CHARLYX9:
lol.why r u teasing this bitch

Dangbo:
A Mysterious Snake which has been attacking the people of Ajegunle in Ikorodu Road has finally been killed.

The Snake has been Disturbing the Community ever since( Don't Know the Actual period)Elders and people of the community has been Reporting to the (Baale) of the community about the incident .



But the Rest are story the snake has finally being Killed and the People are grateful to God and the killers of the Snake.

But i fear Naija sha the woman whose shop the snake was killed came some minutes later that her money was stolen because the snake was killed close to her shop and there was crowd looking at the killing of the snake.


SOURCE: http://hottestdaniel..com/2015/07/photo-mysterious-snake-killed-in.html

donholy28:
so what is mysterious about the snake

Dangbo:
A Mysterious Snake which has been attacking the people of Ajegunle in Ikorodu Road has finally been killed.

The Snake has been Disturbing the Community ever since( Don't Know the Actual period)Elders and people of the community has been Reporting to the (Baale) of the community about the incident .



But the Rest are story the snake has finally being Killed and the People are grateful to God and the killers of the Snake.

But i fear Naija sha the woman whose shop the snake was killed came some minutes later that her money was stolen because the snake was killed close to her shop and there was crowd looking at the killing of the snake.

SOURCE: http://hottestdaniel..com/2015/07/photo-mysterious-snake-killed-in.html

omojeesu:


1. It's a python. Nothing is mysterious about it. It is not venomous but kills by constriction, squeezing life out of it's victims slowly until they die and then swallows them from the head downwards. May not have another meal until weeks or months depending on size of last victim.

2. Snakes also bite to kill for food. This one doesn't.

3. Majority of snakes don't have venom. But nobody wants to wait to be bitten to find out.

4. A venomous snake bite in Nigeria may invariably be fatal: No ambulance service, bad traffic and no antivenom!!!

5. Snakes can easily be killed if you are bold, informed and smart, but too many are too afraid!

Good day!

donholy28:
so what is mysterious about the snake

plaetton:


Good information.

Its very funny that anytime someone kills a snake, they claim that it is a mysterious Snake.

Our people are Sooo much in love with MYSTERY, yet they refuse to learn basic Science, which tend to explain and simplify all mysterious.

plaetton:


Good information.

Its very funny that anytime someone kills a snake, they claim that it is a mysterious Snake.

Our people are Sooo much in love with MYSTERY, yet they refuse to learn basic Science, which tend to explain and simplify all mysterious.

omojeesu:


Science is great and very useful, but cant explain 'all' mysteries! Science can be manipulated for reasons best known to those who mean to.

plaetton:


Rubbish.
This is the kind of crap that Africans fill their lazy half literate minds with.

Over the past few centuries, Science has been, and remains the most reliable arbiter of reality.

The is absolutely no other arbiter of reality than the scientific enterprise.

And to Correct you, science CANNNOT BEE MANIPULATED.
scientific knowledge, just like any other knowledge, can be manipulated.

The emperical scientific method has a self auditing system that weeds out rubbish over time.

Reyginus:
So science can explain all mysteries?

plaetton:


No. It seeks to.
And so far, it explains a lot. Enough for 2 stangers like us to unanymously communicate our ideas over great distances.
If this is not the highest and most useful form of witchcraft, then I don't know what is.

Infact, any rational means of trying to understand something, no matter what, is a scientific endeavor.

Reyginus:
Good. Then philosophy is a science?

plaetton:


No sir.
Philosophy does not seek answers through the empirical method.

Philosophy merely speculates. It neither experiments, tests nor even catalogues what it speculates upon.
That's why you have a myriad of competing and opposing philosophical systems, subsystems and hybrids.

Philosophy has much in common with religion, in that one is free to make it up as You go, and then recruit followers to for self-validation.
There are no certain philosophical truths, because philosophical truths are subjective.

Scientific truths, on the other hand, are measure able, objective and universaly applicable.

4bobo:
missslimbody

Reyginus:
Good. But then your words :

'any rational means of trying to understand something, no matter what, is a scientific endeavor'

Is their no contradiction?

plaetton:


I guess by ration means, I meant any process of observation and measurement.

For example : Ghosts.
whether one believes in ghosts or not, the moment we move outside speculation and then begin to catalogue so-called ghost encounters by doing psychological tests of the witnesses, do a thorough electronic sweep of the environment, taking note of weather anomalies, etc etc, then we can begin to see whether the phenomena is real but scientificaly explanable , or real but unexplanable, or simply hallucinations from frieghtened minds.

This is why I say that all phenomena are open to scientific investigations.

plaetton:


No sir.
Philosophy does not seek answers through the empirical method.

Philosophy merely speculates. It neither experiments, tests nor even catalogs what it speculates upon.
That's why you have a myriad of competing and opposing philosophical systems, subsystems and hybrids.

Philosophy has much in common with religion, in that one is free to make it up as You go, and then recruit followers to for self-validation.
There are no certain philosophical truths, because philosophical truths are subjective.

Scientific truths, on the other hand, are measure able, objective and universally applicable.

voltron:


This nail must have felt the hammer - right on the buzzard

Reyginus:
Good. I was with you until the last part. I thought any phenomenon must experience science before it even becomes one? That is, a phenomenon.

In essence, is a phenomenon not everything already known by science? If it is, then doesn't that imply, from your premises, that science have explained all? If it is not can we then say that science can explain all? Because I am confused here.

Reyginus:
But friend is science not also philosophy?

plaetton:


Rubbish.
This is the kind of crap that Africans fill their lazy half literate minds with.

Over the past few centuries, Science has been, and remains the most reliable arbiter of reality.

The is absolutely no other arbiter of reality than the scientific enterprise.

And to Correct you, science CANNNOT BEE MANIPULATED.
scientific knowledge, just like any other knowledge, can be manipulated.

The emperical scientific method has a self auditing system that weeds out rubbish over time.

plaetton:


I don't understand your confusion.

People often say that there things that science cannot explain.
I say, not true. Science is free to explore all phenomena, and that we should employ the scientific method to explore all phenomena, including our deeply held superstitions.

For example, I can use my scientific ideas to offer you a possible (my own idea ) explanation for the ' GHOSTS' or phantom phenomenon.
The explanation will not be PROOF , but it would be more rational than the superstitions attached to the phenomenon.