Putin Warns Turkey: Leave Syria The Hell Alone

Brave Vladimir Putin told a delegation from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church that if Turkey does not stop funding and supporting ISIS in Syria, he will ‘bring Christianity back to Istanbul.’

‘Should Turkey not stop supporting ISIS, I will end the job that Tsar Nicholas II started.’

It is understood that Putin was referring to Tsar Nicholas II’s attempt during World War I to restore Constantinople (Istanbul) to the Christian world and protect Russian maritime security by liberating the Dardanelles and Bosphorus straits.
Putin also reiterated to the delegation that nothing could shake the blood alliance between Russia and Ukraine, despite the efforts of the UN and western media.

“Rising neo-fascism in Ukraine is like gangrene spreading across the European continent, and we, the people of the Russian Federation, are determined to stop this disease.”

‘ISIS was made in the USA, and I will destroy them’

Putin, a judo enthusiast who can bench 240, has been hitting the New World Order where it hurts, outgunning, outflanking and all-round out-manoeuvring the globalist cabal. He’s got them running scared, which is why they have gone into propaganda overdrive, pumping the mainstream media full of scare tactics, hyperbole, rumour mongering and downright lies in an attempt to distract the masses from what is really happening all around them.

The truth of the matter is that Putin is the only world leader defending Western culture and values in the face of violent and sustained attack.
Western governments are intent on implementing the New World Order agenda that relies on the destruction of traditional culture and values.
The New World Order ruling class have a tight grip over the mainstream media, as well as our food, water, and air supply, and they are actively dumbing down the masses. It is in their interests to destroy Western culture and values so they can usher us into the next phase of the New World Order master plan.

http://investmentwatchblog.com/putin-warns-turkey-leave-syria-the-hell-alone/

Meanwhile there are reports of Russia launching ballistic missilles against Al Nusra Front in Aleppo, but the real shocking report is that Russia has deploy Iskander Ballistic Missile Complex in Syria. This was first reported in March 27th.

I wonder how Putin is going to go about it. Christianity is a none violent religion, so how is he going to force Christianity into turkey through a none violence religion. It will be very difficult for Russia Alone to eliminate ISIS in syria since ISIS ve got tactical support from US, turkey and others

kinibigdeal:
I wonder how Putin is going to go about it. Christianity is a none violent religion, so how is he going to force Christianity into turkey through a none violence religion. It will be very difficult for Russia Alone to eliminate ISIS in syria since ISIS ve got tactical support from US, turkey and others

Lol. When he talked about bringing Christianity back into Turkey, that was purely out of sarcasm embedded in hyperbolism-an exaggeration on emphasis. When codedly reinterpreted, what he actually meant was that, Russia would make life more difficult for Turkey as much as Syria is concerned.

On the side of tackling ISIS, that is nothing to worry about, as already, much gain is been made by the Syrian government and Russia to overthrow the takfiris sons of Lucifer, and there is little the US and the likes of Turkey can do to help them right now. The Russia air campaign together with Hezbollah and Iranian special Ops, plus with the Desert Hawk forces on the ground, have ensured that all Turkish, Saudi aids/support and all western Weapon air-drops for IS, are so far ineffective and a waste of money, as they are being destroyed from time to time.

Raqqa is the last major stronghold of ISIS in Syria, and the SAA back by the Russian Airforce are already moving in to retake the city. When you see a body like IS resulting to suicide attacks as in Fallujah-Baghdad, and Aleppo-Damascus, then know that the game is getting over for them. This is more evident in the fact that they are no longer controlling much of the territories they previously captured before the Russian engagement.

The tables have turned, and its now in ''game over'' mode. Bye bye takfiris, freedom to Syria and peace to Europe.

Appleyard:
Lol. When he talked about bring Christianity back into Turkey, that was purely out of sarcasm embedded in hyperbolism-an exaggeration on emphasis. When coded reinterpreted, what he actually meant was that, Russia would make life more difficult for Turkey as much as Syria is concerned.

On the side of tackling ISIS, that is nothing to worry about, as already, much gain is been made by the Syrian government and Russia to overthrow the takfiris sons of Lucifer, and there is little the US and the likes of Turkey can do to help them right now. The Russia air campaign together with Hezbollah and Iranian special ops, plus with the Desert Hawk forces on the ground, have ensured that all Turkish, Saudi aids/supports and all western Weapon air-drops for IS, are so far ineffective and a waste of money, as they are being destroyed from time to time.

Raqqa is the last major stronghold of ISIS in Syria, and the SAA back by the Russian Airforce are already moving in to retake the city. When you see a body like IS resulting to suicide attacks as in Fallujah-Baghdad, and Aleppo-Damascus, then know that the game is getting over for them. This is more evident in the fact that they are no longer controlling much of the territories they previously captured before the Russian engagement.

The tables have turned, and its now in ''game over'' mode. Bye bye takfiris, freedom to Syria and peace to Europe.

Maybe its a sarcasm though. But the confusion here is, if US is giving ISIS a tactical support, who are they bombing in Syria? is it the government forces or same ISIS they are financing. Who US is actually combating in Syria is not clear.

kinibigdeal:


Maybe its a sarcasm though. But the confusion here is, if US is giving ISIS a tactical support, who are they bombing in Syria? is it the government forces or same ISIS they are financing. Who US is actually combating in Syria is not clear.

The US is bombing two sets of people in Syria; the Syrian Arab Army and civilians. They do not bomb ISIS at all. What they do is show people videos and pictures of terrorists bombed by Russians and claim it is the American Airforce that did the job. There are lots of videos leaked on the internet that shows American soldiers fighting alongside ISIS against Syrian Arab Army.

NaijaTalkTown:
The US is bombing two sets of people in Syria; the Syrian Arab Army and civilians. They do not bomb ISIS at all. What they do is show people videos and pictures of terrorists bombed by Russians and claim it is the American Airforce that did the job. There are lots of videos leaked on the internet that shows American soldiers fighting alongside ISIS against Syrian Arab Army.

But that same US is claiming Russia is bombing civilian rather than ISIS. They even supported their claim with a terrified picture

kinibigdeal:


Maybe its a sarcasm though. But the confusion here is, if US is giving ISIS a tactical support, who are they bombing in Syria? is it the government forces or same ISIS they are financing. Who US is actually combating in Syria is not clear.

It is very clear, brother. For the US, the Islamic State is a means to an end, and an end to a means. The formation of IS was meant as an excuse to consolidate on the ruse ''war on terror,'' but the primary objective within was ''divide and conquer'' of blacklisted entities. This was very apparent in the revelations by formal US General, John Wesley Clark, on the US plan to take out 7 governments among which are Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, etc; and the Islamic State was a part of that means to ensure the take out.

However, there is a problem that have arisen with the ranks of the IS. There are now groups who have become defiant to the central authority and has formed their own independent cliches, running their own activities and making decisions independently, outside the IS central authority, and hence, beyond the reach and control of the US and its western partners in crime. This is the reason you see the US who previously ''ran out of ammos'' to bomb IS oil tankers, suddenly finding some bombs to strike at Certain IS groups and taken out their leaders. Why? These are groups that have gone completely out of US control and pursueing their own objectives to the detriment of the overall US plan.

Therefore, whatever they are doing now against IS made a lot of sense. The IS they created and have refused to bomb ever since, is not the IS they are witnessing today. Uncle Sam is fast losing control, and the only way now is to go the Russian way.

Also bear in mind that the US have plans to break up Syria, using the so-called moderate rebels, But with an increasingly independent IS on ground, and with regime forces to deal with, on the other hand, that dream is becoming more unlikely. Thus, it makes sense in taken out or immobilizing one foe right now, and deal with the other later on. Its a very good strategy.

You will understand better the crux of the matter when both the US backed rebels approaching from Majib, and Russia backed Syrian army approaching from the south, would meet in Raqqa against IS for the final showdown.

It would be hell on earth.

Appleyard:


It is very clear, brother. For the US, the Islamic State is a means to an end, and an end to a means. The formation of IS was meant as an excuse to consolidate on the ruse ''war on terror,'' but the primary objective within was ''divide and conquer'' of blacklisted entities. This was very apparent in the revelations by formal US General, John Wesley Clark, on the US plan to take out 7 governments among which are Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, etc; and the Islamic State was a part of that means to ensure the take out.

However, there is a problem that have arisen with the ranks of the IS. There are now groups who have become defiant to the central authority and has formed their own independent cliches, running their own activities and making decisions independently, outside the IS central authority, and hence, beyond the reach and control of the US and its western partners in crime. This is the reason you see the US who previously ''ran out of ammos'' to bomb IS oil tankers, suddenly finding some bombs to strike at Certain IS groups and taken out their leaders. Why? These are groups that have gone completely out of US control and pursueing their own objectives to the detriment of the overall US plan.

Therefore, whatever they are doing now against IS made a lot of sense. The IS they created and have refused to bomb ever since, is not the IS they are witnessing today. Uncle Sam is fast losing control, and the only way now is to go the Russian way.

Also bear in mind that the US have plans to break up Syria, using the so-called moderate rebels, But with an increasingly independent IS on ground, and with regime forces to deal with, on the other hand, that dream is becoming more unlikely. Thus, it makes sense in taken out or immobilizing one foe right now, and deal with the other later on. Its a very good strategy.

You will understand better the crux of the matter when both the US backed rebels approaching from Majib, and Russia backed Syrian army approaching from the south, would meet in Raqqa against IS for the final showdown.

It would be hell on earth.

Let's agree with all you have said. What about a group called "Al-Nuara". Al-Nusra is said to be an affiliate of Alqueeda. Earlier this year we were told of the new affiliation between ISIS and Al-Nustra. Al-Nustra has two agenda, to force the syria forces backward and unleash terror on Americans. Who are this group actually, can we say its an affiliation of ISIS also backed by US? i still dont know why bahrain, jordan, qatar, saudi arabia, UAE and turkey are backing the ISIS?

kinibigdeal:


Let's agree with all you have said. What about a group called "Al-Nuara". Al-Nusra is said to be an affiliate of Alqueeda. Earlier this year we were told of the new affiliation between ISIS and Al-Nustra. Al-Nustra has two agenda, to force the syria forces backward and unleash terror on Americans. Who are this group actually, can we say its an affiliation of ISIS also backed by US? i still dont know why bahrain, jordan, qatar, saudi arabia, UAE and turkey are backing the ISIS?

Yes! Al Nusra is an Al Qaeda affiliate in Syria. It has and habors the same ideology like ISIS - to recreate and reestablished an islamic caliphate - but Al Nusra is more distinctively patient and methodological in character. While ISIS has declared its de facto islamic state/caliphate and tries to legitimate it by conquest, Al Nusra, on the other hand, has taken after Al Qaeda leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri's method of formenting a religious and social revolution by embedding itself within an indegeneous insurgency, and the Syrian brouhaha with so many of such groups, provided it the perfect environment to achieve this strategy and hence, its overall aims. And due to its subtlety and insidious nature, its therefore very threatening and more difficult to defeat than IS. It is no secret that the US is known to support many or both sides of a conflict, provided that its immediate or long term goals are or would be realized. That is exactly what is happening in Syria: funding both YPG and Al Nusra alike for the main objective -taking out Assad, even though this two groups are enemies on the field any day, any time.

As for the nations you mentioned, the aim of them backing ISIS in Syria, is twofold. To take out Assad and pave the way for their dream Mideast -Europe oil pipeline, which must pass through Syrian territory to come into fruition, since Iran, the alternate option, is already out of the question.
The other reason is the issue of Sunni vs Shia power and dominion tussle in the very heart of the MidEast. The likes of Turkey and Satan Arabia has invested so much to see a sunni dominated power house and influence, but unfortunately for them, the entrance of the Bear into the ''Damascus Dragon'' has completely thwarted and make desolate all their efforts.

But make no mistake about it: the last has not been heard from Syria. We can only hope for the best while expecting the worst. God help the MidEast.

Stay well.

Appleyard:


Yes! Al Nusra is an Al Qaeda affiliate in Syria. It has and habors the same ideology like ISIS - to recreate and reestablished an islamic caliphate - but Al Nusra is more distinctively patient and methodological in character. While ISIS has declared its de facto islamic state/caliphate and tries to legitimate it by conquest, Al Nusra, on the other hand, has taken after Al Qaeda leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri's method of formenting a religious and social revolution by embedding itself within an indegeneous insurgency, and the Syrian brouhaha with so many of such groups, provided it the perfect environment to achieve this strategy and hence, its overall aims. And due to its subtlety and insidious nature, its therefore very threatening and more difficult to defeat than IS. It is no secret that the US is known to support many or both sides of a conflict, provided that its immediate or long term goals are or would be realized. That is exactly what is happening in Syria: funding both YPG and Al Nusra alike for the main objective -taking out Assad, even though this two groups are enemies on the field any day, any time.

As for the nations you mentioned, the aim of them backing ISIS in Syria, is twofold. To take out Assad and pave the way for their dream Mideast -Europe oil pipeline, which must pass through Syrian territory to come into fruition, since Iran, the alternate option, is already out of the question.
The other reason is the issue of Sunni vs Shia power and dominion tussle in the very heart of the MidEast. The likes of Turkey and Satan Arabia has invested so much to see a sunni dominated power house and influence, but unfortunately for them, the entrance of the Bear into the ''Damascus Dragon'' has completely thwarted and make desolate all their efforts.

But make no mistake about it: the last has not been heard from Syria. We can only hope for the best while expecting the worst. God help the MidEast.

Stay well.

Hmmm....Very convincing explanation's. But you know what my confusions are on this issue, if US are backing ISIS, why are they beheading American citizens and planting explosive device in US? You earlier talked about the disintegration of ISIS into two group, one backed by US and the other independent. How long can a group sustain such independence without any western intelligence backing? ISIS may be supported by US but the killing of their citizen is another debate. You and I are aware of the recent massacre.

kinibigdeal:



Hmmm....Very convincing explanation's. But you know what my confusions are on this issue, if US are backing ISIS, why are they beheading American citizens and planting explosive device in US? You earlier talked about the disintegration of ISIS into two group, one backed by US and the other independent. How long can a group sustain such independence without any western intelligence backing? ISIS may be supported by US but the killing of their citizen is another debate. You and I are aware of the recent massacre.

I get your point. The killings Its all part of the show - the ruse war on terror - call it collateral damage. Americans like every other westerners had to be killed in order to instil the necessary fear and reality of terror, and also to give credibility to the notion of terror, and to woo the people's will and support as the legitimate ticket to perpetually continue in this endless act of war on terror, while using the opportunity to squeeze constitutional liberty, inter alia, by way of emergency legislation sequel to Martial law.

So, whenever you see or hear of such terror attacks, especially in America and in some places in the West, know that it might have happened with either by an express connivance of the government thereof (for the essence of what is called "false flag" operations,) or by an act of negligent conduct on their part.
This doesn't mean there are no authentic terror attacks, of course, there are; but its no secret that the government is also complicit in such acts either by covert malicious oversight or gross negligent intent. Take for instance the Boston Bombing before which, the US authorities were furnished with information by the Russian authorities regarding the extremist vhews and radical ideology of the two terrorists brothers, long before they carried out the devilish crime. But the American authorities simply refused to follow up on them. Either this was done intentionally or by the extreme case of pure negligence, as there was no other viable excuse that would have suggested otherwise. At the end, it gave the authorities more impetus to get more and more on the dèfence budget, to go out and attack and bomb one place to another in the name of terror which they created. We all know about the false flag of 9/11 and how they created the terror excuse to destroy Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. What about Libya? The ultimate winners at the end of the day, is the elite that owns and control the MIC, the oil multinationals and the banksters.

It will interest you to know that cracks are now appearing in the recent Florida Orlando gay-club killings. I watched in awe when an eye witness from the bar was telling ABC news live that ''there was a 2nd gunman by the door...,''
and as the eyewithness was explaining further, ABC news quickly cut off the conversation and switched to a different feed entirely that was not related to the case on ground. The question is: what were they trying to hide? :-O Now, there is the news of one of the SWAT team cops ''laughing in the background.'' Are you in a comic show or what? :-O

But when folks like us point out such anomalies like the ones above and similar cases like ''Sector 7'' going down on a free fall in 9/11, (which every building engineer has ruled impossible,) the Paris attack in Which one of the Criminals ''miraclelously'' left his ID Card behind, (even an armed robber will not go to a place of crime with his ID card on him, talkless of a professional murderer) in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks, etc, some people who knows next to nothing or simply cannot deduce facts from fiction, will tag you a conspiracy theorist, which in itself is a term coined to derail the truth movement and discredit the credibility of the critical thinker.

My brother, as far as terrorism is concerned mostly in the US led West, the government is 75% complicit.

Stay bless.