People need guidiance and want to believe anything. Spiritual leaders are entrusted with the respobsibility of guidiance thesis followers . Like every other profession, conflict of interest many arise placing not emphasis to place personal interest and church growth and financial survival above the interest of vulnurable truth seekers. Betraying such trust is possible.

Like a lady who falls in love for the first time, first heart break could create a devastating experience and pish her into statements Like "all men are dogs never to be trusted".. Similarly, taking advantage of vulnurable seekers could push one into irreligiosity and atheism.

BE SLOW TO CALL AN ATHEIST A FOOL, THEY WERE ONCE RELIGIOUS. YOUR ACTION LED THEM TOWARDS THAT PATH

tobechi74:
People need guidiance and want to believe anything. Spiritual leaders are entrusted with the respobsibility of guidiance thesis followers . Like every other profession, conflict of interest many arise placing not emphasis to place personal interest and church growth and financial survival above the interest of vulnurable truth seekers. Betraying such trust is possible.

Like a lady who falls in love for the first time, first heart break could create a devastating experience and pish her into statements Like "all men are dogs never to be trusted".. Similarly, taking advantage of vulnurable seekers could push one into irreligiosity and atheism.

BE SLOW TO CALL AN ATHEIST A FOOL, THEY WERE ONCE RELIGIOUS. YOUR ACTION LED THEM TOWARDS THAT PATH

they only said what the bible says to their followers.

Ps 14:1. "...The fools says in his heart, there's no God... "

A typical Christian knows nothing about the bible. Discuss with them a little and their level of ignorance becomes obvious.

Most of them, out of frustration from listening to superior argument from non Christians, result to quoting Psalm 14:1 just to call someone "fool" for not believing, ignoring Mattew 5:22 which says calling one a "fool" endangers you to hell fire.

How conflicting can a book be!