₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
Just like Ukraine won't last 3 days against Russia?

Invading Taiwan is a costly undertaking if not it would have been done since, and unlike Ukraine, Taiwan have rockets to hit all major Chinese cities and dams that can flood their cities

This is not crossing border with tanks, this is landing 3 million men on Taiwan by ship to fight at least 1.5 million Taiwanese who all do mandatory military service and have rigged the beaches with all sorts of incendiary devices. Taiwan have pipes under all landing beaches to release oil into the water and burn landing crafts.

With 100,000 sea drones, ships won't even get that far, they will turn to shark food in the China sea

And Taiwan will gather aerial drones to put pressure on Chinese cities also

Allies in WW2 were butchered in Dunkirk just trying to land ships against few thousand men with machine guns, and took years to be able to land in Normandy against common machine guns. Talkless of landing against sea drones, aerial drones, precision rockets and oil pipelines against 1.5m soldiers and conscripts,not to mention a mountain range that splits the Island in two. The human cost to China will be enormous, and the Window is closing on China. Getting drafted to invade Taiwan for a Chinese soldier will be like flipping coin for your life. More than half of them won't even touch land

beer parlour discussion

WritterNg:
⚡Putin:

"I dare say that, the majority of people's in the countries whose leaders criticize us, support us".

Yes, More than 65% of the globe is aware and supportive of the Special Military Operation. people's are tired of autocrats within the EU and US. They're tired of blackmailing and gaslighting.

History told us the battle of Stalingrad was a victory to the free world and today the fight isn't only against fasicts in Kyiv but it's a fight with a slut of more than 35 autocrat leaders.

But the fight is for all of us to throw them out of their corrupt chairs.

But the fight is for all of us to throw them out of their corrupt chairs. Putin dey campaigns for trump

Tiopii:
In the context I was using it, is in direct conflict, In any conflict N.Korea isn't a threat to the US. the US would stomp on them.

The context in the link you share is if N.Korea is able to develop it's nuclear programme. For the totalitarian regimes N.Korea operate having nukes would make it a threat to the world as it would be in the control of just one individual. and an unstable individual at that.

my bad for not contextualizing it properly.

I know shey you no go gree
Set awon "no gree for anybody"

Tiopii:
N.Korea's military is obsolete. It poses no threat to the US or her interests. There's Democracy is S.Korea. In the Int'l arena N.Korea is more like a child.

The benefits of democracy is obvious in S.Korea as well as the benefits of communism is obvious in N.Korea.

abeg dey search before typing jargons
You just dey argue with no evidence

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/article/article/2067648/north-korea-remains-security-threat-to-us-allies-policy-official-says/

Tiopii:
Oh my bad. I was wrong then.

The US has a fair chance, one thing I'm certain is the war won't be fought on American soil.

As things stand, China would avoid war with the US, their biggest market is the US, And China's economy is in shambles, Xi admitted this when he visited the US and was trying to assure US/European investors that China is safe place to invest and saying they don't want war with the US.

Russia is also in no shape to fight with the US, they are too occupied in Ukraine, US military bases would be handy.

The Iran/Hamas, Iraq, N.Korea, would be on the defensive all through the hypothetical war.

The chance of an all out war is slim. I doubt China would fall for the same provocations tht Russia fell for.

But fair chance for the US, that is bar a nuclear conflict. The wild card however would be China.

beer parlour discussion!

Tiopii:
Well, the US however have more habitable land than Russia. And the population is better distributed

provide your proof

Tiopii:
What's the percentage of those moving Russia would need to develop those areas first and that would take years. At the moment most of Russias funds are going to the war. The weather in those areas are extreme. There are reasons people choose not to stay there in the first instance.

go and ask Putin

Tiopii:
Pls answer this question how many percentage of Russia's landmass is habitable?

Russia have a huge land no doubt, but the cities are cramped together and a significant portion are unhabitable. The US have better lands are better distributed than Russia.

almost half or ⅓ of USA land is also unhabitable! Google it and come back to tell me what you see[/quote]

Tiopii:
Pls answer this question how many percentage of Russia's landmass is habitable?

Russia have a huge land no doubt, but the cities are cramped together and a significant portion are unhabitable. The US have better lands are better distributed than Russia.

Russia does putting their balls in a basket
Russia knows the implications of nuclear war they are encouraging there people to go far east, depopulation of the crowded region is happening! 🧏

Tiopii:
Since you've watched his videos, what reasons did he give?

NATO will suffer pass Russia,bcs of Russia land mass,pls don't question me oooo , you better go and watch the video

Tiopii:
Axis of resistance is Iran, Iraq and N.Korea. But you added Russia and China. The possible toughest battle would be with the Chinese. Tough battle but the US are the favourite.

Xi was in the US to debunk wanting war with the US, saying that US/China relationship is the most important in the world. so I'm kinda surprised you're pairing them with the axis of resistance.

Russia has been degraded, it'd be in their best interest to stay out but if they want war, the US is more than capable.

Iran, Iraq, N.Korea really? You think they stand a chance?😂😂😂😂😂

if this is what exclude china from the resistance axis, Putin also said the same thing, likewise Iran

Tiopii:
What Nuclear scientist?

the video plenty for you tube with his name

Tiopii:
I didn't say anyone would win. I said if there's any chance of survival of the nuclear conflict between NATO and Russia, Russia would be the worst hit.

Both would be dealt significant damages but one side would come out worse than the other.

nuclear scientist says NATO and Europe are going to suffer most, Google am

Air Force officer won train ground force officer, you won train them how to dey grow wings?

🇺🇸⚔️🇸🇾🇮🇶🇮🇷CNN reporter Jeremy Diamond: The 5-day delay in the operation led to the readiness of Iran and its affiliated forces, as a result of the transfer of key people and important weapons from the headquarters.

🇺🇸⚡🇮🇷🇸🇾🇮🇶John Kirby: We are not looking for conflict with Iran USA dey even fear Iran, but there slave no go gree

okeysoninv:
UAE will be on the News soon. Eyes should be on UAE

bcs of that picture uploaded by writenig abi you must be F🌕🌕 L

Tiopii:
see how you worded it.😂😂😂😂😂😂.

Ukraine is a sovereign state, so you're admitting that Ukraine's refusal to inherit the "enemy" of Russia is the cause of the war. nice.

Obviously Ukraine wants to join NATO for it's own safety, the way former USSR states joined and Russia had to hands off.

Ukraine joining the EU/NATO would make them independent from Russia economically and militarily but you choose to ignore this simple fact.

Have you ever asked yourself why states close to Russia are joining NATO, if Russia is indeed as good as they claim? The states that have shared history with Russia are avoiding them and pivoting towards EU/US but you blame the victims.

It's popular fact that Ukraine, would be better off as a nation joining the EU/NATO, Russia has nothing to offer them aside the War they are currently waging.

Russia should focus on Russia, while Ukraine focus on Ukraine.

Russia shouldn't be dictating what another sovereign nation can do and can't do. what exactly is Russia scared of? don't they have weapons of different proportions themselves? including nukes? don't Russia claim they can hit the US/NATO directly with nukes?

So yea, if Russia wants a multipolar, they should allow Ukraine show their path.

the bold

This is exactly what caused Cuba missile
USA is serving others what he can't take

DystopianMuse:
Bomb the fucking terrorists to oblivion!!!!!!!!!!

your slave master don deny

Allthelight:
i have followed news here you all talked about hate while you only promote it.

For years i stopped watching any thing news channels because of how people like you promote hate because they can.

Few months ago i said the west and the u.s are not against a two state solution you all were saying otherwise because of your favourite propaganda channels.


Now the u.s and u.k are still coming out to support a palestine state

can you point out there support for Palestinian state from this map?
I don tell you to Google before typing nonsense

🇺🇸🏴‍☠⚔🇮🇷 CBS says plans to attack Iranian targets in Iraq and Syria have been approved.

@stayfreeworld why not in Tehran?

🇺🇸Texas Governor Greg Abbott said that "it's time for Joe Biden to stop trying to play with Putin".

The governor also advised the US president to learn from his Russian counterpart how to act in the national interests.

@ukraine_watch Putin to the world

◾An Israeli occupation bulldozer was razzling homes to the ground, the soldier driving received an anti tank missile from the Palestinian resistance right in his face.

◾Follow:
/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses this video sweet me wella