MrsAminaBello:
has it been fixed?

Yea, but I lost my data

mistercharles:
download WhatsApp business it’ll work. Use it for like a month then move to WhatsApp

Till you encounter this you will understand what I'm talking about. Go to Twitter, people are complaining about it.

Mine is working cus I've repaired the phone and deactivated the whatsapp account from the old phone and use on this new phone

Tlyon1:



You still have your Redmi 10c with bad screen?

Yes boss. They said to repair the screen, it's 58k.

....

MrsAminaBello:

my oppo screen got damaged, don't have funds to fix it so my sister gave me her phone to use for the time being.
I wanted downloading Whatsapp to link my account to it but with this review of yours I guess I may come across similar issues.
But what if that phone was stolen nkor?

Maybe they will fix it later but it's sad

13regular:


Been battling with this for more than four days now. Same scenario! Changed device and the nonsense started!!

For the friend above me, I have never used any of the aforementioned whatsapp!!!

Yes, it's for people that have changed their devices. I'm looking for a way to repair the other one so that I can deactivate it

Westerhoffe:
It's because you have either GBWhatsApp, FMWhatsApp, WhatsApp Plus, OGWhatsApp, YoWhatsApp, or others installed and used.

None of the above

I need help on this .👇👇

My Redmi 10C has screen fault, so I decided to buy a second-hand phone. While trying to register my whatsapp on the new phone, it keeps telling me that I need an official Whatsapp, whereas I am using an official Whatsapp. It works with another SIM card but refused to work on my permanent whatsapp line.

I've sent them mail but they gave me automated response. I've reinstalled, but still not working.

What could be the problem and how do I solve?

emkz:
Yes.

For many years, we have been living in a bubble. We subsidized the consumption by the rich. Our refineries have not been producing. There was pervasive insecurity. Oil theft was rife. Chinese were stealing from us. We started handing out dollars to people for reasons that don't make sense. The subsidy was consistently being abused by people who claimed it and still took the products across the borders. Local fuel consumption was inflated. There were no investments in critical infrastructure. Questionable billionaires emerged following the start of the 4th republic. The bought banks and no one knows the source of their incomes. Industries completely collapsed and religion became rife.

Infact, we started borrowing to pay salaries and subsidies. People like Professor Usman Yusuf in NHIS used their positions to rob the nation. Today, they are sudden moralists for a better Nigeria.



What Tinubu is doing is an attempt to refocus things so that the pains will not be even more in the future. Tinubu demonstrates the boldness many before him lacked. We can see some improvements in certain areas. For example, after the kidnap of the Nabeeha family and the killing of Nabeeha herself, we can see how Wike and Co swung into action and have arrested the masterminds. Our military chiefs are not talking too much and are doing the job.

I recall when they started partitioning roads in Lagos for BRT. As soon as the buses were rolled out, no one criticized Tinubu again. So the suffering we are currently facing are pains that will pass.

We only call on Tinubu to go after the sponsors of terrorism, banditry and rogue businessmen inflating prices. We also call on governors to show workings. It is evil for PDP governors to be attacking the president when they should be worried and working harder for their people.

As a people, let us put the same pressure on the governors, representatives and senators as we put on the president.

If the elections hold again, I'd still throw my weight behind Tinubu. Atiku had his time, and he had nothing to show for it beyond plundering national assets to cronies. He is one of the architects of the current mess and should take responsibility. He also lacks understanding of presidential processes. Peter Obi is just a revolt against the status quo and people conveniently forgot he was a governor as well and Anambra did not improve.

Any sincere Nigerian would make suggestions to help the nation.

Always talking Nansense

Was it an offside goal?

Blankstare:

E.h Carr in my 100l was like the historical Bible, very abstract book, not until almost final year before I could decode its substance. I just followed you

Thanks.
How do you see the work? Though, I'm kinda busy for sometimes now

vulpeslopez:
how is the CYBERSECURITY going??

Started with Cloud Computing first. So far, though tedious, but it's going smothly

APCNig:


You go just die over nothing

It is what it is

https://youtube.com/shorts/Tg5gNF15B6w


Sorry for posting in a wrong section

Did you know: History is beyond the story of the past?

Still on it

Subscribe to my channel

The Development of History as an Academic Discipline

History became an academic discipline in the mid-nineteenth century. History was often a part of literature, and information was left unrecorded. People had not defined specific study patterns, making storing historical data irrelevant. However, changes in the social and economic statuses led to redefining the need for historical recording information.
The main concern of history as a discipline is the change and the intertwinement of historical issues. History is written and defined by individual groups who may misrepresent facts and provide misinformation. For instance, wars are written by the victors and not the losers. For example, the truths of the Numberg trials limit the facts that even the allies committed crimes against humanity.
History is considered a discipline because it involves gaining knowledge of and interpreting the past. Historians are also involved in the recording of the past. History consists of the study of prehistoric and historical information.

The historical method comprises the techniques and guidelines by which historians use primary sources, and other evidence, to research and write history.

Herodotus, from the 5th-century BC, has been acclaimed as the "father of history", after he wrote the Histories – a detailed account of the Greco-Persian Wars. However, his contemporary, Thucydides is credited with having first approached history with a well-developed historical method in the History of the Peloponnesian War. Thucydides, unlike Herodotus, regarded history as the product of the choices and actions of humans, and looked at cause and effect, rather than the result of divine intervention (though Herodotus was not wholly committed to this idea himself). In his historical method, Thucydides emphasized chronology, a nominally neutral point of view, and that the human world was the result of human actions. Greek historians viewed history as cyclical, with events regularly recurring.
There was sophisticated use of historical method in ancient and medieval China. The groundwork for professional historiography in East Asia was established by court historian Sima Qian (145–90 BC), the author of the Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji) and posthumously known as the Father of Chinese historiography.
Saint Augustine of Hippo was influential in Christian and Western thought at the beginning of the medieval period. Through the Medieval and Renaissance periods, history was often studied through a sacred or religious perspective. Around 1800, German philosopher and historian Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel brought philosophy and a more secular approach in historical study.
In the preface to his book, the Muqaddimah (1377), the Arab historian and early sociologist, Ibn Khaldun, warned of 7 mistakes he thought historians committed. In this criticism, he approached the past as strange and in need of interpretation. The originality of Ibn Khaldun was to claim that the cultural difference of another age must govern the evaluation of relevant historical material, to distinguish the principles according to which it might be possible to attempt the evaluation, and to feel the need for experience, in addition to rational principles, in order to assess a culture of the past. Ibn Khaldun criticized "idle superstition and uncritical acceptance of historical data". He introduced a scientific method to the study of history, and referred to it as his "new science".  His method laid the groundwork for the observation of the role of state, communication, propaganda and systematic bias in history, and so is considered to be the "father of historiography"  or the "father of the philosophy of history".
In the West, historians developed modern methods of historiography in the 17th and 18th centuries, especially in France and Germany. In 1851, Herbert Spencer summarized these methods:"From the successive strata of our historical deposits, they [historians] diligently gather all the highly colored fragments, pounce upon everything that is curious and sparkling and chuckle like children over their glittering acquisitions; meanwhile the rich veins of wisdom that ramify amidst this worthless debris, lie utterly neglected. Cumbrous volumes of rubbish are greedily accumulated, while those masses of rich ore, that should have been dug out, and from which golden truths might have been smelted, are left untaught and unsought." By the "rich ore" Spencer meant scientific theory of history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi5l42-ebvU

Subscribe to my channel

History is life

Remember that we mentioned few historians, then the question is who is a historian. Let's define who is an historian.

Who is a Historian: Historians collect and evaluate information from many primary sources to answer questions about historical events, a process known as the historical method. They may analyze written records, physical artifacts, and other types of evidence during the course of their investigations.A historian is a person who studies and writes about the past and is regarded as an authority on it.
Historians are concerned with the continuous, methodical narrative and research of past events as relating to the human race; as well as the study of all history in time.
A historian is a person who specializes in the discipline of History. They aimed to research, study, analyze, interpret the historical sources of past humanity. They can specialize in particular geographies, events, or periods of history. Historians differently than other people must be objective and must refer to facts avoiding opinions or any form of bias. They started with their investigation with many questions that they are collecting historical data from different types of historical sources to analyze and interpret. Then they are organizing data and preparing this organizing data to present historical accounts and findings in the form of published papers, books, and conferences. Historians are not working alone. They are consulting and collaborating with groups, organizations, museums and foundations to promote activities, organize conferences and exhibitions. They can also interview with people to gather information of life events of individuals; and documenting and organizing information. Though they analyze and document historical data, they should be analytical and identify issues and resolve problems in a timely manner using critical thinking and good judgment.

............

Illuminating the Meaning of History through the Lens of Historians
Here are the few definitions by historians.
Marcus Cicero: “History is the witness of the times, the light of truth, the life of memory, the teacher of life, the messenger of antiquity.”

E.H. Carr: “History is an unending dialogue between the present and the past and the chief function of a historian is to master and understand the past as a key to the understanding of the present.”

Thomas Charlyle : “World History is a biography of great men”.

Prof. G. J. Renier: “History is the memories of societies.”

Prof. G.R. Elton: “History is concerned with all those human sayings, thoughts, deeds and sufferings which occurred in the past and have left present deposit; and it deals with them from the point of view of happening change and particular done in the past”

Prof. A.L. Rowse: “History is essentially the record of the life of men in societies in their geographical and their physical environments. Their social and cultural environments arise from the interaction of the one with the other, the society and its geographical condition.”

Aristotle: 'History is an account of the unchanging past'

K. Kris Hirst: "History is the study of the human past as it is described in written documents left behind by humans."

Voltaire: "History is nothing but a pack of tricks we play on the dead."
Burckhardt: "History is the record of what one ages finds worthy of note in another".

H.G. Wells : Human history in essence is the history of ideas

Henry Johnson: History is the detailed account of the events that have taken place.

Arthur Marwick : The bodies of knowledge about the past produced by historians, together with everything that is involved in the production, communication of, and teaching about that knowledge.

History is simply defining as the study of a series of events of human past from written, visual, and spoken sources with the analysis and interpretation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4imH0Dd0XI

History is part of live

Watch and subscribe to my channel

Support me

Have you watched