₦airaland Forum

therationa:
My goodness, you are sounding un-educated again. I haven't touched it with my hands, but I have read the relevant books and journals. The evidence is in the DNA.

I asked you about Chromosome No. 2. Have did you check it out. You really should not be living in this era, with such attitude. The bronze age befits you better.

@therationa
So, you are saying you saw the DNA and made up your own speculations

You are yet to answer these ->
- Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes?
- Have you ever touched an evolving organism with your own hands, as it evolved?

imhotep:
@therationa
So, you are saying you saw the DNA and made up your own speculations

You are yet to answer these ->
- Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes?
- Have you ever touched an evolving organism with your own hands, as it evolved?

- Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes? ---- NO
- Have you ever touched an evolving organism with your own hands, as it evolved? ---- NO

OK, my questions to you;

Have you ever touched an AIDS virus with your own hands?
Have you ever touched uranium with your hand?

therationa:
- Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes? ---- NO
- Have you ever touched an evolving organism with your own hands, as it evolved? ---- NO

@therationa
Good. Next set of questions.
If your answer to both questions is 'No' ->
1) Can we not say that you are an adherent of evolution by virtue of faith alone (since you merely believed what you read)?
2) Has evolution not become some sort of religion for you?

Faith is defined as 'the hypostasis of things not seen'.

did you see these question?


Have you ever touched an AIDS virus with your own hands?
Have you ever touched uranium with your hand?

therationa:
did you see these question?

Have you ever touched an AIDS virus with your own hands?
Have you ever touched uranium with your hand?

Yes, I saw them. They do not belong to this thread.

imhotep:
Yes, I saw them. They do not belong to this thread.

But can you attempt an answer?

Thumbs up imhotep. Bless U and j-girl. If you can, Don't bother much about those arguments. It is not worth the time

Can someone tell me what this people are taliking about

j-girl:
I meant that a law is more established than a theory

It isn't.

There has to be a difference between theory and law.

Yes, theories tend to incorporate the laws of old, and try to explain them.

A law should be stronger than a theory.

Why?

I meant that the big bang is supposed to be how the earth was formed.

No, that's wrong.

I know those other stories of creation do not include a superior being. I just prefer my belief in a superior being.

And your belief and the theories that explain origins are not necessarily incompatible.

men and brethren?
               Stumbling on "hard evidence that" which disproves evolution. I think it would do anyone that is really for knowledge to see visit this URL   https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-110965.0.html. while there try being objective.

EVOLUTION IS ABOUT THE CLEAREST OF THE THOERIES THAT CLOSELY MIRROWS AND EXPLAINS THE EXISTENCE OF LIFE FORM.
ITS KINDA REDICULOUS FOR AN INTELLECTUAL TO BELIEVE IN A WOU\RLD THAT IS 6000 YRS OLD, WHERE GEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY CAN REFUTE OTHERWISE WITHOUT EFFORT. MOST OF US ARE AWARE OF LIVING ORGANISMS ACCUMULATING 14CARBON WHILE ALIVE AND DISPENSED GRADUALLY AT DEATH. THIS HAS GROWN TO BE ONE OF THE DATING TECHS. APPLIED BY GEOLOGIST AND ANTHR.  fOSSILS FOUND DURING EXCAVATIONS CONFORM.

I BELIEVE OUR WORLD IS OLDER THAN 6000 YRS JUST AS GALILEO BELIEVED THE EARTH MOVES.

KAG, are you an evolutionist too?
Just how was the earth formed?

Orobert:
EVOLUTION IS ABOUT THE CLEAREST OF THE THOERIES THAT CLOSELY MIRROWS AND EXPLAINS THE EXISTENCE OF LIFE FORM.
ITS KINDA REDICULOUS FOR AN INTELLECTUAL TO BELIEVE IN A WOU\RLD THAT IS 6000 YRS OLD, WHERE GEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY CAN REFUTE OTHERWISE WITHOUT EFFORT. MOST OF US ARE AWARE OF LIVING ORGANISMS ACCUMULATING 14CARBON WHILE ALIVE AND DISPENSED GRADUALLY AT DEATH. THIS HAS GROWN TO BE ONE OF THE DATING TECHS. APPLIED BY GEOLOGIST AND ANTHR. fOSSILS FOUND DURING EXCAVATIONS CONFORM.

I BELIEVE OUR WORLD IS OLDER THAN 6000 YRS JUST AS GALILEO BELIEVED THE EARTH MOVES.

The idea of organs developing incrementally (to adapt to changes in the environment, or whatever) is objectionable, in the form of questions like =>

1) What use is half a wing?
2) What use is half an eye?
3) What use is half a brain?

etc etc

j-girl:
KAG, are you an evolutionist too?

I accept the theory of evolution as the best explanation we have for the diversity and complexity of life.

Just how was the earth formed?

Probably by accretion.

imhotep:
The idea of organs developing incrementally (to adapt to changes in the environment, or whatever) is objectionable, in the form of questions like =>

1) What use is half a wing?

https://img151.imageshack.us/img151/1307/34317457aa4.th.jpg

2) What use is half an eye?

Nautilus
https://img99.imageshack.us/img99/663/nautilushw5.th.jpg

3) What use is half a brain?

https://img522.imageshack.us/img522/3164/bushhead2hk4.th.jpg


[QUOTE]
etc etc[/quote]Those things mean a great deal to the animals I mentioned above.

@KAG

Very funny.

Adaptation n God do not have to be mutually exclusive. I believe in a SuperBeing who is in control of the Universe, however I by my own observations have accepted proof of adaptation. Full blown evolution however I am still skeptical of because the world as we know it has little physical proof of the likely in-between stages ie missing links.

@KAG, therationa
Have u heard of the Pre-Adamite world/Pre-Adamite Flood?

therationa:
Skyone, I see you live in Essex. Have you ever visited a museum? What if you go down to the Museum of Natural History in London and see some hard evidence of evolution. Would that change you mind?

I was there, once again, yesterday. My conclusion was that atheists are arrogant people. They look with contempt on those who believe they know it all but don't have a clue. If the atheist could just forgive them, after all, it's not as if they know what they say.

If only the Natural History Museum could come to Nigerians. Though, they'll probably pray it down to hell!

There is however hope for them yet.

therationa:
Your questions show how un-educated you are with the methods of science. No point discussing with you on matters beyond your capabilities, cause it would be like talking to someone from the bronze age. Sorry for the analogy, but there's no other way to proceed.

Am out. Bye

I want to be as intelligent as you are. One day. Thanks.

Free pdf


Evolution for Dummies

Ignorance will not be your portion.