ANOTHER NAIL TO THE SHIA COFFIN (A MUST READ).
BismiLLaah walHamduliLLaah wasolla Allahu wa sallam alaa Rosoolihi wa aalihi wa sahbihi wa sallam.

The Shia in their extreme and irrational hedonism have permitted that a man lends his wife to his neighbour, friend, visitor or to even any stranger.

Sayyid Husayn alMusawiyy -one of the contemporary scholars of the shia- said in his book (لله ثم للتاريخ liLLaahi thumma littaarikh) :

“Indeed the widespread adherence to mut’ah has called for lending of the privates (of a woman), and the meaning of lending the privates is that a man gives his wife or slave to another man and makes permissible for him to enjoy her or do whatever he wishes with her, so when the man(husband) wishes to travel he keeps his wife with his neighbour or friend or any person that he wills, and then makes permissible for him to do whatever he wishes (with her) throughout his travel period. And the reason (for permitting this lending) is known, (and that is) to be rest assured on his wife that she doesn’t commit adultery in his absence (!!!!)

[please what else is the definition of adultery after this?!].

And there is another way to lend the privates, when a guest arrives with anyone and they wish to honour him then the owner of the house lets his wife to the visitor throughout his stay and makes permissible for him everything”.


Then the deviant stated his proofs from classic shia books:

Toosiyy reported fom Ja’far alyhissalam said: I (Toosiyy) said: “A man makes his woman permissible for his brother? He said yes, there is no problem with what he makes permissible of her to him” (istibsar 3/136).

Al-Kulainiyy and Toosiyy reported from Muhammad bn Mudhaarib said: Abu Abdillah alyhi salam said to me:

“O Muhammad take this girl she will serve you and do whatever you like with her, when you leave return her to me”! (al-Kaafee, al_Furuu’ 2/200, al-Istibsar 3/136).


Sheikh Muhammad Bayyomiyy –a contemporary Sunni Scholar- commenting of this filthy creed of shia said:

“The two Imams (Abu AbdiLLaah and Abu Ja’far) are too eminent to have said these false statements…..We travelled to India and met worshippers of cow and other idolaters and we read a lot about those religions but we never found any of them to make permissible what this path has permitted for its followers…..So how can Islam permit such despicable act that negates the simplest level of intellect.” (aqeedatu Shiah pg 379).

And what grieves the heart is that the people of Najaf (the city of the filthy shia Sheikh Sayyid Hassan alMusawiyy) were given the misguiding verdict of lending the privates, and there are many families that act upon it in southern Iraq and in Baghdad and some other region upon the evil verdicts of their leaders: some of these families are As-Sistaaniyy, As-Sadr, ash-Sheeraaziyy, at-Tobtobaa’iyy etc and many of them when he visits anyone rents their wife if he sees her to be beautiful, and she remains rented with him till he departs!!(Aqeedatu Shiah 380).

The filthy Shia did not restrict their misguidance to that alone, rather they permitted Anal intercourse with the women, and they reported narrations that they attributed to the Imams.

It was reported from Toosiyy from AbduLLAh, from Abu Ya’foor said ; “I asked Abu AbdiLLaah about a man that meets his wife in her anus, he said: no problemif she is pleased… and went on to twist some verses to support the misguidance (istibsaar 3/243).

For clear and satisfactory explanation on the prohibition of anal intercourse please see al-Inshiraah fee aadbi Nikah by Abu Ishaaq al-Huwayni (may Allah preserve him and grant him good health upon the Sunnah).

The Obligation upon every student of knowledge is to warn the generality of these despicable acts that the filthy Rawaafidh are perpetrating and striving -day and night- to spread among the believers.

Allah says:
O you who believe! Follow not the footsteps of shaytan. And whosoever follows the footsteps of shaytan, then verily, he commands al-fahshaa (to commit indecency –illegal sexual intercourse) and al-munkar (disbelief and polytheism)….. (Nuur:23)


Verily, those who like that (the crime of) illegal sexual intercourse should be propagated among those who believe, they will have a painful torment in this world and in the hereafter. And Allah knows and you know not. (Noor:19)


Wa solla Allahu ‘alaa nabiyyinaa wa aalihi wa sahbihi wasallim.

what is the source of the article? no source!

what is the source or reference for the alleged words of the scholars you quoted? no source!

the references you gave in the content cannot be found or validated.

now answer this: do you believe the rubbish you either made up/copied, or do you simply not care whether it is credible or not, but you want others to believe it because "the end justifies the means"; and whatever causes damage to the name and image of the Shia, you are good with it?

it is not surprising, and not shocking. these are your ways that the Wahhabi ideology has made you follow.

Rafidi:
what is the source of the article? no source!

what is the source or reference for the alleged words of the scholars you quoted? no source!

the references you gave in the content cannot be found or validated.

now answer this: do you believe the rubbish you either made up/copied, or do you simply not care whether it is credible or not, but you want others to believe it because "the end justifies the means"; and whatever causes damage to the name and image of the Shia, you are good with it?

it is not surprising, and not shocking. these are your ways that the Wahhabi ideology has made you follow.

Last time I checked it was the shia who had the aqeedah of taqiyyah! It enabled them to lie and still give it a spiritual justification.

Your Sheikh alQummiyy said;

التقية واجبة من تركها كان بمنزلة من ترك الصلاة
"at-taqiyyah is obligatory whoever leaves it is like the one who leaves Solah". (al-i'tiqaadaat pg 104)

and alkulaynee narrated from ja'far as-Soodiq that he said;

التقية من ديني و دين آبائي ،و لا إيمان لمن لا تقية له"
at-taqiyyah is part of my religion and the religion of my fathers, and whoever has no eeman has no taqiyyah" (Usoolul Kaafee 2/219)

And he reported from Abu AbdiLLaah that he said;

إن تسعة أعشار الدين من التقية، و لا دين لمن لا تقية له، و التقية في كل شيء إلا في النبيذ، و المسح على الخفين
Indeed a ninth of ten (parts) of the religion is taqiyyah, and there is no religion for the one who has no taqiyyah, and taqiyyah applies to everything except wine and wiping over the khuff (leather socks)

(Usuulul Kaafee 2/217)

I can keep quoting from your books.

Maybe you need glasses to see the names and pages of the books I referenced.

If only you would repent and return to the sunnah of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam and love those whom Allah loves (The companions and household of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam) and never bear grudges against them. If only you would repent, if only you would repent.

Allah the most high -after praising the companions i.e ansaar and muhaajiroon said - praised the next generation of believers and described them thus;

And those who came after them say; "Our Lord! forgive us and our brethren who have preceded us in faith, and put not in our hearts hatred for those who have believed. Our Lord! You are indeed full of kindness Most Merciful. (al-Hashr;10)

Aishah (the beloved wife of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam) said to urwah bn Zubayr (they were commanded to seek forgiveness for the companions of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam but they insulted them) (Muslim; 3022)

Anas bn Malik may Allah be pleased with him reported from the messenger of Allah alyhissolaat wassalaam (The sign of Eeman is loving the Ansaar and the sign of hypocrisy is hating the Ansaar) (Bukharee; 3789 and Muslim;74)

And Abu Sa'eed alKuhudree said, the messenger of Allah alyhissolaat wassalaam said "Do not insult my companions, if one of you spent the size of (mount) Uhud in gold it wouldn't equate a handful of one of them even half of it" (Bukharee; 3673 and Muslim; 2541).

Newnas:

Last time I checked it was the shia who had the aqeedah of taqiyyah! It enabled them to lie and still give it a spiritual justification.
Your Sheikh alQummiyy said;
التقية واجبة من تركها كان بمنزلة من ترك الصلاة
"at-taqiyyah is obligatory whoever leaves it is like the one who leaves Solah". (al-i'tiqaadaat pg 104)
and alkulaynee narrated from ja'far as-Soodiq that he said;
التقية من ديني و دين آبائي ،و لا إيمان لمن لا تقية له"
at-taqiyyah is part of my religion and the religion of my fathers, and whoever has no eeman has no taqiyyah" (Usoolul Kaafee 2/219)
And he reported from Abu AbdiLLaah that he said;
إن تسعة أعشار الدين من التقية، و لا دين لمن لا تقية له، و التقية في كل شيء إلا في النبيذ، و المسح على الخفين
Indeed a ninth of ten (parts) of the religion is taqiyyah, and there is no religion for the one who has no taqiyyah, and taqiyyah applies to everything except wine and wiping over the khuff (leather socks)
(Usuulul Kaafee 2/217)
I can keep quoting from your books.
Maybe you need glasses to see the names and pages of the books I referenced.
If only you would repent and return to the sunnah of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam and love those whom Allah loves (The companions and household of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam) and never bear grudges against them. If only you would repent, if only you would repent.
Allah the most high -after praising the companions i.e ansaar and muhaajiroon said - praised the next generation of believers and described them thus;
And those who came after them say; "Our Lord! forgive us and our brethren who have preceded us in faith, and put not in our hearts hatred for those who have believed. Our Lord! You are indeed full of kindness Most Merciful. (al-Hashr;10)
Aishah (the beloved wife of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam) said to urwah bn Zubayr (they were commanded to seek forgiveness for the companions of Allah's messenger alyhissolaat wassalaam but they insulted them) (Muslim; 3022)
Anas bn Malik may Allah be pleased with him reported from the messenger of Allah alyhissolaat wassalaam (The sign of Eeman is loving the Ansaar and the sign of hypocrisy is hating the Ansaar) (Bukharee; 3789 and Muslim;74)
And Abu Sa'eed alKuhudree said, the messenger of Allah alyhissolaat wassalaam said "Do not insult my companions, if one of you spent the size of (mount) Uhud in gold it wouldn't equate a handful of one of them even half of it" (Bukharee; 3673 and Muslim; 2541).

cant you guys stick to a topic? why running from one topic to another as diversion? the references contained in the body of the article are not valid. can you validate them with scan copies? can you tell us where the Najaf Sheikg Hassan al-Musawy made the statement attributed to him? you just attribute words to someone without evidence where and when he made the statement?

you are being asked to amend one problem, you rushed to create more. so mut'ah is "haram", and taqiyyah is also "haram". then what is halal? check the position of the Quran on Taqiyyah. Taqiyyah is halal and an Islamic concept as per the Quran. then you brought up the issue of the companions. get this clear: you do not speak on behalf of the companions as a whole. there are companions the Shia greatly respect and the Sunnis frown upon and tarnish their image. e.g. Mukhtar al-Thaqafi, Hujr Ibn Adi.

the Sunnis insult Mukhtar al-Thaqafi (ra) and consider him an hypocrite because he was a Shia of Imam Ali (as) and also a companion of the Prophet (sa) who did not contain himself with propagating the truth and abiding by the Quran and Ahlul-Bayt (as),but he rose up with the sword to avenge the tragedy of Karbala and the blood of Imam Hussain (as) and killed those who stood against Imam Hussain (as),the grandson of the Prophet (sa).

Muawiya the founder of the Sunni sect killed companions of the Prophet (sa).and there are Sunnis up to this day who have gone as far as finding justification why Muawiya (who the Prophet described in unappealing terms) killed Hujr Ibn Adi (ra),a pious companion.there are even Sunnis (the wahhabis particularly) who honor Yazeed,the killer of Imam Hussain (as).what do you say about someone who would honor an enemy of the Prophet's (sa) blood and who ordered for Hussain's (as) blood to be shed?

the Shia honor and greatly love companions like Ammar Ibn Yassir,Bilal al-Habashi,Abu Dhar al-Ghifari,Salman al-Farisi e.t.c. who are all companions of Prophet Muhammad (sa),who were active Shia of Imam Ali (as) and stood by the truth.

it is only people who have limited the definition of being a companion of the Prophet (sa) to refer to those who disobeyed the Prophet (sa),harmed his Ahlul-Bayt (as) and went ahead to ride the tide of Islam for their personal glory and name and use it as title to promote their ill-gotten "virtues",that think "companions of the Prophet" only refer to a few individuals.there were thousands of companions.the companions of the Prophet (sa) are not limited to abu bakr and umar.it is that fair to accept.so do not accuse the Shia of insulting the "companions of the Prophet".that is a baseless allegation.just the way there were companions Sunnis dislike,there are also companions Shia dislike.it makes more noise when it is abu bakr and Umar because of the power they usurped from the Ahlul-Bayt (as) and particularly Imam Ali (as).in this respect,as far as i do not insult them,there is no need for any Sunni to feel offended.and Almighty Allah be my witness that if i have ever used insults to address those men i regret that.we Shia are not trained to insult anyone.that is not part of being Muslims.we only send La'nat on the wrongdoers,hypocrites,tyrants,and oppressors because sending la'nat (which is translated to mean "curse" ) is a sunnah of Allah even in the Quran.in that case do not feel offended because the entire history of division in islam and the disagreement boil down to the actions by abu bakr and umar the Shia object to.this is a sincere objection that should be addressed in an academic way.we should be able to prove to you how they disobeyed the Prophet (sa) and what the Prophet (sa) foretold about how those among his closest companions would deviate and prophesied they would be taken away from him into hell fire.

now let us see what the Prophet (sa) had said about his companions.please when going through these hadiths,let us keep in mind this Quranic verse and pay attention to the highlighted part:

"And among those around you of the bedouins are hypocrites, and [also] from the people of Madinah. They have become accustomed to hypocrisy. You, [O Muhammad], do not know them, [but] We know them. We will punish them twice [in this world]; then they will be returned to a great punishment".
Quran [9:101]

now let us quote hadith .and there are many narrators who reported this hadith:

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.584
Narrated Anas:

The Prophet said, "Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake
Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from
me, whereupon I will say, 'My companions!' Then it will be said, 'You
do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after
you." (also Sahih Muslim, part 15, pp 53-54)


Review these:

www.abubakr.org


"Abu Bakr and his follower attempted to assassinate Prophet (saw) in Aqaba"
http://najah.info/2.%20Followers/group/bakri%20assassinated%20prophet.html