BinghiNya: you should be shot in the balls has a muslim ever gone to a church to shout tekbir

Super1759: so its obvious that killing makes you a soul winner abii. Smh.

Gorrbachev: Winston Churchill on Islam (from his book The River War, 1899):

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

dr stone:
Then We[Allah] Said to the ones{Seed} on His {Adam's }Left:.....TO HELL AND I DONT CARE!!!!

Rossikk:

The protesters in Jos did not kill or destroy anything. They launched a peaceful protest.

mbhs139:

In response to your comment. The Ambassador is certainly not the producer of the movie. But the producers were well aware of the consequence. They knew it will result into the death of powerful and influential people. And that was part of the game plan.

If no Ambassado had been killed, particularly that of the United States, the objective would have been defeated. To them, what is the worth of the life of an Ambassador compared to their long term goal and plan? As a matter of fact, one Ambassador is too little for them to conviniently achieve their aim. They would have wished that for more and more attacks, in all ramifications, and just like everyone - muslims and christains- are attacking one another on this plartform, so that they could have a veritable ground to play their role as the world police.

They would prefer that such an occurance produces more terrorist group, in the name of defending Islam, so that they can have an excuise to enter into their territory.

It is all a game plan as far as I'm concerned, and the Muslims are playing into their hands. And why wont they? Because they have studied us and know that we don't take lightly matters such as this.

@Fittty, please engage me in this discussion from an intellectual point of view and not with sentiments or any biasedness. Thank you and God bless you.

glizengem: but ur peaceful protests always ends up in chaos

armadeo:


Why did Jesus instructed his desciples to sell their garment and buy SWORDS.


Pls enlighten me on this statement.

rimax: u people are illetrate

mbhs139: I have quieta number of post on this issue and I'm quiet disappointed by majority of comments. My basis of being disappointed is that I believe anybody that have the ability and resources to come to this forum should have at least been educated in some ways or the other. So, I'm more disappointed in most commentators ability to differentiate between religion and individual differences,

I'm a muslim and a public affair analyst. But I would like to view this issue with the public affair analysis training in me.

Although I've not seen the film in question, but the question that need to be asked is; what is the motive of the producers of the film, is it to blasphem agaist Islam, Muslims or Muhammed?

To the best of my knowledge and understanding, none of these may possibly be the answer.

Can someone somewhere possibly spend million of dollars, manpower, time and energy in producing a film for the singlelar reason of just portraying Islam and the Muslims in bad light? The answer, as far as I'm concerned is certainly No.

What then could have been the motive or objective behind this so called film about Muhammed or Islam? Believe me-you, it can be farther from economic reason. I guess you know at hand where I'm heading to. I honestly believe it can't be any other reason than for economic and perhaps political reason.

Why did I think so?

I'm quiet sure that the producers of this said film knew the implication and outcome of people's reaction to this film, particularly in the middle east, before sending it out to public domain. They knew the type and amount of riot and may helm that will result from the release and yet went ahead to do so. You will recall that this was the same thing that happened in similar event occured in Denmark some few years back.

In conclusion, the most probable reason for the production and release of the film is to give a dog a bad name so as to hang it. The producers knew quiet well the type of reception and reactio that will greet the said film and they knew what they want to achieve with it; an excuise to make incurssion into a territory under the pretext of protecting their interest. Don't forget that they are the makers of the Al-Qaeeda of this world in the first place. Or what other reason you do you think there could have been for them to enter Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and a host of others, if not under the pretext of looking for Islamic terrorist groups.

And for all those calling for The American drones into the Nigerian northern territory, I pray the affirmative is not the case. It will be palatable at the end, that's just putting it mildly.

Dipwater:


Let's assume that the movie producer portrayed yur mohammed in a very bad lite ,does it still justify the killing of an innocent man.why not target the movie makers and kill them instead of killing people that are not related to the film industry

So wat u are trying to say here is dat if a muslim for instance insults my god I shuld kill any available muslim I can lay my hands on.

And u did not show any sympathy for those that were killed u only went ahead to talk on behalf of ur mohammed
Am not a xtian neither am I a muslim I don't biliv in a god. But I value human life over whateva rubbish religion u practice.


U have to agree with me that the law of the land shuld be above the sharia law and the xtian law. Nobody or group of persons shuld be above the law of the land. Cuz we are living in world filled with different belief system.

Super1759: so its obvious that killing makes you a soul winner abii. Smh.

mbhs139: I have quieta number of post on this issue and I'm quiet disappointed by majority of comments. My basis of being disappointed is that I believe anybody that have the ability and resources to come to this forum should have at least been educated in some ways or the other. So, I'm more disappointed in most commentators ability to differentiate between religion and individual differences,

I'm a muslim and a public affair analyst. But I would like to view this issue with the public affair analysis training in me.

Although I've not seen the film in question, but the question that need to be asked is; what is the motive of the producers of the film, is it to blasphem agaist Islam, Muslims or Muhammed?

To the best of my knowledge and understanding, none of these may possibly be the answer.

Can someone somewhere possibly spend million of dollars, manpower, time and energy in producing a film for the singlelar reason of just portraying Islam and the Muslims in bad light? The answer, as far as I'm concerned is certainly No.

What then could have been the motive or objective behind this so called film about Muhammed or Islam? Believe me-you, it can be farther from economic reason. I guess you know at hand where I'm heading to. I honestly believe it can't be any other reason than for economic and perhaps political reason.

Why did I think so?

I'm quiet sure that the producers of this said film knew the implication and outcome of people's reaction to this film, particularly in the middle east, before sending it out to public domain. They knew the type and amount of riot and may helm that will result from the release and yet went ahead to do so. You will recall that this was the same thing that happened in similar event occured in Denmark some few years back.

In conclusion, the most probable reason for the production and release of the film is to give a dog a bad name so as to hang it. The producers knew quiet well the type of reception and reactio that will greet the said film and they knew what they want to achieve with it; an excuise to make incurssion into a territory under the pretext of protecting their interest. Don't forget that they are the makers of the Al-Qaeeda of this world in the first place. Or what other reason you do you think there could have been for them to enter Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and a host of others, if not under the pretext of looking for Islamic terrorist groups.

And for all those calling for The American drones into the Nigerian northern territory, I pray the affirmative is not the case. It will be palatable at the end, that's just putting it mildly.

Okija_juju: Prophet Mohammed (SAW) must be very insecure.. Its like he cant take a joke of any kind.. Meanwhile the number of carricature pictures of Jesus and God are countless.. Lets not even talk about Buddah and Krishna!

And there is no rule in the Quran that expressly bares Mohammed from being made fun of..

EXAMPLES:





[img]http://4.bp..com/-0HdG5FWGF9g/T8xeCVNUgwI/AAAAAAAAnOk/29K2VTKKNh0/s1600/jesus_and_mo_beer_1.jpg[/img]

carytommy: when will this gaddamn country implode?

Itohen: A group of Muslims in the troubled tin city of Jos, Plateau State, yesterday evening held a demonstration over an America-produced film that purportedly blasphemed Prophet Muhammad.

The protesters, who defied security agents, said they would rather die than to watch their Prophet insulted, and will submit only to the laws of Allah which, to them, are supreme to any other law.

The mostly youth and children protesters, who numbered almost 100 were led by one Malam Mansur Sani Adamu in the demonstration, which took place on Bauchi Road.  They carried placards condemning the United States, Israel, Denmark and Holland, accusing them of plotting against Islam and Muslims.  Before they dispersed, they chanted, “Allahuakubar, Allahuakubar, they have touched our Prophet....”

Malam Adamu said, “We are doing this to express our anger against enemies of Allah and Islam led by America and her allies like Israel, Denmark and Holland because they are plotting against Islam. These days they have also produced another depicting film; this is what is troubling us.

This denigration of Prophet Muhammad is very sad and we are against it. With this it is better that it is death that consumed us for our Prophet to be denigrated. All Muslims in the world should come out and protest and those who cannot should pray.”

According to our source, security agencies urged the protesters to disperse since they had not secured permission, to which leader of the demonstration responded, “If our Prophet is blasphemed we will not wait for any law, Islam supersede any laws of the country.”

http://saharareporters.com/news-page/muslims-jos-protest-film-prophet-mohammed

saly kely: christianity prosper in nigeria by misinforming people about islam. The arab muslims av their issues with america who kill them on daily basis with drones, so it is nt suprising that d US ambasador was killed in libya. Afterall america contributed to d state of lawlesnes in libya.
Again, if nt 4 stupidity and ignorance why on earth will a nigerian xtian insult Allah? What will u think of an arab muslim insulting God just bc he knw him as Allah in his own language.
Again on d issue of figthin 4 GOD, WHAT did d CRUSADERS did in jerusalem? Why did moses and david fought wars on d instruction of God? Why did Jesus instructed his desciples to sell their garment and buy SWORDS. IGNORANT PEOPLE IF U DNT KNW D HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY IN EUROPE WHY NT GO AND READ. What was d punishment 4 blashphemy in eaurope during d papacy? Why were thousands BURNT ALIVE BY THE PAPACY? HUMAN RIGHT AND DIGNITY CAME TO EUROPE WITH D OVERTHROW OF PAPACY WITH SECULARISM.

stjudas: This movie go really be fun. In fact, make i go check am for market.

saly kely: the PEACE christians talk about does nt exist any where nt even on social media. Have d xtians ask themselves y muslims are at peace with Jesus (pbuh)? And they xtians are ful of insult to our beloved Prophet.
This same peace u talk about does nt exist in ur churches where u stoke pile weapons, this same peace does nt exist with ur brothers in jos who are knwn CARNIBALS.
Have u ever ask urself who were d first ppl to take d life of a sitin nigerian prime minister, the first to kil a premier, the first to blast nigerians by bomb, just think of any evil today in nigeria xtians are sure to be first. The fact dat u av d media on ur side does nt mean dat u dnt commit these atrocities. The south east bost of 99percent xtians, then what moral values av xtianity impercted on this spacie of blacks. They are worst in all form of crimes, 4rm kidnapin to robbery to drug peddlin to prostitution to anytin fake. To this ppl human life has no sanctity if it can fetch money

tucker12:


I feel if the Islamic groups felt disrespected over what was said about their Mohammed. All they needed to do was file a complaint and request a retraction and prosecution for of the film maker. Does that not make sense?? rather than the barbaric act of killing,burning down building and resort to this blog insults

Is this action displayed not a prove that violence is embedded in them a contradiction of a religion of peace. Imagine someone says obama should come and tender an apology to them My advice he should wait Drones are on the way


Funny enuff the movie wuznt produced in their land. I haven't watched the film and have not heard of it b4 now. They have helped in a way to make the film popular and that means too much money for the producers

US is a civilized country where u are free to produce wateva u like as long as u do not go against the laws of the land .

And wats this thing about "any critism melted against muslims was done by the xtians" wat if the guy(s) is(are) athiest(s) or mixed as in muslim ,xtian,atheist ,agnostic etc...

Most of the movie producers in US are not xtians .from the cartoons to the sci fi go check it out. Most of this guys do not biliv in god they only produce films that wuld enrich their pockets chikena!

tucker12:


I feel if the Islamic groups felt disrespected over what was said about their Mohammed. All they needed to do was file a complaint and request a retraction and prosecution for of the film maker. Does that not make sense?? rather than the barbaric act of killing,burning down building and resort to this blog insults

Is this action displayed not a prove that violence is embedded in them a contradiction of a religion of peace. Imagine someone says obama should come and tender an apology to them My advice he should wait Drones are on the way


Funny enuff the movie wuznt produced in their land. I haven't watched the film and have not heard of it b4 now. They have helped in a way to make the film popular and that means too much money for the producers

US is a civilized country where u are free to produce wateva u like as long as u do not go against the laws of the land .

And wats this thing about "any critism melted against muslims was done by the xtians" wat if the guy(s) is(are) athiest(s) or mixed as in muslim ,xtian,atheist ,agnostic etc...

Most of the movie producers in US are not xtians .from the cartoons to the sci fi go check it out. Most of this guys do not biliv in god they only produce films that wuld enrich their pockets chikena!