₦airaland Forum

hello guys... i saw this pattern in a quantitative reasoning textbook.. and i got stucked, to my amazement i couldnt link up the pattern.. can someone try this out??

@lalasticlala, ishilove, etc... abeg allow the world of NL to tackle this.. thanks

Just wait ...

this view would be clearer..
gurus in the house.. abeg mek una use dis one shine...

Modified*
My first time to hit FP oo after 4years of struggle.. abeg mek una help me celebrate...i pray b4 mek God do am for me dis year and it didnt evn hav to take up to a month for it to happen.. BAba God Oshe.. this is my year..

For those still struggling to hit FP.. pls dnt be discouraged.. keep on.. one day e go happen like film trick.. Thanks to the Mod wey push this thing.. MAy God bless you and ur generation... u jux made my day wonderful..
NA different things dey mek diffrent people happy oo.. lol...Tanchuu Eu bonita..
Proudly a Frontpager.....

1stt Example..............U add 4 +3++7=14 subtract 9+1+1=11 so 14-11=3

Love stuffs like this

infact, I thought I have been the only one.

I taught my younger ones quantitative reasoning during their days and they topped back to back, but is shocked me last year when I came across some patterns I could get solved after minutes of calculative staring.

let me go get those patterns!

I later resolved they must have made mistakes cos what worked for 1 wouldn't work for 2.

muheewa:
1stt Example..............U add 4 +3++7=14 subtract 9+1+1=11 so 14-11=3

what about the second one?

lalasticlala, mynd44, ishilove, ijebabe, setaje oya come help us o.

anukulapo oya na.

muheewa:
1stt Example..............U add 4 +3++7=14 subtract 9+1+1=11 so 14-11=3

Lol.. nice one.. bub i have don this.. and unfortuantely, it didnt work for the second pattern.. i think we are missing a little stuff in the link.. i jux taya for d tin..

MAths hard oo..

some of the figures in the lantern quatitative reasoning workbook are sometimes wrongly placed/inserted.. wont be surprise if this is one of those patterns..
this is unsolvable........i stand to be corrected tho

Me I no see the thing well jare. Na phone I dey take browse am. When morning come, I go use computer then the "problem" will be QED

Oga ayobase,Me I no see the thing well jare. Na phone I dey take browse am. When morning come, I go use computer then the "problem" will be QED

anukulapo:
Oga ayobase,Me I no see the thing well jare. Na phone I dey take browse am.
When morning come, I go use computer then the "problem" will be QED

Ok.. we dey wait oo

maestrojay:
hello guys... i saw this pattern in a quantitative reasoning textbook.. and i got stucked, to my amazement i couldnt link up the pattern.. can someone try this out??

@lalasticlala, ishilove, etc... abeg allow the world of NL to tackle this.. thanks

Not hard..

apply knowledge of algebra..... label each number with a symbol.... then..start the manipulation.

here.

maestrojay:
Ok.. we dey wait oo

Ah, so no be my phone no let me see the thing sef. Na because this one pass my level. Walahi, I can't make sense of it. Thank God say i don finish primary school before them stat to set this kin PhD questions for pupils.

@ayobase - abeg, make una wey do engineering maths come solve this primary school problem. I'm going back to reading my William Shakespare. Na there my mates dem dey

Cool Let's see if we can push it

agentofchange1:
here.

BAba... na futher maths u dey enter so oo...
NA dis kine tin u wan teach pikin of primary 4?

I hail ur work sha.. mek i wait 4 d simpler version.. me no sabi maths wella..

anukulapo:
Ah, so no be my phone no let me see the thing sef. Na because this one pass my level. Walahi, I can't make sense of it. Thank God say i don finish primary school before them stat to set this kin PhD questions for pupils.

@ayobase - abeg, make una wey do engineering maths come solve this primary school problem. I'm going back to reading my William Shakespare. Na there my mates dem dey

Lol.. dis guy no go kee me with laff

maestrojay:
BAba... na futher maths u dey enter so oo...
NA dis kine tin u wan teach pikin of primary 4?

I hail ur work sha.. mek i wait 4 d simpler version.. me no sabi maths wella..

Haha..

ok boss, but the stuff no hard na.....I just did some manipulation/trial n error...(this ain't further maths at all ) which later yields the above relations.. nd yes this' how I teach my younger siblings... they always get it ..n score high marks in Math/quantitative reasoning

Just follow this logic carefully.. letters rep. numbers. .u will see .. its that simple .

#cheers .

anukulapo:
Ah, so no be my phone no let me see the thing sef. Na because this one pass my level. Walahi, I can't make sense of it. Thank God say i don finish primary school before them stat to set this kin PhD questions for pupils.

@ayobase - abeg, make una wey do engineering maths come solve this primary school problem. I'm going back to reading my William Shakespare. Na there my mates dem dey

lmao.

I also wanna thank God sey this no dey for Engineering Maths. I for never graduate fah!

But on a serious note, are those supposed to be that difficult or just mistakes?

agentofchange1:
here.

Thanks for taking your time.

but, this is too much for a primary student to grab without breaking it down in example as you did.

Even, the simplest calculation in General Mathematics is properly exampled before exercise.

I bet you, many teachers can't figure this out for students.

During my days, quantitative reasoning no dey complicated like this.

agentofchange1:
Haha..

ok boss, but the stuff no hard na.....I just did some manipulation/trial n error...(this ain't further maths at all ) which later yields the above relations.. nd yes this' how I teach my younger siblings... they always get it ..n score high marks in Math/quantitative reasoning

Just follow this logic carefully.. letters rep. numbers. .u will see .. its that simple .

#cheers .

Actually, your answer has no logic. It defeats the purpose of quantitative reasoning
why would A be equal to (E+D)-(F-G) when C is equal G(D-E)? Looking at the drawing you notice A and C are mirror images of each other, so C is expected to follow a similar(and possibly opposite) pattern as that of A.
It seems like your answer is a bit too random and is more of chance than reason... Although it works

maestrojay:
hello guys... i saw this pattern in a quantitative reasoning textbook.. and i got stucked, to my amazement i couldnt link up the pattern.. can someone try this out??

@lalasticlala, ishilove, etc... abeg allow the world of NL to tackle this.. thanks

plz post some of the exercises following those examples.

timonski:
Actually, your answer has no logic. It defeats the purpose of quantitative reasoning
why would A be equal to (E+D)-(F-G) when C is equal G(D-E)? Looking at the drawing you notice A and C are mirror images of each other, so C is expected to follow a similar(and possibly opposite) pattern as that of A.
It seems like your answer is a bit too random and is more of chance than reason... Although it works

Haha..yea boss....dia. r .other way(s) I cud .manipulate out those answers ( patterns.) . .

random ke.?. chance ni......lol..

thank God it works....

k

i wanna know how solve this will increase your chance in marketing a product

.

great, upon close examination, i see two Ys - one standing erect and the other inverted.

Then i can see numbers running in single digit..only humans understand that

What is this?

make una dey solve away, people dey make bar steady

maestrojay:
hello guys... i saw this pattern in a quantitative reasoning textbook.. and i got stucked, to my amazement i couldnt link up the pattern.. can someone try this out??

@lalasticlala, ishilove, etc... abeg allow the world of NL to tackle this.. thanks

you got stucked?

Imagine if such was brought to you by your naughty little sister
who you do brag to about your academic success . . .#Gobe