Though Abati explained that no part of constitution spells out the removal of states governors but i see this declaration as mild n limited. The governors and all house of assembly members should ve been made to vacate the seats of authorities in this declaration, because they ve failed in their responsibilities to tackle states issues.
Why were the governors not removed? Could it be politics as usual?

MY BROTHER.THE PRESIDENT IN HIS NORMAL CHICKEN HEARTED WAY HAS MADE THE DECLARATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY IN A WAY THAT THE NORTH WILL NOT CRITICISE HIM.

BUT HE HAS FORGOTTEN THAT WHAT IS WORTH DOING IS WORTH DOING WELL.THE GOVERNORS AND THE ENTIRE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FOR THE MAIN TIME,TO ALLOW THE MILLITARY DO A THOROUGH JOB.IF YOU INVESTIGATE WELL,YOU WILL FIND OUT THAT THE GOVERNORS AND SOME PUBLIC OFFICERS HAVE A HAND IN THIS INSECURITY THING IN THE NORTH.

THE PRESIDENT HAS NOT DONE A THOROUGH JOB.I WELCOME A STATE OF EMERGENCY,BUT NOT IN THIS FORM.I FEAR THAT THE PURPOSE MIGHT NOT BE ACHIEVED.