VBCampaign's Posts
Nairaland Forum › VBCampaign's Profile › VBCampaign's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 29 pages)
How Pastor Sola Abraham was Killed by an Okada Rider in Ipaja, LagosSource
|
orisa37:Yesso |
Is Donald Trump a Modern Adolf Hitler? By: Deji Yesufu Prof. Fasanmade is a father figure to my family. At over seventy, when a man of his age raises concerns, you want to listen to him. Prof. sent me a WhatsApp message yesterday night, where he asked me to re-examine the beginning of Nazism in Germany in the late 1920s. He explained that Donald Trump’s politics might be neo-fascism. He then provided a link to a speech Hitler delivered on the 10th of February, 1933. His point was that the same ultra-nationalism that Donald Trump is exuding could easily have been traced in that speech by Hitler. The biggest fear for him is that in the early days of the Nazis, they also rode upon Christian sentiments – even quoting Martin Luther’s criticism of the Jews as their justification for their anti-Semitism. Prof. fears that Donald Trump could plunge America into a global war – a World War 3. I do not share Prof.’s sentiments. I am not a prophet and I cannot tell what tomorrow holds. I would however use the remainder of this article to explain why I am positive Donald Trump is not a modern day Adolf Hitler. Before I go into my reasons, I will need to provide certain definitions for my readers. These definitions concern political ideologies that have developed in our world over the past three hundred years. There is such a thing as political right and political left. I am not sure how these ideas were developed but the political right are usually persons who are generally conservative in their ideologies. They want society to continue on old and proven ideas; they are generally very religious – preserving religious rights and tenets, and they are very suspicious of emerging ideas and progressive thoughts. On the left, however, are individuals who are progressive. They are usually iconoclasts. They want to tear down established beliefs and institute new ideas that are working. They are usually not religious people – in fact, many of them are either agnostics or atheists. The French Revolution of the late 18th century pitched these two ideologies against each other. The right wished to preserve the French monarchy; the left sought to abolish it. The right sought to preserve the religious institutions; the left was convinced that these were the people who aided the bourgeoise in defrauding the people. Karl Max tried to reconcile the left with the right with the socialist ideas he wrote about, which eventually formed much of the ideologies of Europe in the early 20th century. Today, however, political scientists see that no country can effectively be run on either right or left political ideas alone. Most countries will benefit from different measures of both ideologies used as each situation demands. So, every government would have to employ both progressive and conservative ideas to lead its people. The reason why Adolf Hitler’s speech, which Prof. Fasanmade referred me to earlier, sounded queer is because politically both Hitler and Donald Trump would be considered to be on the political right. Hitler may be seen as far right, while Trump is a little closer to the middle. It is this similarity in ideas that scares people about Donald Trump. The reasons I will now provide will show you why Trump cannot become a modern day Hitler. The first thing Hitler did when he came to power in Germany in 1933 was to acquire absolute power. He made himself the Fuhrer – the leader. He became the maximum leader of Germany in a way that no one in the early 20th century had ever acquired power. He was deliberate in doing this so that all of his decrees could be carried out without being questioned. Donald Trump can never become a Fuhrer because the world has learnt a great lesson from World War 2. Trump has signed a couple of executive orders. Those orders can be challenged in courts of law, and the law has the power to make them stand or fail. Another thing is that the American Constitution limits the powers of the federal government extensively. The best Trump might succeed at is enforcing his executive orders in red states – Republican-dominating states of America- while his orders fail in blue states. There is also an intimidating press in the United States. Every day, political ideas are being debated. The right may have power today but they are certain to lose that power if they do not use it responsibly. America, regardless of who controls the Senate and House, will always have elections every four years, and the people will always perform a plebiscite on their government. Hitler ruled Germany as the maximum ruler from 1933 until his suicide in 1945. There is no way Trump will do such a thing. It will never happen. Donald Trump cannot be another Adolf Hitler. Another point that we must consider is the fact that Trump’s nationalistic ideas are not entirely evil. They are natural. It will take purely irresponsible people to sit back and watch their country being ruined by foreigners, and do nothing about it. In the early 1980s, the Shagari government suddenly decided to deport Ghanaians. That was when the phrase Ghana-Must-Go became quite popular. Ghanaians had to flee Nigeria almost overnight with their belongings; they resorted to using plastic bags to pack their belongings. What happened was that the 1970s had brought tremendous wealth to Nigeria via oil. Ghanaians naturally began to come to Nigeria because there was a great demand for their expertise – especially in the area of teaching (Kwame Nkrumah had invested in training teachers and Nigeria enjoyed a great deal of Ghanaian teachers even to this date). However, by the turn of the 1980s, austerity had begun to bite Nigerians; oil money had evaporated; and the government blamed Ghanaians for this. It should be noted also that Nigeria considered expelling Ghanaians because Ghana had done a similar thing to Nigerians in the late 1960s. My point is that every country preserves their heritage and wealth for its people and its unborn children. It is only Nigerians that eat up the future of their children – no one else does such. I digress. So, when Trump says America first, he is only stating what every one of us would do if we were in his shoes. Even ending birthright citizenship is a similar thing in this direction. If you and I wish to have our children live in a good country, then let us fix this country. There is no point fleeing to another person’s country to enjoy what their own fathers have done for them, while we mess up ours. Nationalism is a natural thing, and if you consider what is happening in the USA with the Democrat Party’s foolish open border policies, you will understand Trump’s nationalism. Donald Trump cannot be a Hitler because today Trump is the biggest supporter of Israel. In less than five days in office, Trump has effected the release of Jewish hostages held by Hamas since October 7, 2024. There are many other reasons I could state to show that Trump is far different from Hitler, but I will limit my discussions to the two points above. The question another person might wish to ask is this: how does this all affect the cost of Garri in a Nigerian market? I will explain. World market prices are interconnected. With the astronomical rise in the dollar recently, the cost of fuel was hiked which led to the cost of transportation increasing, and which led to a congo of Garri selling for N2,000 from the N150 we used to buy it. If Nigerians understand that it is production that boosts a nation’s economy, they will realize that the work they are going to Canada to do can be done here in Nigeria, and they will earn an equal amount with time. It also means that if we think of Nigeria first, like Trump thinks of America first, we will bring in a level of patriotism to all that we do. We will buy Nigerian-made products because we are convinced that the money will return to a Nigerian trader, who will in turn do more business in Nigeria. We will buy Nigerian books; we will read Nigerian authors; we will watch Nigerian movies and listen to Nigerian songs more; we will promote Nigerian football and not the Premier League; we will listen to Nigerian preachers and buy the books that some of us sell. We will do Nigeria first, and Nigeria will benefit from it. This is what is making countries like China and Russia rival the United States today. These people are fiercely patriotic because they are convinced that a productive China will benefit the Chinese first, and they will not need to go abroad for a better life. All the fears surrounding a Trump presidency need not be entertained if all of us are doing the bit we can to develop our country. Unfortunately, we have tied the apron of our survival to America and are now afraid that a Trump presidency will cut off that unhealthy umbilical cord. While a Hitler can exist in Russia or China, it is not likely that America would be able to entertain one. The blessing of democracy is that the people do have the power to choose, and America does not have the likes of INEC overseeing its electoral processes. In Trump’s first term, he was committed to fulfilling his electoral promises. He will do the same in the second. While people feared he was going to witchhunt his enemies in his first term, he totally ignored them. It is not likely he will do that now. He has just one term to lead the United States and he would be more concerned at leaving a legacy for his children, than becoming an animal like Adolf Hitler. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. Source
|
All Hail Lady-Bishop Funke Felix-AdejumoSource
|
CC: Seun |
The tragic death of Bola Ige... part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FZX3oDYw4o?si=DexwjIPiIdb6h5xM |
WesleyPepper:Well... |
happney65:Well said |
Moment2:Listening... |
Bola Ige: What is Edmund Obilo Doing?Source
|
olisaEze:Sad |
Tochitee:. We will see |
Xisnin:Yes! |
Xisnin:We will see how it plays out |
Xisnin:Dele understood what he was getting into. The problem is not absence of evidence. The problem is whether the evidence available will convince a criminal judiciary. |
descarado:This will be a Bookshop. He autographed books for sale |
Multipurple:... I agree it is the writer's perspective and I agree with it. Peace is always worth it. And laws promote peace. |
Seun, I believe this thread would add to constructive public discuss on this subject |
Multipurple:We cannot genuinely claim independence to a system and document we just received, and for which we have benefited from. I'll tell you this, if the judgement had favored Balewa, they would still have stuck to the Privy Council. Such appeals were not cheap, nor were they frivolous. The state of the nation's peace dependent on it. If Akintola had been removed, Nigeria would never have gone to war. Law determines peace and prosperity. Lawlessness is the mother of chaos. |
A response to this article by a reader: Your article, How a Failed Judiciary Triggered the Nigerian Civil War, invites the reader into a profound contemplation of Nigeria’s judicial history, tracing the origins of systemic decay back to both colonial and post-colonial circumstances. There is an inherent wisdom in your recognition of the intertwining between legal history and national identity, and the reflections on figures such as Macaulay and Nzeogwu anchor your argument with depth and context. This is a commendable philosophical move, as it demonstrates that the current state of the judiciary cannot be understood without a broader consideration of its historical evolution. Yet, like any critical work, its strengths lie not only in the questions it asks but also in how it responds to them. In this spirit, I offer the following considerations from my own philosophical standpoint and without prejudice. 1. Overgeneralization: Your description of the judiciary as “criminal” strikes me as a bold and impassioned critique, but it runs the risk of obscuring the complexity of the issue. While the failures of the system are undeniable, a more nuanced exploration of its moments of integrity and legal resistance could enrich your analysis. In this, you would echo the philosophy of Hegel, who recognized the dialectic between moments of injustice and the striving toward justice. A recognition of the judiciary’s potential for reform would reinforce your critique without sacrificing its severity. 2. Causal Relationships: The nexus you propose between judicial failure and the Nigerian Civil War is thought-provoking, but the narrative could be expanded to consider the multiplicity of forces at play—ethnic tensions, political divisions, and economic challenges—each of which plays its part in the broader tapestry of Nigeria’s history. This would align your argument with the dialectical method of Marx, who argued that historical events are rarely the result of a single cause but emerge from the interplay of multiple, often conflicting, forces. 3. Absence of Prescriptions: Your essay illuminates the judiciary’s failures, but leaves us with the existential question: What now? A philosophical critique, no matter how profound, is always made richer by a vision of transformation. Proposals for judicial reforms, whether through institutional independence or broader public engagement, would move your argument from critique to constructive possibility, echoing the vision of thinkers like Rawls, who saw the need for both critique and the design of a fairer system. 4. Evidence and Data: To elevate your reflections from compelling narrative to a broader philosophical discourse, one might consider introducing comparative analysis—drawing on examples of other post-colonial societies or contemporary judicial systems. The inclusion of empirical data would allow the reader to ground your reflections in something more substantial than the merely philosophical, and might invite a dialogue between theory and practice. In conclusion, your piece acts as both a critique and a call to action. It challenges the reader to reconsider not only the judiciary’s failures but also the very structures that allow such failures to persist. By expanding on these suggestions, your work might evolve into an even more compelling philosophical inquiry into the nature of law, justice, and social transformation. Warm regards - Adeola Adeniyi |
kingceejay:Yes |
Dalohad:Pure and simple! |
Blazebond:That is not true. The Privy Council served all Commonwealth nations. Our Supreme Court had long existed, and the Privy Council always over ruled them. Why not then, again? |
Multipurple:Balewa cannot come to government and do something other than others have been doing. What has made the country functional up till that time were laws that even the British obeyed. Is it any wonder that governments of today flaunt court orders with reckless abandon? It began with him. And, beware of what you wish. Balewa paid for all this with his very life. |
rinzaugustine:They will fail... |
ibechris:The law that govern a land should be blind... |
OkCornel:Yeah... |
Dele Farotimi: How a Failed Judiciary Triggered the Nigerian Civil War By: Deji Yesufu Obafemi Awolowo explains in his writing that British rule was not entirely negative. Before the coming of the white man, for instance, most of Yoruba land was at war with each other. When the British eventually integrated the many warring factions and created a modern nation-state which would ultimately be called Nigeria, they did this solely on some specific laws. The white man, Awolowo would learn with time and did not take documentation lightly. Whatever is written carries weight. This was why the first set of people the British began to take issues with were those who criticized the British government through their writings. The highest form of documentation for the British was the nation's laws. They understood that the law was blind and that the same law that stood against you today, could work for you tomorrow. Therefore, the British always obeyed the injunctions of the courts of law. Between 1921 and 1928, two celebrated legal disputes pitched Herbert Macaulay against the British rulers of Nigeria, which eventually propelled Macaulay to celebrity status. In 1921, Herbert’s Macaulay supported Chief Amodu Tijani against the government of the day. Tijani had argued in the Nigerian Supreme Court that he was to be compensated for land in Apapa (Lagos) that the government had forcibly taken from his family. The Supreme Court ruled against him, but Tijani took his case to the British Privy Council, a body of legal luminaries, whose decisions were respected in the British Commonwealth. The Privy Council overturned the ruling of the Nigerian Supreme Court and Tijani got compensation for his land. 1928, Macaulay supported Echugbayi Ekeko, the king of Lagos, against the British government in Lagos. The government had deposed Eleko and installed Akintoye. Macaulay joined Eleko in his trip to London to argue his case, again, at the Privy Council. The Privy Council weighed the matter and ruled in favour of the Eleko. Macaulay returned to Nigeria a hero. As the British departed the shores of Nigeria in 1960, the first thing that suffered was our nation’s commitment to the rule of law. The resultant effect of it all was that the country experienced a bloody thirty-month civil war that ended exactly one decade after the staff of government had been handed to us by the British. A lot of things could be said to have contributed to the start of the civil war, but the contributions of the judiciary can not be overlooked. In less than two years after independence, the ruling party in the Western Region, the Action Group, found itself in an imbroglio – the party had expelled Chief Ladoke Akintola, who was the Premier of the region. The party was convinced that Akintola along with a few people in his caucus, were no longer following party guidelines for the development of the Western Region. Obafemi Awolowo, the leader of the party and also the leader of the opposition in the Federal Parliament in Lagos, had been unable to get the cooperation of Akintola – his erstwhile deputy. The government of Tafawa Balewa stepped into the matter and declared a state of emergency in western Nigeria in 1962. The matter was taken to a Nigerian court which ruled in favor of Akintola. Akintola was restored to office based on this ruling, but the Action Group took the case to the British Privy Council, which acted as a court system higher than even the Nigerian Supreme Court then. The Privy Court dismissed the ruling of the Nigerian court and declared the Action Group to be in the right. The government of Akintola was declared illegal, and Chief Adegbenro of the Action Group was declared the lawful Premier of the Western Region. The Balewa government rejected the Privy Council ruling, declaring that Nigeria was now an independent country and no longer bound to obey the British. That singular action ended all appeals to the Privy Council in Nigeria. At about the time the country was rejecting British lawful counsel, a young man by the name of Chukwuma “Kaduna” Nzeogwu had just been appointed the first military intelligence officer in the Nigerian army. Nzeogwu had been trained by the military in the prestigious Sandhurst military academy in England and was appointed to head the army’s intelligence unit in Lagos. Nzeogwu was a conscientious person who detested oppression. He had imbibed socialist ideas while in England, and was convinced that these ideas could change Nigeria and the whole of Africa. As a military man, he had the option of carrying out his revolutionary thoughts using weapons. He hoped to bring positive change to Nigeria, and then head to South Africa to overthrow the apartheid government of that time. Nzeogwu, via his work at the intelligence office, had access to classified information and could tell that the government of the day was persecuting Awolowo – a man whose socialist ideas he shared. It was at this time that Nzeogwu met up with Ifeanyi Ifeajuna and Adewale Ademoyega to hatch a plan to violently overthrow the government of the day. When peaceful means of change and development are rejected by a people, violent means become inevitable. I am arguing here that the seeds that set the tone towards the Nigerian civil war were a brazen rejection of the country’s laws by the Nigerian ruling class in the first republic. ____________ These thoughts bring me back to Dele Farotimi and his book “Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System”. You will be living on Mars if you believe that Nigeria has a functional justice system. Farotimi may have exaggerated his point by stating that the nation’s judiciary was criminal. However, we all know that the best way to make a point is to employ something of hyperbole in our words, and this is what Farotimi has done. What is abundantly clear with the Nigerian judiciary is that money talks; the poor and ordinary man cannot argue a case on its merit alone – you must be able to back up your claim with money. Most people who run foul of the law in this country, and go to jail, are usually persons who don’t have money or don’t know somebody – or both. No nation can move forward where there is a brazen disregard for the law. How many times has the government refused to obey court orders in Nigeria? It appears that the government operate by its own rules, and only obeys court orders that suit them. Now, whichever way Dele Farotimi’s case goes, the man would remain a winner. His book is shedding light on a fundamental problem in this country. And whether he wins or loses his case, we all know now that there are fundamental problems with the judiciary that must be fixed ASAP. Another thing we must keep in mind is that Farotimi is a continuation of the #ENDSARS revolution. What #ENDSARS failed at achieving, this Farotimi case will succeed at. By helping Nigerians rethink the trouble in this country, hopefully, we will find workable solutions. I have provided the civil war twist to this matter to warn us in this country: the things that drown a country in perdition are usually little things. Top on that list are brazen disregard for the rule of law; cheating the weak; stealing from the poor; and disobeying court injunctions. Dele Farotimi, in one book, has provided this country with a synopsis of her problems. We will avoid greater trouble by attending to the issues raised in the book, rather than crucifying the prophet God is using to speak for the betterment of the country. Deji Yesufu is the Pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. Source https://www.youtube.com/live/2cvzS8YyEVw?si=9rnFIHqxYTNsSXxG
|
Fisayo Soyombo: Dear President Tinubu By: Deji Yesufu My name is Deji Yesufu. I am a Christian missionary and a die-hard lover of Nigeria. Besides who I am and what I do, I have had opportunities to leave this country. For the first time after evading many temptations from many quarters, I am considering leaving Nigeria. What has occasioned this thought is what happened to Fisayo Soyombo a few days ago. This is what has also led me to write this open letter to you with the hope that it will get to your table eventually. Just in case you didn’t hear what befell Soyombo, I will use the next few paragraphs to describe it. Fisayo Soyombo is a household name in Nigeria. He is an investigative journalist – who has carried out tens of ground-breaking investigations, revealing the rot in many of our public institutions, and calling on government to reform them. In his latest investigation, whose report is yet to be unveiled, Soyombo gets involved in oil bunkering to find out who and who makes this illegal business possible in Nigeria. What is clearly in the public domain, following his three-day detention by the men of the 6-Division of the Nigerian army, is that many highly placed men in the military are involved in this business. Soyombo has put his life on the line so that this country can stop the bleeding of her commonwealth; so that resources can be available to develop infrastructures in the country; so that this country can become productive and then give strength to her naira; and so that a gleam of hope can arise in the minds and hearts of Nigerians who are committed to the good of the country. The military is an institution that is extremely dear to my heart. I pray for the Nigerian military every day. It is a career choice I might even consider for my now eleven-year-old son because his late maternal grandfather, Prof. B. E. Olufemi (former Dean of Students at the University of Ibadan), used to call him “General”. I fell in love with the military after I did research on it to write my first book “VICTOR BANJO” and saw how much these men do to keep us alive in this country. No other institution in this nation has her men and women protecting us with their very lifeblood. No one has the right to spoil the good name and achievement of a nation’s military. But there have been strong allegations linking the military to the continuation of the violence of Boko Haram – people alleging that as long as that crisis continues, resources would be made available to buy weapons and people at the highest echelon of the army would make money out of it. Now if we assume these allegations are false, how do we reconcile it with what has just happened to Soyombo? Fisayo Soyombo, as he is apt to do, went undercover and linked up with oil bunkerers in Portharcout. He says that he paid a lofty sum of twenty-three million naira to get crude oil transported from Portharcout to Enugu. While he could easily have cosied up in his home in Lagos, and allow the smugglers to do the job he had paid them to do, Soyombo puts his life at risk and joins the team to transport the crude. It should also be understood that a lion's share of the money paid would be used to “settle” security officials whose job it is not to allow for bunkering to take place. Now, while they were transporting the goods, someone who was not settled – someone high up in the army, sent his men to burst the deal. Soyombo is discovered and arrested. In the process of interrogating him, Soyombo reveals details of the bunkering process to the army. But in a twist of events, the army published a statement linking Soyombo to oil bunkering; they also revealed the details they had to the bunkerers – intending obviously to tarnish his image in the public and to endanger his life. This is the reason why, sir, you must use your good office to investigate the people who are behind this in the army and have the guilty ones punished. A few months ago, I discovered all the written works of Obafemi Awolowo, and I have been consuming the man’s philosophy. I now understand why true federalism is at the root of the numerous states we have in Nigeria and why it is the best way to develop the country. I see the “Awoism” worldview and one can say that you are the fulfilment of that goal that our fathers sought both for the south-west Nigeria and for the country at large. Awo did not become president but he left a legacy we are proud of. You are president today and you have the opportunity to leave a legacy for the unborn Nigerian child. The raging corruption in many Nigerian public institutions will not let this happen. The EFCC and the ICPC have all the resources to investigate corruption in the Nigerian army. They only need a nod from you and that legacy of a New Nigeria will be a reality. You can make this happen, Mr. President. You can write your name in gold in the history of this country and encourage a myriad of committed Nigerians to remain within the country and help build it up. One such person is Fisayo Soyombo – this country cannot afford to allow anything to happen to him, and we must do everything to fix the troubles with our public institutions. Thank you for reading. Deji Yesufu is the Pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. Source
|
Sinai By: Deji Yesufu In the late 16th century and early 17th century, Europeans – mostly English men – began to go to the New World to escape religious persecution at home. Many people who came to America in those days were Protestant Christians. When these people settle into a community to live there, three things become essential to their communal life: the land they work to grow the food they eat; building community with their neighbours who sometimes could be far or near; and the local church. There would usually be one local church in a given community that served all the people. This church could be Baptist, Methodist, or Anglican – the three leading protestant denominations in those days. Roman Catholicism is a later development in American history. If you were Baptist in persuasion, you live in a community with a Baptist Church, etc. In other words, the local church, not where you work or how much you earn, determines where you live. At Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan, the local church is becoming increasingly central to our lives. The reason is that we began the year 2024 with a commitment to expositional preaching, and we have found out that all of our lives revolve around what we are learning from the scripture. One thing this engenders in us is obedience to God. Another thing it does is make the Bible more and more real to us. At some point in the life of our local church, we saw the need to engage in apologetics through our para-church ministry – Reformed Naija TV. We began to teach the “doctrine of God” and that led us to study Moses – his encounter with God; the wrath of God on Egypt; and then we came to Sinai. At about the time we reached Sinai, we were also studying the London Baptist Confessions 1689, and we saw written in chapter 14, paragraph two: “By this faith, a Christian believeth to be true whatsoever is revealed in the Word for the authority of God himself, and also apprehendeth an excellency therein above all other writings and all things in the world, as it bears forth the glory of God in his attributes, the excellency of Christ in his nature and offices, and the power and fullness of the Holy Spirit in his workings and operations: and so is enabled to cast his soul upon the truth thus believed; and also acteth differently upon that which each particular passage thereof containeth; yielding obedience to the commands, trembling at the threatenings, and embracing the promises of God for this life and that which is to come…” This part of the confession deals with the characteristics of those who have true saving faith. It says among many things that they hold the Bible as true, they obey the command of scriptures, and they tremble at God’s threat. As we meditated on what it meant to tremble at God’s threatening, we came to Sinai. Why is Sinai significant to this discussion? I will explain. When God sent Moses to deliver the children of Israel from Egypt, he told them that he would bring them to a mountain where they would worship him. He said all these things to them without giving them any other details. Up until Israel’s encounter with God at Sinai in Exodus 19, these people had been riding high on the wings of God’s grace and mercies. They had stood by watching God bring all his terrors on their oppressors; he even killed all their first-born sons; and it all culminated in the dance, singing and rejoicing of Exodus 15 which Mariam led: “… sing unto the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously. The horse and its riders have he thrown into the sea…” What they did not factor was that Sinai was going to be a different kettle of fish entirely. While God had terrorised his enemies in Egypt, at Sinai he came down to terrorise his people. Three aspects of this encounter are worth examining: Stated Purpose of God Appearing at Sinai – verse 9 “I am going to come to you in a dense cloud so that the people will hear me speaking with you and will always put their trust in you.”The first and chief error and sin of all humanity is this: “Did God say?” This was how Satan deceived Eve, and this is how he deceives all humanity today. If you and I are sure that something is a clear commandment from God, there is a likelihood that we will obey it. It will be doubly so if God were to appear to us today and speak from heaven in all of his glory and state to us what he wants us to do. This is the purpose of God appearing at Sinai to the children of Israel: that they will hear God speak to them directly, and that they will appreciate the fact that Moses was God’s spokesman. Whatever Moses says to them, they must obey. In a similar vein, this was the challenge with the Jews in the days of Jesus’ ministry: they simply would not accept that Christ was God’s spokesman who had essentially come to fulfil God’s word through Moses to them. And today, while we no longer have Moses on earth, and we no longer have Jesus and his apostles on earth, we have the very words of God written for us in the Bible. The point of coming to Sinai is to appreciate the fact that God has revealed himself; he has spoken and has ensured that his words are written in the Holy Bible. Our duty, as God’s people, is to hold scripture sacrosanct and obey its commands. We ought not to just obey it, we must also tremble at its threat. 2. Holiness and the Third Day Encounter – verse 10-13 As the God of the whole earth announces his coming encounter with Moses, he also leaves numerous injunctions to the people to the people to sanctify themselves. In other words, they were coming to meet a holy God and he would not tolerate any disorderliness or unholiness. Along with this, he gives them a stated time that this encounter will occur: on the third day. Thinking deeper into this matter, I realize that if the Bible is true it means that all of us human beings have only three days to meet with our God. That this awesome and holy God is going to call us into an encounter with him in three days. These three days, by biblical numerology, could be three hours, three days, three weeks, three months, three years, thirty years, or three hundred years. The point however is that our time is already ticking: prepare to meet with this awesome and holy God. 3. God Appears in Terror – verses 16-19 Finally, God appears to these people and he appears not as a loving, cuddling Father; but as a terrible God. The people are shaking; the New Testament records that even Moses was shaking (Hebrew 12:21); there is smoke on the mountain, bellowing up like from a furnace; and God finally speaks. And when he speaks, he continually warns that the people do not break his commands, lest he breaks out against them. Hebrew 12 describes it best: our God is a consuming fire! __________________________________ When I write about “coming to Sinai”, what exactly is the point I am trying to make? It is simply this: I wish to remind my readers that Exodus 19 is a precursor to Exodus 20. In the latter, God enumerates his ten commandments. That chapter tells us that Exodus 20 is a continuation of the Exodus 19 encounter. God speaks the Ten Commandments to these people – and leaves them shaking in terror. The point of it all is that the fear of God may be etched upon the hearts of these people, and that way they would not sin. It is the same with us today: The God of Exodus 19 has not changed. He is still the same God we will have to encounter when we die. We had better have found cover for our sins in Christ Jesus. The most important point of this encounter however is that nobody is living that can come face to face with this holy God: no one. We are sinful creatures, and if we are to encounter God even in our best deeds – we will walk away from him happily and embrace hell instead. The only way to meet with this awesome and holy God of Sinai is to meet with him through an Advocate: Jesus Christ. Coming to Sinai is a reminder of the Christian gospel. It is a reminder of the blessing of the deeds of Christ in becoming our substitute on the cross and taking the wrath of God upon himself on our behalf. We need not fear meeting an angry God at our death – Christ has taken his wrath. If, however, we have rejected Christ as our Saviour, we have every reason to be afraid of what lies after now. Finally, Sinai reminds us of the kind of attitude we must have as we come to God’s presence, particularly in church, to worship. Our worship must carry some gravity, fear, and reverence. We must never forget that despite the blood of Jesus that speaks better things on our behalf, we cannot take God for granted. Our worship every Sunday must be biblical – as God has commanded in the Bible. We must also have reverence for the preached word. We must commit to obeying God’s commands to our hearts. The preacher must be grave: understanding that he is God’s mouthpiece to the congregation. Church is Sinai; the church is serious business – when we come to church, we come to Sinai. This is why God’s people of past generations took the church seriously. They made the mountain on which they worshipped a priority wherever they lived. We can imitate this also. Deji Yesufu is the pastor of Providence Reformed Baptist Church Ibadan. He is the author of HUMANITY. Source
|
