TopeQs:



Lol....


One thing about movie review here is that there are many reviews done with emotions. One has to review and)or critique with reasons but someone here will just give 3/10, say it's shitty, just like that, that's the end.

Anyways, enjoying movie is subjective and to each it's own.

I enjoyed "last seen alive" yet online movie reviews all said it's shitty. I'm waiting to see Thor (love and thunder) on Wednesday, let me see how marvel will impress after the subpar money grab called Dr Strange 2.

After Thor (if it's as bad as many review), maybe marvel should just forget phase 5 because there have been too many below par movie in phase 4. The fact that they still make buckload of money won't change their approach anyway but they should know they're losing fans.

Karleb:
The sea beast is a very dumb movie.

It started out great until they introduced nonsense into the movie. Should we just believe and have faith in a kid because she's just a kid?

GRIMMJOE:
Movie way no too special dey come give you spoiler, watin you won watch again.

trueking:
Thank God I saw Jurassic world Dominion before coming here, I enjoyed every second of that movie, Everything everywhere all at once, I couldn't watch one hour of the movie, yet they said it's good, hehe

Take away - if you want to watch a movie disregard reviews here, shikena

trueking:
Thank God I saw Jurassic world Dominion before coming here, I enjoyed every second of that movie, Everything everywhere all at once, I couldn't watch one hour of the movie, yet they said it's good, hehe

Take away - if you want to watch a movie disregard reviews here, shikena

AnfieldFan:
Jamie and Snoop hunting vamps, sign me up...

AnfieldFan:


Is this your first watch?

AnfieldFan:
Jamie and Snoop hunting vamps, sign me up...

AnfieldFan:
Jamie and Snoop hunting vamps, sign me up...

durubennie:
Thor temporarily killed **** and Valkyrie stole *****,to aid her in fighting gorr the God butcher in thor love and thunder.

Kaycee7:
Bro, this brilliantly written paradox is about to ruin my brain. What came first? The chicken or the egg? I desperately need to know. Been stretching my brain to see where the head of the Ouroboros is.

Was going to check more of The Spierig Brothers' works but they mostly do horror and I does not fück with horror.

Kaycee7:
Bro, this brilliantly written paradox is about to ruin my brain. What came first? The chicken or the egg? I desperately need to know. Been stretching my brain to see where the head of the Ouroboros is.

Was going to check more of The Spierig Brothers' works but they mostly do horror and I does not fück with horror.

IbrahimMav:


This picture doesn't belong here.
It's from another movie, Baby Driver.

Calibrator:
You can argue with someone about this movie all day and you will both be right

Kaycee7:
Word! Cos anyhow you check am. From beginning, from end, from middle, you go still come back the same place

AnfieldFan:


Predestination Paradox Explained – A predestination paradox occurs when a time traveler is caught in a loop of events that “predestines” or “predates” him or her to travel back in time. The paradox suggests that those people who travel back in time would have no way of changing a situation.



https://www.thisisbarry.com/film/predestination-2014-movie-plot-ending-explained/#:~:text=Predestination%20Paradox%20Explained%20%E2%80%93%20A%20predestination,way%20of%20changing%20a%20situation.


It's a bit similar to Marvel's method of time travel.... Going back in time doesn't really alter the future because the past is the future for you(the person traveling), it just branches to a new timeline...

Kaycee7:
The ending isn't even what's fücking my brain. It's the conception of Jane.
For Jane to be conceived, she has to become John who then goes back in time to impregnate her. And without the sex change resulting from the labour, Jane doesn't become John. But if she doesn't become John, Jane is also never conceived. So how was Jane conceived initially and how does she go on to become John and conceive herself in the very first cycle?
This is the chicken and egg situation that's been stressing my brain.

Kaycee7:
The ending isn't even what's fücking my brain. It's the conception of Jane.
For Jane to be conceived, she has to become John who then goes back in time to impregnate her. And without the sex change resulting from the labour, Jane doesn't become John. But if she doesn't become John, Jane is also never conceived. So how was Jane conceived initially and how does she go on to become John and conceive herself in the very first cycle?
This is the chicken and egg situation that's been stressing my brain.

nani667:
°°°

phr0nesis:

Seems both of you like confusion

trueking:
Thank God I saw Jurassic world Dominion before coming here, I enjoyed every second of that movie, Everything everywhere all at once, I couldn't watch one hour of the movie, yet they said it's good, hehe

Take away - if you want to watch a movie disregard reviews here, shikena

IbrahimMav:


I find it funny that you ended up doing exactly what you said others do.
I was expecting you to make an objective post but you ended up making a completely subjective one devoid of any objectivity.
The same Doctor Strange 2 you called "subpar" is an objective success story.
Its word of mouth is B which implies it's a very good movie even if it's not excellent.
It means moviegoers loved it.
It might not have made a billion bucks but it's due to it not getting a Russian and Middle east release.
So as you can see, your tagging it "subpar" is just you being emotional.
Calling it subpar is another way of saying it's shitty, just like that, that's the end.
As for Thor 4, while you're here projecting and claiming that Marvel is losing fans, its current word of mouth is B.
This is good news because it implies it's relatively well received by moviegoers and given time, will do the numbers.
The reality is Marvel is nowhere close to losing fans, if anything, it's gaining.
Many of you here in africa who get their movies on the high seas think your opinions mean shit?
Well they don't.

TopeQs:



I already reviewed Dr strange sometime back, hence my "subpar" conclusion. I just didn't jump to that.

Reading this reply also showed you're just being emotional about marvel movies. I'm a big fan of marvel, I've seen all their movies but I don't comment with emotions. The few good things about marvel phase 4 movies are the graphics and sometimes acting, the fight scenes, the plot, the direction and many others things have been below par, considering how marvel's movies were.

As for Thor 4, I've read trusted reviews (not just nairaland garbage) on the plot, the delivery, the acting and the likes, like I said, the acting seems to be the highlight. I'm still seeing it on Wednesday.

Also, I'm not sure any movie goer opinion count on here so calm your nerves. Your opinions do not matter too, that doesn't mean you can't opine on what you want. At the end of the day, it's just a movie, just entertainment, enjoy, argue, laugh and move on, doesn't have to be more than that or send subliminal shots below the belt.


Note: a movie going on to make crazy money doesn't mean it's good just like movie making shitty money doesn't make it bad. I'm sure you know this though but your emotions won't allow you accept that fact.

Kaycee7:
We go watch film wey people wey smoke Aba weed write.