There are indications that the incoming Muhammadu Buhari presidency may discard the regulations drawn for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke (SAN), The PUNCH has learnt.

The regulation, a subsidiary legislation derived from provisions of section 43 of the EFCC (Establishment) Act 2004, is believed to be hampering the independence of the anti-graft agency in prosecuting high profile corruption cases.

A senior lawyer, who is familiar with the incoming administration’s anti-corruption strategy, disclosed to our correspondent that the regulation drawn by Adoke would be dropped or reviewed.

According to the source, the independence of the EFCC as the Buhari government will desire in its bid to deliver on its promise to fight corruption, cannot be guaranteed under such regulation.

Section 10 of the regulation mandates the EFCC to report the outcome of its investigations on “serious or complex” cases to the AGF before commencing prosecution.

What constitutes a “serious or complex” case, according to Adoke, includes having a “significant international dimension,” involves money or assets worth N50m, or is likely to be of widespread public concern, among others.

“The incoming government will ensure that there is no interference with the investigation and prosecution by the EFCC. So, parts of Adoke’s regulation will be reviewed if not completely discarded,” the source said.

Section 43 of the EFCC Act from which Adoke derived his power to draw regulations for the anti-graft agency reads, “The Attorney General of the Federation may make rules or regulations with respect to the exercise of any of the duties, functions or powers of the commission under this Act.”

The 10-part regulations drawn by Adoke pursuant to the provisions of the EFCC Act commenced on September 20, 2010, about five months after he assumed office on April 6, 2010.

The AGF’s directives to the EFCC covers procedure for receiving complaints, investigation, arrest and granting of bail, prosecution of cases, valuation and disposal of seized assets, plea bargain, foreign aid and grants.

Section 10 of the regulation, titled ‘Report of Results of Investigation in certain cases’ reads, “(1) Where the commission conducts investigation in respect of a case or complaint which is serious or complex it shall forward to the Attorney General (of the Federation) the outcome of the investigation with its recommendations on whether there are sufficient grounds to initiate prosecution.

“(2) For the purpose of these regulations, a case is serious or complex if the case or complaint:

“(a) has a significant international dimension;

“(b) involves money or assets of a value exceeding N50m;

“(c) requires specialised knowledge of financial, commercial, fiscal or regulatory matters such as the operation of markets, banking systems, trusts, or tax regimes;

“(d) involves allegations of fraudulent activity against numerous victims;

“(e) involves substantial and significant loss of funds by a Ministry, Department or public body

“(f) is likely to be of widespread public concern; or

“(g) involves an alleged misconduct which amounts to an act of economic sabotage.”

Though section 6 of the regulation says, “Nothing shall be construed as preventing the commission from exercising any of its powers under section 7 of the Act (the EFCC Act)” but some employees of the commission said the need to get approval from the AGF and the presidency before it could prosecute had not augured well for the EFCC.

An in-house counsel with the EFCC, who also pleaded not to be named because he was not authorised to speak on the issue, said the anti-corruption agency had been handicapped by the Presidency’s disposition towards high profile corruption cases.

The source said, “We have to get approval from the Presidency before we can investigate or prosecute the suspects (high profile).

“But the approval is not forthcoming. We are hoping that things will start changing when the new government is inaugurated.”

The APC spokesperson, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, could not be reached for his comment as he did not respond to a text message sent to him, and only responded to our correspondent’s call through a text message on Tuesday that he could not answer calls at that moment. He did not respond to our correspondent’s several other calls afterwards.

The Director, Media and Publicity, All Progressives Congress Presidential Campaign Council, Mr. Garba Shehu, when contacted referred our correspondent to the party’s manifesto.

In the party’s manifesto, section 2 titled as ‘War Against Corruption and National Orientation’ states among others that the government formed by the party would create special courts for corruption, strengthen anti-graft agencies and repeal laws capable of inhibiting their independence.

Section 2(i) of the manifesto reads, “We shall strengthen and make independent the EFCC, ICPC and other anti-graft agencies and repeal the laws which inhibit their independence.”

Copyright PUNCH.

For our people that don't like reading.A quick summary is that the EFCC by the provisions in the act setting it up cannot prosecute any case in which the amount involve is above 50MILLION NAIRA without a go ahead from the AGF and the presidency.

Wonder why Adoke included this clause, that is because before you can steal up to 50m you will be closer to the power at the top.

Now you all know why EFCC has been chasing only yahoo boys in the last 5 years

This is proof that the Jonathan's presidency was responsible for the inhibition of EFCC to functioning competently, refer to this post I made about the EFCC becoming so jobless as to be pursuing police matters instead of high profile cases:

https://www.nairaland.com/2327564/should-efcc-one-prosecuting-case

But yet on another note, the incoming government should review EFCC's records to see if they actually submitted high profile cases to the AGF and presidency, and the extent to which they followed up on those cases, to ascertain if the presidency was actually the one impeding their efforts

NewNigeriaMind:
For our people that don't like reading.A quick summary is that the EFCC by the provisions in the act setting it up cannot prosecute any case in which the amount involve is above 50MILLION NAIRA without a go ahead from the AGF and the presidency.

Wonder why Adoke included this clause, that is because before you can steal up to 50m you will be closer to the power at the top.

Now you all know why EFCC has been chasing only yahoo boys in the last 5 years

Great revelation. Now I see why people named "EFCC-a toothless bull dog."