My hypotheses;
1. Where each state develops capacity to produce goods and services as endowed, Nigeria as it is presently constituted has consumption propensities adequate to be organized as a semi economic block.
2. Only where production activities are organized such that state/regions produce goods and services each state is most endowed that economic dependencies which will strengthen Nationhood will develop.
3. A political agenda drawn to develop intra-state/regional economic dependencies is necessary to promote acceptance among the people across ethnic, cultural and religious expressions in Nigeria.
4. The present political elite irrespective of the political parties do not have capacity​ to drive interstate economic dependencies in Nigeria
5. Unless the civil society comes together to define an agenda of change and mobilize the masses to achieve these dependencies, the political elite which is benefiting from the status quo will not change it's character and social and economic crises will continue to spread and one day Nigeria could suddenly be no more.
6. If interstate economic integration is achieved, poverty in Nigeria would be reduced drastically and more people will be gainfully employed,
7. If people are gainfully employed,, they would be busy about taking advantage of legitimate economic opportunities and there would be no one to fight religious, ethnic and cultural wars which some criminally explore to further weaken a failing system which they helped created for the purpose of exploiting the masses.
8. If inter-state/regional economic integration, justice and equity is achieved, Nigerians will be wealthier in Nigeria than they would be if the country separates. But agitations for separation will not go away if security of lives and the sanctity private enterprise is not guaranteed.

change