Without wasting much of our time;;; this has been on my mind to share my point of view concerning this::I think if a child should know how to steal,fornicate,too lazy to do house chores,not interested in going to school or to attend church or mosque service etc::at a very tender age it would well be understood by people that such a child has no home training and may get worst as he or she grows up;;But if a child has always been faithful at his or her tender age,but start changing in his or her ways and behaviour as he/she is growing:::such a child people believe that he/she has been influenced by friends but could be advice not to mingle with such kind of friends and there is every tendecy that there would be changes since he/she is well trained by his or her parent from childhood and has not been a bad child right from birth:::: So my question is,in this kind of suituation, which of them do u think is likely to change easily?:::ur point of view please::

i dont really know

The day his/her environment teaches them how to lie, steal and be disobedient.

Are u now trying to say corruption is good but for a certain age

Starships4u:
Are u now trying to say corruption is good but for a certain age

that is not what I really mean

Victorjoseph:
that is not what I really mean

owkay oh..... No age is good for that pls.....