by Rakesh Krishnan Simha

source: The Russia India report

In June 2014, the Pentagon conducted a “table top” exercise – a sort of war game between Russia and NATO. The scenario was Russian pressure on NATO member Estonia and Latvia. Would NATO be able to defend those countries?

“The results were dispiriting,” Julia Ioffe writes in Foreign Policy. Even if all US and NATO troops stationed in Europe were dispatched to the Baltics – including the 82nd Airborne, which is supposed to be ready to go on 24 hours’ notice – the US would lose.

“We just don’t have those forces in Europe,” explains a senior US general. “Then there’s the fact that the Russians have the world’s best surface-to-air missiles and are not afraid to use heavy artillery.”

The Russian ‘victory’ was not a one-off. The Americans conducted the exercise as many as 16 times, under various scenarios, all favourable to NATO, always with the same conclusion. The Russians were simply invincible.

In this backdrop, Turkey’s rash act of shooting down a Russian Air Force jet portends grave tidings for NATO. Because Turkey is a NATO member, if the Russian Air Force pounds the living daylight out of the Turks, at least in theory all the other members of the US-led military bloc are treaty-bound to come to its defence.

Although the chances that the Americans will risk New York for Istanbul are smaller than small – which leaves a very nervous Turkey on its own – one can never rule out the possibility of a NATO hothead wanting to attack Russia.

A nuclear exchange will undoubtedly have catastrophic consequences for both sides – and perhaps the entire planet – but there are certain factors that could skew the fighting field in Russia’s favour.

Megaton capability

According to data exchanged on October 1, 2014 by Moscow and Washington, Russia has 1,643 deployed strategic warheads, compared with 1,642 for the US. Marginal difference in numbers but Russian land-based strategic forces have an explosive yield that is an order of magnitude greater than anything in the US armoury.

Moscow’s primary deterrent weapon is the mighty SS-18, a single one of which can destroy an area the size of New York – the state, not just the city. To get an idea of the destructive power of the SS-18, just look at the nuclear weapon the US used to destroy the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The Hiroshima bomb was a primitive 15 kiloton warhead and yet it wiped out a city of 70,000 in a few seconds. The SS-18 – code named Satan by NATO – carries 10 warheads, each having a yield of 750 to 1000 kiloton). Some of these missiles carry a single 20,000 kiloton warhead – that’s 1333 times Hiroshima.

At the same time, 80 per cent of the American population resides on the eastern and western seaboards, so a few well-aimed nuclear missiles can end all human life in these densely populated coastal strips. Russia has a population only half of the US but it’s dispersed widely across the country’s massive landmass so that pockets of human inhabitation can survive both a first as well as a second strike.

Russia has another trump card up its sleeve – its supersonic bomber fleet of Tupolev Tu-160s. These Mach 2 plus aircraft can take off from well-defended airbases located deep in the heart of Russia, fly over the North Pole, launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles from safe standoff distances over the Atlantic, and return home to watch the destruction on CNN.

That’s assuming CNN will be around. For, the Russian strategic bomber fleet can singlehandedly wipe out every major city in the US.

It is because the Americans know the capability of Russia’s nuclear forces that they have tried hard to eliminate the doomsday weapons like the SS-18 through arms limitation talks.

Tactical warheads

Before the use of strategic weapons, Russia could cripple forward NATO bases with tactical – or battlefield – nukes. Russian military doctrine emphasises the use of small-yield nuclear weapons as a war fighting tool early on in a conflict in order to stun and confuse NATO forces, impacting their ability to think and act coherently.

After tactical nuclear artillery decimates forward deployed NATO military troops, Russia could deliver small-yield warheads via intermediate range missiles that could devastate the next line of military bases, while limiting civilian casualties. At this point the US would be faced with the option of retaliating with strategic weapons and face a devastating response from Moscow. A good guess is the option won’t be used.

For, no American president would risk a single US city for a dozen European ones. John F. Kennedy didn’t risk it in 1962 for the same reason – the loss of even one city was too many.

State of US strategic forces

How reliable is the US Strategic Nuclear Command? If you are an American, you won’t feel so reassured after reading that Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton both “reportedly lost the launch code cards that presidents are expected to have on them at all times – Clinton for months, according to a former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. Carter allegedly sent his out with a suit to the cleaners”.

In any conflict – more so in a high stakes nuclear standoff – morale, training and discipline are key factors. Russian officers who have the job of deciding when and where to aim their nuclear missiles include PhD holders who are required to think on their feet. On the other hand, American personnel who have the same role are beset with alcoholism, depression and cheating.

Nothing can sugar coat the crisis plaguing the US strategic forces. In October 2013, Major General Michael Carey, responsible for the command of 450 nuclear missiles, was fired after drunken behaviour on a visit to Russia. Days earlier, another military officer, Vice Admiral Tim Giardina, with high-level responsibility for the country’s nuclear arsenal, was relieved of his duties after he was caught using counterfeit gambling chips at an Iowa casino.

Think that’s frightening? Check this out. A US Air Force general who supported the command mission to provide nuclear forces for the US Strategic Command was an alcoholic. General David C. Uhrich kept a vodka bottle in his desk and repeatedly drank on duty, so much so that another officer told investigators that “if he did not have his alcohol, the wheels would come off”.

The rot has trickled down to US missileers who have a culture of cheating on competency tests, endangering the readiness off American ICBMs. Again, in February 2014, the US Navy revealed it was looking into allegations that enlisted sailors cheated on tests involving the nuclear reactors that power its submarines and aircraft carriers.

The US strategic forces are also suffering from systemic neglect, with its ICBM bases in North Dakota and Montana reporting “leaking roofs”. The missileers, who work in blast-proof bunkers located 60 feet underground, are forced to defecate in buckets and urinate in jugs, and bring it all back up at the end of 24 hours. How ready these personnel will be when they have to react to a Russian missile strike is questionable.

On the other hand, Russian Strategic Forces are treated as the very elites in the military. The quality of Russian personnel can be deduced from the actions of Russian strategic forces officer Lt Colonel Stanislav Petrov. On September 26, 1983, a Russian early-warning satellite indicated five US nuclear missile launches. Tensions were high between Washington and Moscow after the downing of a South Korean airliner weeks earlier, and Petrov had only minutes to respond. With little additional information to go on, he deemed the readings a false alarm, reasoning that “when people start a war, they don’t start it with only five missiles”.

This is precisely why highly qualified personnel matter. When you’re placed squarely in the cross hairs of the enemy’s nuclear missiles and you’re holed up in a bunker 60 feet below the earth’s surface, then nervousness, insomnia and depression are part of your daily life. Unable to cope, less educated personnel will abuse alcohol and drugs and even exhibit criminal behaviour. On the other hand, educated and motivated officers will keep their cool even in the event of a thermonuclear showdown.

For, a nuclear war may not necessarily involve a quick exchange of ballistic missiles. According to War Scare: Russia and America on the Nuclear Brink, by Peter Vincent Pry, Director of the US Nuclear Strategy Forum, the Russian Strategic Forces are trained to “launch pre-emptive or retaliatory nuclear strikes, survive a hammer blow from a massive enemy nuclear attack, launch follow-on nuclear strikes, and supervise military operations in a protracted nuclear war, expected to last weeks or months”.

In such a drawn out, harrowing scenario, Russia’s nuclear warfare specialists clearly have the edge.

Reflexive Control: Ultimate Weapon

Disinformation, camouflage and stratagem are some of the ways one can influence the outcome of a war. The Russians have taken these ancient arts to another level through the use of the theory of Reflexive Control (RC).

Developed by Russian military strategists in the 1960s, RC aims to convey information to an opponent that would influence them to voluntarily make a decision desired by the initiator of the action. It can be used against either human or computer-based decision-making processors. Russia employs it not only at the strategic and tactical levels in war but also in the geopolitical sphere.

Russian Army Major General M.D. Ionov was among the early proponents of RC, having pursued it since the 1970s. In an article in 1995, he noted that the objective of reflexive control is to force an enemy into making decisions that lead to his defeat by influencing or controlling his decision-making process.

Ionov considers this a form of high art founded of necessity on an intimate knowledge of human thinking and psychology, military history, the roots of the particular conflict, and the capabilities of competing combat assets.

Timothy L. Thomas writes in the Journal of Slavic Studies: “In a war in which reflexive control is being employed, the side with the highest degree of reflex (the side best able to imitate the other side’s thoughts or predict its behaviour) will have the best chances of winning. The degree of reflex depends on many factors, the most important of which are analytical capability, general erudition and experience, and the scope of knowledge about the enemy.”

If successfully achieved, reflexive control over the enemy makes it possible to influence their combat plans, their view of the situation, and how they fight. RC methods are varied and include camouflage (at all levels), disinformation, encouragement, blackmail by force, and the compromising of various officials and officers.

According to Robert C. Rasmussen of the Center for International Maritime Security, “It is exactly this type of application of Reflexive Control that a young Vladimir Putin would have learned in his early development at the 401st KGB School and in his career as a KGB/FSB officer.”

Because every battle is first fought in the head before a bullet is fired on the ground, Russia’s long experience with RC would be a key factor in its existential struggle with the US.

I never know what would be used to fight world war iii but world war iv would be fought with sticks and stones.



Rest in peace to the world

mighty SS-18,

mighty Satan can do it for real.. Mind you Esu is not satan.. mighty SS-18, is the real satan..

These Russians should be feared

Op this article is pro Russian. I love putin,i see him as a good man,a president that says no to America's double standards,but believe me Russians, I mean putin wants no war with Nato.

You just stated all the gallantry of russia,you didn't tell us what the usa who has the highest defence spending in the world has in its armoury,not to talk of smaller countries like france,denmark,uk,infact all nato member states...anyways I think in the case of a war,Germany being a member state might choose to play neutral.

chigo931:
Op this article is pro Russian. I love putin,i see him as a good man,a president that says no to America's double standards,but believe me Russians, I mean putin wants no war with Nato.

You just stated all the gallantry of russia,you didn't tell us what the usa who has the highest defence spending in the world has in its armoury,not to talk of smaller countries like france,denmark,uk,infact all nato member states...anyways I think in the case of a war,Germany being a member state might choose to play neutral.

They have 600- 800 bases scartared all over the world. Isn't that enough military spending ? To U.S military is Business as usual but Russia is opposite. This is why. It's not about military spending pal.

And again the united west lost not once not twice in past with Russia, NATO is just a learner. Those countries you mentioned are vassals, NATO colonial states. They do not have a say. This is why they are vulnerable in an all out war with Russia.

This article is too Rusian-centric. Have it in mind that the US and the NATO would not just sit there asses down and watch Russia obliterate them. You belittle the US defensive and attacking capabilities.

OP, in as much as I know that Russia (Putin) is the most powerful country in the world, and in an all out war will decimate NATO within hours. I still believe that some of the things you wrote are too one-sided.

Silly and unserious analysis as usual. Brought comical relief though

jnhmaxxwell:


They have 600- 800 bases scartared all over the world. Isn't that enough military spending ? To U.S military is Business as usual but Russia is opposite. This is why. It's not about military spending pal.

And again the united west lost not once not twice in past with Russia, NATO is just a learner. Those countries you mentioned are vassals, NATO colonial states. They do not have a say. This is why they are vulnerable in an all out war with Russia.

Exactly! Maintaining these bases costs an insane amount of money.
People also think that cos the United States spends so much on its military it automatically means its military is vastly superior.
People don't realize that the United States has a deeply ingrained military-industrial-complex culture hence the need to spend frivolously - and the more elaborate & cutting edge the project, the greater the inclination to spend.
Arlington is rife with a lot of private military contractors, each eager to showcase its "cutting edge" and "ground breaking" weaponry. Arlington is the choice location as the CIA and the Pentagon are next door neighbors. This is the military industrial complex Eisenhower warned about in his farewell address - the bloodthirsty, warmongering military lobby that just can't get enough "defense" spending.
A very good and sorely conspicuous example of the Hegemon's wasteful military spending would be the F-35 program which has been been beset with one problem or another. This alone has cost the US over $400 billion (and counting).
The abandoned Commanche helicopter program also cost $10 billion and I am not even sure a prototype was built. Imagine what China or Russia would do with this amount of money!!
So please, before anyone gets a hard-on on just how much more the US spends on its military as an indicator of just how powerful it is, you should consider if this money was spent judiciously or if it in reality constitutes overinflated or over run budgets.

And about those stories telling how American military personnel that held strategic and sensitive positions have been acting up, they are indeed true. I personally remember reading those stories as they broke.

- OutThere (Otherwise known as NairaMinted)

vedaxcool:
Silly and unserious analysis as usual. Brought comical relief though

no be small comical relief go and look at past my posts, I have stopped replying the kid since . The idiot thinks that Russia will just launch Missiles against the west and that will be the end of it. Ignorance is bliss

mazeltov:
no be small comical relief go and look at past my posts, I have stopped replying the kid since . The idiot thinks that Russia will just launch Missiles against the west and that will be the end of it. Ignorance is bliss

It is indeed. Russia under putin seems to have borrowed a leaf from gobbel or whatever his name was, make outrageous claims and let some silly troll do the rest.

vedaxcool:


It is indeed. Russia under putin seems to have borrowed a leaf from gobbel or whatever his name was, make outrageous claims and let some silly troll do the rest.

[b]Yes you are right!! Putin and his puppets seem to understand the importance of propaganda and little children like Scully95 and others are intellectually blinded and have filled the tubes of their brains with illusion of Russian's nuclear weapons and victory for Russia with respect to nuclear war. His feeble analysis shows that he is a dull neophyte when it comes to military tactics and warfare, how could a right thinking man projected a victory and defeat in an all out Nuclear war. Did you see where he mentioned the roof of American's nuclear is leaking or something
To unfurl the deepness of his foolhardiness, he never made tangible reference to where the war would be fought, maybe in his backyard -
what else? Russia will just fly Bomber jets and start bombing Newyork. I am not pointing at errors but accentuating on his intellectual lapses
Anytime you feel like laughing, just come to Foreign Affairs section and open any Sculy95's thread - and you will see how far the slowpoke has lost in touch with reality.[/b]

OutThere:



Exactly! Maintaining these bases costs an insane amount of money.
People also think that cos the United States spends so much on its military it automatically means its military is vastly superior.
People don't realize that the United States has a deeply ingrained military-industrial-complex culture hence the need to spend frivolously - and the more elaborate & cutting edge the project, the greater the inclination to spend.
Arlington is rife with a lot of private military contractors, each eager to showcase its "cutting edge" and "ground breaking" weaponry. Arlington is the choice location as the CIA and the Pentagon are next door neighbors. This is the military industrial complex Eisenhower warned about in his farewell address - the bloodthirsty, warmongering military lobby that just can't get enough "defense" spending.
A very good and sorely conspicuous example of the Hegemon's wasteful military spending would be the F-35 program which has been been beset with one problem or another. This alone has cost the US over $400 billion (and counting).
The abandoned Commanche helicopter program also cost $10 billion and I am not even sure a prototype was built. Imagine what China or Russia would do with this amount of money!!
So please, before anyone gets a hard-on on just how much more the US spends on its military as an indicator of just how powerful it is, you should consider if this money was spent judiciously or if it in reality constitutes overinflated or over run budgets.

And about those stories telling how American military personnel that held strategic and sensitive positions have been acting up, they are indeed true. I personally remember reading those stories as they broke.

- OutThere (Otherwise known as NairaMinted)

Please tell anglozionist empire's toilet trolls, super zombies (like Fela's song) that consumes propaganda 3 square meals everyday. The likes of @mazeltov , @vedaxcool .. zombie oh zombie.. Zombie no go die unless toba darugbo zombie.. Fela lines..

Truth usually hurt the empire of lies. This is the reality today as analysed.. Russia is 2.7 times bigger (by Land-mas) than U.S.. It can survive first strike and even second strike.. Can U.S survive retaliatory strike ? Russia will never strike first.

U.S is twice bigger than Russia (by population).. Again this post is not for kids like mazeltov , vedaxcool ...

mazeltov:

[b]Yes you are right!! Putin and his puppets seem to understand the importance of propaganda and little children like Scully95 and others are intellectually blinded and have filled the tubes of their brains with illusion of Russian's nuclear weapons and victory for Russia with respect to nuclear war. His feeble analysis shows that he is a dull neophyte when it comes to military tactics and warfare, how could a right thinking man projected a victory and defeat in an all out Nuclear war. Did you see where he mentioned the roof of American's nuclear is leaking or something
To unfurl the deepness of his foolhardiness, he never made tangible reference to where the war would be fought, maybe in his backyard -
what else? Russia will just fly Bomber jets and start bombing Newyork. I am not pointing at errors but accentuating on his intellectual lapses
Anytime you feel like laughing, just come to Foreign Affairs section and open any Sculy95's thread - and you will see how far the slowpoke has lost in touch with reality.[/b]

Buhahaha abeg eazy the guy will have to sleep after a hard day of trolling or do you expect him not to think of his life after this trouncing you gave. The silly individual does not understand what nuclear war entails. It is something like Syria at the end everywhere is in roubles like Russia currency

scully95:



Please tell anglozionist empire's toilet trolls, super zombies (like Fela's song) that consumes propaganda 3 square meals everyday. The likes of @mazeltov , @vedaxcool .. zombie oh zombie.. Zombie no go die unless toba darugbo zombie.. Fela lines..

Truth usually hurt the empire of lies. This is the reality today as analysed.. Russia is 2.7 times bigger (by Land-mas) than U.S.. It can survive first strike and even second strike.. Can U.S survive retaliatory strike ? Russia will never strike first.

U.S is twice bigger than Russia (by population).. Again this post is not for kids like mazeltov , vedaxcool ...

I am not here to roll with bairns whose mental proficiency has been crisscrossed by online propaganda. The time you are using to search through net to get fallcy and online propaganda would have been used to expand your mental capacity by embarking on mind profiting researches devoid of deceit and bloopa
See where you copied the crap https://www.quora.com/If-a-war-starts-between-Russia-and-the-US-who-will-win

mazeltov:
I am not here to roll with bairns whose mental proficiency has been crisscrossed by online propaganda. The time you are using to search through net to get fallcy and online propaganda would have been used to expand your mental capacity by embarking on mind profiting researches devoid of deceit and bloopa
See where you copied the crap https://www.quora.com/If-a-war-starts-between-Russia-and-the-US-who-will-win

We guess his brain power isn't even capable of producing this poo of an op. This guy is a plagiarist a shameless one at that.

Half baked analysis...Russia will put up a good fight but still lose
Mind you,I'm a putin Fan

vedaxcool:


We guess his brain power isn't even capable of producing this poo of an op. This guy is a plagiarist a shameless one at that.

lwkmd have mercy on the kid

mazeltov:
I am not here to roll with bairns whose mental proficiency has been crisscrossed by online propaganda. The time you are using to search through net to get fallcy and online propaganda would have been used to expand your mental capacity by embarking on mind profiting researches devoid of deceit and bloopa
See where you copied the crap https://www.quora.com/If-a-war-starts-between-Russia-and-the-US-who-will-win

That post on the link was 8h ago.. This post above was yesterday.
I have told you.. These are posts for highly matured people. Not for kids.

When foolishness is your second name and western propaganda is your first name.. You obviously do not know how google Algorithms work.
mental slavery is a disease for real. It's sad that a kid like you could even be talking. I have told you several times.. You and you cohorts to grow up and stop being kids...

Like I said again.. These are posts for hightly matured people with brains not for brainless crooks like @mazeltov and @vedaxcool

Spydamannn:
Half baked analysis...Russia will put up a good fight but still lose

Mind you,I'm a putin Fan

You seem not to get the gig.. There won't be a good fight when it comes to nukes.. It will be the end of Both countries.. RUssia .. U.S.A.. Meanwhile, base on landmass.. Russian survival is still possible.. But forget it.. You don't know the power of that Satan..

If you detonate nukes 300-500km away from it, it will not blow it up.. The only thing that could get as near once it passed the launch stage which is just few mins..

Go and learn about the non official Satan missile..

scully95:



That post on the link was 8h ago.. This post above was yesterday.
I have told you.. These are posts for highly matured people. Not for kids.

When foolishness is your second name and western propaganda is your first name.. You obviously do not know how google Algorithms work.
mental slavery is a disease for real. It's sad that a kid like you could even be talking. I have told you several times.. You and you cohorts to grow up and stop being a kids...

Like I said again.. These are posts for hightly matured people with brains not for brainless crooks like @mazeltov and @vedaxcool

what exactly is your point in that post?
Instead of you to admit that you are a slow-witted metaphrast because you like devoting your time lifting fallacies and propaganda on net just to unheed the facts which will always consolidate your unenlightenment . Carry your propaganda go elsewhere , we don't need it here

mazeltov:

what exactly is your point in that post?
Instead of you to admit that you are a slow-witted metaphrast because you like devoting your time lifting fallacies and propaganda on net just to unheed the facts which will always consolidate your unenlightenment . Carry your propaganda go elsewhere , we don't need it here

Go and seat down.. I don't answer super zombies, dummies of the 21st century.. Empire of Dundee. Mere Effigy of Super brainwashed Pro-Neocons, Anglozionist empire and Terrorists.

scully95:


You seem not to get the gig.. There won't be a good fight when it comes to nukes.. It will be the end of Both countries.. RUssia .. U.S.A.. Meanwhile, base on landmass.. Russian survival is still possible.. But forget it.. You don't know the power of that Satan..

If you detonate nukes 300-500km away from it, it will not blow it up.. The only thing that could get as near once it passed the launch stage which is just few mins..

Go and learn about the non official Satan missile..

I'm sure none of them will want to use nukes...but what do I know

scully95:


Go and seat down.. I don't answer super zombies, dummies of the 21st century.. Empire of Dundee. Mere Effigy of Super brainwashed Pro-Neocons, Anglozionist empire and Terrorists.

You don't pontificate every propaganda and deception you see online just because you want to make a region/country look ''Super-human'' to the fleeceable minds of your calibre - I have been following international related news ever before you wrote your common entrance exam so stay calm and sip from the fountain of knowledge. -
If you see any analysis online that says Russia will defeat America in war or America will defeat Russia in a nuclear war, quiclky close the page before your mosquito-like brain got magneted with it. It's one of the things you need to learn but how would you comprehend that when you always refute people's calims with irrelevances like 'super human''

Spydamannn:
I'm sure none of them will want to use nukes...but what do I know

I really hope so.. Cos the Article is pointing to what could or would lead to U.S first strike. U.S only knows how to bully. It may also continue to spread its famous propaganda that it's building missile defense system in Europe.

I think U.S should accept the recent realities and stop this pushing of its puppets, vassals, protectorate states, war mongering with Russia.

Russia is obviously the wrong person to fight with. NATO expansion won't help matters either.. The Bear is awoken.


Russia has put its future on the table.. A multi-polar world.. Now left for U.S to fight or just let it be.. Soviet broke without major wars.. U.S should eat the humble pie.. U.S and its puppets.. ( AngloZionist Empire)

scully95:



That post on the link was 8h ago.. This post above was yesterday.
I have told you.. These are posts for highly matured people. Not for kids.

When foolishness is your second name and western propaganda is your first name.. You obviously do not know how google Algorithms work.
mental slavery is a disease for real. It's sad that a kid like you could even be talking. I have told you several times.. You and you cohorts to grow up and stop being kids...

Like I said again.. These are posts for hightly matured people with brains not for brainless crooks like @mazeltov and @vedaxcool

You are smart lol

scully95:


I really hope so.. Cos the Article is pointing to what could or would lead to U.S first strike. U.S only knows how to bully. It may also continue to spread its famous propaganda that it's building missile defense system in Europe.

I think U.S should accept the recent realities and stop this pushing of its puppets, vassals, protectorate states, war mongering with Russia.

Russia is obviously the wrong person to fight with. NATO expansion won't help matters either.. The Bear is awoken.


Russia has put its future on the table.. A multi-polar world.. Now left for U.S to fight or just let it be.. Soviet broke without major wars.. U.S should eat the humble pie.. U.S and its puppets.. ( AngloZionist Empire)

Talking real sense here. U.S should eat the humble pie. #Confirmed!! You truly understand where U.S is going and coming from.
Nice one.

mazeltov:

what exactly is your point in that post?
Instead of you to admit that you are a slow-witted metaphrast because you like devoting your time lifting fallacies and propaganda on net just to unheed the facts which will always consolidate your unenlightenment . Carry your propaganda go elsewhere , we don't need it here

Unfortunately his IQ level barely surpasses that of noisy toad, hence he lacks the capacity to even identify his foolishness and rectify it! I propose he reads the book:

"the life of an accidental Russia Hasbara Troll"

vedaxcool:


Unfortunately his IQ level barely surpasses that of noisy toad, hence he lacks the capacity to even identify his foolishness and rectify it! I propose he reads the book:

"the life of an accidental Russia Hasbara Troll"

kai, pity the kid

These guys just won't stop,Putin's co-ck must be rich in all types of vitamins and minerals,cause heck,you Russian dollop heads love sucking the shii out of it

Here we go again...

I see yu @Mazeltov...I guess our friend's obsession for the West's downfall is growing excessively like Cancer cells

@Scully95 I can see yu can't let go of The US and co...I went through the pains of reading yur entire post and I can only say one thing, Balderdash!
Do yu think wars are as simple as yur post made it look?? do yu think The US will sit and watch like a dog under hypnosis while the Ruskie rascals bomb the hell outta dem? Do yu think that half these missiles would come near the shores of USA without being shot down? Do yu think yu entirely know the military capabilities of USA Army just by sitting behind yur PC and reading every trash online put up by enemies of Western Policies?? Do yu think UK, Germany, Israel, France etc will sit and watch while the whole drama unfolds?? Which Allies can Russia boast of that will come to their rescue that will have the military capabilities of UK and France together?? How many Allies do the Ruskies have compared to that of the US??
Lastly, do yu think the Russians or US are stupid enough to allow complete destruction of their countries by engaging in a senseless battle? Why do yu think they haven't attacked each other since the era of cold war??

I can go on and on with these questions and until yu answer them, then a war between Russia and Us or like yu call out "Annihilation of the US" won't be possible, for now until situation changes..There's no war between the two Countries that won't involve Nukes and a total destruction of both countries, and trust me, the two Presidents ain't that silly!

I respect yur admiration for the Ruskies and how yu believe they can change the world via their policies and by eliminating the west..There's a thin line between being factual and being Unrealistic (daydreaming). Yu my friend, have crossed that line tending towards the unrealistic.
If yu have any corrections, feel free to holla! Cheers!!