Sincere9gerian:
The relocation of military command centre and the dismantling of military check points were dumb moves, which may have aided the renewed boko haram attacks. If care is not taken boko haram may attack that military command centre just to prove how stupidd the idea was

PPAngel:
The AirForce has been grounded and Buhari has given explicit order that any major offensive by the military on Boko Haram must first get his final approval.

Since being sworn in the idiot has refused to approve any major offensive and with the military brass relocated to the NE communicating with Buhari has bern cumbersome.

Buhari is shielding Boko Haram and he will soon grant them amnesty for their role in distabilizing the former govt and for doing some good work in ridding the northwest of kafirs .

Buhari you will eventually pay for all the blood you have spilt.

abbey621:


For a nobody, it's amazing the amount of information you have on the president's daily activities and those close to him I've got to give it to you tho, you sure know how to stir up the crowd

barcanista:
Many people are wondering why there is increased Boko Haram attacks and less military action under the administration of General Muhammadu Buhari (unlike what was obtained at the twilight of the Jonathan's administration). Please I urge readers to take their time to read this piece to find answers to many questions.

1. ACN/APC Believes BH Terrorists "Grievances" Should Be "Addressed" (Jan 1, 2012):
In reaction to the December 2011 State of Emergency declared by exPresident Goodluck Jonathan, Alhaji Lai Muhammed of ACN/APC reacted in a manner that made one ponder on his party's position in BH. First he made sense by stating that the government(of Jonathan) should tackle the root cause. However, his concluding statement rather appear as one that sympathised with the terrorists. In his own words...

‘’It is clear that the perpetrators of the violence believe they have grievances against the state, at whatever level. As unreasonable as this may seem in certain quarters, the truth is that unless these grievances are largely addressed, we will remain in the woods’’
www.vanguardngr.com/2012/01/mixed-reactions-trail-govts-emergency-declaration/

What was happening during that time in Nigeria? Certain groups were getting amnesty and the other one being labeled as terrorist. The Boko haram mess had not reached the point of no return as it has today, so it is within logical reason what was said about their grievances. Assuming the GEJ led government had a firm stance on all terrorist groups then we might say the statement is uncalled for. To me MEND, MASSOB and BOKO all started out with grievances with some justified and others just insane!

2. ACN/APC Never Believed In Military Action Against BH(May 2013):
While Nigerians celebrated the State of Emergency against BH in May 2013, the ACN/APC openly displayed their opposition to it and further opposed the sending of troops to tackle BH. Read Lai Muhammed's reaction
“We hereby REJECT the declaration of emergency rule in the three states of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe, and we call on the National Assembly to also reject it and not allow itself to be used to rubber-stamp a declaration that is largely cosmetic.
If the use of force in the affected states have failed to curtail the activities of the insurgents, why send in more troops?

This also made sense as the root cause was not being tackled.

APC/ACN leader Bola Ahmed Tinubu went further to say sending military against BH portends danger....

“The tenor of the state of emergency declared by the Federal Government yesterday portends danger for the polity. The full militarisation of security operations in these states will compound the already tense situation.”
http://www.punchng.com/news/reject-emergency-rule-acn-urges-nassembly/
http://thenationonlineng.net/new/acn-tinubu-sani-kick-as-nlc-nba-can-back-action/

3. Buhari Never Believed In Military Action Against BH:
April 2013
He made case for Amnesty for BH in April 2013...
“It is good that they have set up a committee on amnesty. I have not seen the terms of reference, but it is a right step in a right direction. “This is not the first time amnesty would be given to a violent group. You remember it happened in the time of Yar’Adua when he gave amnesty to militants, but whatever would bring us peace as a society, we should do it,”
www.sunnewsonline.com/new/buhari-supports-amnesty-for-boko-haram/

Did he not speak the truth? Why favor one group over the other? Amnesty should have never been given to the militants because all it accomplished was making the precedence for future militia.

June 2013:
Despite the fact that Abubakar Shekau in in April 2013 rejected GEJ's negotiation proposal (as advocated by the North), despite the fact that BH carried out continuous attacks against the Nigeria State, Buhari still maintained his position that BH be flown in planes and granted "amnesty" and condemned killing of BH terrorists.

“You see in the case of the Niger Delta militants, the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua sent an airplane to bring them, he sat down with them and discussed with them, they were cajoled, and they were given money and granted amnesty.
“They were trained in some skills and were given employment, but the ones in the north are being killed and their houses demolished. They are different issues, what brought this? It is injustice.”
http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/buhari-military-offensive-against-boko-haram-anti-north/149256/

This is the part that I disagree with, Yar'Adua should have never done that and we certainly don't need to entertain Boko Haram. The time for amnesty has long passed, it is now a full blown war and I'm sure PMB would not want to jeopardize his political career by allowing Boko Haram to exist throughout his presidency.

PPAngel:


You think we are all cowards like you.

I got my shotgun ready to split any boko ligaments

sparkleRed:


Incase u don't knw, political spy re on NL so u don't knw who is a "nobody" actually as u don't knw who dis pple re

Arch1:
you lot are undersestimating the prowess of BH. Didnt they attack the Command and Staff College, Jaji? Didnt they attack the MNJTF, Baga?

BH is more deadly that we know. It has nothing to do with PDP or APC. They are even in your own state

Arch1:
I supported a Buhari presidecy but i have stated severally(check my previous posts), Buhari CANNOT end the insurgency in the NorthEast.

I quite agree with u. But when the man at the helm of affair begins to sympathize with the sect, I can't but link it with his party.
Boko Haram/ISWAP inusrgency is more dire than we know. There are Boko Haram memebers all over West Africa, there are Boko Haram memebers in all the 36 states of Nigeria. This has nothing to do about APC or PDP