Assuming you mean, like, procreate together (making some kind of a human-ape hybrid), it was attempted. Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov, a Soviet doctor attempted this and failed. He injected human semen into female apes and no fertilization occurred.


Source: https://www.quora.com/Can-humans-crossbreed-with-other-primates

Perfect Money/Payeer/Epay/Neteller: www..com.ng

sacrifice

Dont use your knowledge against God. This is a typical example

Some kind people wey dey this country dey make me doubt if e never happen already

We can't.

One of the reasons I don't believe the Evolution theory.

I'm atheist and believe in evolution, Ape is the closest primate to homo sapien but can never interbreed with us human because of the difference in chromosomes, human possess 23 while the closest primate to human which happens to be the ape possesses 24.

Human could have interbred with neatherman, homohabilis, homo erectus etc to continue evolution process in the homos specie but others died out and only homo sapien survived.

aaronson:
I'm atheist and believe in evolution, Ape is the closest primate to homo sapien but can never interbreed with us human because of the difference in chromosomes, human possess 23 while the closest primate to human which happens to be the ape possesses 24.

Human could have interbred with neatherman, homohabilis, homo erectus etc to continue evolution process in the homos specie but others died out and only homo sapien survived.

lol why nau.. CLOSEST yet not possible...evolution na farce abi... okay where are the neatherman, homohabilis, homo erectus etc ... oh am so dumb they are extinct yet the CLOSEST cannot breed with man....

I can tell you that it's possible if the research is carried out with much more committment. That scientist probably carried out that experiment a couple of years ago without succeeding. Some factors may have contributed to his experimental failure. But that clearly isn't an indication that subsequent trials won't yield desired results. Those genes can be engineered to match (i.e. mutation).
.
I am not an atheist, but when you spend some time to study Biology generally, you'll begin to see that an organism is just a collection of atoms which combine to form giant molecules such as proteins. We must not bring religious views into scientific matters.

Humans and other primates are different species. Trying to produce an offspring between these groups who incidentally have the most complex cell structure requires proficiency in cell biology and the technology to execute it.

Bear in mind that the offsprings from different species are largely sterile and the possibility of further procreation are largely non-existent.

Smh. Op what's the definition of species?? The key characteristic that determines a species is the ability to produce viable offspring when mating occurs. Humans are a separate species from chimpanzees. They can't mate and produce offspring.

aaronson:
I'm atheist and believe in evolution, Ape is the closest primate to homo sapien but can never interbreed with us human because of the difference in chromosomes, human possess 23 while the closest primate to human which happens to be the ape possesses 24.

Human could have interbred with neatherman, homohabilis, homo erectus etc to continue evolution process in the homos specie but others died out and only homo sapien survived.

so at what point (and why) did one chromosome get added to apes or removed from humans if they have a common ancestor as evolutionists assert?

Bahddo:
so at what point (and why) did one chromosome get added to apes or removed from humans if they have a common ancestor as evolutionists assert?

You should try to know about DNA and gene mutation.

Bahddo:
so at what point (and why) did one chromosome get added to apes or removed from humans if they have a common ancestor as evolutionists assert?

okay let me explain using your family root. chances are your grand pa has the same ancestor as your dad but your dad had to interbreed from another family(you mom) in other to procreate you. Now you now share DNA from about paternal and maternal ancestry.

The only difference between the ape and human is, the ape evolved in the specie embedded with a different chromosome in contrast with another specie of homo sapien with different type of chromosome.

aaronson:
okay let me explain using your family root. chances are your grand pa has the same ancestor as your dad but your dad had to interbreed from another family(you mom) in other to procreate you. Now you now share DNA from about paternal and maternal ancestry.

The only difference between the ape and human is, the ape evolved in the specie embedded with a different chromosome in contrast with another specie of homo sapien with different type of chromosome.

In simple terms, the difference in chromosomes is as a result of mutations. And this is not what happened yesterday; it took place about 12 or 13 million years ago. Most evolutionists assert that a completely new generation of human beings may evolve as a result of mutation. But since mutation is a slow process, the evolution of new humans (probably with more advanced features), may take several years.
.
However, if techniques are developed to speed up the process of mutation, we'll get promising results.

aaronson:
okay let me explain using your family root. chances are your grand pa has the same ancestor as your dad but your dad had to interbreed from another family(you mom) in other to procreate you. Now you now share DNA from about paternal and maternal ancestry.

The only difference between the ape and human is, the ape evolved in the specie embedded with a different chromosome in contrast with another specie of homo sapien with different type of chromosome.

duh! That example is dead on arrival. It does nothing to explain how there came to be difference in number of chromosomes. You probably realized it that's why you mentioned something as vague as "the specie embedded with a different chromosome." Pray tell, how did it get embedded?

The best explanation anyone can come up with is mutation, but we all know how 'healthy' babies born with an extra chromosome turn out.

The precious few who survive and are capable of having offspring do not even pass their condition to their offspring. Unlike changes in chromosome structure, changes in number of chromosomes are exclusively random (they are not inherited). So mutation does not explain it at all.

You are just throwing the word 'species' around anyhow. Animal species are not analogous to human families in any way.

PS: There aren't different species of Homo Sapien

Nonsense remains nonsense even when talked by world famous scientists. -John C. Lennox

Bahddo:

You are just throwing the word 'species' around anyhow. Animal species are not analogous to human families in any way.
.
PS: There aren't different species of Homo Sapien

I think your point here is equivocal. What's the definition of "animal species" and "human families"? Besides, you sound as if mutation is something that can happen within 10 or 15 years.

Very possible if the experimental condition is suitable.

Remember this interspecies breeding has been successful as seen in

Lion+tiger gave liger

Zebra and horse gave Zorse.

Etc