gyde:

, Almost for Federer,but kudos to him,the guy is strong mentally,but of cos he is also superb on grass,was he trying to prove something yesterday?

i think he was and he did, anyone else wish, the days of Boris Becker, Andre Agassi, Govan Ivanossivic, Pete Sampras would come back, the tennis these days is so one way it's not funny,

28Schweet:

i think he was and he did, anyone else wish, the days of Boris Becker, Andre Agassi, Govan Ivanossivic, Pete Sampras would come back, the tennis these days is so one way it's not funny,

all the people u listed all dominated tennis when they were on song

Becker did b4 Agassi, Agassi took over and handed over to Sampras while Sampras handed the baton to Roger Federer

from the look of things, Nadal will take over soon

tkb417:

all the people u listed all dominated tennis when they were on song

Becker did b4 Agassi, Agassi took over and handed over to Sampras while Sampras handed the baton to Roger Federer

from the look of things, [b]Nadal will take over soo[/b]n

I would disagree with that part in bold,Nadal can not dominate the way Roger or Sampras did,Yes,he dominates on clay-which is played for only 3months within a calendar year,what happened the rest of the year,the moment he is outside clay he is not soo dominance,any player could take him on and win,a point proven by Lopez at queens.

^^^yeah, you are right. Nadal is only good on clay and playing those masters series. Outside of clay, he doesnt exist

we shall see soon

Stosur,what happened?,my bet was on you to go far, Blake,from BREAKING BACK to BREAKING OUT,think u should retire

There's no constitency in female tennis

It appears so,that doesn't seems to be the problem with the male counterparts as Nadal muscled his way through in straights sets

medjai:

^^^yeah, you are right. Nadal is only good on clay and playing those masters series. Outside of clay, he doesnt exist

But he has beaten Federer at Wimbledon and the Aussie Open to clinch both titles and have the supposed G.O.A.T crying like a biaaaaaatch. A win at Flushing Meadows is all it takes for him to complete grand slam sweep and you are here yarning opaks

just 2 grand slams on grass when we have 3 grand slams on grass in a year.

Tufiakwa!!
Dominique modify your second post ASAP!!
Federer cant be world no 1!

Men chill,Federer is seeded number 1 for the Wimbledon Championship

gyde:

Men chill,Federer is seeded number 1 for the Wimbledon Championship

thanks for clearing that
Nadal remains ATP no. 1

medjai:

just 2 grand slams on grass when we have 3 grand slams on grass in a year.

wrong
hard court = 2
clay = 1
grass = 1

^^^expound your point, please. Anyway Fed still is the favourite for this one. He has a 76-2 record on grass. His second defeat on grass was at the just held Halle Masters.

@ jay bee
K, i get ur point. US Open is hard court, i made a mistake. Which other one is hard court? Aussie is grass

Aussie and US open are played on Hard court ma guy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis

^^^noted

medjai:

^^^yeah, you are right. Nadal is only good on clay and playing those masters series. Outside of clay, he doesnt exist

Not true Nadal has won 7 grand slam titles and lost in 2 wimbledon finals
5 french opens(clay court), 1 wimbledon (grass) and 1 Australian open (hard court) which for a guy with a dodgy knee is some feat,

^^^ i know clay is Nadals forte. I was comparing Nadals form outside clay to Federer's outside grass. Federer has played in 5 Aussie open(hard court) finals and won 4. Played in 4 French open finals(clay) and won 1. Played in 7 Wimbledon finals(grass) and won 6 and played in 6 US open finals and won 5.

I think what started this argument was whether Nadal would Dominate the way federer did, and I said he cant!, cos,yes he could dominate on clay but he cant on other surfaces,yes, he has won a slam on grass and on hard courts,but can he win 6 on grass like Roger did?, he has also won a slam on hard,but can he match Federer's total 10 slams on hard courts (Us open and Aussies)?, He simply cant achieve that cos he really isn't that dominance on other surface like he is on clay,

FedExpress to deliver as usual. I have my money on you

Federer is struggling too much in these early rounds. maybe he is trying 2 prove like you lots are saying, but I hope his luck doesnt run out on him. He is making Llija look like a top seeded player.

omo, who is watching the Mahut/Isner game, Its stretched into 6 hours o. What a game.

It's not 7hrs 38 mins . . . 40-41

Tha's officially the longest in Tennis History


Fed is getting weaker day by day. Thnak God he's made it to the next round sha.

we may be up for another interesting grand slam. . . .

davydenko is not finding it too easy wt brands. . . .quite interesting. 1 game apiece and the 3rd set is like a ding-dong thingy.

These guys would just collapse, if they don't stop play.

How can one play for more almost 7 hours non-stop?

FOD:

These guys would just collapse, if they don't stop play.

How can one play for more almost 7 hours non-stop?

These guys will die in that court.

i believe federrer and serena would take the day.

Tsonga is getting fat men

The Scot is giving the Queen something to cheer ,its been long since he played this awesome,sharapova is also having a good tournament,her decibel level still quite low,