The most likely conspiracy theories you'll see
for MH17
Here are several of the most likely conspiracy
analysis explanations that are likely to emerge from
the downing of MH17 as investigations continue. As
you read these, keep in mind that I am not in any
way stating these are already supported by the facts.
Rather, these are the conspiracy explanations
which are most likely to be investigated
surrounding this event. It is quite possible that none
of these is true, but only a more in-depth
investigation will tell for sure.
Theory #1) The plane was destroyed because
AIDS researchers were close to a breakthrough
It is factually true that 100 AIDS researchers --
including many top scientists on the subject -- were
on board the plane as it headed for an AIDS
conference in Sydney. (1) It is also widely known that
every "disease industry" absolutely does not want a
cure to ever be revealed to the public. The cancer
industry, for example, depends entirely on the
continued existence of cancer for its profits and
power. (That's why legitimate cancer cures are
systematically suppressed while government funds
for cancer cure research are strictly limited to only
those things which will never result in a cure.)
This theory says that a team of scientists on board
MH17 were about to present key research of an AIDS
breakthrough which would result in a real cure. Thus,
they had to be taken out in order to protect the
highly-profitable cancer industry, which generates
billions of dollars for pharmaceutical companies that
practically run the government.
And if you don't believe Big Pharma interests
dominate government activities, then ask yourself
why Fedex is being charged with multiple felony
crimes by the U.S. government for innocently
delivering packages from online pharmacies. Click
here for the full story.
Theory #2) It was a false flag scripted by
Ukraine to paint Russia as evil in order to
garner political support for the war effort
This theory supposes that Ukraine forces, desperate
for international support for the war, staged the
missile launch as a false flag event which could be
conveniently blamed on the Russians.
Once the Russians were implicated, international
condemnation would soon follow, giving Ukraine a
political edge in the war.
Theory #3) A high-level diplomat, war general
or weapons scientist was on board and was
targeted for termination
There is zero evidence for this theory (so far), but it
will be considered nonetheless. As the passenger
manifest is meticulously researched, it may be
discovered that an important Russian war officer or
political officer was on board, and that Ukrainian
forces were willing to sacrifice innocent civilians in
order to kill this one strategically important person.
Again, I must emphasize there is no evidence of such
a scenario, but this is the kind of theory which will be
investigated.
Theory #4) MH17 is the missing MH370
Malaysia Airlines jet which was previously
hijacked and now had to be destroyed
This is one of the more outlandish theories being
floated. It supposes that the Malaysia Airlines MH370
jet which has gone missing in the Indian Ocean for
many months had to be destroyed in order to
eliminate the evidence of the aircraft, and so it was
"repackaged" as MH17 and deliberately shot down.
I'm not sure why this would involve loading it up with
passengers and flying it over Ukraine, and I very
much doubt Malaysia Airlines would fail to notice it
was flying the same aircraft used in MH370. For the
record, airline companies keep meticulous
aircraft maintenance records due to the stringent
demands placed upon them by governments. Jet
engines, for example, must be completely
overhauled after so many hours of operation. Flight
controls, electronics, hydraulics and other systems
are also carefully inspected in a strict "hours of
operation" basis, which obviously requires airlines to
know which aircraft they are inspecting or flying.
The theory that MH17 is actually MH370 seems
rather outlandish, even to conspiracy analysts who
are open-minded about unusual possibilities.
Theory #5) Recovered passports were faked,
and therefore...
An
article on BeforeItsNews.com (2) lays out a number
of conspiracy analysis ideas, some of which don't
seem to hold much water. But one of the ideas that
does raise legitimate question is the photo of the
claimed "recovered passports" of MH17 passengers.
Miraculously, all these passports appear to be in
mint condition, even though the aircraft itself is a
smoldering nightmare of wreckage. (See photo,
right.)
Here's a legitimate question we should all be asking:
What level of damage to passports should be
expected after a civilian aircraft is destroyed by a
high explosive military missile?
I'm not an expert in military missiles, so I can't
answer this as an expert. However, from the point of
view of a layperson, it seems like something is fishy
here: shouldn't these passports be a lot more
tattered, burned or singed in some way?
The answer to this seems to depend on where the
missile struck the aircraft. If it struck one of the
engines, located under the wings, then it's not really
necessary for the main fuselage to have been
"burned up" in an explosion. The loss of an entire
wing is enough to cause the loss of structural
integrity of the aircraft, resulting in a mid-air breakup
of the fuselage and possibly "dumping" live
passengers into the open atmosphere at 33,000 feet,
with their fully-intact passports in their pockets or
purses.
On
the
other hand -- and this is really important to
understand -- the aircraft EXPLODED on the
ground, leaving behind the charred remains shown
in another photo on the right.
If you know anything about airplanes -- and I do
because I'm a pilot -- you know that the fuel is
stored in the wings. For an aircraft to explode on
the ground, it would require at least one wing to have
dropped to the ground fully intact, and this is only
likely to happen if a significant portion of the
fuselage remains intact as well. In other words,
because of this fireball explosion on the ground, it
seems like that much of the plane remained
intact, with passengers inside the fuselage as it
plummeted to the ground.
(See fireball explosion photo on the right. This is
taken from the actual video of the aircraft hitting the
ground and exploding.)
It is
difficult to imagine anything coming out of that
fireball in pristine condition as seems to be shown
with recovered passports. It's not clear, however, if
these passports were recovered from passengers
killed in the fireball explosion on the ground, or if
they were recovered from falling bodies that were
somehow thrown clear of the airplane at high altitude
and then plummeted to the ground.
What I'm saying here is that if these passports were
recovered from falling bodies, then it's reasonable to
expect them to be in relatively good shape. But if the
official story is that these passports were recovered
from bodies blown up in the ground explosion, then
that's obviously a cover story that holds no water.

Interesting theories. The 1st theory sound ridiculous.

from where you have this, it is bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!

May the souls of those who died rest in peace.
Theory 40# musiwa mistake the plane for mank toy so he shot the plane down.
Theory 41# APC in their usual fashion thaught people in the plane are coming to fight BH so they sponsored the shooting through their terrorist wing .