old boys of Government College, Ibadan, and both classmates at GCI. Olunloyo recorded, of course, a first class in Mechanical Engineering. So did Ifedayo Oladapo, who went on to do his PhD at Cambridge. At the end of the graduation year, the best results from the top ten universities in the UK, the Ivy League institutions, are pooled, and the very best of them get the most prestigious prize, the 1939 Prize, and also to dine with the monarch. It was Olunloyo who won the British Association Prize for the Most Distinguished Student in the Faculties of Science, and so dined with Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth in 1958. Olunloyo was exempted from a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Mathematics and instead went straight on to do a PhD, a four to seven-year programme. He did it in a record time of two years with outstanding merit, finishing in 1959. He was twenty-four. Let us not debate: he was one of Nigeria’s most brilliant men. His brilliance was proudly extolled both overseas and in Nigeria. He returned to Nigeria, and marriage soon followed. I point this out just to relate it to brilliance. For his honeymoon, he and his first wife, Funmilayo, flew to the UK. On their return from Liverpool, they hitched a ride back on the Prime Minister’s yacht that had gone over for repairs. It was going to be a new adventure returning home by sea. Early one morning in the middle of the journey, Olunloyo looked to the sun and to his shadow on the deck and used both to plot a mental compass enough to determine that the ship was headed in the wrong direction. He asked for the captain to come to the deck. He shared his mental calculations, and the captain laughed. A disdainful laugh followed, and then silence fell, followed by a reflective sigh. At the captain’s command in his cabin were dials pointing directions, knots showing speed, scopes indicating the depth of water and coordinates, and here was Olunloyo without a tool other than a phenomenal brain telling him he was taking the ship in the wrong direction. Olunloyo asked that he should go back to check his controls. The captain went back to his control and checked his dials and his consoles and when he returned this time, there were sweat beads on his eyebrows. He found that the ship was headed in the wrong direction on the mighty sea. The captain, speechless, motioned that Olunloyo should go back to his cabin. He was going to do a right about turn with the ship, the kind, if you are familiar with the sea, that brings about instant sea sickness. Well, better be sick than dead. Olunloyo, armed only with his brain and the rays of the sun, saved the ship, the crew, and the passengers from imminent disaster. Concluded in the next post First photo: Dr. Victor Omololu Olunloyo Second photo: Olunloyo with daughter Kemi
|
CC: Seun |




