Senate President Bukola Saraki has reacted to the recent call by the National Chairman of the All Progressive Congress, Adam’s Oshiomhole, that he should resign or face impeachment saying a million Adams Oshiomhole cannot remove him from office.

In a statement issued on Friday by his Media Adviser, Yusuph Olaniyonu, Saraki also accused Oshiomhole of being ignorant of parliamentary rules as it relates to election and removal of principal officers like the Senate President.

The statement said a million Adams Oshiomhole cannot remove Saraki as Senate President.
“His illegal plots, can only feed his insatiable ego and keep him awake at nights. But it will remain an exercise in futility.”
The 14-paragraph statement read:
“It is rather surprising that Mr. Adams Oshiomhole is behaving like a rain-beaten chicken, crying all over the place about Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, as if the Senate President is the apparition haunting his life and the sinking ship that he captains.
“Having decided not to join the pigs in rolling in the dirt; we would not like to be involved in any meaningless exchange with the demagogue now in charge of APC. However, because he claimed that he was reacting to the issues raised by the Senate President during his World Press Conference, we thought it necessary to give the APC chairman some attention.

“Alas, we found that instead of addressing any issue raised by the Senate President, his press conference merely showcased his obsession and those of his sponsors with Saraki’s removal, which he did without any decorum befitting of his age or his awarded office. He brimmed with hate, hurled abuses, threw tantrums, told lies, huffed, puffed. In the end, he said nothing.
“It is indeed amazing that the same Oshiomhole, who is now describing Saraki as a politician of no consequence was the same one who only a few months ago was crawling all over the place pleading for Saraki’s support to become chairman. We are sure that those who took him to Saraki several times to plead his case must now be thoroughly embarrassed by his reckless and uncouth manner.

” By his conduct and utterances, Oshiomhole, who accused Saraki of not acting in national interest needs to do more to convince Nigerians that his desperate desire to become party chairman is not simply to feed his over-sized ego.
“The position of Oshiomhole and his cohorts in the APC that the Senate President must resign is a mere wishful thinking. They will continue to dream about their planned removal of the Senate President. They will need 73 Senators to lawfully remove Dr. Saraki and they will never get that in the present eight Senate.

” The argument of APC that the Senate President must come from a majority party; that the Senate Presidency is their crown and National Assembly is their palace is only supported by ignorance and dangerous delusion. First, the issue of which party is in the majority will only be resolved when the Senate resume. Two, Section 50 (1) (a) of the constitution is clear that any Senator can be elected as Senate President. If the only thing left of the APC change agenda is to change the Senate President we can only wish them goodluck.

“Perhaps, Mr. Oshiomhole needs to be better educated about our parliamentary history when he stated that “For the first time in parliamentary history in Nigeria, we had a situation where the APC had majority of Senators and went on to elect a PDP as Deputy Senate President”. Where is Mr. Oshiomhole when Senator John Wash Pam of the Nigerian People’s Party (NPP) became Deputy Senate President in the Second Republic even when the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) had the majority. The same thing happened in the House of Representatives when NPP’s Rt. Hon. Edwin Umeh Ezeoke was elected Speaker in an NPN majority House. But then, it would require a level of education to understand these things.

“What hypocrisy! To think that this same APC were jubilating when Rt. Hon. Aminu Tambuwal retained his position after he defected from the PDP and still retained his seat, even when his new party was in the minority. These are people whose standards of morality are infinitely elastic.

“We are sure the remaining APC Senators need to do a lot of work to bring Oshiomhole up to speed about parliamentary practice. His ignorance are too clear in his comments about how the Senate was adjourned on July 24, 2018, the distribution of committee chairmanship in the Senate and the difference between the post of Senate President and Minority Leader.

” He has made so much song and dance about Mr. Godswill Akpabio resigning as Senate Minority Leader when he left the PDP to join APC. For this, Akpabio has become his hero and a symbol of honour. He obviously does not understand that the post of Minority Leader is a strictly party affair. And the PDP simply decided who to give it as it is not even a position that was mentioned in the constitution. Whereas, the Senate President position is a constitutional creation, which required majority votes of all the members. Again, we don’t expect people whose only experience in politics is at the provincial levels to understand this. No wonder they are talking of crowns and inheritance.

“The fair distribution of the Committee chairmanship is one of the stabilizing factors in the 8th Senate and has helped it in achieving more than all its predecessors.
“We need to inform this divisive element who now leads APC that if he wants to know why the 2018 budget was delayed, he should ask the heads of the MDAs. We reckon that should be easy for him since he is now their ‘headmaster’, moving around with canes to whip ministers into line.

“Oshiomhole once again demonstrated his lack of sense of history by talking of Buhari winning more votes in Kwara than Saraki. We are sure President Buhari himself will disagree with the APC chairman. We invite the APC chairman to look at the figures of votes secured by the President in 2003, 2007, 2011 and 2015 to know that the difference is clear, like a commercial advert stated.”

http://www.akelicious.net/2018/08/a-million-oshiomhole-cant-remove-me.html

Let's wait and see. Sagay has interpreted the senate President's removal in an innovative way that doesn't need any other judicial interpretation and you are here beating your chest that you cannot be removed. You will surely fall and go to jail, one person you've consistently bribed and bought over to use against the government of the day has fallen, your fall will be deadlier than his.

JusticeSeeker:
Let's wait and see. Sagay has interpreted the senate President's removal in an innovative way that doesn't need any other judicial interpretation and you are here beating your chest that you cannot be removed. You will surely fall and go to jail, one person you've consistently bribed and bought over to use against the government of the day has fallen, your fall will be deadlier than his.

We jst hv lettered illiterate all over. Is Sagay a judicial institution in Nigeria? What benign interpretation are u talking abt? Y dnt u say dt Buhari cn be removed in the same light as the deluded interpretation Sagay gave?

[s]

JusticeSeeker:
Let's wait and see. Sagay has interpreted the senate President's removal in an innovative way that doesn't need any other judicial interpretation and you are here beating your chest that you cannot be removed. You will surely fall and go to jail, one person you've consistently bribed and bought over to use against the government of the day has fallen, your fall will be deadlier than his.

[/s]
Rubbish
who listen to that kpomo bass mouth cigar abi siGAY
Nonsense!

ehinmowo:


We jst hv lettered illiterate all over. Is Sagay a judicial institution in Nigeria? What benign interpretation are u talking abt? Y dnt u say dt Buhari cn be removed in d same Sagay gave dt deluded interpretation?

the senate President's impeachment is easier than that of the president of the country. In the former, it can be initiated and concluded in a sitting while the later requires a series of notification and 'transmission' of letters/notices before it can be done in more than one sitting which means if a particular number that formed a quorum initiated the idea, those absent in that sitting must make it to the next sitting where a final impeachment motion is to be voted for or against. This is the bare fact my friend.

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]
Rubbish
who listen to that kpomo bass mouth cigar abi siGAY
Nonsense!

He'll be listened to this time around. What he's averred is simply innovative and flawless. If it didn't require the entire house to elect Saraki as the president, what makes you think it requires the entire senate to impeach him. This is what Sagay is saying in simple terms. Let SANs counter him on this and not laymen like you.

He is a hypnotised man in Labour!

This is the beginning of the end of Bukola Saraki

[s]

JusticeSeeker:
He'll be listened to this time around. What he's averred is simply innovative and flawless. If it didn't require the entire house to elect Saraki as the president, what makes you think it requires the entire senate to impeach him. This is what Sagay is saying in simple terms. Let SANs counter him on this and not laymen like you.

[/s]
Rubbish then what are the apc criminal law makers waiting for

nonsense stop disgracing your IQ
Oshiomole is a rat to saraki.

if Saraki can pocket Tinubu who's the oily face scallywag Oshiomole

kiss the truth

JusticeSeeker:
the senate President's impeachment is easier than that of the president of the country. In the former, it can be initiated and concluded in a sitting while the later requires a series of notification and 'transmission' of letters/notices before it can be done in more than one sitting which means if a particular number that formed a quorum initiated the idea, those absent in that sitting must make it to the next sitting where a final impeachment motion is to be voted for or against. This is the bare fact my friend.

I will let this slide. because not doing it is wasting my time. APC should go to court for interpretation. Dts d function of the judiciary afterall.

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]
Rubbish then what are the apc criminal law makers waiting for

nonsense stop disgracing your IQ
Oshiomole is a rat to saraki.

if Saraki can pocket Tinubu who's the oily face scallywag Oshiomole

kiss the truth

It's unfortunate Sagay has opened their eyes to be watchful so as to avoid a sitting that may be made up of only APC senators. Just wait and see. In this narrative, you're the one disgracing your intellect and not me.

[s]

JusticeSeeker:
It's unfortunate Sagay has opened their eyes to be watchful so as to avoid a sitting that may be made up of only APC senators. Just wait and see. In this narrative, you're the one disgracing your intellect and not me.

[/s]
that's illegal sitting
why do apc support illegality?
an av apc supporter is an extremist and a potential terrorist

saraki is not going anywhere and will be reelected in 2019

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]
that's illegal sitting
why do apc support illegality?
an av apc supporter is an extremist and a potential terrorist

saraki is not going anywhere and will be reelected in 2019

This is your wishful thinking. It's delusional.

Only the blockhead APC thugs think otherwise

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]
that's illegal sitting
why do apc support illegality?
an av apc supporter is an extremist and a potential terrorist

saraki is not going anywhere and will be reelected in 2019

What was the sitting of 57 senators to elect thief Saraki the senate president called. Illegal sitting? Answer this sir and I will explain to you the composition of a sitting that can oust the thief and chief bribe giver

And a million of you cannot win your senatorial district.

They have not even remove you, you are already shouting to the world to help you.
The world cannot even save you.

alanwanyiasaba:
if not for our useless electoral rules that gives illiterates opportunities to rule over the wise just because of some quota system
how can a stark illiterate like Oshiomole compare himself with a medical doctor

Oshiomole you're older than Saraki but he's more fulfilled in life than you can ever be.

he's a medical doctor you're not even an academic doctor
he's a senator(senate president) you've not even smell national assembly

and not to forget
he's a very handsome man you're as ugly as fork even chimpanzee fine pass you.

the only thing you can compare yourself of is both of you being a former governor.

very useless ritualistic bastard

go impeach him naaa you think that this is edo state agbero union
useless man with oily face

Brains aren't everything. In fact, in your case, they're nothing.

[s]

JusticeSeeker:
What was the sitting of 57 senators to elect thief Saraki the senate president called. Illegal sitting? Answer this sir and I will explain to you the composition of a sitting that can oust the thief and chief bribe giver

[/s]
claptrap

electing and impeachment are not the same procedure
learn and be wise
read your constitution
Stop wallowing in ignorance
kiss the truth

[s]

JusticeSeeker:
This is your wishful thinking. It's delusional.

[/s]
more trash
what's holding apc thieves back?

[s]

johnmartus:
Brains aren't everything. In fact, in your case, they're nothing.

[/s]

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]
claptrap

electing and impeachment are not the same procedure
learn and be wise
read your constitution
Stop wallowing in ignorance
kiss the truth

This is laughable.

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]

pain who ? You're doing yourself my friend, I pray your children's will not curse you tomorrow.

JusticeSeeker:
He'll be listened to this time around. What he's averred is simply innovative and flawless. If it didn't require the entire house to elect Saraki as the president, what makes you think it requires the entire senate to impeach him. This is what Sagay is saying in simple terms. Let SANs counter him on this and not laymen like you.

Young man, just stop disgracing yourself openly over an issue you clearly know nothing about. It is obvious you don't know that the rule is different for electing a senate president and impeaching same! Electing the senate president just requires the majority of the members but impeachment requires a 2/3 majority. Educate yourself on issue before coming to embarass yourself openly. By the way, many lawyers have been rubbishing Sagay's claim on the constitution since, the same Sagay who said Kemi Adeosun would not be removed even if she truly committed forgery? the man has clearly gone bias for obvious reason of working for the goverment, so people like that can't be taken serious. And Femi Falana had already spoken about the process, or is he not a SAN?

alanwanyiasaba:
[s][/s]
claptrap

electing and impeachment are not the same procedure
learn and be wise
read your constitution
Stop wallowing in ignorance
kiss the truth

If you say 57 senators, is that not clearly the majority which is more than half of the entire members of 109? That's the constitutional requirement for electing a senate president.

JusticeSeeker:
What was the sitting of 57 senators to elect thief Saraki the senate president called. Illegal sitting? Answer this sir and I will explain to you the composition of a sitting that can oust the thief and chief bribe giver

If you say 57 senators, is that not clearly the majority which is more than half of the entire members of 109? That's the constitutional requirement for electing a senate president.