niceeric:
since when did 5 volts from a standard Usb charger start blowing up heads?

I understand if an appliance that uses the full 230v is plugged but the truth is even in that case,the injury on the face is not gonna b that bad....he'll be thrown off almost immediately after contact with the copper

thirdly, na stainless steel b the guy teeth....wey b say he chew that thick wire finish till e reach the copper and no one saw him?

Finally, with these few points of mine, I hope I've been able to convince u and not confuse u that the story is a HOAX but only has a moral or two to teach anyway

Voltage does not electrocute... (rread about van der graffs generator). What you should be worried about is the current, measured in amperes. For a usb appliance, the amperage is just 0.20 amps, which is not enough to electrocute a child, at least not up to that extent.

MaziKachi:


Voltage does not electrocute... (rread about van der graffs generator). What you should be worried about is the current, measured in amperes. For a usb appliance, the amperage is just 0.20 amps, which is not enough to electrocute a child, at least not up to that extent.

guy come on!!!...anyways as an Electronic and computer engineering graduate, i'll speak in my capacity to disprove your 'theory'.

Though I'll admit current actually is the cause of electrocution BUT without enough voltage to allow for the work of current flow in the conductor, electrocution would not occur. simple

High voltage + current flow in capacity of the ((PD(voltage))= electrocution

Tarya:
CCTV camera mumu

Biggest Mumu .. does this looks like a CCTV picture? Ode

Lies

Charger can't do this

Ode

Logician:
The current in a phone charger isnt strong enough to do such damage. And even if electrocution occurs, a responsive action that is involutary would ultimately enable the minor withdraw the cable from his mouth & avert fatality. But I understand your message though.

Parents be advised, monitor your kids\toddlers closely.

on point.

Logician:
The current in a phone charger isnt strong enough to do such damage. And even if electrocution occurs, a responsive action that is involutary would ultimately enable the minor withdraw the cable from his mouth & avert fatality. But I understand your message though.

Parents be advised, monitor your kids\toddlers closely.

thanks jare

niceeric:

guy come on!!!...anyways as an Electronic and computer engineering graduate, i'll speak in my capacity to disprove your 'theory'.

Though I'll admit current actually is the cause of electrocution BUT without enough voltage to allow for the work of current flow in the conductor, electrocution would not occur. simple

High voltage + current flow in capacity of the ((PD(voltage))= electrocution

You're right but you forget ohmic law viz v = iR.
Anybody can only electrocute if his resistance is not that much to withstand the voltage.The ability of a resistive materials to withstand the voltage is what give rise to current.

So I can say that the baby has lower resistance in his body compare to the 230 voltage in the supply which made the high current developed in his body to charr/burn him . Chikena....lobatan

BABANPY

baba11:

You're right but you forget ohmic law viz v = iR.
Anybody can only electrocute if his resistance is not that much to withstand the voltage.The ability of a resistive materials to withstand the voltage is what give rise to current.

So I can say that the baby has lower resistance in his body compare to the 230 voltage in the supply which made the high current developed in his body to charr/burn him . Chikena....lobatan

BABANPY

good one... resistance is a factor that limits current flow, hence limiting d degree of electrocution BUT did u notice the argument was about being electrocuted by a charger??.....The good Lord knows a WET chicken won't get electrocuted by a 5Vdc1A charger!

niceeric:

good one... resistance is a factor that limits current flow, hence limiting d degree of electrocution BUT did u notice the argument was about being electrocuted by a charger??.....The good Lord knows a WET chicken won't get electrocuted by a 5Vdc1A charger!

..
A wet chicken cannot get electrocuted by 5vdc1A ... like wise this particular case,a DC can't electrocute this baby to this degree except if there's a fault/bypass supply over the whole circuitry or it's a plain AC supply...

baba11:
..
A wet chicken cannot get electrocuted by 5vdc1A ... like wise this particular case,a DC can't electrocute this baby to this degree except if there's a fault/bypass supply over the whole circuitry or it's a plain AC supply...

simple and precise....though dc voltage sources can be used even better by the devil too esp if a good current is involved but dem no born phone charger well lol

Nice one bro...u know as e dey go!

niceeric:

simple and precise....though dc voltage sources can be used even better by the devil too esp if a good current is involved but dem no born phone charger well lol

Nice one bro...u know as e dey go!

Naso....I'm a graduate of electronics and computer engineering like you

baba11:


Naso....I'm a graduate of electronics and computer engineering like you

No wonder!!!!!!

u graduated from which of the tertiary institutions?

JayneStephanie:
Who took the photo of the baby chewing the wire?

d first thing that came to my mind

niceeric:
No wonder!!!!!!
u graduated from which of the tertiary institutions?

? LASU...I'll like to know you more.... PM sent!!!

baba11:
? LASU...I'll like to know you more.... PM sent!!!

really??...thesame LASU Epe Campus?.... that's where I graduated from too!

niceeric:

really??...thesame LASU Epe Campus?.... that's where I graduated from too!

Really!....

The pictures are just illustration of what can happen if don't restrict your your 1 to 5years old child from play with electrical appliances at home.



www.nairaland.com/attachments/2410757_waecvol3endorsedphsize_jpege5d88479da0bed5d5b837ae01ecefd3d

baba11:
Really!....

YEA sure!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JayneStephanie:


Hey please watch the language you use on me...you can quote me but you can't abuse me

sorry oh

Mubby4luv:

Biggest Mumu .. does this looks like a CCTV picture? Ode

How does CCTV picture looks?? Otondo

Tarya:
How does CCTV picture looks?? Otondo

Do you even know it's meaning? Sakare

Mubby4luv:
Do you even know it's meaning? Sakare

kai walahi na my worst insult 4 dis Year be dat... sha i no blame u na ur papa pay my sch fee

What a wonderful "God" una dey serve o!
God of high-tech abortions!

Seriously parents need to be careful what they put at the disposal of kids

JayneStephanie:
Who took the photo of the baby chewing the wire?

the person shld be sue to court 4 murder.

Tarya:
kai walahi na my worst insult 4 dis Year be dat... sha i no blame u na ur papa pay my sch fee

lol.. I'm sorry. peace

Logician:
The current in a phone charger isnt strong enough to do such damage. And even if electrocution occurs, a responsive action that is involutary would ultimately enable the minor withdraw the cable from his mouth & avert fatality. But I understand your message though.

Parents be advised, monitor your kids\toddlers closely.

You too much.