DNA
If you have sex with a man, his DNA lives in you forever.
A research by university of Seattle USA has proven that.
There is now a greater understanding of why God asks us not to have sex before we get married.
This research proves that any man, that a woman has sex with leaves a part of his DNA in the woman.
The man who has had more sex with her, leaves more of his DNA in the woman. So when a woman ovulates, the eggs that she produces contain more of other DNAs.
So we need to educate the girlchild to remain a virgin till marriage.
Anytime you have sex with another man you become one with that man (spiritually too) and carry the man's DNA.
At some point when you have too many of the male DNA in you; you change, because your cells are changing.
That also proves why when married couples live together for a long time they end up looking alike. The woman's DNA changes when she has sex with men. This is very serious.
The world should know this and stop silly sex promotions.
It is bad than good.
Unfortunately women are the victims.
This was found out in many other research articles mostly released this year. So it is new and we all have to know.
The fact is, women retain DNA from every man they have slept with.
Cells transferred from a man to a woman during intercourse become integrated into the woman's body after sex, every single time they have sex.
This study found the presence of genetically distinct male cells in the brain of women. This also means these other male cells will be found in a foetus when the woman gets pregnant.
(This is called microchimerism.)
Every male you absorb sperm from becomes a living part of your life. Sperm is a living substance. Living cells. It enters your bloodstream and collects in your brain and spine.
Stop experimenting with sex.
When the sperm enters a woman it swims until it hits a wall and then seeps into your flesh.
If it's in your mouth, (abomination) it can get into your nasal areas, behind your eyes and even your inner ear. It then enters your bloodstream and collects in your brain and spine. You can never get rid of it.
It becomes a part of you forever. These are the true consequences of sexual intercourse.
Original research is from University of Seattle and Fred Hutchinson cancer research center.
They accidentally found this when they were researching to find out why pregnant women carrying boys get men neurological diseases.
This is real and not a joke.!!!
Stop having sex if you are not married.
And stop having sex with other than your husband, for the married.
The consequences of doing this is devastating!!
No wonder the world is the way it is!
BOTTOM LINE
Say no to sex when not married.
Say no to EXTRA-MARITAL affairs also. 1 Like 1 Share |
oyb:
this is why i was telling my son this morning that you must be discerning, sceptical, and not believe any BS [i didn't put t like that] shared on the internet
https://globalnews.ca/news/3558598/no-women-do-not-absorb-and-retain-dna-from-every-man-they-have-sex-with/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/08/15/male-dna-is-often-found-in-womens-brains-where-does-it-come-from/#715472f47459
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/women-retain-dna/ On 23 June 2017, frequent purveyor of misinformation YourNewsWire.com posted an article (“Women Absorb and Retain DNA from Every Man They Have Sex With”) that made the claim that “a new study” demonstrates that cells transferred from a man to a woman during intercourse become integrated into that woman’s body after sex. Every single time.
In actuality, however, that study (which was published in PLOS ONE in 2012, despite being billed as “new” in 2017) demonstrated for the first time the presence of genetically distinct male cells in the brains of women (who had been examined in autopsy). The existence of male cells in the bodies of females, in general, is not news. As discussed in a PLOS ONE blog post describing that 2012 study, their presence is typically ascribed to cells from a male fetus from a prior pregnancy:
The idea of two genetically distinct populations of cells, or their DNA, residing in one individual isn’t new. It’s called microchimerism. […] Medical chimerism arises after a transfusion or transplant, and it may follow pregnancy. Our microbiomes, the bacteria within us, are more like guests than body parts.
[The research groups responsible for the 2012 study] found Y chromosome DNA sequences in several brain regions in autopsy slides from 37 out of 59 women. Such DNA liberated from fetal cells can come from several sources: children, fetuses that never made it to be born, older siblings, or twins. Both son and daughter DNA partake in this “feto-maternal trafficking,” but female DNA, at the chromosomal level, is harder to detect amid the maternal two X’s.
The significance, in the case of that specific research paper, was that it demonstrated that these male cells — wherever they came from — were able to cross what is known as the blood-brain barrier — a semi-permeable membrane that prevents most chemicals in the blood from entering the brain. The linked study, in fact, does not once mention sexual intercourse as a proposed mechanism. This is as close as you will get from the PLOS ONE paper:
The most likely source of male [microchimerism, Mc] in female brain is acquisition of fetal Mc from pregnancy with a male fetus. In women without sons, male DNA can also be acquired from an abortion or a miscarriage. The pregnancy history was unknown for all but a few subjects in the current studies, thus male Mc in female brain could not be evaluated according to specific prior pregnancy history. In addition to prior pregnancies, male Mc could be acquired by a female from a recognized or vanished male twin, an older male sibling, or through non-irradiated blood transfusion.
At least that’s what they want you to think, according to YourNewsWire:
Through the study the researchers assumed that the most likely answer was that all male DNA found living in the female brain came from a male pregnancy. That was the safe, politically correct assumption. But these researchers were living in denial. Because when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant, let alone with a male child, they STILL found male DNA cells prevalent in the female brain.
At this point the scientists didn’t know what the hell was going on. Confused, they did their best to hide the evidence until they could understand and explain it. They buried it in numerous sub studies and articles, but if you sift through them all you will find the damning statement, the one line that gives the game away and explains exactly where these male DNA cells come from.
In an odd chronologic twist that necessitates abandoning the notion that time progresses linearly in one direction, YourNewsWire then used text from a paper published in 2005 to support the argument that scientists buried this salacious truth, discovered in 2012, in other “sub studies”. That 2005 paper, which does indeed show the presence of male cells in women who had never given birth to males (or, in some cases, at all), makes only passing reference to the possibility that sexual intercourse alone could contribute male microchirality to women, noting that the issue has yet to be studied:
Another possibility that has not been investigated is whether male DNA can be detected in a woman’s circulation from sexual intercourse without pregnancy.
That explanation is the authors’ speculative fourth suggestion (out of four) after three more plausible, and actually researched, theories:
One potential explanation for male microchimerism could be a nonrecognized (male) miscarriage. […]
A second potential source is from a “vanished (male) twin.” A vanished twin is thought to be a relatively common phenomena resulting from spontaneous resorption of one sac or embryo in a twin pregnancy. […]
A third possibility is from an older male sibling transferred by the maternal circulation to the fetus of a later pregnancy. [i.e. you are born with male DNA your older brother left behind in your mother’s body].
A paper published, fittingly, in the journal Chimerism in 2015 investigated this topic further, concluding that — potentially — all of those potential mechanisms may contribute. That paper, which was fairly limited in its dataset, makes it clear that the sexual intercourse transfer of male chimerism remains entirely speculative:
A total of 154 girls were studied of which 21 (13.6%) tested positive for male microchimerism. There was a tendency that girls were more likely to test positive for male microchimerism if their mothers previously had received transfusion, had given birth to a son or had had a spontaneous abortion. Furthermore, the oldest girls were more likely to test positive for male microchimerism.
However, less than half of microchimerism positivity was attributable to these factors. In conclusion, data suggest that male microchimerism in young girls may originate from an older brother either full born or from a discontinued pregnancy or from transfusion during pregnancy. We speculate that sexual intercourse may be important but other sources of male cells likely exist in young girls.
Far from demonstrating that 100 percent of a woman’s male sexual partners have male cells that de facto become part of their body, the studies cobbled together by YourNewsWire show that even if sexual intercourse transferred cells from a male that later became incorporated into the female partner’s body (which science has only speculated about at this point), it clearly wouldn’t happen in all cases.
We are also unsure, for the record, what motivation would exist for scientists to hide the truth about male microchimerism in the first place.
Snopes.com has long been engaged in the battle against misinformation, an effort we could not sustain without the support of our readers. Answer by Suzanne Sadedin, Ph.D. in evolutionary biology, on Quora:
Do women retain DNA from every man they have ever slept with? No. The claim comes from an absurd clickbait article on YourNewsWire which I won’t give more oxygen by linking. That article references this study, which found male cells in 37 out of 59 women’s brains studied (63%).
Where did the cells come from? The most likely explanation is pregnancy. During implantation, embryonic cells are programmed to divide extremely fast and invade the mother’s bloodstream. Sometimes, they can establish populations in other parts of her body that survive for the rest of her life.
But wait! Another study showed that a few women had male cells, even though (so far as they knew) they had never been pregnant. Based on this, the authors of the YourNewsWire article make a gigantic leap to claiming that these cells must be sperm collected from sex partners.
Now, think about sperm. They’re haploid; they can’t function like normal human cells. They’re highly specialized, having evolved solely to compete to get to the egg. They don’t survive more than a few days, even in the oviduct, which evolved to store them. And most importantly, they can’t divide.
So no, women don’t retain men’s sperm for life. That’s just silly.
Why do some women who’ve never been pregnant still have male cells? Most likely they had been pregnant, they just didn’t know it. It’s thought that around half of all pregnancies end in spontaneous miscarriage, very often before they are detected.
There are also two other plausible sources for these cells: (1) cells from an older brother that had been retained in the woman’s mother were incorporated by the woman when she was growing in the womb or (2) cells from a male twin that was absorbed before birth.
It’s remotely possible that women might sometimes retain some non-sperm cells from male partners, since that’s never been studied and biology is weird. But there’s currently no reason to think it’s true, and many reasons to think it’s not. For starters, the female reproductive tract is actually a horribly unfriendly place to start a new cell colony. If it weren’t, you’d have embryos growing all over the place, and an ectopic pregnancy is really bad news.
You would be far more likely to “catch” someone else’s cells in an open wound, but that’s also extraordinarily rare (e.g. the case of the surgeon who developed cancer after cutting his hand during surgery on a cancer patient). Cancers are cancers because they proliferate aggressively — in fact they often use the same genetic architecture as embryos. But even so, we don’t generally worry about catching cancer, because our immune defenses rapidly eradicate foreign cells. The chance of propagating normal adult male cells in the reproductive tract is presumably far smaller. Several websites published false stories this week on a “new study” that purported to show women “retain and carry living DNA from every man with whom they have sexual intercourse.”
“That’s right ladies; the startling discovery was made by researchers at the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre,” says an article published by the Deccan Chronicle, an English-language daily newspaper published in Hyderabad, India.
Several other sites including YourNewsWire.com and Information Nigeria published similar false stories with headlines like “Women absorb, retain the DNA of every man they have unprotected s*x with and they are genetically bonded forever – Report.”
In reality, the story is based on a study first published in PLOS ONE in 2012, by lead author William F. N. Chan, a biochemist at the University of Alberta.
As Snopes.com points out the study examined the brains of several women during an autopsy and demonstrated for the first time the presence of genetically distinct male cells.
Known as microchimerism [Mc], the presence of male cells in the bodies of females is not new and is usually caused by cells from a male fetus from a prior pregnancy.
“The idea of two genetically distinct populations of cells, or their DNA, residing in one individual isn’t new. It’s called microchimerism,” PLOS ONE wrote in a blog post in 2012. “Medical chimerism arises after a transfusion or transplant, and it may follow pregnancy. Our microbiomes, the bacteria within us, are more like guests than body parts.”
READ MORE: Donald Trump this week: ‘Time’ is not on his side and a Twitter fight turns ‘blood
The study said that in addition to prior pregnancies, “male Mc could be acquired by a female from a recognized or vanished male twin, an older male sibling, or through non-irradiated blood transfusion.”
However, Yournewswire.com draws a very different and false conclusion.
“Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you for life. The women autopsied in this study were elderly,” the article says. “Sperm is alive. It is living cells … Then it digs in. It enters your bloodstream and collects in your brain and spine.” |
