What is Shiasm? Shiasm is a religion founded by a yemeni jew named Abdullah ibn Saba yemeni. As the result of his plots against Islam, the army of Hadhrat Ali (radhiallahu anhu) had split into four groups. 1. The group known as Shiah
Al-Aoula or the initial
Shiahs. They were the
sincere supporters of
Hadhrat Ali (radhiallahu
anhu). They were all members of the Ahlus
Sunnah Wal Jama`ah. They
recognised and accepted
the senior Sahaabah
(radhiallahu anhum) and
the holy wives of Rasulullah (sallallahu
alayhi wasallam). They
honoured the Sahaabah
and the holy wives in all
respects. The group of
sincere supporters did not fall into the trap of
shaitaan as the other
groups had. 2. The second group is
known as the
Tafdheeliyah. They
assigned to Hadhrat Ali
(radhiallahu anhu)
superiority over all the Sahaabah. This group
consists of the rank and
file followers of the
accursed Ibn Saba. They
had fallen prey to the evil
conspiracy of Ibn Sabã and had to a degree
accepted his
teaching. Hadhrat Ali
(radhiallahu anhu) had
severely threatened them.
He warned that he would flog them eighty lashes if
they assigned superiority
to him over Hadhrat Abu
Bakr and Umar
(radhiallahu anhuma). 3. The third group is called
Sabbayyah or Abusers.
They are also called
Tabarraiyyah. They
believed that all the
Sahaabah were oppressors, usurpers,
Munafiq and Kaafir. The
members of this group
constitute the middle-
class of the followers of
the shaitaan, Ibn Saba. This group derived
maximum capital for their
evil from the conflicts
which had developed
between the two camps of
Sahaabah.In his Khutbahs, Hadhrat Ali (radhiallahu
anhu) had disassociated
himself from these vile
anarchists and mischief
mongers. 4. The fourth group is called
the Ghullaat or the
Extremists. They were the
elite and closest students
and followers of Ibn Saba.
They believed in the divinity of Hadhrat Ali
(radhiallahu anhu) like the
Christians believe in the
godhood of Hadhrat Isaa
(alayhis salaam). From
their belief of godhood, they later shifted their
position and propagated
the doctrine of ‘Hulool’,
i.e. Allah Ta`ala’s ‘Rooh’
descended into Hadhrat
Ali (radhiallahu anhu) and he was god
incarnate.Some of the
Ghullaat were burnt out
alive on the instructions
of Hadhrat Ali
(radhiallahu anhu). Thus, the beginning of Shi`ism with its numerous varieties and off-shoots developed from the latter three groups of Hadhrat Ali’s (radhiallahu anhu) army or followers. The father and vile progenitor of them all was Ibn Saba, the Jew. Imam ibn Al-Tamiyyah writes: Shias hold beliefs and principles which are shirkful, challenging the tawheed (oneness of Allah) and contrary to the teachings of prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him), such as the following: -1-They exaggerate about their imams, claiming that they are infallible, and they devote many acts of worship to them such as supplication, seeking help, offering sacrifices and tawaaf (circumambulating their tombs). This is major shirk which Allaah tells us will not be forgiven. These acts of shirk are committed by their scholars and common folk alike, without anyone among them objecting to that. -2-Cursing and slandering the two wives of prophet Muhammad (peace be upon to him), ummu Aisha (radhi Allahu anha) and ummu Hafsa (radhi Allahu anha). They do not have a good opinion of Aisha (radhi Allahu anha) because she was the daughter of first caliph Abu bakr siddique (radhi Allah anhu), and they do not speak well of Hafsa (radhi Allahu anha), because she was the daughter of caliph Umar ibn al-Khatthab (radhi Allahu anhu). The Shia believe that Aisha (radhi Allahu anha)was a Munafiqh (hypocrite) and Kaffir (disbeliever), and we see this allegation in the well-known books of the Shia: “Aisha was an infidel woman (Kaffir).” (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 726) It is further stated: “Aisha was a hypocrite (Munafiqh).” (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Page No. 867) And again: “Aisha and Hafsa were hypocrite and infidel women.” (Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol. No. 2, Page No. 900) The famous Ayatollah, Mullah Baqir Majlisi, states: “She [Aisha] was a traitor.” (Mullah Baqir Majlisi, Tadhkiratul Aimmah, p. 66) -3-They say that the Holy Quran has been distorted, and that things have been added and taken away. They have books concerning that which are known to their scholars and many of their common folk, and they even say that believing that the Quran has been distorted is an essential tenet of their beliefs. -4-They regard most of the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them) as kaafirs, and disavow them, and they seek to draw closer to Allaah by cursing and reviling them. They claim that they apostatized after the death of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) except very few (only seven). This is a rejection of the Qur’aan which affirms their virtue, and says that Allaah was pleased with them and chose them to accompany His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). It also implies a slur against the Qur’aan itself, because it was transmitted via them; if they were kuffaar then there is no guarantee that they did not distort it or change it. This is what the Raafidis believe anyway, as stated above. -5-They attribute badaa’ to Allaah, i.e., forming a new opinion that was not held before. This implies attribution of ignorance to Allaah, may He be exalted. -6-They believe in taqiyah (dissimulation) which means showing outwardly something other than what one feels inside. In fact this is lying and hypocrisy and skill in deceiving people. This is not something that they do at times of fear; rather they regard use of taqiyah as a religious duty for minor and major matters, at times of fear and times of safety. Whatever of truth was narrated from one of their imams, such as praise for the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), or agreeing with Ahl al-Sunnah, even in matters of purification or food and drink, is rejected by the Shi’ah who say that the Imam only said that by way of taqiyah. -7-Belief in raja’ah, which is the belief that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and the members of his household (ahl al-bayt), ‘Ali, al-Hasan, al- Husayn and the other imams will return. At the same time, Abu Bakr, ‘Umar, ‘Uthmaan, Mu’aawiyah, Yazeed, Ibn Dhi’l- Jooshan and everyone who harmed Ahl al-bayt – according to their claims – will also return. All of these people will return – according to their beliefs – to this world once more before the Day of Resurrection, when the Mahdi reappears, as the enemy of Allaah Ibn Saba’ told them; they will return in order to be punished because they harmed Ahl al-Bayt and transgressed against them and denied them their rights, so they will be severely punished, then they will all die, then they will be resurrected on the Day of Resurrection for the final recompense. This is what they believe. -8-Muatah. “Mutah” translates literally to “pleasure” in Arabic. In the Shia context, Mutah refers to a “temporary marriage.” A man pays a woman a sum of money (i.e. a so-called “dowry”) and he can have sexual relations with her for however long they agree for in the Mutah contract. The Mutah time period can be as little as one night, or even one hour–enough time for the man to do the sexual act. For all intents and purposes, Mutah is prostitution: a man pays a sum of money in order to have sexual relations with a woman. Al-Kafi is one of the four Shia books of Hadith; of the four, it is considered the most authoratative and authentic. We read one such Sahih Hadith, in which the Imam says:“One who engages in Mutah once in his lifetime reaches the status of Imam Al-Hussain. One who engages in it twice becomes equal in status to Imam Al-Hasan. The one who performs it three times reaches the position of Imam Ali. And he who practices it four times acquires the level and position of the Prophet Muhammad.” (Furoo al-Kafi) The Iranian government recently passed legislation which created legal LovePeddler- houses, brothels which would be officially liscensed under law as “Chastity Houses.” Such a name is of course the epitome of Orwellian terminology, and the irony of the name should not be lost to anyone. -9-Matam. Self flagellation. As for the Ahlus Sunnah, they are saddened by the wrongful death of Hussain (radhi Allahu anhu). He is one of the many great heroes of Islam that died in the Name of Allah. However, the Ahlus Sunnah does not engage in self- flagellation or self-mutilation, which are both considered strictly Haram (forbidden). The Prophet (peace be upon him) forbade barbaric practises like such, and he said: “No harm may be inflicted on oneself.” Do the Shia really think that Hussain (radhi Allahu anhu) would appreciate people engaging in self- flagellation and self-mutilation? If Hussain (radhi Allahu anhu) were alive today, he would think that these people have lost their minds.why do the Barbaric Shia assume that Hussain (radhi Allahu anhu) would want his death to be remembered in such a barbaric way? -End Quote- He states : Khomeini has a book in which he mentions the excellence of the Imaams of the family of the Prophet (sal- Allaahu `alayhe wa sallam) over and above the Prophets and the Messengers (`alayhim as- salaam); Khomeini, in his book Al- Hukoomatul-lslamiyyah (the Islamic government), claims that the Twelve Imams are infallible, and he raises them to a level above the heavenly angels and the commissioned Prophets of Allah; he stresses: “Certainly, the Imam commands a noble station and lofty position; a creative vicegerency to whose rule and power submit the very atoms of all creation. And an essential tenet of our Shi’ite sect is that the Imams have a position which is reached neither by the angels [in the highest heaven] nor by any commissioned messenger of God. ” (Khomeini, Al-Hukoomat ul-lslamiyyah, pp. 52-53) We wonder how the Shia could claim that the very atoms of all creation submit to the Imams. Surely, we should only submit to Allah and Allah alone. Khomeini further stated: “The teachings and directives of the Imams are just like those of the Quran; it is compulsory on one to follow them and carry them out.” (Khomeini, Al- Hukoomat ul- lslamiyyah, pp. 52-53) (So) based upon this (statement of his) he is not a Muslim. -End Quote- "Whoever doubts whether the Shia are disbelievers has himself committed disbelief." "I have not seen among the heretics a people more famous for falsehood than the Raafidi,Shia. Narrate knowledge from everyone you meet except for the Raafidi, 'Shia', because they invent ahaadeeth and adopt them as part of their religion" when asked about the Raafidi Shia, Imam Malik said; "Do not speak to them or narrate from them, for surely they are liars." "Religion is gained from Ahl al-Hadeeth, scholastic theology, and crafty exemptions from religious ordinances from Ahl-ar- ray and lies from the Raafidite Shi'ites". "If you see someone degrade any of the companions of the Prophet SAWS know that he is a disbeliever". One can find more details about in the following books, which explain how false they are: al-Khutoot al-‘Areedah by Muhib al-Deen al-
Khateeb (available in
English, translated by Abu
Bilal Mustafa al-Kanadi) Usool Madhhab al-Shi’ah al-Imamiyyah by Dr. Naasir
al-Qafaari Firaq Mu’aasirah tantasib ila al-Islam by Dr. Ghaalib
ibn ‘Ali ‘Awaaji
(1/127-269) Al-Mawsoo’ah al- Muyassarah fi’l-Adyaan
wa’l-Madhaahib wa’l-
Ahzaab al-Mu’aasirah
(1/51-57). From the above it is clear that this shiasm is not
Islam and that it goes
against the beliefs of Ahl
al-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa’ah,
and that its beliefs will not
be acceptable from anyone, either from their scholars
or their common folk and
Allaah will not forgive
whoever attribute
partners to him. As for the imams to whom they claim to
belong, they are innocent
of this lie and falsehood . 1. Ali ibn Abi Taalib (may Allaah be pleased with
him) who was martyred in
40 AH. 2. Al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased with
him) (3-50 AH) 3. Al-Husayn ibn ‘Ali (may Allaah be pleased
with him) (4-61 AH) 4. Ali Zayn al-‘Aabideen ibn al-Husayn (38-95 AH),
whom they call al-Sajjaad 5. Muhammad ibn ‘Ali Zayn al-‘Aabideen (57-114
AH) whom they call al-
Baaqir 6. Ja’far ibn Muhammad al-Baaqir (83-148 AH)
whom they call al-Saadiq 7. Moosa ibn Ja’far al- Saadiq (128-148 AH) whom
they call al-Kaadim 8. Ali ibn Moosa al-Kaadim (148-203 AH) whom they
call al-Rida (Reza) 9. Muhammad al-Jawaad ibn ‘Ali al-Rida’ (195-220
AH) whom they call al-
Taqiy 10. Ali al-Haadi ibn Muhammad al-Jawaad
(212-254 AH) whom they
call al-Naqiy 11. al-Hasan al-‘Askari ibn ‘Ali al-Haadi (232-260)
whom they call al-Zakiy 12. Muhammad al-Mahdi ibn al-Hasan al-‘Askari,
whom they call al-Hujjah
al-Qaa’im al-Muntazar.
They claim that he entered
a tunnel in Samarra’, but
most researchers are of the view that he did not
exist at all, and that he is a
Shi’i myth. The Sunni religion is the second most popular religion of the whole of the Iranian population, i.e. 15-20 million people out of 60 million of Iranian population.Most of the Iranian Sunni Muslims live in Kurdistan Balushstan, border cities of Khorasan, Turkamen Sahara and along the edges of only regions.From the time Iran was converted into shiism during Safawi era in 906 until present time, all of the Iranian Sunni Muslim are struggling under persistent religions discrimination and unjustified pressure imposed by the dominate Shiite governments who were and are mainly of Persian origin. After the so-called "Islamic- revolution" Iranian Shiite government has taken regular steps in order either to convert the Iranian Sunni Muslims into shiism or wipe them out of Iran by different means.The followings are some clear examples of such unjustified tactics launched by Iranian government to keep the Sunni minority in consistent deprivation. 1) The Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei of Shite Iran - Supreme Leader of Iran released a statement : "We destroy the mosques of Sunni Muslims but they show no reaction, we kill their religious leader and they have been no reaction from their side, therefore we should rape their women, as Sunni Muslims are very sensitive on this issue, once they start to protest or show reaction, then we would aim to wipe them out" 2) Preventing from taking an important government position, deprivation of Iranian Sunni minority from government post is well known to most of Sunni population out of 270 member of Iranian parliament, for example there are only 15 representatives Sunni Muslims who are mainly popets of the regime. In more sensitive offices or institution one can not find even a single Sunni Muslim as minister or ambassador or even a governor in Sunni populated provinces. In contrast to what mentioned above, Iranian government consistently persist that in Afghanistan 1/4 of government sites should be allocated to representatives of Shiite religion!! While in Afghanistan the population of those practicing shiism does not exceed 10% of whole of Afghan population. 3) Arming Shia tyrants such as Bashar Al-Asad, hezbollah leader Hasan nasrallah to wipe out sunnis from their region. Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has personally sanctioned the dispatch of the experienced officers to ensure that the Assad regime, Iran's most important regional ally, survives the threat to its survival.In addition, Iran has shipped hundreds of tons of military equipment, including guns, rockets, and shells, to Syria through the regular air corridor that has been established between Damascus and Tehran. 4) Attracting sunnis around the world to spread their shia ideology and portray themselves as heroes among muslims. today many of our youngesters are greatly attracted by the Persian regime without knowing their Hidden aims. What is more by achieving these aims, the government in one hand would gain control over the Sunni dominated areas and on the other hand it would be able to cut off all links which the people have had over centuries with their brother Sunni Muslims in the region.In so doing the Iranian regime have encouraged a large group of Shiite people to settle down in Sunni dominated regions of Khorasan, Hormozgan, Balushistan, Kurdistan and some gulf regions like Bahrain. It is evident by increasing the Shiite population deliberating in these regions and keeping the Sunni Muslims in minority, the Sunnis will not be able to bring enough vote to send their representative in Parliament of the regime.Hence, the Sunni Muslims would have no voice in present Iranian policy. 5) keeping Iranian Sunni Muslims in minority by means of imposing a harsh and strict birth control. In Sunni Muslims in Iran are mainly living in rural areas where the growth rate of population is about 13% compared to 3% in urban areas of Iran. Obviously imposing a strict birth control over the people in the region would have grave consequences as far as the social structure in the area is concerned .Recently the government organs have launched a series of campaign in order to wipe out the Sunni Muslims from the region inducing sterilization of men and women. 6) Monopolization of military forces by Shiites despite suppression of Sunni Muslims by different means including imprisonment, torture and execution of Sunni Muslim youth, the present regime is still ruling under persistent fear from people of the area. This has resulted in the fact that the whole military forces become a monopoly of dominated Shiite, ignoring the fact that Sunnis in the areas are also Iranians. 7) One of the most disgraceful campaign of the regime in Sunni populated areas is the introduction of temporary marriage "Mutah" which was once even recommended by fourth president of Iran Ali Akbar Hashemi Raftsenjani. The temporary marriage or Mutah is obviously against the values and tradition of Sunni Muslims. Clearly the main aim of the regime in introducing such evil programs is to attract Sunni youths by different means in order to convert them into shiism. Other important tactic of the regime in the region is persecution and imprisonment of influential figures under vague accusation. Many mosques in Sunni dominated parts of Iran were destroyed one after another. Indeed the so- called "Islamic regime of Iran is the only government in the world which pride itself as demolishes of mosques in its own country". Interestingly in capital city of Teheran where there are tens of churches, many Hindu temples, and places of worship for people of other faiths, there is no a single mosque for Sunni Muslims. It is evident why Shiite regime of Iran is so afraid of Sunni Muslims because they well know their weak points, which is if the reality become evident nobody would follow the system of cult and religious revisionism. It is worth mentioning again that Khamenaie, the spiritual leader of Shiite regime have repeatedly stated that" we destroy the mosques of Sunni Muslims but they show no reaction, we kill their religious leader and they have been no reaction from their side, therefore we should rape their women, as Sunni Muslims are very sensitive on this issue, once they start to protest or show reaction, then we would aim to wipe them out. It should be noted that one junior Shiite clergyman have personally confessed to have raped 60 Sunni Muslims women, who were then arrested by the Sunni anti- regime troops under the leadership of "Hameed Narooei" (who was poisoned by the regime agents) and executed) Here we see how the Shias and their Shiite persian regime have gone away from Islam. Indeed, this is why we find no proof for the Shia faith from the Quran, but rather we only find it in the sayings of the Imams. Be sociable! Share!

Very beneficial and enlightening article bro, Baarakallaahu feek.

Pls try to modify the post and improve the typesetting so that the benefits would be easier to assimilate.

The content of this post is similar to what Imam Abu Monsur documented about the shia sect in his book al-farqu baynal firaq. So whoever wishes for more benefits should revise the book.

http://waqfeya.com/book.php?bid=363

Newnas:
Very beneficial and enlightening article bro, Baarakallaahu feek.

Pls try to modify the post and improve the typesetting so that the benefits would be easier to assimilate.

The content of this post is similar to what Imam Abu Monsur documented about the shia sect in his book al-farqu baynal firaq. So whoever wishes for more benefits should revise the book.

http://waqfeya.com/book.php?bid=363

baarakallahu fiik, i,ll try to modify it later i updated it with a phone.

@OP. Thanks for the enlightenment. Jazakumullah khaeran.

muhamadnur:
-8-Muatah. “Mutah” translates literally to “pleasure” in Arabic. In the Shia context, Mutah refers to a “temporary marriage.” A man pays a woman a sum of money (i.e. a so-called “dowry”) and he can have sexual relations with her for however long they agree for in the Mutah contract. The Mutah time period can be as little as one night, or even one hour–enough time for the man to do the sexual act. For all intents and purposes, Mutah is prostitution: a man pays a sum of money in order to have sexual relations with a woman. Al-Kafi is one of the four Shia books of Hadith; of the four, it is considered the most authoratative and authentic. We read one such Sahih Hadith, in which the Imam says:“One who engages in Mutah once in his lifetime reaches the status of Imam Al-Hussain. One who engages in it twice becomes equal in status to Imam Al-Hasan. The one who performs it three times reaches the position of Imam Ali. And he who practices it four times acquires the level and position of the Prophet Muhammad.” (Furoo al-Kafi) The Iranian government recently passed legislation which created legal LovePeddler- houses, brothels which would be officially liscensed under law as “Chastity Houses.” Such a name is of course the epitome of Orwellian terminology, and the irony of the name should not be lost to anyone.

Hmmm!

MrOlai:


Hmmm!

Shia sheikhs are bloody P. I. M. Ps!!!

Surah Al-Isra, Verse 32:
وَلَا تَقْرَبُوا الزِّنَا إِنَّهُ كَانَ فَاحِشَةً وَسَاءَ سَبِيلًا

And come not near to the unlawful sexual intercourse. Verily, it is a Fahishah [i.e. anything that transgresses its limits (a great sin)], and an evil way (that leads one to Hell unless Allah forgives him).
(English - Mohsin Khan)

via iQuran