Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,162,842 members, 7,851,855 topics. Date: Thursday, 06 June 2024 at 09:17 AM

Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? (1191 Views)

Why Western Countries Continues To Attack African Traditions And Culture / Is Civilisation Fornicating With Your Teacher At 15? Fani-kayode Blasts Macron / Nigerians React After Governor Ambode Failed To Keep To Press Conference Time (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by Elbinawi: 11:46pm On Jun 16, 2018
Western civilization has succeeded in assimilating all civilizations with the exception of Islam. This underlined their fueling of #Islamophobia factory to release their utter frustration.

When a Hindu murdered an innocent child, they do not scream "Hindu terrorism". When Buddhists are slaughtering innocent Muslims in Burma, they do not scream "Buddhist terrorism". But when US-backed terrorists in Syria threw a man from a height, US President Trump screamed "Islamic terrorism".

They did everything humanly possible to demonize the Hijab so that Muslims will abandoned the Hijab but they failed woefully. People that sketched the blessed Mary (as), Mother of Jesus (as), in Hijab will turn around and scream "Hijab is a tool of oppression".

They failed to assimilate Islamic civilization because Islamic civilization is superior. Inferior will never assimilate superior. Sadly, they are sponsoring murderous Wahhabism in our midst. A Wretched, primitive, barbaric and bloodthirsty cult that is Inferior to all civilization.

Recently, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, called on Muslims to embrace Science and technology. This is most important.

#FreeZakzaky
#GodProtectZakzaky

#ElbinawiTweets
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by Odingo1: 5:13am On Jun 17, 2018
Continue your terror alone

6 Likes

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by ZKOSOSO(m): 5:48am On Jun 17, 2018
Confusion....Transmission......Confusion...!!

Where do u stand, young man.??

One hand u extolled the superiority of Islamic civilization and the other hand Science and technology...?? Confusion...! I tell ya.!

Islam in its purest form as stated in Hadiths and Quran is meant for wild animals in the Zoo. It's no civilization but celebration of barbarism....!

Repent and accept Christ for your own good...!!

8 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by wickyyolo: 5:55am On Jun 17, 2018
Killing your entire population is called civilization grin

5 Likes

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by Preshy561(f): 5:56am On Jun 17, 2018
Islamic terrorist on the lose.undecided

6 Likes

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by bluke(m): 6:00am On Jun 17, 2018
what superiority are you talking about?
when two third of your quran was taken from the bible

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by RussianKGB: 6:20am On Jun 17, 2018
You should worry more about Sunni superiority and opression you and your likes eg Your demigod zakzakky are passing through than western civilization. The west you so much despise are light years ahead and don't even care if you lots exist.

Can't you see the difference between the muslim states that embraced terrorism and the ones that embraced western civilization? The United Arab Emirates will always be modern and more developed than their counterpart terrorist states in the terror ridden war ravaged middle east.

4 Likes

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by magoo10(m): 6:45am On Jun 17, 2018
More terrorist activities of larger proportion have been carried out in the name of Islam than any other religion.

Elzakzakky whom you are seeking his release is currently being held against numerous court orders by a president who practices Islam so direct your grievances to the appropriate quarters.

4 Likes

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by kamalcole3000: 9:47am On Jun 17, 2018
Elbinawi:
Western civilization has succeeded in assimilating all civilizations with the exception of Islam. This underlined their fueling of #Islamophobia factory to release their utter frustration.

When a Hindu murdered an innocent child, they do not scream "Hindu terrorism". When Buddhists are slaughtering innocent Muslims in Burma, they do not scream "Buddhist terrorism". But when US-backed terrorists in Syria threw a man from a height, US President Trump screamed "Islamic terrorism".

They did everything humanly possible to demonize the Hijab so that Muslims will abandoned the Hijab but they failed woefully. People that sketched the blessed Mary (as), Mother of Jesus (as), in Hijab will turn around and scream "Hijab is a tool of oppression".

They failed to assimilate Islamic civilization because Islamic civilization is superior. Inferior will never assimilate superior. Sadly, they are sponsoring murderous Wahhabism in our midst. A Wretched, primitive, barbaric and bloodthirsty cult that is Inferior to all civilization.

Recently, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, called on Muslims to embrace Science and technology. This is most important.

#FreeZakzaky
#GodProtectZakzaky

#ElbinawiTweets
Trash!

I used to follow your posts seeing some sense in it but this one absolute balderdash.

There in nowhere in the world where people perpetrate evil in the name of religion except people who practice Islam

people from all faith,from all religions commit atrocities and they not ascribe it to their religion except in Islam

There are good and bad people all over the world irrespective of their religion

lastly,do you know why we have crime perpetrated by Muslim?

because naturally and psychologically there are abnormal people and social misfits in the world and best religion where they can unleash their innate evil desires is by becoming Muslims cos that's the only religion you can commit all kind of atrocities and ascribe it to God.

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 10:47am On Jun 17, 2018
Elbinawi:
.
When Buddhists are slaughtering innocent Muslims in Burma, they do not scream "Buddhist terrorism".


Budhist monks abide by the Karma doctrine. They are by far the most peaceful religion on earth.

The Buddhist had no choice to repay the ungrateful migrant Muslims with instant Karma because it was the same Muslims that have been killing and abducting Buddhist in their own country!

For Budhist to go on full blast against the migrant Rhoinghay Muslims in Burma ought to tell you that Muslims are by the most difficult and dangerous sets of people on the planet.

Go and do a proper research on why the majority Asiatic Buddhist population want the migrant Bangladeshis Muslims out of their country.

Even Aung San Suu Kyi, a Noble Peace reciepient did not even bat an eye for the Rhoinghay Muslims.

It was the Muslims that started attacking their Buddhist hosts.



Even the Dalai Lamma did not call for peace and end of riots targetting Muslims becuase he knows that you muslims are evil.

And one more thing, Obama in conjnction with the evil Saudi govt propped up a Muslim terrorist organization of mostly Rhohingay muslims to terrorise the Burma state and Buddhist population all becuae of the discovery of large deposits of natural gas off the SE coast of Burma. The Chinnese signed a multi-billion dollar concession with the Burmesse govt to exploit the gas reserves and build a gas pipeline all the way to China.

It was at this point Obama (the Saudi stooge), set up the Rhohingay Islamic terrorist militia to disrupt the project.

This is exactly what the US and Saudis did in Syria and Iraq after these two countries refused to allow for a gas pipeline from the gulf states to Europe.

Google Is Ara which is The Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (Burmese: အာရ်ကန်ရိုဟင်ဂျာ ကယ်တင်ရေးတပ်မတော်; abbreviated ARSA), also known by its former name Harakah al-Yaqin (meaning Faith Movement in English). It is a Rohingya insurgent group active in northern Rakhine State, Myanmar which was financed by the US and Saudi Arabia to disrupt the Chinese gas project in Burma.



So please stop all this bullsh!t nonsense about Buddhist killing Muslims as these Rhohingay Muslims deserve every treatment they get and that goes to all you useless Muslims.

Also, note that any nation devoid of a sizable Muslim population is always at peace with itself.

Just grab a map on conflict zones in the world and you will see that Muslim nations or ones with a sizable Muslim population are never at peace!

Islam does NOT mean Peace! Islam is from the pits of hell created by a marauding sociopathic criminal!

7 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 10:49am On Jun 17, 2018
kamalcole3000:

Trash!

I used to follow your posts seeing some sense in it but this one absolute balderdash.

There in nowhere in the world where people perpetrate evil in the name of religion except people who practice Islam

people from all faith,from all religions commit atrocities and they not ascribe it to their religion except in Islam

There are good and bad people all over the world irrespective of their religion

lastly,do you know why we have crime perpetrated by Muslim?

because naturally and psychologically there are abnormal people and social misfits in the world and best religion where they can unleash their innate evil desires is by becoming Muslims cos that's the only religion you can commit all kind of atrocities and ascribe it to God.

The guy really dissapointed me with this trash.

I was even seeing a ray of hope for peace in Nigeria with the Shiites but now I know that they are as evil as their Sunni brethren.

Let them kill themselves.

No more fcks left for the Shiites on my part.

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 10:54am On Jun 17, 2018
Buddhist are generally perceived to be peaceful tolerant and religious people with the orange clad bald monks typifying this stereotype. This is true to an extent but what most of you don't know about Buddhists is that they believe in instant Karma and are not usually patient for Buddha to carry out his Karma.

In the following posts, I will be reproducing articles that explain in detail why Buddhist are insisting of purging their country of Muslims.

With Rhonyingah Muslims just less than 4% with Christians and Animist accounting for 7%, why are the majority Buddhist Burmanese dealing with only Muslims?

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 10:56am On Jun 17, 2018
Before there was any mention of crusades there was jihad.

They still cry for Spain which they invaded and were later driven out.

They claim jerusalem and claiming Philistine at the same time (Palestine means land of the Philistine, and it was coined by Emperor Hadrian after he sacked all of Israel and Judah of Jews).

They occupy constaninople which was the first Roman Catholic capitol and have turned the first cathedral of christ to a mosque.

They occupied Greece, Armenia and other baltic states where they committed much atrocities but when the Serbs retaliated they were shouting genocide.

The only language these animals understand is equal and more brutal foolishness

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by IslamicRebel01: 10:58am On Jun 17, 2018
Islam is not compatible.with civilisation.

2 Likes

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 11:04am On Jun 17, 2018
A little bit of the background for you. British India included Pakistan in the west, India in the middle, Bengal in the east and Burma a bit further to the east. Burma was never formally part of British India, but a separate colony. Bengal and Burma share a long border. In 1948, when India became independent, Bengal became part of Pakistan and was renamed East Pakistan. Burma also became independent. Later on in the ’70s East Pakistan fought itself free from West Pakistan, which used it as a colony to be exploited. It gained full independence as Bangladesh.

Formerly East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, is dirt poor, intolerant as only mohammedans can be, and is treated annually by Allah with a couple of massive floods with usually shocking loss of life and property. The damage is always restored by very generous and very dhimmi western countries.

Burma shares a border with Bangladesh. The Burmese state Rakhine (also known as Arrakan) borders Bangladesh, has a large percentage of mohammedans, and is much dryer. From 1948 onwards lots of Rohingya, originating in Bangladesh on the other side of the border, crossed over and settled in Rakhine. They rather liked it there, and decided they wanted it. With full indirect support of East Pakistan they tried to take over the state. That almost became a real war, which they lost. The East Pakistani/Bangladeshis were permitted to stay, but they never got Burmese citizenship. Something they bitterly resent.

Burma itself deteriorated into one of the worst military dictatorships of the world in 1962. The official name of the country was changed from the Union of Burma into the Union of Myanmar in 1989. It changed lots of other names; for example, Rangoon is now Yangoon and actually no longer the capital. The SLORC (name of the military dictatorship) built an entire new capital city, Naypyidaw in the middle of nowhere, literally. Hardly a soul lives there. Tourists are allowed to visit it, but it is eerily quiet. Almost like a superbly maintained ghost town. Before the military takeover in 1962 Burma was widely seen as the up-and-coming country in southeast Asia. Thailand not so much; that was much more a backwater. After the 1962 takeover the roles completely reversed. Burma is now the official backwater of the continent.

There are a lot of people who know squat about Buddhism and perceive it to be peaceful. Buddhists can be as violent and intolerant as any other religion. Burma itself was a highly militarized state (it still is) and very aggressive. For many centuries Burma was at war with the kingdoms of Sukhothai, Ayutthaya and Siam, which later became the kingdom of Thailand. The Burmese were able to conquer the capital of Ayutthaya, burned it to the ground, destroyed all the statues of the Buddha, took the population back home as slaves and exterminated the royal family.

To be fair, the Thais, Lao or Khmer behaved exactly the same when given the chance. It was custom to hide valuables in Buddha statues. Not surprisingly, some less religiously inclined soldiers were somewhat inquisitive. Even today lost treasures are sometimes found in Buddha statues. The relations between Thailand and Burma are better than they used to be, but border incidents do happen fairly frequently.

Internally Burma is not exactly a peaceful country. It is a union or federation of states, a bit like America. And there are lots of very active independence movements fighting the army. In a military stalemate: the army can’t defeat the independence movements, and the independence movements cannot defeat the army. The independence movements, for example the Karen Liberation army and the united Wa State Army, make money by producing hard drugs like opium, heroin and amphetamines. They sell it in and through Thailand. The infamous Golden Triangle is no longer working in Thailand, but very much so in Burma.

Back to the poor pitiable Rohingya. From 1948 onwards they crossed the border and parked their goats in Burma. Relations between the original (Buddhist) Rakhinese and (mohammedan) Rohingya were never good. Perhaps the Rohingya cultural habit of raping Rakhinese girls or robbing and/or murdering non-muslims has something to do with it. Things became really nasty when Rohingyas started to murder and behead Buddhist monks around 2012. The Burmese army had to intervene to prevent all Rohingya from being sent directly to allah. Burmese aren’t exactly as meek as Westerners are, so when Rohingyas raped a Rakhinese girl or murdered someone, they were paid in kind with some interest added.

The Burmese government is first and foremost Burmese (or Myanmarese, if you prefer). Right after that they are Buddhist, then military and very little else. Human rights are rare, foreigners are slightly suspicious and cuddling pitiable minorities doesn’t rate high on the agenda.

Even Aung San Suu Kyi doesn’t mince words about the poor suppressed sadly misunderstood Rohingya. That doesn’t sit very well in left-wing circles. They put lots of pressure on the Nobel prize committee in Norway to withdraw her Nobel Prize. That’s not possible, but it shows the hatred for people who don’t think the right (in this case: left) way.

What you may not know is that there are two very different types of Nobel prizes. The real ones are awarded in Stockholm. They are given for truly important discoveries in science. In Oslo two fake Nobel prizes are awarded: for peace and for literature. It’s not really possible to quantify objectively who should get one. Finland, not exactly a world leader in literature, was awarded a prize for literature in 1940 because … poor Finland was invaded by the Soviet Union. Iceland (population < 340,000) got one in 1955 because dear little Iceland otherwise will never get a Nobel Prize. Yasser Arafat, Nelson Mandela and even a certain Mr. Hussein Obama got peace prizes. But Mahatma Gandhi never got one. Need I say more?

Effectively, the colonization of Rakhine state has failed. However, mohammedans have a very different view. Once they colonize a territory, it’s theirs. Forever. No matter what. So they mobilize their Western allies to pump up the pity machine. Rohingya are suppressed, misunderstood, persecuted and need our full support. Plenty of propaganda journalists who can write sad stories and take heartbreaking photos of little mistreated babies.

Yes, Burma (or Myanmar) is a country where human rights are practically non-existent. It’s also a Buddhist country were 86% of the population is Buddhist. 6% is Christian, 4% is mohammedan, and 2% animist. There are no religious problems with other religious groups. Plenty of problems, but none are religion-related. The only state in Burma with a substantial percentage of mohammedans is Rakhine state, where 52% are Buddhist and 47% mohammedan. That automatically leads to mohammedan violence, as they are nearly in the majority.
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 11:05am On Jun 17, 2018
What you will see are poor mistreated Rohingya, but you will not see or hear anything the Rohingya do themselves. They rape, rob and murder where they can. Since 2012 Buddhist monks have been their preferred targets, if possible by beheading. You won’t hear a peep about that. It would spoil the picture. What you also will not read in the media is that all those Rohingya are effectively Bangladeshi citizens, and should — since they are no longer wanted or accepted in Burma — go back to that country. But Bangladesh doesn’t want them back. They bring in money, and at the same time work on taking over Rakhine state, something Bangladesh very much wants to add to its territory.

Same story for nearly all other mohammedan countries. Turkey isn’t keen to see its citizens come back, and Morocco even less, for example. In both cases, they make huge amounts of money from their expatriates and politically infiltrate very quietly into those countries. It doesn’t say so in the koran, but we should respect that culture. Once their scum lives in our countries, that is forever.

As always, they want to move to countries where life is a lot better. For example, to Thailand. There are lots of refugee camps in Thailand, where people from Laos, Cambodia and Burma are sheltered. The only group of people Thailand no longer accepts are … you probably guessed it … Rohingya. Their brethren in the faith in Malaysia aren’t willing to receive them either. Why? Every left-wing activist will tell you that’s because of the brutal oppressive regimes there.

The darker side of the Rohingya is something you will not read about in the mainstream media.

— H. Numan

http://gatesofvienna.net/2017/09/oh-oh-oh-pity-the-poor-mohammedans/

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 11:13am On Jun 17, 2018
This video was posted on YouTube in 2013.

5 years prior to the Buddhist clampdown on Rhohingay Muslims.

The video shows the aftermath of Muslim terrorist attacks in Myanmar targeting Buddhists.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PtMAwoMcg4
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by BAILMONEY: 12:06pm On Jun 17, 2018
TylerDurden:
This video was posted on YouTube in 2013.

5 years prior to the Buddhist clampdown on Rhohingay Muslims.

The video shows the aftermath of Muslim terrorist attacks in Myanmar targeting Buddhists.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PtMAwoMcg4
YOU NAILED IT BRUH

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by SadiqBabaSani: 12:52pm On Jun 17, 2018
TylerDurden:
A little bit of the background for you. British India included Pakistan in the west, India in the middle, Bengal in the east and Burma a bit further to the east. Burma was never formally part of British India, but a separate colony. Bengal and Burma share a long border. In 1948, when India became independent, Bengal became part of Pakistan and was renamed East Pakistan. Burma also became independent. Later on in the ’70s East Pakistan fought itself free from West Pakistan, which used it as a colony to be exploited. It gained full independence as Bangladesh.

Formerly East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, is dirt poor, intolerant as only mohammedans can be, and is treated annually by Allah with a couple of massive floods with usually shocking loss of life and property. The damage is always restored by very generous and very dhimmi western countries.

Burma shares a border with Bangladesh. The Burmese state Rakhine (also known as Arrakan) borders Bangladesh, has a large percentage of mohammedans, and is much dryer. From 1948 onwards lots of Rohingya, originating in Bangladesh on the other side of the border, crossed over and settled in Rakhine. They rather liked it there, and decided they wanted it. With full indirect support of East Pakistan they tried to take over the state. That almost became a real war, which they lost. The East Pakistani/Bangladeshis were permitted to stay, but they never got Burmese citizenship. Something they bitterly resent.

Burma itself deteriorated into one of the worst military dictatorships of the world in 1962. The official name of the country was changed from the Union of Burma into the Union of Myanmar in 1989. It changed lots of other names; for example, Rangoon is now Yangoon and actually no longer the capital. The SLORC (name of the military dictatorship) built an entire new capital city, Naypyidaw in the middle of nowhere, literally. Hardly a soul lives there. Tourists are allowed to visit it, but it is eerily quiet. Almost like a superbly maintained ghost town. Before the military takeover in 1962 Burma was widely seen as the up-and-coming country in southeast Asia. Thailand not so much; that was much more a backwater. After the 1962 takeover the roles completely reversed. Burma is now the official backwater of the continent.

There are a lot of people who know squat about Buddhism and perceive it to be peaceful. Buddhists can be as violent and intolerant as any other religion. Burma itself was a highly militarized state (it still is) and very aggressive. For many centuries Burma was at war with the kingdoms of Sukhothai, Ayutthaya and Siam, which later became the kingdom of Thailand. The Burmese were able to conquer the capital of Ayutthaya, burned it to the ground, destroyed all the statues of the Buddha, took the population back home as slaves and exterminated the royal family.

To be fair, the Thais, Lao or Khmer behaved exactly the same when given the chance. It was custom to hide valuables in Buddha statues. Not surprisingly, some less religiously inclined soldiers were somewhat inquisitive. Even today lost treasures are sometimes found in Buddha statues. The relations between Thailand and Burma are better than they used to be, but border incidents do happen fairly frequently.

Internally Burma is not exactly a peaceful country. It is a union or federation of states, a bit like America. And there are lots of very active independence movements fighting the army. In a military stalemate: the army can’t defeat the independence movements, and the independence movements cannot defeat the army. The independence movements, for example the Karen Liberation army and the united Wa State Army, make money by producing hard drugs like opium, heroin and amphetamines. They sell it in and through Thailand. The infamous Golden Triangle is no longer working in Thailand, but very much so in Burma.

Back to the poor pitiable Rohingya. From 1948 onwards they crossed the border and parked their goats in Burma. Relations between the original (Buddhist) Rakhinese and (mohammedan) Rohingya were never good. Perhaps the Rohingya cultural habit of raping Rakhinese girls or robbing and/or murdering non-muslims has something to do with it. Things became really nasty when Rohingyas started to murder and behead Buddhist monks around 2012. The Burmese army had to intervene to prevent all Rohingya from being sent directly to allah. Burmese aren’t exactly as meek as Westerners are, so when Rohingyas raped a Rakhinese girl or murdered someone, they were paid in kind with some interest added.

The Burmese government is first and foremost Burmese (or Myanmarese, if you prefer). Right after that they are Buddhist, then military and very little else. Human rights are rare, foreigners are slightly suspicious and cuddling pitiable minorities doesn’t rate high on the agenda.

Even Aung San Suu Kyi doesn’t mince words about the poor suppressed sadly misunderstood Rohingya. That doesn’t sit very well in left-wing circles. They put lots of pressure on the Nobel prize committee in Norway to withdraw her Nobel Prize. That’s not possible, but it shows the hatred for people who don’t think the right (in this case: left) way.

What you may not know is that there are two very different types of Nobel prizes. The real ones are awarded in Stockholm. They are given for truly important discoveries in science. In Oslo two fake Nobel prizes are awarded: for peace and for literature. It’s not really possible to quantify objectively who should get one. Finland, not exactly a world leader in literature, was awarded a prize for literature in 1940 because … poor Finland was invaded by the Soviet Union. Iceland (population < 340,000) got one in 1955 because dear little Iceland otherwise will never get a Nobel Prize. Yasser Arafat, Nelson Mandela and even a certain Mr. Hussein Obama got peace prizes. But Mahatma Gandhi never got one. Need I say more?

Effectively, the colonization of Rakhine state has failed. However, mohammedans have a very different view. Once they colonize a territory, it’s theirs. Forever. No matter what. So they mobilize their Western allies to pump up the pity machine. Rohingya are suppressed, misunderstood, persecuted and need our full support. Plenty of propaganda journalists who can write sad stories and take heartbreaking photos of little mistreated babies.

Yes, Burma (or Myanmar) is a country where human rights are practically non-existent. It’s also a Buddhist country were 86% of the population is Buddhist. 6% is Christian, 4% is mohammedan, and 2% animist. There are no religious problems with other religious groups. Plenty of problems, but none are religion-related. The only state in Burma with a substantial percentage of mohammedans is Rakhine state, where 52% are Buddhist and 47% mohammedan. That automatically leads to mohammedan violence, as they are nearly in the majority.
good expository

1 Like

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by redsun(m): 1:55pm On Jun 17, 2018
Early Islamic civilization is the foundation of today's western civilization-arts, science, astronomy, architecture, name it. However, today's Islamic civilization has been hijacked by touts and inherent morons, hence its crude, unproductive and brutal nature at the moment.

1 Like

Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by Nobody: 2:01pm On Jun 17, 2018
Muslims can be killed but islam can never be destroyed
I you don't have something reasonable to say don't quote me
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by efighter: 2:50pm On Jun 17, 2018
I am Muslim and don't give a fucck what you think about me. One thing is sure, falsehood will never triumph over truth.
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 2:56pm On Jun 17, 2018
[s]
redsun:
Early Islamic civilization is the foundation of today's western civilization-arts, science, astronomy, architecture, name it. However, today's Islamic civilization has been hijacked by touts and inherent morons, hence its crude, unproductive and brutal nature at the moment.
[/s]

Stop this nonsense!

The Arab Muslims stole everything from the Persians, Greeks and Hindus.

Even your useless Koran was badly plagiarized from the Bible and Torah.

If Islamic Culture was behind Western civilization, then pray tell, why Islamic civilization is still in the Camel age or why you Muslims have contributed little or nothing to modern science?
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 2:59pm On Jun 17, 2018
[s]
efighter:
I am Muslim and don't give a fucck what you think about me. One thing is sure, falsehood will never triumph over truth.
[/s]

You do.

Or else you won't be posting on this thread or your fellow rag heads will not be rioting over any small criticism of Islam.
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 3:01pm On Jun 17, 2018
[s]
Abubakarsiddeeq:
Muslims can be killed but islam can never be destroyed
I you don't have something reasonable to say don't quote me
[/s]

Just like roaches can never go extinct.

Or STDs can never be eliminated.

You see, the prevalence of evil or a bad thing, doesn't make it a good thing.
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by Nobody: 3:41pm On Jun 17, 2018
TylerDurden:
[s][/s]

Just like roaches can never go extinct.

Or STDs can never be eliminated.

You see, the prevalence of evil or a bad thing, doesn't make it a good thing.
stay off my mention
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by TylerDurden: 3:47pm On Jun 17, 2018
[s]
Abubakarsiddeeq:

stay off my mention
[/s]

Pained!

Now go and blow yourself up
Re: Why Western Civilization Failed To Assimilate Islamic Civilisation? by debaj10: 4:02pm On Jun 17, 2018
why all this rhetoric?
actions should speak louder than words.
abi?

(1) (Reply)

Ohakim Kneels For Bianca Ojukwu / Buhari Is Healthier, Stronger Than 80% Of Nigerians – Ngige / Breaking: APC Governorship Candidate And Sen Adeleke Misses Channels Debate

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 88
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.