FOLYKAZE:


Anthropomorphic entity is not human. The human trait attribute are figurative expression pointing to an existing element.



This does not make your twisted lie truth.



Do you see that you are having comprehensive problem?

I said there is difference between belieiving in God and acknowledging in it existence?

The difference here is very clear. For example, christians acknowledge the existence of other Gods. They accept that some other Gods exist in other cultures. Even these Gods were mentioned in the bible. But do christians believe in these Gods?

For dummy which you are:

do christians acknowledge some other Gods exist? Yes.

Do christians believe in these other Gods? No.

I dont know what is hard to understand here.




You better start up some reading dumbo.

Hinduism is a pantheistic religion. I believe you do not want me to start schooling you on the personhood of hindu Gods.

Deism

Deism[ edit]
In general, most Deists view God as a personal God.

Foolish dumbo. Where are you going to hide your blocked head?



You are too dumb.

God are described as a person but that doesnt make them a person. It is foolishness that you cling on figurative expression which depict man as human rather than decoding the message.



Liar. All theologists agree that the account are metaphor.



Your lies shredded.



Can you explain how it is contradictory?



Shakti is Energy.

Gaia is Earth.

Ogun is Iron.

These Gods existence justified.



Incoherent.

Gaia represent Earth. Natural entity.

Lady Justice represent Law/Justice. Idea.

What more do you want dumbo?



You are not addressing anything.



Running of out of counter argument.



Did you tell us how it is vague?

Pathetic...

FOLYKAZE:


Should we conclude christians do not agree that their God is human or person?

Human Smh

Pls go to a church and find out.

macof:

Human Smh

Pls go to a church and find out.

experience of 20 years in the church is enough to have a handful understanding of Christianity.

On another note, what you said on Finofaya thread indicate that there is human nature of christian God. You were looking out for personhood of Christian God. This impies that you are in possession of some knowledge about christian God been a person.

So what prompted the question? Did any christian leader ever told you their God is person or has a personhood?

FOLYKAZE:


experience of 20 years in the church is enough to have a handful understanding of Christianity.

On another note, what you said on Finofaya thread indicate that there is human nature of christian God. You were looking out for personhood of Christian God. This impies that you are in possession of some knowledge about christian God been a person.

So what prompted the question? Did any christian leader ever told you their God is person or has a personhood?

Ask a christian this. Why do you keep saying human tho

macof:


Ask a christian this. Why do you keep saying human tho

Were you not the one that said you were looking for tge personhood of God?

FOLYKAZE:


Were you not the one that said you were looking for tge personhood of God?

And God must be human because of that?

macof:


And God must be human because of that?

Yes. Or do you think it should Goat?