Here are some of the views that support my assertion:

1)  He introduced the concept of hell, a particularly vile place for everlasting punishment.

2)  Had particularly obnoxious family values - calling of people to hate their family members and abandon their families

3)  He called on people to make no plans for tomorrow.

4) He call for people to not self-defend themself against aggressors, but instead give to aggressors

5)  He called on people to self-mutilate to avoid sinning, thus showing that he did not know how "sinning" originate.  He should have called on people to cut off their heads instead since sinning starts as a thought in the brain.

6)  He was particularly opposed to his followers fraternising with non-Jews, describing one such as a dog.

7)  He called on his enemies to be brought forth and slain before him.

8-)  He said " I did not come to bring peace BUT a sword"

9)  He was particularly uncharitable to women facing divorce from their men, describing them as commiting adultery and putting a bar against other men from marrying such women.

10) Was particularly materialistic, prefering that an expensive perfum be used on him, rather having it sold and the money given to the poor.


And this is the view one get from reading the new testament. I have not even mentioned the actions of Jesus in the old testament.


Does anyone who espouses such vile views deserve to be respected and renerated?

So what do you stand to gain by creating this thread?? more like wasted space if you ask me,!!!

How come non of you are addressing the point I made above? You guys seem to be unable to defend you man. How bizarre!

huxley:

How come non of you are addressing the point I made above?

You didn't make any point that deserves to be addressed. Get something good to do with your time!

@ poster
Item 4 is in direct contradiction with item 7.

incidentally u left out BATTYMANISM.
he called on men to fish for men.
and demonstrated this by surrounding himself with 12 men

Ever notice how Christian Nigerian men love to hug another christian man?

This fictitious fool didn't even exist, a man made doctrine and conception created by the Vatican and the counsel of Nicea in 325 AD

Battyman didn't even know the warmth or feel of a woman, always depicted half naked and walking around with men, No off spring whatso ever when Abba YHWH commanded man to go forth and multiply 

takin baths in streams with men under the false auspices of baptism

Yisraylite:

This fictitious fool didn't even exist, a man made doctrine and conception created by the Vatican and the counsel of Nicea in 325 AD

The first British slave ship was called the Good Jesus, Now all these brain washed Black people are following this bytch - man around crying to the image of a blue eyed blond batty man -

Here are some of the views that support my assertion:

1) He introduced the concept of hell, a particularly vile place for everlasting punishment.

2) Had particularly obnoxious family values - calling of people to hate their family members and abandon their families

3) He called on people to make no plans for tomorrow.

4) He call for people to not self-defend themself against aggressors, but instead give to aggressors

5) He called on people to self-mutilate to avoid sinning, thus showing that he did not know how "sinning" originate. He should have called on people to cut off their heads instead since sinning starts as a thought in the brain.

6) He was particularly opposed to his followers fraternising with non-Jews, describing one such as a dog.

7) He called on his enemies to be brought forth and slain before him.

8-) He said " I did not come to bring peace BUT a sword"

9) He was particularly uncharitable to women facing divorce from their men, describing them as commiting adultery and putting a bar against other men from marrying such women.

10) Was particularly materialistic, prefering that an expensive perfum be used on him, rather having it sold and the money given to the poor.


And this is the view one get from reading the new testament. I have not even mentioned the actions of Jesus in the old testament.


Does anyone who espouses such vile views deserve to be respected and renerated?

Huxley,

How confident are you that these claims are attributable directly to Jesus and he decreed these sentences, as opposed to evaluations of your sources and their credibility for cosmic truthfulness free of bias?

Negro_Ntns:




Huxley,

How confident are you that these claims are attributable directly to Jesus and he decreed these sentences, as opposed to evaluations of your sources and their credibility for cosmic truthfulness free of bias?

Very very very confident if the bible is anything to go by.

With what I've seen in the Islam section, this surprises me not.

Very very very confident if the bible is anything to go by

.

Isn't that contradictory? Why the doubt?

Does being an atheist equal being really disgusting and shall I say senseless? This topic is very distasteful indeed. Get help, huxley, you need it

Another emotionally drained brain showing off,

whew tell us why you mad bruh.

ayinba1:

Does being an atheist equal being really disgusting and shall I say senseless? This topic is very distasteful indeed. Get help, huxley, you need it

you'd think muslims who love to scream about discrimination would refrain from generalizing people. not a shocker.

this topic is a def must watch.

Religion is a wide topic and i disapprove anyone who directly critizes any other religion. Why dont you be more constructive

Sweet Jesus, because of your mercy that endureth forever, please have mercy on this poster.

Interesting how my critics on this post lack the intellectual mettle to deal with the facts I have presented. Instead, they are attacking me or want to preach to me. It's obvious that their slavish attachment to this dangerous and maniacal ignoramus called Jesus has damaged their thinking ability, hence their inability to deal with the facts of the thread.

@ POSTER

If not for Jesus they wouldn't have been a second chance for sinners, hell has already be in existence and meant
for sinners which was the reason he came to this world, he came to save mankind from hell, and here you are saying
he introduced the concept of hell. i pray that your understanding would open some day onorder for you to
really know the magnitude of this post and ask him for forgiveness.

pinky lady:

@ POSTER

If not for Jesus they wouldn't have been a second chance for sinners, hell has already be in existence and meant
for sinners which was the reason he came to this world, he came to save mankind from hell, and here you are saying
he introduced the concept of hell. i pray that your understanding would open some day onorder for you to
really know the magnitude of this post and ask him for forgiveness.

Before Jesus came about, the concept of hell existed simply as a place where the dead go for a long repose. But when Jesus came about he converted hell into a place of everlasting punishment. So basically according to Jesus's redesign of hell people, from the aborted foetus, infants, stillborns, to all types of adults, who do not believe in him will roast in hell. Now, are these the works of a loving and merciful man/god?

huxley:

Interesting how my critics on this post lack the intellectual mettle to deal with the facts I have presented. Instead, they are attacking me or want to preach to me. It's obvious that their slavish attachment to this dangerous and maniacal ignoramus called Jesus has damaged their thinking ability, hence their inability to deal with the facts of the thread.

But the mistake you made is trying to reason with them in the first place.

Dogma is blind to anything that reason has to say so,

LOL@ Tallnajaf and Ysiraelite

Couldn't agree more