Please wait patiently while we analyse the result before posting them

First Judge Assessment

For King94
1. Presentation=3
2. Logic of arguments= 2.5
3. Strenght of facts, examples, cases= 2
4. Persuasiveness= 3
5. Demonstration of knowledge and
understanding of the subject= 3
TOTAL= 13.5 out of 25

Niyi20
1. Presentation= 2
2. Logic of arguments= 2
3. Strenght of facts, examples, cases=1
4. Persuasiveness= 1
5. Demonstration of knowledge and
understanding of the subject= 2
TOTAL: 8 out of 25

Second Judge Assessment

For King94
1. Presentation= 4
2. Logic of arguments= 3.5
3. Strenght of facts, examples, cases= 4
4. Persuasiveness= 3.5
5. Demonstration of knowledge and
understanding of the subject= 4
TOTAL 19 out of 25

Niyi20
1. Presentation= 3
2. Logic of arguments= 3
3. Strenght of facts, examples, cases= 3.5
4. Persuasiveness=3
5. Demonstration of knowledge and
understanding of the subject= 3.5
TOTAL: 16 out of 25

combining the scores,we have

1. Presentation=12
2. Logic of arguments= 11
3. Strenght of facts, examples, cases= 10.5
4. Persuasiveness =10.5
5. Demonstration of knowledge and
understanding of the subject =12.5
TOTAL: 56.5 out of 100

56.5/100. Hmmmn. Thanks to the judges for their assessment. We shall improve if we qualify for the next round.

judges can now make statements about the debate

king94: 56.5/100. Hmmmn. Thanks to the judges for their assessment. We shall improve if we qualify for the next round.

We still have a lot to work on

king94: 56.5/100. Hmmmn. Thanks to the judges for their assessment. We shall improve if we qualify for the next round.

You guys obviously need to improve on your piece.

Your presentation was just average while that of Niyi was below average. Niyi needs to work on his grammatical structure and spellings. He should note that although grammatical structure was not listed as one of the scoring criteria, it has an effect on the overall score.

Nevertheless, I'm impress with the your use of examples and case scenarios to buttress your point. It made your debate very rich and interesting to read by both the judges and the audience.

Niyi's work was very scanty and less persuasive. I'm presuming he has more to offer but decided to mellow on realising his team had no opponent. I sincerely hope he brings out his talent in the next round if he qualifies.

So conclusively, I'll say weldone guys. You guys tried but you guys can do much better.

Regards,
Obinoscopy

Debate has ended.

thread now open for normal comments

Obinoscopy: You guys obviously need to improve on your piece.

Your presentation was just average while that of Niyi was below average. Niyi needs to work on his grammatical structure and spellings. He should note that although grammatical structure was not listed as one of the scoring criteria, it has an effect on the overall score.

Nevertheless, I'm impress with the your use of examples and case scenarios to buttress youri point. It made your debate very rich and interesting to read by both the judges and the audience.

Niyi's work was very scanty and less persuasive. I'm presuming he has more to offer but decided to mellow on realising his team had no opponent. I sincerely hope he brings out his talent in the next round if he qualifies.

So conclusively, I'll say weldone guys. You guys tried but you guys can do much better.

Regards,
Obinoscopy

Ok

Standing...
RANKING

DELSU 78
UI 73
FUTA 56
UNIJOS 0
NDU
UNN
UNIBEN
FUNAAB
OAU
KSU
NU
ABU ZARIA
IMSU
FUTMINNA
UNILAG
LAUTECH
LASU
AAUA
OSUSTECH

To my partner, niyi20, I'm proud of ur contribution to d debate. To obinoscopy, I salute u.Thanks 4 ur critique. To alutacontinua nd davo93, thanks also for pushing us all d way.