I know someone that has tried gamp -- getgamp dot com -- she said the service is good sha. 6k for 6 months coverage

but this post did not elaborate on whether the king's initial goals have been achieved.

the system is working, people are spending more within the community.
but has the economy of the system improved, and by how much

it makes me want to ask: (if) since the initial goal has been achieved, in order not to continue exposing the system to the risks that the economists noted, why don't they close it down.

this is because: if the system worked, and people have gotten more stable financially, then they can know that even without the voucher, they can continue to spend within the community and things would be good for them.