constructive criticisms pls...

by eradesigns

Nice concept, but D̶̲̥̅̊ red outline in the "Street tailor" ɪ̣̝̇§ not advisable, it shud be one color,, but shey Ɣøµ D̶̲̥̅̊ε̲̣̣̣̥γ̲̣̣̥ among D̶̲̥̅̊ pple wey bin attack me sometime back that logos dnt contain gradients??

Sir Czar, this is a presentation and not the logo in its basic form and I never said there can't be gradients in logos, not jst the kinda gradients that can't be represented in grayscale. I'll upload the basic logo dis evening.

this is the logo as it is...

The basics are the main bro.
The 's' in d shape of a street is one concept I believe a logo is abt.
U shld enter this into one of those logo contest in some of em popular logo sales sits out there, i believe it wld get some good attention there.
U r d man.

It looks bulky. Fashion logo should look simple and elegant.

Compare these.

GraphicsPlus: Compare these.

Simple, yes.
But they,ll do more better with concept and depth

Thanks

Yeah! 'STREETY', tht's the depth right there.
I'm nt much of a good designer 'yet' but I know a good concept when i see one, and i shld say this one is.

I wld suggest though, u placing d image just above d texts in the basics like u did with d first one. U cld try tht and then make a comparism. Tht i believe wld take care of the 'seemingly' bulkyness, as putting everything side by side kinda makes d whole look like a single over-stretched image. In other words, the first one looks more compact but the others are nicer.
Just my views though.

Encouraging things u guys r doing here.

GraphicsPlus: Compare these.

compare what?? Smh, Ur number (2) sef is worst D̶̲̥̅̊ "S" in D̶̲̥̅̊ street doesn't luk professional at allllllll

@OP the first one is great, thumbs up bruv

GraphicsPlus: Compare these.

u don fall ur own hands although am not dat gwud in CG, but wat u designed is nat gwud. Dats all

Oh graphicsPlus.....u just neva sieze to show how stupid u are.