1bkaye:
More. I really want to believe she's been hacked lol

peppyluv02:
Her account wasn't hacked. She tweeted it afterall she is human so the outburst of emotion is allowed.
Besides she just exposed herself...She revealed she was a child bride at 13. She was his late daughter's friend.

doublewisdom:
Aisha is a tout and a thief! Cheap wh.ore in Aso Rock!

Pheals:
This ..... Doesn't know they are grown up

I don't believe she owns the Twitter a/c

OK Ikwokrikwo thanks I can c it's verify !
Have checked it..






Aisha buhari will force PMB to take illegal actions against fayose


WOMEN-!!

Ivyy, Darlings please I need your support in this thread.

Hey dear, please come cast a vote for me in this thread
https://www.nairaland.com/3180901/miss-nairaland-contest-2016-semi-final#46802924

voting format: I VOTE IVYY cc: Nljega

Just copy the bolded in red and paste it into the thread.

Voting ends @6pm

iamDiabolic:
when hell roofayi nd other apc physchopats were insultin gej nd pej,where yo as at

dollytino4real:
I like fayose sha, bt talking to mama of nigeria like dat is not a good idea.

Gbawe:



you continue to show the arrogance of Nigerians I have talked about here many times. Many can see I begged the interpretation of Lawyers and humbly submitted I am not one and would therefore welcome their input. You, despite been asked directly if a lawyer, continue to cling to some 'i am right' high ground with vague reference to the constitution when everyone knows there are grey areas that mean immunity does not confer on a person the right to go around acting lawlessly. I hinted at this when , using common sense, I suggested in an earlier post that Fayose should be immune from malicious prosecution that distracts him from doing his very important job. I also added that this does not mean he escapes sanction for his own deliberate actions aimed at impugning the name or reputation of others.

You never told us if you are a lawyer or not and i can now see why. You simply want us to accept your layman interpretation as correct when you actually don't have any professional knowledge to confirm you are 100% correct. Nigerians do this a lot. I know my people and this is why I investigated further to indeed note that i have a point. I was going on instincts related to equity and fair play initially while you just want to hide behind an "immunity is complete and final" argument to support your opinion. See below to indeed note I have a valid point. Every sensible person know you cannot have access to greater specialist legal knowledge than a Presidency, which includes a distinguished and accomplished lawyer as VP, that warned that there will be "legal consequences" against Fayose's actions. Read what is written below and take it in although I suspect you will still continue to claim you know authoritatively that Fayose is above the law as is customary with many Nigerians who are always ready to argue emotionally while never humbly submitting themselves to the opinions of those who have authority to speak decisively on the matter at hand. This is why I asked if you are a lawyer in the first place, since I had asked for the input of legal experts only, and you failed to tell us this.

Nairalanders, please judge the article below yourselves from legal affairs media Nigeria while our Nairaland Femi Falana, i.e lastpage, continues to insist otherwise. We are watching since it seems lastpage and some other Nairalanders, who are all not legal experts, know more than the Presidency which insists there will be legal consequences for Fayose's action. I think it is clear , from below, that the constitution does not give Fayose carte blanche to be "verbally reckless" as this cannot be allowed to be a "defence for defamation". We will see she.

http://allafrica.com/stories/200901230475.html

Nigeria: Immunity, Defamation And Press Freedom

Legal AffairsMediaNigeriaWest Africa

By Buchi Okoli
Immunity cannot shield any governor from verbal recklessness and cannot be a defence to defamation.

The 1999 constitution contains a clause that has become flagrantly abused and disrespected by the persons to whom it refers. The section aims at protecting the persons sought to be protected. This however does not in the least permit or encourage executive lawlessness on the part of the person with immunity. The person with immunity must have a duty not to deliberately flaunt the constitution and make nonsense of the immunity clause. Their criminal accusation of any citizen must be based on facts and not hearsay. A fact anyway must not necessarily be the truth. Immunity must be earned and not acquired by anybody. It applies to the office and not the person occupying the office. However in the new improved constitution yet to evolve, the excesses of this clause must be clogged. My only regret in this is that the National Assembly seem very lackadaisical about this constitutional review, which is a major function of their existence as per the 1999 constitution.

iamdstar:
ppl should read this article on this case and give their opinion. personally I want to believe Fayose on this.

http://www.post-nigeria.com/us-court-documents-reveal-aisha-buharis-involvement-in-the-atiku-jefferson-scandal/

As indicated by the New York Times story, “she (Aisha Buhari) told him that her father was the former military ruler of Nigeria, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, and that her American friends included politicians like Mr. Jefferson of Louisiana.”

The former Governor, also verified the claim by the New York Times when he said, he knows Ms. Buhari’s daughter, who is still a powerful Nigerian politician, by reputation. He also met her, he said, in 2001 when she accompanied a group of American politicians that included Mr. Jefferson to Akwa Ibom, to see oil-related pollution problems there.

“All I needed to do was ask Aisha if she knew him,” Mr. Attah recalls.

lastpage:


I read the article and some paragrapgh, which l quote below, is worth "examining" for CLUES!



From the above, it is clear that much of the evidence linking Buhari name to the crime, is provided by the former Akwa Ibom Governor.
He is what we call a Principal Witness.

Now, only scrutinising his deposition, one would notice that:

*He knows the accused very well, in person
*He has repeatedly referred to the accused person as DAUGHTER of Buhari
*He has repeatedly alluded to the relationship between the accused and our current President as that of FATHER and DAUGHTER.

[b] It is my own conviction that, based on the provided witness depositions (FACTS, which evidence the Court has found reliable and relied upon), the relationship between the current President and the accused lady "Aisha" Buhari, is that of "Father and Daughter".

The lady that Fayose is currently accusing of being the "accused person" in the scandal, has a relationship of "HUSBAND and WIFE" with President Buhari... going over 30yrs and predating the scandal (which was between 2001 AND 2005)

Based on these FACTS (as against opinions), the President's wife cannot be the accused person, who was his daughter (adopted or biological) as shown in the witness depositions.

FAYOSE missed this one, except he can provide incontrovertible proof, that both are one and the same person.
As of this moment, he has not done that.

"the LAW is about EVIDENCE".....put before the Court".[/b]

Gbawe, what is your take?



Lastpage!

iamdstar:


Thanks mate for giving your own take on this and I am glad we still have reasonable ppl who will comment on a post with logic and their own findings based on facts available. Well for me I just want this country rid of our corrupt leaders and it should be done soonest.

Meanwhile can you please tell me your take on this issue of the legislatures asking for immunity for their leaders just like the executive arm of the govt are enjoying?

LordVarys:
Despite Rotimi Amaechi's relentless attacks on Mama Peace, she never responded to him instead leaving it to her subordinates and minions to handle. The First Lady should take the high road and keep her dignity.

LordVarys:
Despite Rotimi Amaechi's relentless attacks on Mama Peace, she never responded to him instead leaving it to her subordinates and minions to handle. The First Lady should take the high road and keep her dignity.

doublewisdom:
Aisha is a tout and a thief! Cheap wh.ore in Aso Rock!

lastpage:


Sir,

I share the bolded sentiments with you, in its entirety.

Based on the principle of Separation of Powers, each arm of Government should be independent and able to discharge it duties without fear or favor from another arm of Govt.
Such fear would arise from issues of threat to "starve them of fund" (Executive => Judiciary and legislature), prosecute them (Executive => Legislature), with-hold the passing of financial legislation to run the Govt (legislature => Executive), Unfounded threat of impeachment (legislature => Executive) e.t.c

Immunity is a PROTECTION from Prosecution, while occupying a designated office.
But as has been identified above, such Immunity has to be assumed with a sound character, responsible personality and not abused to commit and act with impunity! fayose is a good example of the latter parts!

On the Legislature, we should ask ourselves: Why do they need Immunity? What level of "protection" do they currently have? and finally? What is their antecedents, that makes them a candidate for such immunity?

On a general note, everyone who occupies a Public office cannot enjoy immunity from prosecution because it is a very powerful constitutional protection!

1.) the legislature already enjoys "financial immunity" such that whether salary are not paid or Nigeria earns only ten Naira in a financial year, their own ALLOCATION from the Nation's purse is guaranteed! Yes, they would get their MONEY if me and you cannot be paid for work done to the public service, whether Hospitals cant buy Oxygen to attend to surgery patients, whether teachers cant get salary, e.t.c

This is explained a few months back when the Senate President, Bukola Saraki bought close to 50 Vehicles (cant remember the exact number now) at #36Million Naira each, as GIFT for his fellow Senators who followed him to the CCT tribunal ..... in a country that was so broke that majority of States were going abroad to borrow money to pay backlog of salaries to public servants!
He claimed that money was the money left from the previous years Budget..... but one might ask if unspent Budget are not supposed to be returned to the nations treasury and used judiciously?

The Executive Arm of Govt could have seized the money but then, the NASS money is under IMMUNITY!

Again, we know that a lot of our former Governors simply "transformed to Senators" by brazen rigging and using state funds to buy elections!

Question is why would someone who has governed a State for 8years, seek to become a Senator (Not even a Minister?)
The answer lies in the "partial protection" they enjoy (a sort of mini-immunity) as Senators!
Our own Senators want to use the Senate to "protect their criminality"..... as opposed to use it to make laws that better the citizens and protect the weak!
Thieves and treasury looters clamour to become Senators just so they can be shielded from their past crimes!
If the Govt agency tries to prosecute a former Governor (now Senator) who has looted his state's treasury (like most ex-Governors).. he will simply brandish the "they want to muzzle Legislative Arm of Govt Card"... so his mates can rally around him!
You know their is "protection/honor between thieves"!

Many Governors who are now Senators have killed people or organised assassinations of their political opponent! Remember Bola Ige was the nations Attorney General when he was murdered in his bedroom?

Now, imagine if such people are given constitutional immunity from ALL PROSECUTIONS, like the Governors! It would be MAYHEM on earth!

Finally, the 'reason detre' behind giving Federal and state Executives "immunity' was to prevent them from being subjected to frivolous, legal distractions which would prevent them from adequately discharging their responsibility to the Public (everyone will sue the President or Governor, if they can!)
It was not construed to be used as an instrument of oppression or abuse of office or to commit and cover-up crimes!... which is what it is mostly being used for, by some of those enjoying it now, despite their number being limited.

I have predicted before now that the first thing Fayose will do just before his immunity expires, is to become a Senator!
he wants to shield himself form answering for whatever crime he has been accused of!

So, if you give Senators immunity, Senators who by their antecedents have shown that they dont err on the side of the Citizens?
Senators who blatantly increase their own Salaries and Allowances when the same Govt is asking the citizens to "tighten and already tight belt"?
Senators who are known to collect Bribes and pervert the course of Justice?
Senators who collect salaries for doing virtually NOTHING, some dont even attend sessions and only do so when there is money to be shared?
Senators who cannot purge the criminals amongst themselves?

My point is you dont accrue such "absolute power" to irresponsible and very selfish people!
Everyone accused of a crime should be willing to go to the court to prove their innocence and defend their integrity. Even sue for Libel/Defamation/Character assassination.

No one should be able to say "I dont want to be charged o court", in the absolute sense..... Not even the President (though he gets "impeachment" on his neck, to checkmate him, something Senators dont get)!

I would rather Judges have immunity (and they also do to a little extent, in their own Court..... and the Judicial Council is also a disciplinary body for them..... whereas there is nothing like that to discipline Senators!)

As of now, only the Legislative arm of Govt (out of the three Arms) does not have a "check and balance" body to discipline them!
They cant even be recalled by their constituency or removed when they "jump ship" after being elected on the platform of a political party.
Its this bad already!

Do you also remember the Senator Farouk Lawan-Gate scandal? was he prosecuted or disciplined in anyway? NO!

Now, imagine adding immunity to the protection of such criminals!

Infact, if you ask me, l would suggest that the Senate be abolished "as it is" now, turned to a "part-time" body (where they are paid only a stipend as sitting allowance and can do their daily jobs elsewhere) while making laws for the country.

There is too much "money and power" attached to these political offices, that is why it has become a do-or-die affair and Criminals are attracted to it ......more than intelligent, patriotic people!


The IMMUNITY thing should even be restricted to the President alone and the V.P should only have it when they are acting in capacity as President
Forget giving it to Senators. That should NEVER happen!

The above is my opinion.

Thank you.





Lastpage!

PS: I was writng this while watching 2016 Euro Championships at the same time, so the idea might be disjointed a bit. forgive me.