What exactly are you saying? ,those post you read on my thread's concerning my parent's are just for example,i didn't mention in any way of hatred to them with my post,if not for the root of "Religion" they came out from,wish i alway's regret !,
for im from christian background,a religion practice that is not truthful, so please better blow U_turn and read all my post that involved my parent's ,i didn't kick them off my life because i cant force them to quit their believe of the christian religion full of contradiction's?

dadde:

ogaga4luv shld closly come 2nd cos he never hides his dislike for his parent and their believes.

pls more nominatns. There could b an award 4 d winner

timmy7:

Some pple dumb sha wetin dis javamohammadichatred dey yarn abt sef

gen2genius:

It's you we should be asking that question. You said it's obvious we have varying opinions, and the OP is simply expressing his! So WHAT'S THE FUSS?

gen2genius:

Just like the every other muslim fanatic, the stench of your hypocrisy follows you wherever you go. You want the whole world to believe that the Bible if full of filth, yet you spew out more absurdities, vulgarities and profanities than any other person on this forum. Now we know how "clean" the quran is. Shame on you!

ilosiwaju:

1. Abuzola
2. Noetic

I wouldn't call them annoying per se, let's just say unreasonable.

oyb:

obviously it depends

for muslims

davidylan, [b]noetic, [/b]osisi, and their acolytes

for christians in general

abuzola, tudor, huxley

for catholics

davidylan, no2atheism

for protestants

i dunno - maybe lady

for those who revere daddy go and co as the er 'anointed men of god '

jakumo , banom

for atheists

_{those fellas have the most fun - they have nothing to be knocked} 

maybe noetic , abuzola -

for traditional worshippers -

jury still out on that 

for scientologists -
they are yet to show face on NL
 
for 'christians'
davidylan 

noetic2:

I dont belong to that list.

I also dont belong to ur list. nairaland muslims are naturally not objective and do not tolerate opposing views.

Chrisbenogor:

And you think you are objective?

noetic2:

what other adjective best describes my post?

Chrisbenogor:

Do you mean your posts on Nairaland or the one I questioned?
I meant your posts generally on nairaland are not objective, you like Abuzola are in the habit of harassing muslims that their holy book is bad, that does not smell like objectivity to me.

Chrisbenogor:

Do you mean your posts on Nairaland or the one I questioned?
I meant your posts generally on nairaland are not  objective, you like Abuzola are in the habit of harassing muslims that their holy book is bad, that does not smell like objectivity to me.  

noetic2:

thats simply because u choose to see it from an atheist and opinionated point of view.  

This is what the dictionary defines as objective: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/objective
1. not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion.
2. intent upon or dealing with things external to the mind rather than with thoughts or feelings, as a person or a book.
3. being the object of perception or thought; belonging to the object of thought rather than to the thinking subject
4. of or pertaining to something that can be known, or to something that is an object or a part of an object; existing independent of thought or an observer as part of reality.

I believe that my posts on nairaland meet the four criteria above.

not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations

oyb:


this coming from davidyan and his acolyte

two manic fundamentalist fanatics who have no problem condemning others with differing views as 'christians', 'spawn of satan ' consider themselves objective

the lies fanatics tell themselves so they can sleep at night