Karlebolu:
https://m./233857170077482?refid=27




.
That's the link to his group, he'll need to add you before you can post, it's a closed group.


I've forgotten his moniker I would have called him out.

The problem is not even charging, it's charging that much.

I laughed

currentprice:


Surveycash is the monika

jorel1:
I think the guy has the right to charge whatever he deems fit ..it's up to the client to decide if they accept the fee or not...
So I don't understand why you all pokenosing in a business activity going on outside your thread.... it's business and it becomes your headache only when he does it on your thread.

Lifecontinues:
I laughed , when you jumped in to take up the challenge to find him. I sure trust you would find him
Now let me do my research on surveycash, wanna go through all his posts....

Kind of less busy, no mind me

currentprice:


he is good man,,, he has created many thread helping different people on NL.

currentprice:


he is good man,,, he has created many thread helping different people on NL.

currentprice:


he is good man,,, he has created many thread fx and nonfx helping different people on NL.

JLINE:

learnt a few things from him too back then too.

Lifecontinues:
That dude should be very very rich with $500 for 12 zombies ($6000, equivalence in naira is gbammmm with what naira is saying at the moment)

AXYZ:


Even Nial Fuller charges less

JLINE:
i think something just happened right here and someone just went missing though...name reserved. it seems the person just figured out how to make money without trading by the $500 webinar stuff and going to run his or something similar.

AXYZ:



Wouldn't I rather subscribe to Nial Fuller's $319 life access package?!

JLINE:

i mean someone has gone to do the same by starting to sell stuffs or training to make money.
Those bucket shop sellers:nial fuller's and the rest of them. i never subscribed to those sellers,never will i and i don't personally advice anyone to do so in the future...i never read his writings or trades though

AXYZ:


Nial is a great guy but I'd rather read his free newsletters except if I've got $1m or thereabouts to trade.

JLINE:

lol hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...nial is a great guy,its true but i would rather trade some guys alerts here than trade his but i will trade myself rather too. wait $1m to trade signal from nial,its suicide cos you will loose everything. call a great guy i will listen when you mention George soros who really hit the bank not those who got popular with marketing.

AXYZ:


Hahahaha. Ok na. That competition he won actually made me a follower of his price actions

AXYZ:


Hahahaha. Ok na. That competition he won actually made me a follower of his price actions

jendy36:


Forget Nail's deal with that broker... his winning was a deal with Axitrader

He just used it to market his strategy and to advertise more for the broker on his blog.

You'll now imagine that a broker could pay such to clients.

I laughed

JLINE:

did you read the details of the competition...he never announced joining the competition at the beginning,the username used was not his but claimed ownership after winning, so many nuances in the competition too...try checking his older videos you will see him recommending the same broker for his subscribers too,so they planned the competition and your guy won and after teaching his followers,he then directs them back to the same broker...i hope you understand though.

JLINE:
i want to share my thoughts and ideas about the market...the trendy side of me anyways....

Here's my take on it, please feel free to shoot my logic to pieces:

1. There's no such 'thing' as a four-hour candle. the market doesn't halt, make a note and then restart every four hours. Likewise one hour or 15min candles.

2. The OHLC of a '4hr candle' on my EST broker platform is totally different to the OHLC of a '4hr candle' on someone else's GMT broker platform, which generates different candlestick formations one broker to the next. A strong reversal on one is an indecisive reversal on another.

so,lets chat up

AXYZ:
You're on point, Priceaction . If we have big money, you are most prolly going to make better money.

Jline I get you, it's just that say, 4hr candlestick, for instance. In a trending market, it would easily show you the trend, taking cognizance of the probable supports and resistances and the obvious pinbars, all things being equal. My opinion though.

jorel1:
Having more money in the account is no guaranty that your trades will end in profit .. In fact you could could end in a deficit in your first 5 trades and you end up only trying to make up for the losses, so you spend 2 months or so trying to make up for losses (From initial capital of $1M , you are down to $950K then spend 3 or 4 months to get it back to $1M at the end of the year maybe you end up with a break even or still negative ). and you call this making money ?? looks like a merry go round game to me

worst case scenario , revenge emotion comes in and you have to triple lot size to make up for the losses quickly (why not , afterall I have more than a enough capital) and then you begin to make irrational trade decisions..

One just needs to be good with trading and a good risk/money management process .. else if you claim to risk only 2% of capital and you are taking bad quality trades or dont even know right time to buy or sell , its just a waste of time...

If you know how to trade very well both technically and fundamentally when to place a buy sell order , you will make money consistently , you will even make much more money if you have a good risk and money management process coupled to it.
But if you are only sound with money / risk management , you wouldn't make money , only merry go round

jorel1:
Having more money in the account is no guaranty that your trades will end in profit .. In fact you could could end in a deficit in your first 5 trades and you end up only trying to make up for the losses, so you spend 2 months or so trying to make up for losses (From initial capital of $1M , you are down to $950K then spend 3 or 4 months to get it back to $1M at the end of the year maybe you end up with a break even or still negative ). and you call this making money ?? looks like a merry go round game to me

worst case scenario , revenge emotion comes in and you have to triple lot size to make up for the losses quickly (why not , afterall I have more than a enough capital) and then you begin to make irrational trade decisions..

One just needs to be good with trading and a good risk/money management process .. else if you claim to risk only 2% of capital and you are taking bad quality trades or dont even know right time to buy or sell , its just a waste of time...

If you know how to trade very well both technically and fundamentally when to place a buy sell order , you will make money consistently , you will even make much more money if you have a good risk and money management process coupled to it.
But if you are only sound with money / risk management , you wouldn't make money , only merry go round

JLINE:
These thought are provoking though but what keeps me ahead most times...The term is TECHNICAL ANALYSIS but what i see what most traders do is TECHNICAL TRADING rather than technical analysis.