The Bible’s answer
Yes, for although the Bible is not a science textbook, it is accurate when it mentions matters of science. Consider some examples showing that science and the Bible agree and that the Bible contains scientific facts that differed greatly from the beliefs of many people living at the time it was written.
The universe had a beginning. ( Genesis 1:1 ) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. ( Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25 ) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
The earth is suspended in empty space. ( Job 26:7 ) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. ( Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6 ) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. ( Psalm 104:6, 8 ) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. ( Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13 ) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.
Are there scientific errors in the Bible?
A reasonable examination of the Bible shows the answer to be no. Here are some common misconceptions about the scientific accuracy of the Bible:
Myth: The Bible says that the universe was created in six 24-hour days.
Fact: According to the Bible, God created the universe in the indefinite past. ( Genesis 1:1 ) Also, the days of creation described in chapter 1 of Genesis were epochs whose length is not specified. In fact, the entire period during which earth and heaven were made is also called a “day.”— Genesis 2:4 .
Myth: The Bible says that vegetation was created before the sun existed to support photosynthesis.— Genesis 1:11, 16.
Fact: The Bible shows that the sun, one of the stars that make up “the heavens,” was created before vegetation. ( Genesis 1:1 ) Diffused light from the sun reached the earth’s surface during the first “day,” or epoch, of creation. As the atmosphere cleared, by the third “day” of creation, the light was strong enough to support photosynthesis. ( Genesis 1:3-5, 12, 13) Only later did the sun become distinctly visible from the surface of the earth.— Genesis 1:16 .
Myth: The Bible says that the sun revolves around the earth.
Fact: Ecclesiastes 1:5 says: “The sun rises, and the sun sets; then it hurries back to the place where it rises again.” However, this statement merely describes the apparent motion of the sun as viewed from the earth. Even today, a person can use the words “sunrise” and “sunset,” yet he knows that the earth revolves around the sun.
Myth: The Bible says that the earth is flat.
Fact: The Bible uses the phrase “the ends of the earth” to mean “the most distant part of the earth”; this does not imply that the earth is flat or that it has an edge. ( Acts 1:8 ; footnote) Likewise, the expression “the four corners of the earth” is a figure of speech referring to the entire surface of the earth; today a person might use the four points of the compass as a similar metaphor.— Isaiah 11:12; Luke 13:29 .
Myth: The Bible says that the circumference of a circle is exactly three times its diameter, but the correct value is pi (π), or about 3.1416.
Fact: The measurements of “the Sea of cast metal” given at 1 Kings 7:23 and 2 Chronicles 4:2 indicate that it had a diameter of 10 cubits and that “it took a measuring line 30 cubits long to encircle it.” These dimensions might have been merely the nearest round numbers. It is also possible that the circumference and diameter represented inner and outer measurements of the basin respectively.

https://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/science-and-the-bible/

joyandfaith:
The Bible’s answer
Yes, for although the Bible is not a science textbook, it is accurate when it mentions matters of science. Consider some examples showing that science and the Bible agree and that the Bible contains scientific facts that differed greatly from the beliefs of many people living at the time it was written.
The universe had a beginning. ( Genesis 1:1 ) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. ( Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25 ) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
The earth is suspended in empty space. ( Job 26:7 ) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. ( Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6 ) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. ( Psalm 104:6, 8 ) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. ( Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13 ) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.
Are there scientific errors in the Bible?
A reasonable examination of the Bible shows the answer to be no. Here are some common misconceptions about the scientific accuracy of the Bible:
Myth: The Bible says that the universe was created in six 24-hour days.
Fact: According to the Bible, God created the universe in the indefinite past. ( Genesis 1:1 ) Also, the days of creation described in chapter 1 of Genesis were epochs whose length is not specified. In fact, the entire period during which earth and heaven were made is also called a “day.”— Genesis 2:4 .
Myth: The Bible says that vegetation was created before the sun existed to support photosynthesis.— Genesis 1:11, 16.
Fact: The Bible shows that the sun, one of the stars that make up “the heavens,” was created before vegetation. ( Genesis 1:1 ) Diffused light from the sun reached the earth’s surface during the first “day,” or epoch, of creation. As the atmosphere cleared, by the third “day” of creation, the light was strong enough to support photosynthesis. ( Genesis 1:3-5, 12, 13) Only later did the sun become distinctly visible from the surface of the earth.— Genesis 1:16 .
Myth: The Bible says that the sun revolves around the earth.
Fact: Ecclesiastes 1:5 says: “The sun rises, and the sun sets; then it hurries back to the place where it rises again.” However, this statement merely describes the apparent motion of the sun as viewed from the earth. Even today, a person can use the words “sunrise” and “sunset,” yet he knows that the earth revolves around the sun.
Myth: The Bible says that the earth is flat.
Fact: The Bible uses the phrase “the ends of the earth” to mean “the most distant part of the earth”; this does not imply that the earth is flat or that it has an edge. ( Acts 1:8 ; footnote) Likewise, the expression “the four corners of the earth” is a figure of speech referring to the entire surface of the earth; today a person might use the four points of the compass as a similar metaphor.— Isaiah 11:12; Luke 13:29 .
Myth: The Bible says that the circumference of a circle is exactly three times its diameter, but the correct value is pi (π), or about 3.1416.
Fact: The measurements of “the Sea of cast metal” given at 1 Kings 7:23 and 2 Chronicles 4:2 indicate that it had a diameter of 10 cubits and that “it took a measuring line 30 cubits long to encircle it.” These dimensions might have been merely the nearest round numbers. It is also possible that the circumference and diameter represented inner and outer measurements of the basin respectively.

https://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/science-and-the-bible/

Science is not a field rendered to satisfy the fraught of religion,rather it should be the opposite...because if science is to satisfy theology,then it is no longer science but a propaganda to pilot affairs of ignoramus based on mind guesses and selfish idiosyncrasies.

The short answer is No.

Sarassin:
The short answer is No.

how?

Emphatic Never

Science is objective. Science does not seek to agree with anything nor anyone, irrespective of who or what that person/thing is. Science only agrees with facts.

And as far as Facts are concerned, Science does not agree with everything stated in the Bible. Science considers it untrue to claim that the Sun rotates around the earth, that the moon produces light, that 7 couples of every animal species can be placed in an arch, that the Lion and the tiger used to eat vegetables, etc. The List is almost endless.

Greetings.

[quote author=LoJ post=44830168]Science is objective. Science does not seek to agree with anything nor anyone, irrespective of who or what that person/thing is. Science only agrees with facts.

And as far as Facts are concerned, Science does not agree with everything stated in the Bible. Science considers it untrue to claim that the Sun rotates around the earth, that the moon produces light, that 7 couples of every animal species can be placed in an arch, that the Lion and the tiger used to eat vegetables, etc. The List is almost endless.

Greetings. [/quote
what are ur proofs

[quote author=joyandfaith post=44831784][/quote]

You are confused,if not,you are craving some attention unjustly!

Proof for what? That the sun does not rotate about the earth? That the moon is not illuminuous on it own? Or,that science is objective and render judgement clueless to dogmatism?

joyandfaith:
what are ur proofs

Oh you want a proof that Lion do not eat vegetables? Or you want proofs that the sun does not rotate around the earth (reverse is the case) ?

Well, could you start be explaining to us how according to the Bible, there can be a day and a night on the first day of creation, when the Sun had not yet been created. Then I will give you simple down to earth proofs that Lions do not eat grass.

Greetings

LoJ:

Oh you want a proof that Lion do not eat vegetables? Or you want proofs that the sun does not rotate around the earth (reverse is the case) ?

Well, could you start be explaining to us how according to the Bible, there can be a day and a night on the first day of creation, when the Sun had not yet been created. Then I will give you simple down to earth proofs that Lions do not eat grass.

Greetings

Isn't remarkable how books supposedly dictated by the all powerful creator of the universe still desperately try to reconcile with the punny knowledge of humans..

Humans are proving to be more knowledgeable than the alleged creator of the universe whose knowledge could not surpass that of ancient primitive men who speak for it.

DrLazDevitan:


Science is not a field rendered to satisfy the fraught of religion,rather it should be the opposite...because if science is to satisfy theology,then it is no longer science but a propaganda to pilot affairs of ignoramus based on mind guesses and selfish idiosyncrasies.

Theology is a philosophy of Ignorance because it does not aim at tendering answers objectively true to satisfy the question rather it aims at tendering answers aimed at satisfying the questioner even though untrue.

Don't you it's usual tactics.

Simply get any verse of the bible that is starkly ignorant and falsified by scientific findings then reinterpret it in your own way and say it means something else or it was a metaphor.

that's just what the OP is desperately trying to do.

when a claim is falsified in science it is discarded as bogus and thrown into the trash can of nonsenses, but when a claim is falsified in religion they reinterpret it as a metaphor or allegory..

This is how it works, when science makes a discovery that directly or indirectly debunks a religious claim.

-They reject it as false
-Accuse it as work of the devil
-they say it's biased
-they fight as much as they can to discredit it
-then they go back to the contradicted verse
-reinterpret it
-come out and say it was exactly what their holy book meant

Nope

johnydon22:


Theology is a philosophy of Ignorance because it does not aim at tendering answers objectively true to satisfy the question rather it aims at tendering answers aimed at satisfying the questioner even though untrue.

Don't you it's usual tactics.

Simply get any verse of the bible that is starkly ignorant and falsified by scientific findings then reinterpret it in your own way and say it means something else or it was a metaphor.

that's just what the OP is desperately trying to do.

when a claim is falsified in science it is discarded as bogus and thrown into the trash can of nonsenses, but when a claim is falsified in religion they reinterpret it as a metaphor or allegory..

This is how it works, when science makes a discovery that directly or indirectly debunks a religious claim.

-They reject it as false
-Accuse it as work of the devil
-they say it's biased
-they fight as much as they can to discredit it
-then they go back to the contradicted verse
-reinterpret it
-come out and say it was exactly what their holy book meant

Well said Johny...

LoJ:

Oh you want a proof that Lion do not eat vegetables? Or you want proofs that the sun does not rotate around the earth (reverse is the case) ?

Well, could you start be explaining to us how according to the Bible, there can be a day and a night on the first day of creation, when the Sun had not yet been created. Then I will give you simple down to earth proofs that Lions do not eat grass.

Greetings

Myth: The Bible says that the universe was created in six 24-hour days.
Fact: According to the Bible, God created the universe in the indefinite past. ( Genesis 1:1 ) Also, the days of creation described in chapter 1 of Genesis were epochs whose length is not specified. In fact, the entire period during which earth and heaven were made is also called a “day.”— Genesis 2:4 .
Myth: The Bible says that vegetation was created before the sun existed to support photosynthesis.— Genesis 1:11, 16.
Fact: The Bible shows that the sun, one of the stars that make up “the heavens,” was created before vegetation. ( Genesis 1:1 ) Diffused light from the sun reached the earth’s surface during the first “day,” or epoch, of creation. As the atmosphere cleared, by the third “day” of creation, the light was strong enough to support photosynthesis. ( Genesis 1:3-5, 12, 13) Only later did the sun become distinctly visible from the surface of the earth.— Genesis 1:16 .
Myth: The Bible says that the sun revolves around the earth.
Fact: Ecclesiastes 1:5 says: “The sun rises, and the sun sets; then it hurries back to the place where it rises again.” However, this statement merely describes the apparent motion of the sun as viewed from the earth. Even today, a person can use the words “sunrise” and “sunset,” yet he knows that the earth revolves around the sun.

while bible is not a scientific book. many science books contain errors. but bible is scientifically accurate.

joyandfaith:
...

Hello Joyandfaith,

You are running away from the simple questions, and deviating from the topic. I did not cited any of the verses you used, in fact I had some others in mind. You are even coming with issues I didn't mention. I repeat again:

- How could there be a day and a night on the first day of creation, while the sun was created subsequently (Genesis 1)?
- According to the Bible in Joshua 10:12 -13

Joshua said to the Lord in the presence of Israel:

“Sun, stand still over Gibeon,
and you, moon, over the Valley of Aijalon.”
So the sun stood still,
and the moon stopped,

It is clearly seen here that the Sun and the Moon rotates around the earth. Explain us how.

- Do you believe that the Lion used to eat grass?

- Is it possible that 7 couples of every species of the earth (more than 7 millions known species, many unknown) could suffice in the ark of Noah whose dimensions are well indicated?

I don't even want to mention some other points.

Greetings.

LoJ:

Hello Joyandfaith,

You are running away from the simple questions, and deviating from the topic. I did not cited any of the verses you used, in fact I had some others in mind. You are even coming with issues I didn't mention. I repeat again:

- How could there be a day and a night on the first day of creation, while the sun was created subsequently (Genesis 1)?
- According to the Bible in Joshua 10:12 -13

Joshua said to the Lord in the presence of Israel:

“Sun, stand still over Gibeon,
and you, moon, over the Valley of Aijalon.”
So the sun stood still,
and the moon stopped,

It is clearly seen here that the Sun and the Moon rotates around the earth. Explain us how.

- Do you believe that the Lion used to eat grass?

- Is it possible that 7 couples of every species of the earth (more than 7 millions known species, many unknown) could suffice in the ark of Noah whose dimensions are well indicated?

I don't even want to mention some other points.

Greetings.

heavens are created first before earth. luminary bodies are parts of heaven. note that creative dayscannot be understood literally.OK.
your question now.

The divine will concerning luminaries was accomplished on Day Four, it being stated: “God proceeded to make the two great luminaries, the greater luminary for dominating the day and the lesser luminary for dominating the night, and also the stars. Thus God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth, and to dominate by day and by night and to make a division between the light and the darkness.” ( ) In view of the description of these luminaries, the greater luminary was quite apparently the sun and the lesser luminary the moon, though the sun and moon are not specifically named in the Bible until after its account of the Flood of Noah’s day.— .
Previously, on the first “day,” the expression “Let light come to be” was used. The Hebrew word there used for “light” is ʼohr, meaning light in a general sense. But on the fourth “day,” the Hebrew word changes to ma·ʼohrʹ, which refers to a luminary or source of light. (
) So, on the first “day” diffused light evidently penetrated the swaddling bands, but the sources of that light could not have been seen by an earthly observer. Now, on the fourth “day,” things evidently changed.
It is also noteworthy that at the Hebrew verb ba·raʼʹ, meaning “create,” is not used. Instead, the Hebrew verb ʽa·sahʹ, meaning “make,” is employed. Since the sun, moon, and stars are included in “the heavens” mentioned in , they were created long before Day Four. On the fourth day God proceeded to “make” these celestial bodies occupy a new relationship toward earth’s surface and the expanse above it. When it is said, “God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth,” this would indicate that they now became discernible from the surface of the earth, as though they were in the expanse. Also, the luminaries were to “serve as signs and for seasons and for days and years,” thus later providing guidance for man in various ways.— .

joyandfaith:
So, on the first “day” diffused light evidently penetrated the swaddling bands, but the sources of that light could not have been seen by an earthly observer. Now, on the fourth “day,” things evidently changed.
It is also noteworthy that at the Hebrew verb ba·raʼʹ, meaning “create,” is not used. Instead, the Hebrew verb ʽa·sahʹ, meaning “make,” is employed.

So according to you, the misunderstanding is tied to the fact that people could see the light right from day one, but could only observe the source of the light on day 4. mmmkay.

- And what is it that prevented them from seeing the sun right from day one and that could not prevent them to see it by day 4?
- Who are the people that could not see the light from day one, since according to the Bible it is on day 6 that Adam and the animals were created?
- Why should a God narrating the way he created things, be limited by human's perspectives?
- And why did you not address the other issues? Did Lion eat grass? Could the more than 7 millions known species and the many millions unknown species multiplied by 14 (7 pairs of the pure ones) or by 2 (the impure ones) have found place in the Ark of Noah, whose dimensions are well indicated?? Is Joshua right when he asks the Sun and the moon to stop rotating around the earth?

Good day to you.

LoJ:


So according to you, the misunderstanding is tied to the fact that people could see the light right from day one, but could only observe the source of the light on day 4. mmmkay.

- And what is it that prevented them from seeing the sun right from day one and that could not prevent them to see it by day 4?
- Who are the people that could not see the light from day one, since according to the Bible it is on day 6 that Adam and the animals were created?
- Why should a God narrating the way he created things, be limited by human's perspectives?
- And why did you not address the other issues? Did Lion eat grass? Could the more than 7 millions known species and the many millions unknown species multiplied by 14 (7 pairs of the pure ones) or by 2 (the impure ones) have found place in the Ark of Noah, whose dimensions are well indicated?? Is Joshua right when he asks the Sun and the moon to stop rotating around the earth?

Good day to you.

Wow ... this is brilliant!!! There is no argument here.. done well sir

LoJ:


So according to you, the misunderstanding is tied to the fact that people could see the light right from day one, but could only observe the source of the light on day 4. mmmkay.

- And what is it that prevented them from seeing the sun right from day one and that could not prevent them to see it by day 4?
- Who are the people that could not see the light from day one, since according to the Bible it is on day 6 that Adam and the animals were created?
- Why should a God narrating the way he created things, be limited by human's perspectives?
- And why did you not address the other issues? Did Lion eat grass? Could the more than 7 millions known species and the many millions unknown species multiplied by 14 (7 pairs of the pure ones) or by 2 (the impure ones) have found place in the Ark of Noah, whose dimensions are well indicated?? Is Joshua right when he asks the Sun and the moon to stop rotating around the earth?

Good day to you.

STOL jumping around, if you don't believe the bible then, that one na your own biz, bro, it is not by force to believe in God, continue with your atheism, Lions will not attack people or other animals for food, at least according to that fraud called evolution herbivores came before carnivores, that is a clue, they way things are going on on this planet is not how it was originally made, okay?
Day in the creation is not literal 24H is spans a thousand years enough time to do all the tinkering needed to fine tune things, the fraud called evolution has not been tested to prove ANYTHING but the so called enlightened one like you believe it strongly, do you know why I don't believe the newspaper called daily mail? because they are well known for blowing rumors here and there, the bible said it a long time ago, that the earth is round and it is hanging up on nothing, people took it as a bizzare statement for so many years, was it not until NASA took the photographs of the earth from outside that the whole world realized that the bible had been right after all. So believing in the Bible is not by force, everybody will carry his own load.

cocoduck:
...

Hello cocoduck.

Thank you for your remarks.

I wish you all that is best and purest.

Good day to you.

This thread is full of ignorance! Ignorance in its most pristine form, pure unadulterated ignorance!

The writers of the Bible were ancient scientists who couched their knowledge in figurative language dicepherable only by the truly worthy. The unworthy and the impure and the ill-motivated will never understand. And there are layers of understanding too.

Science and the Bible are contiguous, there is no disunity between both of them. Science proves the Bible right!

Yes! Science agrees with the Bible, and vice versa.

MrPresident1:


The writers of the Bible were ancient scientists who couched their knowledge in figurative language dicepherable only by the truly worthy.

Science and the Bible are contiguous, there is no disunity between both of them. Science proves the Bible right!

Lol, you wish.

cloudgoddess:

Lol, you wish.

No my friend, it is you who is vainly ignorant

urahara:

Your tears have not started, you will weep buckets in time.

I repeat, there is no disunity between the Bible and science, you only need enlightenment on the figurative and illustrative use of language.

This is if you are willing to take personal responsibility for your enlightenment, the first step is to be willing to have a paradigm change in the way you view the Bible.

MrPresident1:


Your tears have not started, you will weep buckets in time.

I repeat, there is no disunity between the koran and science, you only need enlightenment on the figurative and illustrative use of language.

This is if you are willing to take personal responsibility for your enlightenment, the first step is to be willing to have a paradigm change in the way you view the koran.

http://www.speed-light.info/miracles_of_quran/


http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/scientific-miracles-in-hindu-scriptures-must-see.84199/


With an expertise in verbal gymnastics and a gullible mind, scientific facts are clear for all to see in story books such as the bible. Quran and hindu scriptures

urahara:


http://www.speed-light.info/miracles_of_quran/


http://www.religiousforums.com/threads/scientific-miracles-in-hindu-scriptures-must-see.84199/


With an expertise in verbal gymnastics and a gullible mind, scientific facts are clear for all to see in story books such as the bible. Quran and hindu scriptures

My friend, I am not an expert in the Koran, but I can provide you guidance to liberate your mind from Bible ignorance.

That said, the Koran, the Hindu scriptures and the text for many other religions were written by black/Negro men, they are all the Gospel of God, they are all ways to God if rightly interpreted. But my forte is the Bible and I can help you if you are willing to approach with an open mind, if you are truly interested in knowing God, IF YOU ARE READY TO BE CIVILISED, THE WORD OF GOD IS THE CIVILISER OF MANKIND. .

The Word of God is the breathe of God, it is this word of God in you that differentiates you from a beast.

Can you present one or two of your 'Scientific' facts that show that the Bible and science are irreconcilable?

MrPresident1:


My friend, I am not an expert in the Koran, but I can provide you guidance to liberate your mind from Bible ignorance.

That said, the Koran, the Hindu scriptures and the text for many other religions were written by black/Negro men, they are all the Gospel of God, they are all ways to God if rightly interpreted. But my forte is the Bible and I can help you if you are willing to approach with an open mind, if you are truly interested in knowing God, IF YOU ARE READY TO BE CIVILISED, THE WORD OF GOD IS THE CIVILISER OF MANKIND. .

The Word of God is the breathe of God, it is this word of God in you that differentiates you from a beast.

Can you present one or two of your 'Scientific' facts that show that the Bible and science are irreconcilable?

Read ur bible from cover to cover . i cant argue. Read genesis to leviticus in particular.

urahara:


Read ur bible from cover to cover . i cant argue. Read genesis to leviticus in particular.

Chief, your skepticism about religion is not misplaced, religion has been used to perpetrate all kinds of evil in the society. But God transcends religion, you cannot box God into a religion, if one is true because God sees the heart, God will use religion to guide such a person to Himself.

Eventually the true seeker will transcend religion.

If you want to have a more in-depth understanding of the Bible, I think I can help you, but you will need to be personally responsible for your journey

MrPresident1:


Chief, your skepticism about religion is not misplaced, religion has been used to perpetrate all kinds of evil in the society. But God transcends religion, you cannot box God into a religion, if one is true because God sees the heart, God will use religion to guide such a person to Himself.

Eventually the true seeker will transcend religion.

If you want to have a more in-depth understanding of the Bible, I think I can help you, but you will need to be personally responsible for your journey

Are u going to blatantly ignore bible passages about disbelivers being condemned

It seems u are not as fanatical and bigoted as the rest of ur brethen