mkpakanaodogwu:
Or maybe he told the disciples when he rose from the dead

mkpakanaodogwu:
The Holy Spirit

Cutehector:
The bible was written based on inspirations directly from the holy spirit

ozolity:
My brother, it was revealed to them. The Bible was written by the inspiration of God. U wud ve asked who recorded the creation account on Genesis one. Was Moses there when God was doing the creation?

Pr0ton:




Ok. I was expecting this. Now either the Holy Spirit inspired Matthew and didn't inspire the other writers (Luke, Mark and John), or it never inspired Matthew.

Didn't inspire the other writers in the sense that their story contradict. For example, the genealogy of Jesus in Luke contradicts Matthew's; the number of people who visited the tomb of Jesus are different in all accounts; Luke puts the death of Jesus before the day of Passover, while John puts it after the Passover etc. Take your choice.

Pr0ton:




Ok. I was expecting this. Now either the Holy Spirit inspired Matthew and didn't inspire the other writers (Luke, Mark and John), or it never inspired Matthew.

Didn't inspire the other writers in the sense that their story contradict. For example, the genealogy of Jesus in Luke contradicts Matthew's; the number of people who visited the tomb of Jesus are different in all accounts; Luke puts the death of Jesus before the day of Passover, while John puts it after the Passover etc. Take your choice.

Cutehector:
Man's wisdom is foolishnes unto God and the lord's foolishness is wiser dan man's wisdom.

bigtt76:
Holy Spirit get levo naaaa

Cutehector:
The bible was written based on inspirations directly from the holy spirit

Pr0ton:
Luke 22:
39 Jesus went out as usual to the Mount of Olives, and his disciples followed him. 40 On reaching the place, he said to them, “Pray that you will not fall into temptation.” 41 He withdrew about a stone’s throw beyond them, knelt down and prayed, 42 “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” 43 An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him. 44 And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground. 45 When he rose from prayer and went back to the disciples, he found them asleep, exhausted from sorrow. 46 “Why are you sleeping?” he asked them. “Get up and pray so that you will not fall into temptation.”

The gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) were written decades (30 - 40 years) after this event. No one was with Jesus when He said that prayer. There was no one watching; no eyewitnesses. How was the event recorded? Or was the author (who was not Matthew) just making up a story?

polymathic:
2nd peter 2:20-21:: 20. Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God wrote as they were moved by the Holy Spirit. So the Holy Spirit of God is the author of the Bible, not matthew, nor james, nor peter...

Pr0ton:
Luke 22:
39 Jesus went out as usual to the Mount of Olives, and his disciples followed him. 40 On reaching the place, he said to them, “Pray that you will not fall into temptation.” 41 He withdrew about a stone’s throw beyond them, knelt down and prayed, 42 “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” 43 An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him. 44 And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground. 45 When he rose from prayer and went back to the disciples, he found them asleep, exhausted from sorrow. 46 “Why are you sleeping?” he asked them. “Get up and pray so that you will not fall into temptation.”

The gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) were written decades (30 - 40 years) after this event. No one was with Jesus when He said that prayer. There was no one watching; no eyewitnesses. How was the event recorded? Or was the author (who was not Matthew) just making up a story?

basbone:

one thing is clear, those epistles were written years after the Ascention........so the memories of the writers must have been a little jiggled that their accounts slightly differ individualy.
Notwithstanding, the purpose for the epistles is not to tell us old fables of men, but to let us see the life of Christ from different perspectiives, different individualities, who wrote their own accounts without consulting eachother, yet vindicated one point:
that Jesus Christ, the Son of the Almighty God, lived a sinless life, was crucified and rose again, and is with the Father.

Pr0ton:
Luke 22:
39 Jesus went out as usual to the Mount of Olives, and his disciples followed him. 40 On reaching the place, he said to them, “Pray that you will not fall into temptation.” 41 He withdrew about a stone’s throw beyond them, knelt down and prayed, 42 “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” 43 An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him. 44 And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground. 45 When he rose from prayer and went back to the disciples, he found them asleep, exhausted from sorrow. 46 “Why are you sleeping?” he asked them. “Get up and pray so that you will not fall into temptation.”

The gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) were written decades (30 - 40 years) after this event. No one was with Jesus when He said that prayer. There was no one watching; no eyewitnesses. How was the event recorded? Or was the author (who was not Matthew) just making up a story?

barrnchedo:
Holy Ghost.

Pr0ton:




Ok. I was expecting this. Now either the Holy Spirit inspired Matthew and didn't inspire the other writers (Luke, Mark and John), or it never inspired Matthew.

Didn't inspire the other writers in the sense that their story contradict. For example, the genealogy of Jesus in Luke contradicts Matthew's; the number of people who visited the tomb of Jesus are different in all accounts; Luke puts the death of Jesus before the day of Passover, while John puts it on the Passover etc. Take your choice.

Pr0ton:


Apart from skipping the question "how did the writer of Luke 22 write about such event when, apparently, no one was there to witness it?" and not disturbed by the idea that s/he might be making up something, you repeated same point that can be found in ancient mythology. Why did the early Christians (non-gnostic) pick four out of the many Gospels available then? They thought they were not inspired. Sure the OP could have been one of the criteria they used in determining which was inspired or not. Same thing we're applying to this particular Gospel of Luke, and if no answer/rational explanation is provided (and which seems there is none) then we can discard the Gospel as non-inspired, too. Or we can follow the other alternative: getting naive and deluding ourselves into believing something we knowledgeably know is false, and consequently keep proclaiming things that make us look ridiculous like the words in bold in your post.

basbone:

Do you believe in God?? If yes,
then do you believe Satan exist?? If yes,
then Do you believe that Satan was once a beautiful arch angel, ushering praises to God If yes,
then do u believe that Satan rebelled against God and was cast down from heaven If yes,
then u are any of Christian, Jew, Muslim or Satanist (yes satanists believe the same too!) but......

What made u believe all these
Are they written in the bible or koran
Who was there when all these were happening
So you see? Christianity is a religion of believe in faith. I was not there when God created the world.
I wasnt there when God divided the red sea.
I was not there when Daniel was thrown into the den of lions (who even recorded that, was it Daniel)
I wasnt there when the devil came to tempt Jesus in the wilderness (infact, Jesus wasnt the one that recorded it and His disciples were unlearned men)
I wasnt there when Jesus was speaking to the thieves cruxified beside him (i wonder whether His desciples were there even)
But I am here to quote a scripture......"the comforter whom the father will send, will teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance...."
so the Holy Spirit taught them all these and brought it to their remembrance.
The Holy Spirit may make me see a vision from one perspective, yet make someone else to see the same vision from a clearer succinct perspective. We dont have the same grace, and the Holy Spirit cannot work in us all the same way, else it becomes magic.
Paul had a revelation of the past glory of Christ. John the beloved had a revelation of the future glory of Christ in a succinct manner. Thats how the Holy Spirit works!
Now to ur question........
If u can tell me who recorded the meeting between God and Satan over the life of Job or
who recorded the argument between Moses and God in the burning bush Or
who recorded the dispute between the arch angel and satan over the body of moses (read Jude)
Then i will tell u who recorded that statement made by Jesus.

Pr0ton:


It's No. I don't. Why should I believe what people wrote for believing's sake in lack of evidence to substantiate their claim?

Scholar8200:
Of course the Holy Spirit did, by revelation (in accordance with Christ's promise in John 16:15b)! For example, the Lord's supper was between Jesus and the twelve. However,Paul, before ever meeting the other apostles physically got a detailed revelation of the ordinance exactly as it happened:

1 Corinthians 11:23- 24

23 For I received from the Lord Himself that which I passed on to you [it was given to me personally], that the Lord Jesus on the night when He was treacherously delivered up and while His betrayal was in progress took bread,
24 And when He had given thanks, He broke [it] and said, Take, eat. This is My body, which is broken for you. . .

Galatians 1:12
12 For indeed I did not receive it from man, nor was I taught it, but [it came to me] through a [direct] revelation [given] by Jesus Christ (the Messiah).

Pr0ton:




Ok. I was expecting this. Now either the Holy Spirit inspired Matthew and didn't inspire the other writers (Luke, Mark and John), or it never inspired Matthew.

Didn't inspire the other writers in the sense that their story contradict. For example, the genealogy of Jesus in Luke contradicts Matthew's; the number of people who visited the tomb of Jesus are different in all accounts; Luke puts the death of Jesus before the day of Passover, while John puts it on the Passover etc. Take your choice.

Pr0ton:




Ok. I was expecting this. Now either the Holy Spirit inspired Matthew and didn't inspire the other writers (Luke, Mark and John), or it never inspired Matthew.

Didn't inspire the other writers in the sense that their story contradict. For example, the genealogy of Jesus in Luke contradicts Matthew's; the number of people who visited the tomb of Jesus are different in all accounts; Luke puts the death of Jesus before the day of Passover, while John puts it on the Passover etc. Take your choice.

Scholar8200:

The Genealogy of Matthew traced Christ's descent from Joseph while that of Luke traced it from Mary.

As regards the passover, the Lord's supper (before crucifixion) was held on the day of the passover (see Luke 22:13-23) hence it is not possible that Luke will at the same time say the crucifixion was before the passover!

As regards the number of those at the tomb, notice that the emphasis of the revelation to Paul was not peripherals such as the location of the supper or where John placed his head not even the name of the owner of the house, but matters relevant to redemption; the omission of a name by one, while not emphasizing the number involved by the other, does not necessarily mean a contradiction.

Princewell2012:
@proton, why are you disturbing urself over nothing, i have gone tru ur signature, i discovered you are not a christian, and you are just seeking attention and just coursing unnecessary havoc into
the body of Christ. How i wish they will ignore all ur useless post and satanic topics. The lord will judge you weather you believe it or not.

Pr0ton:


How can a reasonable person take this as Mary's genealogy when it reads, "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli..."?

There was a flaw in my post that led to this misunderstanding. In Luke, Jesus died after the Passover Luke 22:13-20; Luke 22:66. In John, he died on the Passover John 19:14-30. I've corrected that. And still, an apparent contradiction.

Some are the location where Jesus appeared to his disciples. Was it in Jerusalem as Luke says, or Galilee as Matthew says?

Did Jesus teach his sermon on the mount as Matthew says, or in the plain as Luke says?

Was the hometown of Joseph and Mary Bathelem as recorded in Matthew, or Nazareth as in Luke? Was Jesus born during the days of Herod as found in Matthew, or Quirinius as found in Luke? And many more.

Cutehector:
The bible was written based on inspirations directly from the holy spirit

Scholar8200:
Women's name hardly appear in genealogies; in tracing the genealogy from Mother's side, the name of the son-in-law is used else Joseph cannot be the son of Heli and Jacob at the same time; he was son-in-law to Heli (or how many female names are found in that list?)

The passover was not a day event it was a weeklong(and each week has its own sabbath) event see Exodus 12:14-17 Leviticus 23:5-7

And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the Lord throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever. 15 Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread; even the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses: for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel. 16 And in the first day there shall be an holy convocation, and in the seventh day there shall be an holy convocation to you; no manner of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat, that only may be done of you. 17 And ye shall observe the feast of unleavened bread;





5 On the fourteenth day of the first month at twilight is the Lord’s Passover.
6 On the fifteenth day of the same month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread to the Lord; for seven days you shall eat unleavened bread.
7 On the first day you shall have a holy “calling together;” you shall do no servile or laborious work on that day.
(AMP)

The two ran concurrently and the blanket word 'passover' must have been because the activities in the latter was a part of the former.

Jesus appeared to His disciples more than once after resurrection. Sometimes not all of them but only a few were present when He appeared.
Acts 1:3 shows that He was with them for forty days before Ascension.

3 To them also He showed Himself alive after His passion (His suffering in the garden and on the cross) by [a series of] many convincing demonstrations [unquestionable evidences and infallible proofs], appearing to them during forty days and talking [to them] about the things of the kingdom of God.
(AMP)

It was on the Mount. The verse you are referring to in Luke, as regards the sermon on the mount, was commenced on another paragraph. Mark clarifies that after the disciples were chosen they all... Mark 3:19
19 and Judas Iscariot, which also betrayed him: and they went into an house.

Kindly specify these with quotes lest if I stated them, you claim that those were not the ones you had in mind.