"A new computer modelling study suggests a powerful wind could have divided the waters just as depicted in the Book of Exodus.

The likely location of the ''miracle'' was not the Red Sea as such, but a nearby spot in the Nile Delta region.

In the biblical account, Moses and the fleeing Israelites are trapped between the Pharaoh's advancing chariots and a body of water identified from translations as either the Red Sea or Sea of Reeds.

Thanks to divine intervention, a mighty east wind blows all night, splitting the waters to leave a passage of dry land with walls of water on both sides.

The Israelites make their escape, but when the Pharaoh's army tries to pursue them the waters come crashing back and drown the soldiers.
Related Articles

Did Moses really part the Red Sea?


Scientists in the US studying ancient maps of the Nile Delta region pinpointed where the crossing may have occurred, just south of the Mediterranean Sea.

Here, according to some experts, an ancient branch of the Nile flowed into a coastal lagoon then known as the Lake of Tanis.

Analysis of archaeological records, satellite measurements and maps allowed the researchers to estimate the water flow and depth at the site 3,000 years ago.

An ocean computer model was then used to simulate the impact of a strong overnight wind on the six-foot-deep waters. The scientists found that an east wind of 63 mph blowing for 12 hours would have driven the shallow waters back, both into the lake and the river channel.
For a period of four hours, this would have created a land bridge about two miles long and three miles wide.

The waters really would have been parted, with barriers of water raised on both sides of the newly exposed mud flats.

As soon as the winds dropped, the waters would have rushed back, much like a tidal bore. Anyone stranded on the mud flats would have been at risk of drowning, said the scientists, whose findings are reported today in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE.

Lead researcher Carl Drews, from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, said: ''The simulations match fairly closely with the account in Exodus.

''The parting of the waters can be understood through fluid dynamics. The wind moves the water in a way that's in accordance with physical laws, creating a safe passage with water on two sides and then abruptly allowing the water to rush back in.

''People have always been fascinated by this Exodus story, wondering if it comes from historical facts. What this study shows is that the description of the waters parting indeed has a basis in physical laws.''

The set of 14 computer simulations showed that dry land could also have been exposed at two other nearby sites during a wind storm from the east.

Those events did not fit so well with the Biblical account, since both involved a single body of water getting pushed to one side rather than being parted.

Several previous theories have been put forward to explain the the parting of the Red Sea.
One involved a tsunami, which can cause a body of water to retreat and then advance rapidly. But such an event would not have caused the gradual overnight divide of the waters as described in the Bible, or been so associated with winds.

Other experts have focused on a phenomenon linked to strong persistent winds known as ''wind setdown'' which can lower water levels in one area while piling up water downwind.
One study found that winds blowing from the north-west at a near-hurricane force of 74mph could in theory have exposed an underwater reef near the present-day Suez Canal, providing a walkable land passage.

Mr Drews' team found that the reef would have had to be entirely flat to allow the water to drain off it in 12 hours. A more realistic reef with lower and deeper sections would have retained water-filled channels that would have been difficult to wade through.

It was also unlikely that the refugees could have made the crossing in almost hurricane-force winds, said the Colorado researchers. "


What's your take on this? Is the parting of the red sea a myth or fact?

The Exodus is mythological. It isn't historical.

Hahahaha..Glory be to the father, His works is Metaphysical...The same way he shut the lions mouth,the same way he put AC in the furnance for Shedrack Meshach and Abedinego,the same way a virgin gave birth,the same way Elijah kept using fire to kill army of fifties.e.t.c..They should also go and investigate the River Jordan..Gods miracles always seem like a lie

oluwaseyi000:


most large water bodies av very deep ocean floor in relation to the sea bank like reed/red sea 2,211m deep(over 2km deep down) (Wikipedia) it will be like a very deep pit

even if Yahweh parted the water how did thousands of Israelis move deep down the sea floor and climb out from the height at the other end

or did he sandfill the sea floor to level with the sea bank or they simply use a ladder or rope or both

This is a nice observation.

Well, consider the picture below. That place called Nuwayba' al Muzayyinah which means "Waters of Moses Opening", is a place today, the location of which, historical corroborates that story.


The issues of Continental drift and Seafloor spreading can be studied here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafloor_spreading

Implication is that:

1. Genesis records that the Land appeared as a single mass out of the water;Genesis 1:9

2. The water then was described as the great deep when the flood came down in the time of Noah Genesis 7:11

3. Over time, the gradual process of Continental drift and Seafloor spreading began but the depth of the water bodies that separated nations/continents were not as deep as we have them today. Besides, the inflow of the great deep into these other ones would have been gradual.

4. Hence it will be anachronistic to assume that the depth of water bodies today was the same then.

oluwaseyi000:


most large water bodies av very deep ocean floor in relation to the sea bank like reed/red sea 2,211m deep(over 2km deep down) (Wikipedia) it will be like a very deep pit

even if Yahweh parted the water how did thousands of Israelis move deep down the sea floor and climb out from the height at the other end

or did he sandfill the sea floor to level with the sea bank or they simply use a ladder or rope or both

Nice observation

Scholar8200:
Well, consider the picture below. That place called Nuwayba' al Muzayyinah which means "Waters of Moses Opening", is a place today, the location of which, historical corroborates that story.


The issues of Continental drift and Seafloor spreading can be studied here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafloor_spreading

Implication is that:

1. Genesis records that the Land appeared as a single mass out of the water;Genesis 1:9

2. The water then was described as the great deep when the flood came down in the time of Noah Genesis 7:11

3. Over time, the gradual process of Continental drift and Seafloor spreading began but the depth of the water bodies that separated nations/continents were not as deep as we have them today. Besides, the inflow of the great deep into these other ones would have been gradual.

4. Hence it will be anachronistic to assume that the depth of water bodies today was the same then.

You do know there is no evidence Noah's world wide flood and the story was copied from another book two thousands years older than itself.
The flood is a lie, ad is many things in the bible

Lennycool:

You do know there is no evidence Noah's world wide flood and the story was copied from another book two thousands years older than itself.
The flood is a lie, ad is many things in the bible

opinion's yours never mind that it's more of an emotional retort that lacks proofs nor clear refutations of that you quoted.

Lennycool:

You do know there is no evidence Noah's world wide flood and the story was copied from another book two thousands years older than itself.
The flood is a lie, ad is many things in the bible

stop detailing... thread's about the great crossing and not a flood.